“Enhanced cooperation”的意思、由来-开放百科全书

In the European Union (EU), enhanced cooperation is a procedure where a minimum of nine EU member states are allowed to establish advanced integration or cooperation in an area within EU structures but without the other members being involved.^[1] As of October 2017 this procedure is being used in the fields of divorce law,^[2] patents,^[1]^[2] property regimes of international couples, and European Public Prosecutor and is approved for the field of a financial transaction tax.^[5]

This is distinct from the EU opt-out, that is a form of cooperation between EU members within EU structures, where it is allowed for a limited number of states to refrain from participation (e.g. EMU, Schengen Area). It is further distinct from Mechanism for Cooperation and Verification and permanent acquis suspensions, whose lifting is conditional on meeting certain benchmarks by the affected member states.

History

Enhanced cooperation was introduced by the Treaty of Amsterdam for community, judicial cooperation and criminal matters. The Treaty of Nice simplified the mechanism and forbade opposition to the creation of enhanced cooperation. It also introduced cooperation for the Common Foreign and Security Policy, except for defence matters.^[6] The Treaty of Lisbon extended cooperation to include defence^[6] and additionally envisions the possibility for establishment of a permanent structured cooperation in defence. The provisions governing enhanced cooperation are now detailed in the Treaty on European Union (Article 20) and Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (Article 326-334).

The Schengen Agreement adoption is considered a historical inspiration for formalising the mechanism of Enhanced cooperation. It was created by European Communities member states only, but outside of its structures, in part owing to the lack of consensus amongst all members over whether it had the competence to abolish border controls,^[3] and in part because those ready to implement the idea did not wish to wait for others. As there was no Enhanced cooperation mechanism back then it was impossible to establish it inside the Community structures from the start, but afterwards the Schengen Agreement was subsumed into European Union law by the Treaty of Amsterdam as the rules of the Schengen Area. With its integration into general EU law it was transformed from a precursor Enhanced cooperation into an opt-out.

Usage

Enhanced cooperation allows for a minimum of nine member states (which amounts to almost one-third at the moment) to co-operate within the structures of the EU without all member states. This allows them to move at different speeds, and towards different goals, than those outside the enhanced cooperation area.^[4] It is designed to overcome paralysis, where a proposal is blocked by the veto of an individual state or a small group who do not wish to be part of the initiative.^[5] It does not however allow for an extension of powers outside those permitted by the treaties of the European Union and is only allowed as a last resort where objectives cannot be achieved normally. It may not discriminate against members, it must further the objectives in the treaties and may not fall within an area which is of exclusive competence of the EU.^[4]

The mechanism needs a minimum of nine Member States, who file a request with the European Commission. If the Commission accepts it then it has to be approved by a qualified majority of all member states to proceed.^[5] A member may not veto the establishment of enhanced cooperation except for foreign policy.^[6]

Currently in force

Applicable law to divorce (Rome III)

With the rise in cross border divorce in the EU, common rules were put forward to settle the issue of under which law trans-national couples can divorce in the EU. However Sweden blocked{{cn|date=August 2017}} the new rules, fearing the loss of its liberal divorce law (divorce law differs strongly, with Nordic liberalism with relatively "easy" procedures, being in contrast to more conservative countries such as Malta which has only recently permitted it). To allow those willing states to proceed without Sweden, in July 2008 nine countries put forward a proposal to use enhanced cooperation: Austria, France, Greece, Hungary, Italy, Luxembourg, Romania, Slovenia and Spain. Belgium, Germany, Lithuania and Portugal were considering joining them.^[14]

At a meeting of the justice ministers on 25 July 2008, the nine states decided to formally seek the measure of enhanced cooperation; eight states (the nine states above minus France) formally requested it from the European Commission on 28 July 2008.^[7]^[8] On 24 March 2010, when the law was formally proposed by the commission, Bulgaria was the tenth state to join the aforementioned eight and France.^[9] Belgium, Germany and Latvia formally joined them on 28 May 2010, while Greece withdrew.^[10]^[19]

MEPs backed the proposal in June 2010^[11] with fourteen states willing to adopt the proposed cooperation: Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, France, Germany, Hungary, Italy, Latvia, Luxembourg, Malta, Portugal, Romania, Slovenia and Spain.^[12] These states were then authorised by the Council to proceed with enhanced cooperation on 12 July 2010.^[13]^[14] Following the adoption of Council Regulation (EU) No 1259/2010 on 20 December 2010, also known as the Rome III Regulation,^[15] came into force in the 14 participating states on 21 June 2012.^[16] Other EU Member state are permitted to sign up to the pact at a later date. Lithuania became the first state to join the agreement when they were approved by the Commission on 21 November 2012.^[17] The provisions of the agreement applied to Lithuania as of 22 May 2014.^[17] Greece's participation was approved by the Commission on 27 January 2014, making them the 16th country to join the regulation, which applied to it as of 29 July 2015.^[18]^[19] Estonia's participation was approved by the Commission in August 2016, and the regulation applied to the country as of 11 February 2018.^[20]^[21]

Unitary patent

The unitary patent, formally a "European patent with unitary effect", is the second case of enhanced cooperation adopted by the European Commission and Parliament.^[22] 26 Member States, all except Spain and Croatia (which acceded to the EU following the unitary patents adoption), participate in the unitary patent. Towards the end of 2010, twelve states^[23] proposed enhanced cooperation to work around disagreements with Italy and Spain over what languages a European patent would be translated into. The unitary patent would be examined and granted in one of the existing official languages of the European Patent Office – English, French or German. Following the Commission approval of the plan on 14 December 2010, the Council of the European Union requested the European Parliament's consent to use of enhanced cooperation for a unitary patent on 14 February 2011 with the participation of 25 member states (all but Italy and Spain).^[24] The Parliament approved it the next day and the Council authorised enhanced cooperation on 10 March 2011.^[25] On 13 April 2011 the Commission adopted a proposal for a Council Regulation implementing enhanced cooperation.^[26] During the European Council of 28–29 June 2012, agreement was reached on the provisions between the 25 member states and the necessary EU-legislation was approved by the European Parliament on 11 December 2012.^[27] Following a request by the government of Italy,^[28] it became a participant of the unitary patent regulations in September 2015.^[29]

