请输入您要查询的百科知识:

 

词条 Double actionability
释义

  1. External links

  2. References

Double actionability is a doctrine of private international law which holds that an action for an alleged tort committed in a foreign jurisdiction can be successful in a domestic court only if it would be actionable under both the laws of the home jurisdiction and the foreign jurisdiction. The rule originated in the controversial case of Phillips v Eyre (1870) LR 6 QB 1.

The rule is no longer used in Canadian law and instead the lex loci delicti rule is used.[1] Likewise, the rule no longer forms part of Australian law which also uses the lex loci delicti rule.[2] This rule holds that the applicable law for a tort committed in a foreign place will be the tort law of the foreign place.

It remains used in New Zealand tort law.[3] Though its continued existence has been called into question, with many suggesting it should be replaced with a rule similar to that of Canada's.

The rule has largely been abandoned in English law by virtue of section 10 of the Private International Law (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1995,[4] although defamation claims are specifically excluded (cf. section 13(1)). However, even prior to it being abandoned the courts had increasingly distanced themselves from the rule by applying a "flexible exception". The exception was first applied in Boys v Chaplin [1969] 2 All ER 1085 and expanded upon in Red Sea Insurance v Bouygues SA [1995] 1 AC 190.[5]

External links

  • [https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/slavery-revolution-double-actionability-rule-colin-riegels Slavery, revolution and the double actionability rule]

References

1. ^Tolofson v. Jensen [1994] 3 S.C.R. 1022
2. ^John Pfeiffer Pty Ltd v Rogerson (2000) 203 CLR 503
3. ^Baxter v RMC Group plc [2003] 1 NZLR 304.
4. ^{{Cite web|url=http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1995/42/contents|title=Private International Law (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1995|accessdate=29 March 2017}}
5. ^{{Cite web|url=http://conflictoflaws.net/2006/forum-non-conveniens-and-choice-of-law-in-tort-equity-in-the-singapore-court-of-appeal/|title=Forum Non Conveniens and Choice of Law in Tort & Equity in the Singapore Court of Appeal|author=Martin George|date=11 November 2006}}
{{DEFAULTSORT:Double Actionability}}{{international-law-stub}}

1 : Conflict of laws

随便看

 

开放百科全书收录14589846条英语、德语、日语等多语种百科知识,基本涵盖了大多数领域的百科知识,是一部内容自由、开放的电子版国际百科全书。

 

Copyright © 2023 OENC.NET All Rights Reserved
京ICP备2021023879号 更新时间:2024/9/20 15:08:40