The enhanced cooperation measures entered into force in January 2013, and will apply to a participating member states from the date when the related Agreement on a Unified Patent Court enters into force for the state. The UPC agreement has been signed by 25 EU member states, including all states participating in the enhanced cooperation measures except Poland; while Italy, on the other hand, signed the UPC agreement prior to joining the enhanced cooperation measures for a unitary patent.^[30]^[31] Poland decided to wait to see how the new patent system works before joining due to concerns that it would harm their economy.^[32] Entry into force of the UPC will take place for the first group of ratifiers on the first day of the fourth month after at least 13 states (including Germany, France and the United Kingdom as the three states with the most European patents in force) have ratified the UPC agreement.^[27]^[30]^[45]^[46]^[33]

Property regimes of international couples

In June 2016, the Council of the European Union authorised 18 Member States of the European Union to initiate an enhanced cooperation in the area of jurisdiction, applicable law and the recognition and enforcement of decisions on the property regimes of international couples, covering both matters of matrimonial property regimes and the property consequences of registered partnership.^[34] Later that month, enhanced cooperation was implemented through Regulations EU 2016/1103 for married couples^[35] and EU 2016/1104 for registered partnerships,^[36] both of which will fully apply from 29 January 2019.

European Public Prosecutor

The European Public Prosecutor's Office (EPPO) is an independent body of the European Union (EU) to be established under the Treaty of Lisbon between 20 of the 28 members of the EU^[37]. It will be based in Luxembourg alongside the European Court of Justice and the European Court of Auditors. The role of the EPPO is to investigate and prosecute fraud against the EU budget and other crimes against the EU's financial interests including fraud concerning EU funds of over €10,000 and cross-border VAT fraud cases involving damages above €10 million. Previously only national authorities could investigate and prosecute these crimes and could not act beyond their borders.

The European Commission proposed a regulation for the establishment of the EPPO on 17 July 2013.^[38]^[39] After no consensus could be reached among all EU member states, the states which wished to participate notified the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission on 3 April 2017 that they would proceed with establishing the EPPO by the use of enhanced cooperation.^[40] This was done under TFEU Article 86, which allows for a simplified enhanced cooperation procedure which does not require authorization from the Council to proceed. The participating member states agreed on the legislative text to establish the EPPO on 8 June.^[41] On 12 October 2017 the regulation was given final approval by the 20 participating states.^[42]^[43] The EPPO will not have authority to begin investigating or prosecuting crimes until a decision of Commission approves this, which per the terms of the Regulation cannot take place until 3 years after the entry into force of the Regulation in November 2017.^[42]

The Netherlands officially requested to join EPPO on 14 May 2018,^[44]^[45] which was approved by the Commission on 1 August 2018.^[46]^[47] Malta requested to join on 14 June 2018,^[48] and their participation was approved on 7 August 2018.^[49]^[50]

Proposals

Financial transaction tax

After discussions to establish a European Union financial transaction tax (FTT), which would tax financial transactions between financial institutions, failed to establish unanimous support due objections from the United Kingdom and Sweden, a group of states began pursuing the idea of utilising enhanced cooperation to implement the tax.^[51] Nine states (Austria, Belgium, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Italy, Portugal and Spain) signed a letter in February 2012 requesting that a FTT be implemented.^[52] After their parliamentary election in March 2012, Slovakia joined the list of states supporting the FTT.^[53] On 16 July 2012, Hungary introduced a unilateral 0.1 percent FTT to be implemented in January 2013.^[54] In October 2012, after discussions failed to establish unanimous support for an EU-wide FTT, the European Commission proposed that the use of enhanced cooperation should be permitted to implement the tax in the states which wished to participate.^[55]^[56] The proposal, supported by 11 EU member states (Austria, Belgium, Estonia, France, Germany, Greece, Italy, Portugal, Slovakia, Slovenia and Spain), was approved in the European Parliament in December 2012^[57] and the Council in January 2013.^[58] On 14 February, the European Commission put forward a revised proposal for the details of the FTT to be enacted under enhanced cooperation.^[59] The proposal was approved by the European Parliament in July 2013,^[60] and must now be unanimously approved by the 11 initial participating states before coming into force.^[59]^[61]

The legal service of the Council of the European Union concluded in September 2013, that the European Commission's proposal would not tax "systemic risk" activities but only healthy activities, and that it was incompatible with the EU treaty on several grounds while also being illegal because of "exceeding member states' jurisdiction for taxation under the norms of international customary law".^[62] The Financial Transaction Tax can no longer be blocked by the Council of the European Union on legal grounds, but each individual EU member state is still entitled to launch legal complaints against a finally approved FTT to the European Court of Justice, potentially annulling the scheme.^[63] On 6 May 2014, ten out of the initial eleven participating member states (all except Slovenia) agreed to seek a "progressive" tax on equities and "some derivatives" by 1 January 2016, and aimed for a final agreement on the details to be negotiated and unanimously agreed upon later in 2014.^[64] With negotiations ongoing into 2016, Estonia formally withdrew from the FTT enhanced cooperation procedure on 16 March 2016, leaving 10 participating states.^[65]

Other arrangements between European Union members

A number of other agreements between a subset of EU member states to deepen integration have been concluded outside the framework of EU law. Some of these have subsequently been replaced by EU regulations, such as the Brussels Convention and the Rome Convention. The European Commission proposed in July 2015 to also integrate the Euro Plus Pact, European Fiscal Compact and the Single Resolution Fund into EU law by June 2017, while planning for the European Stability Mechanism to make the same transition by 2025.^[66]

Permanent Structured Cooperation in Defence

The European Defence Initiative was a proposal for enhanced European Union defence cooperation presented by France, Germany, Belgium and Luxembourg in Brussels on 29 April 2003, before the extension of the coverage of the enhanced cooperation procedure to defence matters. The Treaty of Lisbon added the possibility for "those Member States whose military capabilities fulfill higher criteria and which have made more binding commitments to one another in this area with a view to the most demanding missions [to] establish permanent structured cooperation within the Union framework".^[67]

Those states shall notify their intention to the Council and to the High Representative. The Council then adopts, by qualified majority a decision establishing permanent structured cooperation and determining the list of participating Member States. Any other member state, that fulfills the criteria and wishes to participate, can join the PSCD following the same procedure, but in the voting for the decision will participate only the states already part of the PSCD. If a participating state no longer fulfills the criteria a decision suspending its participation is taken by the same procedure as for accepting new participants, but excluding the concerned state from the voting procedure. If a participating state wishes to withdraw from PSCD it just notifies the Council to remove it from the list of participants. All other decisions and recommendations of the Council concerning PSCD issues unrelated to the list of participants are taken by unanimity of the participating states.^[67]

On 7 September 2017 an agreement was made between EU foreign affairs ministers to move forward with PESCO with 10 initial projects.^[68]^[69]^[70]^[71] The agreement was signed on 13 November by 23 of the 28 members states. Ireland and Portugal notified the High Representative and the Council of the European Union of their desire to join PESCO on 7 December 2017.^[72] Denmark did not participate as it has an opt-out from the Common Security and Defence Policy, nor did the United Kingdom, which is scheduled to withdraw from the EU in 2019.^[73]^[74] Malta opted-out as well.^[75]^[76]

Open Method of Coordination

The Open Method of Coordination is a method of governance in the European Union, based on the voluntary cooperation of its member states. The open method rests on soft law mechanisms such as guidelines and indicators, benchmarking and sharing of best practice. This means that there are no official sanctions for laggards. Rather, the method's effectiveness relies on a form of peer pressure and naming and shaming, as no member state wants to be seen as the worst in a given policy area.

Euro Plus Pact

The Euro Plus Pact is an arrangement for cooperating in economic measures adopted on 25 March 2011 by the European Council through the Open Method of Coordination and includes as participants the Eurozone member states, Bulgaria, Denmark, Poland and Romania.^[77]

Related intergovernmental treaties

Although not formally part of European Union law, several closely related treaties have been signed outside the framework of the EU and its predecessors between the member states because the EU lacked authority to act in the field. After the EU obtained such autonomy, the conventions were gradually replaced by EU instruments. Examples are the Brussels Convention of 1968^[78] (on jurisdiction in civil matters, replaced by the Brussels I Regulation^[79]), the Rome Convention on Contractual Obligations of 1980^[80] (on choice of law in contractual matters, replaced by the Rome I Regulation except in Denmark^[81]), the Dublin Convention of 1990^[82] (on asylum seekers, replaced by the Dublin II Regulation^[83]) as well as the Europol Convention of 1995^[84] (came under the EU's competence with the Lisbon Treaty^[85] and replaced by a Council Decision.^[86]) Furthermore, several treaties have been concluded between a subset of EU member states due to a lack of unanimity. The Schengen Treaty was agreed to in 1985 in this manner, but was subsequently incorporated into EU law by the Amsterdam Treaty, with the remaining EU member states that had not signed the treaty being given an opt-out from implementing it. More recently, the Prüm Convention and European Fiscal Compact were signed as intergovernmental treaties. However, both state that the intention of the signatories is to incorporate the treaty's provisions into EU structures and that EU law should take precedence over the treaty. As well, both agreements are open to accession by any EU member state. The Treaty Establishing the European Stability Mechanism was also signed and entered into force outside of the EU framework. However, a TFEU amendment was ratified which gives the ESM a legal basis in the EU treaties.

Prüm Convention

The Prüm Convention, a treaty for cooperation in criminal matters signed on 27 May 2005 by Germany, Spain, France, Luxembourg, Netherlands, Austria, and Belgium, was adopted outside of EU structures, but it asserts European Union law takes precedence over its provisions (if they are incompatible) and that it is open to accession for any member state of the EU. Part of its provisions were later subsumed into European Union law by the Prüm Decision of 2008.

European Stability Mechanism

The European Stability Mechanism (ESM) is an intergovernmental organization located in Luxembourg City, which operate under public international law for all eurozone Member States having ratified a special ESM intergovernmental treaty. It was established when the intergovernmental treaty entered into force on 27 September 2012, as a permanent firewall for the eurozone to safeguard and provide instant access to financial assistance programmes for member states of the eurozone in financial difficulty, with a maximum lending capacity of €500 billion. It replaced two earlier temporary EU funding programmes: the European Financial Stability Facility (EFSF) and the European Financial Stabilisation Mechanism (EFSM). All new bailouts of eurozone member states will be covered by ESM, while the EFSF and EFSM will continue to handle money transfers and program monitoring for bailouts previously approved for Ireland, Portugal and Greece. Upon its founding, all 17 eurozone member states ratified the agreement to become ESM members. According to the text of the treaty, the ESM is open to accession by any EU member state once their derogation from using the euro has been lifted by the Council of the European Union. New members must first be approved by the ESM's Board of Governors, after which they would need to ratify to the Treaty Establishing the ESM.^[87] After Latvia's adoption of the euro on 1 January 2014 was given final approval by the Economic and Financial Affairs Council on 9 July,^[88]^[89] the ESM Board of Governors approved Latvia's membership application in October 2013.^[90] Latvia became the first state to accede to the ESM with formal membership starting on 13 March 2014. Lithuania adopted the euro on 1 January 2015, and acceded to the ESM with formal membership starting on 3 February 2015.^[91]

A separate treaty, amending Article 136 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU) to authorize the establishment of the ESM under EU law, entered into force on 1 May 2013.^[92] In June 2015, an updated EMU reform plan envisaged ESM should be transposed from being an intergovernmental agreement to become fully integrated into EU framework law in the medium-term (between July 2017 and 2025).^[66]

European Fiscal Compact

The European Fiscal Compact is an intergovernmental treaty dealing with fiscal integration that was signed by 25 member states of the European Union (EU) (all except the Czech Republic and the United Kingdom; Croatia subsequently acceded to the EU in July 2013) on 2 March 2012.^[93] Although the European Fiscal Compact was negotiated between member states of the EU, it is not formally part of European Union law. It does, however, contain a provision to attempt to incorporate the pact into the Treaties establishing the European Union within 5 years of its entering into force. The treaty entered into force on 1 January 2013 for the 16 states which had completed their ratification.^[94] All nine other signatory states subsequently became parties to the treaty.^[95] Two non-eurozone member states, Denmark and Romania, have declared their intent to be bound by the fiscal provisions in the treaty (titles III and IV) upon ratification, and Bulgaria declared themselves bound by parts of these provision, while for the remaining non-eurozone states they will only apply from the date they adopt the euro.^[95]^[96] Latvia's adoption of the euro on 1 January 2014 and Lithuania's adoption of the euro on 1 January 2015 made them bound by the fiscal provision.^[97] Croatia, which acceded to the EU in July 2013, also acceded to the Fiscal Compact on 7 March 2018, as did the Czech Republic on 3 April 2019.

Unified Patent Court

After two regulations utilising enhanced cooperation to establish a European Union patent of unitary effect were approved for 25 participating states (all but Italy, Spain and Croatia, which subsequently acceded to the EU in July 2013) by the European Parliament on 11 December 2012^[27]^[98] the documents were formally adopted as regulation E.U. 1257 and 1260 of 2012 on 17 December 2012, and entered into force in January 2013.^[1]^[2] The provisions will apply once an accompanying Agreement on a Unified Patent Court enters into force. Due to a ruling by the Court of Justice of the European Union that the proposed Unified Patent Court (UPC) was not compatible with European Union law,^[99] it was decided that the court would be established by an intergovernmental treaty between the participating states outside the framework of the EU.^[100] The Agreement on a Unified Patent Court was published by the Council of the European Union on 11 January 2013,^[101] and was signed on 19 February 2013 by 24 EU member states, including all states participating in the enhanced cooperation measures except Bulgaria and Poland, while Italy, which did not originally join the enhanced cooperation measures but subsequently signed up, did sign the UPC agreement.^[30]^[31] The agreement is open for accession to all remaining EU member states, and Bulgaria signed the agreement on 5 March after finalizing their internal procedures.^[30]^[102] Meanwhile, Poland decided to wait to see how the new patent system works before joining due to concerns that it would harm their economy.^[32] States which do not participate in the unitary patent regulations can still become parties to the UPC agreement, which would allow the new court to handle European patents validated in the country.^[103] Entry into force for the UPC will take place after 13 states (including Germany, France and the United Kingdom as the three states with the most patents in force) have ratified the Patent Court agreement, but not before 1 January 2014.^[27]^[30]^[104]^[105]^[33]

Single Resolution Fund

President of the European Central Bank, Mario Draghi, released a report on 26 June 2012 which called for deeper integration in the eurozone, including the establishment of a banking union encompassing direct recapitalisation of banks from the ESM, a common financial supervisor, a common bank resolution scheme and a deposit guarantee fund.^[106] The Single Supervisory Mechanism (SSM) was enacted through two regulations in October 2013 to monitor the stability of banks.^[107] However, during negotiations for the Single Resolution Mechanism (SRM), which would be responsible for resolving failing banks and would establish a Single Resolution Fund (SRF) to fund their restructuring, concerns, especially by Germany, were raised that some of its provisions were incompatible with current EU treaties.^[108]^[109]^[110] As a result, the details of some aspects of the functioning of the SRF, including the transfer and mutualisation of funds from national authorities to the centralized fund, was split off from the Regulation to an Intergovernmental Agreement outside the framework of the EU.^[108]^[109]^[110] However, the treaty states that the intention of the signatories is to incorporate the treaty's provisions into EU structures within 10 years. The agreement was signed by 26 EU member states (all but Sweden and the United Kingdom) and is open to accession to any other EU member states.^[108] It entered on 1 January 2016, following the ratification by states representing 90% of the weighted vote of SSM and SRM participating states,^[108] but only to SSM and SRM participating states.^[108] As of December 2018, all eurozone states, as well as Hungary, Romania, Bulgaria, have ratified the agreement.

Table

See also

Literature

References

1. ^¹{{cite journal|url=http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2012:361:0001:0008:EN:PDF|title=Regulation 1257/2012|journal=Official Journal of the European Union|volume=L 361/1|date=31 December 2012|accessdate=2013-02-09}}
2. ^¹{{cite journal|url=http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2012:361:0089:0092:EN:PDF|title=Council Regulation 1260/2012|journal=Official Journal of the European Union|volume=L 361/89|date=31 December 2012|accessdate=2013-02-09}}
3. ^{{cite book |last1=Craig |first1=Paul |last2=de Burca |first2=Grainne |title=EU Law: Text, Cases and Materials |edition=3rd |year=2003 |publisher=Oxford University Press |location=Oxford |isbn=0-19-924943-1 |page=751}}
4. ^¹²³{{cite web|url=http://europa.eu/scadplus/glossary/enhanced_cooperation_en.htm|title=Europa Glossary: Enhanced cooperation, Europa (web portal)|publisher=}}
5. ^¹²Vucheva, Elitsa (24 July 2008) Divorce rules could divide EU states, EU Observer
6. ^Enhanced cooperation, Europa
7. ^¹Two-speed Europe may emerge over divorce rules, EUobserver
8. ^EU members look to marry up their divorce laws, Europe World
9. ^{{cite news| url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/8585186.stm | work=BBC News | title=EU moves to clarify divorce laws | date=24 March 2010}}
10. ^{{cite web|url=http://www.eubusiness.com/news-eu/justice-divorce.4xi/ |title=Three more EU Member States back cross-border divorce law pact – EUbusiness – legal, business and economic news from Europe and the EU |publisher=Eubusiness.com |date=28 May 2010 |accessdate=2011-12-13}}
11. ^¹{{cite web|last=Pop |first=Valentina |url=http://euobserver.com/9/30183 |title=Twelve EU states inch closer to common divorce rules |publisher=Euobserver.com |date= |accessdate=2011-12-13}}
12. ^{{cite web|url=http://www.eubusiness.com/news-eu/justice-divorce.50x/ |title=European nations seal divorce law pact – EUbusiness – legal, business and economic news from Europe and the EU |publisher=Eubusiness.com |date= |accessdate=2011-12-13}}
13. ^Enhanced cooperation on binational divorce {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110721202112/http://www.europolitics.info/sectorial-policies/enhanced-cooperation-on-binational-divorce-art277730-16.html |date=21 July 2011 }}, Europolitics.info 12 July 2010
14. ^{{cite web|url=http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2010:189:0012:0013:EN:PDF|title=Council Decision of 12 July 2010 authorising enhanced cooperation in the area of the law applicable to divorce and legal separation|date=22 July 2010|accessdate=2012-04-14|publisher=Official Journal of the European Union}}
15. ^{{cite web|url=http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/newsroom/cf/itemdetail.cfm?item_id=6005&tpa=0&tk=&lang=en |title=News Today's Justice Council: A good day for citizens and a good day for growth! |publisher=European Commission |date=14 June 2012 |accessdate=2012-07-06 |deadurl=yes |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20130512010140/http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/newsroom/cf/itemdetail.cfm?item_id=6005&tpa=0&tk=&lang=en |archivedate=12 May 2013 |df=dmy }}
16. ^¹{{cite web|url=http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2010:343:0010:0016:EN:PDF|title=Council Regulation (EU) No 1259/2010 of 20 December 2010 implementing enhanced cooperation in the area of the law applicable to divorce and legal separation|date=29 December 2010|accessdate=2012-04-14|publisher=Official Journal of the European Union}}
17. ^¹{{cite web|url=http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2012:323:0018:0019:EN:PDF|title=Commission Decision of 21 November 2012 confirming the participation of Lithuania in enhanced cooperation in the area of the law applicable to divorce and legal separation (2012/714/EU)|date=22 November 2012|accessdate=2012-11-22|work=Official Journal of the European Union}}
18. ^{{citeweb|url=http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_IP-14-34_en.htm|title=Greece is Member State No. 16 to sign up to EU rules helping international couples|date=2014-01-27|accessdate=2014-01-29|publisher=European Commission}}
19. ^{{citeweb|url=http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2014:023:0041:0042:EN:PDF|title=Commission Decision of 27 January 2014 confirming the participation of Greece in enhanced cooperation in the area of the law applicable to divorce and legal separation|date=2014-01-27|accessdate=2014-01-29|work=Official Journal of the European Union}}
20. ^{{citeweb|url=http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_MEX-16-2781_en.htm#3|title=Estonia is the 17th Member State to participate in EU regulation supporting international couples|date=2016-08-11|accessdate=2016-08-11|publisher=European Commission}}
21. ^{{citejournal|url=http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:32016D1366|title=COMMISSION DECISION (EU) 2016/1366 of 10 August 2016 confirming the participation of Estonia in enhanced cooperation in the area of the law applicable to divorce and legal separation|date=2016-08-11|accessdate=2016-08-11|journal=Official Journal of the European Union|volume=L 216/23}}
22. ^ , EU Commission Press Release, 14 December 2010
23. ^States proposing the unitary patent: Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Lithuania, Luxembourg, The Netherlands, Poland, Slovenia, Sweden and the United Kingdom
24. ^{{cite web|author=Márton Hajdú |url=http://www.eu2011.hu/news/single-european-patent-track |title=Single European patent on track |publisher=Eu2011.hu |date=22 February 1999 |accessdate=2011-12-13 |deadurl=yes |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20120316160757/http://www.eu2011.hu/news/single-european-patent-track |archivedate=16 March 2012 |df=dmy }}
25. ^{{cite web|url=http://www.consilium.europa.eu/uedocs/cms_data/docs/pressdata/en/intm/119732.pdf |title=Council authorises Enhanced Co-operation for EU-Patent |format=PDF |date= |accessdate=2011-12-13}}
26. ^{{cite web|url=http://ec.europa.eu/governance/impact/ia_carried_out/docs/ia_2011/com_2011_0216_en.pdf |title=Commission proposal for a Council Regulation implementing Enhanced Co-operation |format=PDF |date= |accessdate=2011-12-13 |deadurl=yes |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20121103180841/http://ec.europa.eu/governance/impact/ia_carried_out/docs/ia_2011/com_2011_0216_en.pdf |archivedate=3 November 2012 |df=dmy }}
27. ^¹²³{{cite web|url=http://www.europarl.europa.eu/news/en/headlines/content/20121203FCS04313/3/html/Parliament-approves-EU-unitary-patent-rules|title=Parliament approves EU unitary patent rules|accessdate=11 December 2012|date=11 December 2012|work=European Parliament}}
28. ^{{cite web|work=Council of the European Union|url=http://www.consilium.europa.eu/register/en/content/out/?&typ=ENTRY&i=LD&DOC_ID=ST-10621-2015-INIT|title=Notification by Italy of its intention to participate in the enhanced cooperation in the area of the creation of unitary patent protection and in the enhanced cooperation in the area of the creation of unitary patent protection with regard to the applicable translation arrangements|accessdate=10 July 2015|date=7 July 2015}}
29. ^{{cite journal|url=http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=OJ:JOL_2015_256_R_0011&from=EN|title=COMMISSION DECISION (EU) 2015/1753 of 30 September 2015 on confirming the participation of Italy in enhanced cooperation in the area of the creation of unitary patent protection |journal=Official Journal of the European Union|volume=L 256/19|date=1 October 2015|accessdate=1 October 2015}}
30. ^¹²³⁴{{cite web|url=http://www.consilium.europa.eu/uedocs/cms_data/docs/pressdata/en/intm/135593.pdf|title=Signing of the Unified Patent Court agreement|date=19 February 2013|accessdate=2013-02-19|publisher=Council of the European Union}}
31. ^¹{{cite web|url=http://ec.europa.eu/internal_market/indprop/patent/ratification/index_en.htm|title=Unitary patent – ratification progress|accessdate=2013-02-19|publisher=European Commission}}
32. ^¹{{cite web|url=http://www.worldipreview.com/news/will-poland-join-the-unitary-patent-system|title=Will Poland join the Unitary Patent system?|date=5 February 2013|accessdate=2013-02-09 |publisher=World Intellectual Property Review}}
33. ^¹{{cite web|url= http://consilium.europa.eu/homepage/highlights/eu-unitary-patent-–-a-historical-breakthrough?lang=en|title=EU unitary patent – a historical breakthrough|work=Council of the European Union|date=29 June 2012|accessdate=30 June 2012}}
34. ^{{citejournal|url=http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32016D0954|title=COUNCIL DECISION (EU) 2016/954 of 9 June 2016 authorising enhanced cooperation in the area of jurisdiction, applicable law and the recognition and enforcement of decisions on the property regimes of international couples, covering both matters of matrimonial property regimes and the property consequences of registered partnerships|date=2016-06-16|accessdate=2016-07-05|journal=Official Journal of the European Union|volume=L 159/16}}
35. ^{{citejournal|url=http://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2016/1103/oj|title=Council Regulation (EU) 2016/1103 of 24 June 2016 implementing enhanced cooperation in the area of jurisdiction, applicable law and the recognition and nforcement of decisions in matters of matrimonial property regimes|date=2016-06-24|accessdate=2016-09-03|journal=Official Journal of the European Union|volume=L 159/16}}
36. ^{{citejournal|url=http://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2016/1104/oj |title=Council Regulation (EU) 2016/1104 of 24 June 2016 implementing enhanced cooperation in the area of jurisdiction, applicable law and the recognition and enforcement of decisions in matters of the property consequences of registered partnerships|date=2016-06-24|accessdate=2016-09-03|journal=Official Journal of the European Union|volume=L 183/16}}
37. ^{{cite web|url=http://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/press/press-releases/2017/10/12-eppo-20-ms-confirms/|title=20 member states confirm the creation of an European Public Prosecutor's Office - Consilium|website=www.consilium.europa.eu}}
38. ^ Brussels explores creation of EU public prosecutor.
39. ^{{cite web|url=http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_IP-13-709_en.htm|title=European Commission - PRESS RELEASES - Press release - Protecting taxpayers’ money against fraud: Commission proposes European Public Prosecutor's Office and reinforces OLAF procedural guarantees|website=europa.eu}}
40. ^{{citeweb|url=http://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/press/press-releases/2017/04/03-eppo/|title=European public prosecutor's office : 16 member states together to fight fraud against the EU budget|date=2017-04-03|accessdate=2017-10-21|publisher=Council of the European Union}}
41. ^{{Cite web|url=http://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/press/press-releases/2017/06/08-eppo/|title=20 member states agree on details on creating the European Public Prosecutor's office (EPPO) - Consilium|website=www.consilium.europa.eu|language=en|access-date=2017-06-11}}
42. ^¹{{citejournal|url=http://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2017/1939/oj|title=Council Regulation (EU) 2017/1939 of 12 October 2017 implementing enhanced cooperation on the establishment of the European Public Prosecutor’s Office (‘the EPPO’)|date=2017-10-31|accessdate=2017-10-31|journal=Official Journal of the European Union|volume=L 283/1}}
43. ^{{citeweb|url=http://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/press/press-releases/2017/10/12-eppo-20-ms-confirms/|title=20 member states confirm the creation of an European Public Prosecutor's Office|date=2017-10-12|accessdate=2017-10-21|publisher=Council of the European Union}}
44. ^{{citeweb|url=http://data.consilium.europa.eu/doc/document/ST-8939-2018-INIT/en/pdf|title=European Public Prosecutor's Office - update on the implementation|date=2018-05-30|accessdate=2018-06-12|publisher=Council of the European Union}}
45. ^{{citeweb|url=http://www.consilium.europa.eu/media/35542/st09680-en18.pdf|title=OUTCOME OF THE COUNCIL MEETING - 3622nd Council meeting - Justice and Home Affairs|date=2018-06-05|accessdate=2018-06-09|publisher=Council of the European Union}}
46. ^{{citeweb|url=http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_IP-18-4770_en.htm|title=European Public Prosecutor's Office: The Netherlands becomes 21st country to join common efforts to protect EU budget against fraud|date=2018-08-01|accessdate=2018-08-02|publisher=European Commission}}
47. ^[https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32018D1094 COMMISSION DECISION (EU) 2018/1094 of 1 August 2018 confirming the participation of the Netherlands in the enhanced cooperation on the establishment of the European Public Prosecutor's Office]
48. ^{{citeweb|url=https://www.gov.mt/en/Government/Press%20Releases/Pages/2018/June/14/pr181346.aspx|title=PRESS RELEASE BY THE MINISTRY FOR JUSTICE, CULTURE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT: Malta joins the European Public Prosecutor’s Office|date=2018-06-14|accessdate=2018-06-15|newspaper=Government of Malta}}
49. ^{{citeweb|url=http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_MEX-18-4881_en.htm|title=European Commission - Daily News|date=2018-08-07|accessdate=2018-08-08|publisher=European Commission}}
50. ^{{citejournal|url=https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=uriserv:OJ.L_.2018.201.01.0002.01.ENG&toc=OJ:L:2018:201:TOC|title=COMMISSION DECISION (EU) 2018/1103 of 7 August 2018 confirming the participation of Malta in the enhanced cooperation on the establishment of the European Public Prosecutor's Office|date=2018-08-07|accessdate=2018-08-07|journal=Official Journal of the European Union}}
51. ^{{cite web|url=http://www.europolitics.info/economy-monetary-affairs/lowering-contributions-possible-even-under-enhanced-cooperation-art342321-30.html|title=Lowering contributions possible even under enhanced cooperation|last=Sebag|first=Gaspard|date=31 August 2012|accessdate=2012-09-20|publisher=Europolitics|deadurl=yes|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20130512094546/http://www.europolitics.info/economy-monetary-affairs/lowering-contributions-possible-even-under-enhanced-cooperation-art342321-30.html|archivedate=12 May 2013|df=dmy-all}}
52. ^{{cite web|url=http://www.euractiv.com/euro-finance/countries-push-financial-transaction-tax-news-510650 |title=Nine countries push for financial transaction tax |author= |publisher=EurActiv |date=8 December 2012 |accessdate=2012-09-20 |deadurl=yes |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20120520103746/http://www.euractiv.com/euro-finance/countries-push-financial-transaction-tax-news-510650 |archivedate=20 May 2012 |df=dmy }}
53. ^{{cite news | url=http://www.spiegel.de/international/europe/0,1518,820965,00.html | title=Euro Zone Split over Financial Transaction Tax | author= Carsten Volkery | date=13 March 2012 |publisher=Der Spiegel | accessdate=2012-09-20}}
54. ^{{cite web|url=http://www.budapesttimes.hu/2012/07/17/parliament-approves-transaction-tax/|title=Parliament approves transaction tax|publisher=The Budapest Times|date=17 July 2012|accessdate=2012-09-20}}
55. ^{{cite web|url=http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_IP-12-1138_en.htm|title=Commission proposes green light for enhanced cooperation on financial transactions tax|date=23 October 2012|accessdate=2012-12-27|publisher=European Commission}}
56. ^{{cite web|url=http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/international-business/11-eurozone-states-ready-to-launch-financial-transactions-tax-eu-tax-commissioner/articleshow/16738834.cms|title=11 eurozone states ready to launch financial transactions tax: EU tax commissioner|date=9 October 2012|accessdate=2012-10-09|publisher=The Economic Times}}
57. ^{{cite web|url=http://www.europarl.europa.eu/news/en/pressroom/content/20121207IPR04408/html/Eleven-EU-countries-get-Parliament%27s-all-clear-for-a-financial-transaction-tax|title=Eleven EU countries get Parliament's all clear for a financial transaction tax|date=12 December 2012|accessdate=2012-12-27|publisher=European Parliament}}
58. ^¹{{cite web|url=http://www.consilium.europa.eu/uedocs/cms_data/docs/pressdata/en/ecofin/134949.pdf|title=Financial transaction tax: Council agrees to enhanced cooperation|publisher=}}
59. ^¹{{cite web|url=http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_IP-13-115_en.htm|title=Financial Transaction Tax under Enhanced Cooperation: Commission sets out the details|date=14 February 2013|accessdate=2013-02-14|publisher=European Commission}}
60. ^{{citeweb|url=http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_MEMO-13-652_en.htm|title=Commissioner Šemeta welcomes European Parliament vote on Financial Transactions Tax|date=2013-07-03|accessdate=2013-07-27|publisher=European Commission}}
61. ^{{cite web|url=http://www.europarl.europa.eu/news/en/headlines/content/20121207STO04364/html/Financial-transaction-tax-clearing-the-next-hurdle|title=Financial transaction tax: clearing the next hurdle|date=11 December 2012|accessdate=2012-12-27|publisher=European Parliament}}
62. ^{{cite news | title = EU lawyers say transaction tax plan is illegal | first = Huw | last = Jones |others=Additional reporting by Gernot Heller in Berlin, John O'Donnell in Brussels, Paul Day in Madrid and Silvia Aloisi in Milan; editing by Anna Willard| url = https://www.reuters.com/article/2013/09/10/us-eu-transactiontax-idUSBRE9890F620130910 | agency = Reuters | date = 10 September 2013| accessdate =10 September 2013}}
63. ^{{cite web|url=https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2014/may/06/george-osborne-eu-financial-transaction-tax-legal-challenge|title=George Osborne bristles as EU moves closer to financial transaction tax|publisher=The Guardian|date=6 May 2014}}
64. ^{{cite web|url=https://www.bloomberg.com/news/2014-05-23/eu-financial-transaction-tax-plans-turn-to-derivatives.html|title=EU Financial-Transaction Tax Plans Turn to Derivatives|publisher=Bloomberg|date=23 May 2014}}
65. ^{{citeweb|url=http://data.consilium.europa.eu/doc/document/ST-9602-2016-INIT/en/pdf|title=Enhanced cooperation in the area of Financial Transaction Tax − Proposal for a Council Directive implementing enhanced cooperation in the area of Financial Transaction Tax = State of play|date=2016-06-03|accessdate=2016-07-05|publisher=Council of the European Union}}
66. ^¹{{cite web|url=http://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/european-council/president/pdf/5-presidents-report-en_pdf/|title=Completing Europe's Economic and Monetary Union: Report by Jean-Claude Juncker in close cooperation with Donald Tusk, Jeroen Dijsselbloem, Mario Draghi and Martin Schulz|format=PDF|publisher=European Commission|date=21 June 2015}}
67. ^¹²³{{cite web|url=http://register.consilium.europa.eu/pdf/en/08/st06/st06655.en08.pdf|title=Article 42(6), Article 43(1), Article 46, Protocol 10 of the amended Treaty on European Union|publisher=}}
68. ^{{cite news|url=https://seenews.com/news/romania-to-join-eus-defence-initiative-pesco-587373|title=Romania to join EU’s defence initiative PESCO|first=Nicoleta|last=Banila|work=SeeNews|date=2017-10-17|access-date=2017-12-07|dead-url=no|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171018190554/https://seenews.com/news/romania-to-join-eus-defence-initiative-pesco-587373|archive-date=2017-10-18}}
69. ^{{cite web|url=https://www.eu2017.ee/news/press-releases/PESCO|title=EU defence ministers: defence cooperation needs to be brought to a new level|date=2017-09-07|access-date=2017-12-07|publisher=Estonian Presidency of the Council of the European Union|dead-url=no|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171018134113/https://www.eu2017.ee/news/press-releases/PESCO|archive-date=2017-10-18}}
70. ^{{cite web|url=https://eeas.europa.eu/headquarters/headQuarters-homepage_en/31832/Permanent%20Structured%20Cooperation%20on%20defence%20could%20be%20launched%20by%20end%202017|title=Permanent Structured Cooperation on defence could be launched by end 2017|date=2017-09-08|access-date=2017-12-07|publisher=European External Action Service|dead-url=no|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170912233945/https://eeas.europa.eu/headquarters/headquarters-homepage_en/31832/Permanent%20Structured%20Cooperation%20on%20defence%20could%20be%20launched%20by%20end%202017|archive-date=2017-09-12}}
71. ^{{cite news|url=http://www.praguemonitor.com/2017/10/12/czech-government-join-pesco-defence-project|title=Czech government to join PESCO defence project|date=2017-10-12|access-date=2017-12-07|work=Prague Daily Monitor|dead-url=no|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171012093704/http://www.praguemonitor.com/2017/10/12/czech-government-join-pesco-defence-project|archive-date=2017-10-12}}
72. ^{{citeweb|title=Permanent Structured Cooperation (PESCO) - Council Decision - preparation for the adoption|url=http://data.consilium.europa.eu/doc/document/ST-15511-2017-INIT/en/pdf|date=2017-12-08|access-date=2017-12-12|work=Council of the European Union}}
73. ^{{cite news|url=http://www.dw.com/en/pesco-eu-paves-way-to-defense-union/a-41360236|title=PESCO: EU paves way to defense union|date=2017-11-13|accessdate=2017-11-16|work=Deutsche Welle|dead-url=no|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171118173325/http://www.dw.com/en/pesco-eu-paves-way-to-defense-union/a-41360236|archive-date=2017-11-18}}
74. ^{{Cite news|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2017/11/13/world/europe/eu-military-force.html|title=E.U. Moves Closer to a Joint Military Force|last=Erlanger|first=Steven|date=2017-11-13|work=The New York Times|access-date=2017-11-13|language=en-US|issn=0362-4331|dead-url=no|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171113205230/https://www.nytimes.com/2017/11/13/world/europe/eu-military-force.html|archive-date=2017-11-13}}
75. ^{{citenews|url=https://www.timesofmalta.com/articles/view/20171211/local/malta-among-three-countries-opting-out-of-eus-new-defence-agreement.665421|title=Malta among three countries opting out of EU's new defence agreement|work=Times of Malta|date=2017-12-11|access-date=2017-12-12|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171212065330/https://www.timesofmalta.com/articles/view/20171211/local/malta-among-three-countries-opting-out-of-eus-new-defence-agreement.665421|archive-date=2017-12-12| deadurl=no}}
76. ^{{citenews|url=http://www.dw.com/en/twenty-five-eu-states-sign-pesco-defense-pact/a-41741828|title=Twenty-five EU states sign PESCO defense pact|work=Deutsche Welle|date=2017-12-11|access-date=2017-12-12|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171212145317/http://www.dw.com/en/twenty-five-eu-states-sign-pesco-defense-pact/a-41741828|archive-date=2017-12-12}}
77. ^{{cite web|url=http://www.consilium.europa.eu/uedocs/cms_data/docs/pressdata/en/ec/120296.pdf |title=25 March 2011 Council decisions |format=PDF |date= |accessdate=2011-12-13}}
78. ^{{citeweb|url=http://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/documents-publications/agreements-conventions/agreement/?aid=1968001|title=Convention on jurisdiction and the enforcement of judgements in civil and commercial matters|accessdate=2014-11-06|publisher=Council of the European Union}}
79. ^{{citejournal|url=http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2001:012:0001:0023:EN:PDF|title=COUNCIL REGULATION (EC) No 44/2001 of 22 December 2000 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters|date=2001-01-16|accessdate=2014-11-07|journal=Official Journal of the European Union|volume=L|number=121}}
80. ^{{citeweb|url=http://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/documents-publications/agreements-conventions/agreement/?aid=1988024|title=Convention on the law applicable to contractual obligations|accessdate=2014-11-06|publisher=Council of the European Union}}
81. ^{{citejournal|url=http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32008R0593&from=EN|title=REGULATION (EC) No 593/2008 OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL of 17 June 2008 on the law applicable to contractual obligations (Rome I)|date=2008-07-04|accessdate=2014-11-07|journal=Official Journal of the European Union|volume=L|number=177}}
82. ^{{citeweb|url=http://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/documents-publications/agreements-conventions/agreement/?aid=1990090|title=Convention determining the State responsible for examining applications for asylum lodged in one of the Member States of the European Communities (Deposited with the Government of Ireland)|accessdate=2014-11-08|publisher=Council of the European Union}}
83. ^{{citejournal|url=http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32003R0343&from=EN|title=COUNCIL REGULATION (EC) No 343/2003 of 18 February 2003 establishing the criteria and mechanisms for determining the Member State responsible for examining an asylum application lodged in one of the Member States by a third-country national|date=2003-02-25|accessdate=2014-11-08|journal=Official Journal of the European Union|volume=L|number=50/1}}
84. ^{{citeweb|url=http://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/documents-publications/agreements-conventions/agreement/?aid=1995106|title=Convention drawn up on the basis of Article K.3 of Treaty on European Union, on the establishment of a European Police Office (Europol Convention)|accessdate=2014-11-06|publisher=Council of the European Union}}
85. ^{{citeweb|url=http://europa.eu/legislation_summaries/glossary/europol_en.htm|title=Europol (European Police Office)|accessdate=2014-11-06|publisher=European Union}}
86. ^{{citejournal|url=http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2009:121:0037:0066:EN:PDF|title=COUNCIL DECISION of 6 April 2009 establishing the European Police Office (Europol)|date=2009-05-15|accessdate=2014-11-06|journal=Official Journal of the European Union|volume=L|number=121}}
87. ^{{citeweb|url=http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_MEMO-13-166_en.htm|title=Latvia and the euro|date=2013-03-05|accessdate=2013-03-31|publisher=European Commission}}
88. ^{{cite web|url=https://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-07-09/latvia-wins-final-eu-approval-to-adopt-euro-on-jan-1-next-year.html|title=Latvia Wins Final EU Approval to Adopt Euro on Jan. 1 Next Year|date=2013-07-09|accessdate=2013-07-09|publisher=Bloomberg}}
89. ^{{cite web|url=http://ec.europa.eu/economy_finance/articles/euro/2013-06-05-convergence-report_en.htm|title=Commission: Latvia meets the conditions for adopting the euro|date=2013-06-05|accessdate=2013-06-16|publisher=European Commission}}
90. ^{{citeweb|url=http://www.esm.europa.eu/about/governance/shareholders/latvia/index.htm|title=Latvia to join the ESM on 13 March 2014|accessdate=2014-03-03|publisher=European Stability Mechanism}}
91. ^{{cite web|url=http://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/documents-publications/agreements-conventions/agreement/?aid=2012002|title=Agreement - Consilium|website=www.consilium.europa.eu}}
92. ^{{cite web|url=http://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/documents-publications/agreements-conventions/agreement/?aid=2011030 |title=a136 Amendment details|accessdate=2013-04-23}}
93. ^{{cite news|url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-17230760|title=EU summit: All but two leaders sign fiscal treaty|work=BBC News|accessdate=2 March 2012|date=2 March 2012}}
94. ^{{cite web|url=http://www.consilium.europa.eu/uedocs/cms_data/docs/pressdata/en/ecofin/134543.pdf|title=Fiscal compact enters into force 21/12/2012 (Press: 551, Nr: 18019/12)|publisher=European Council|date=21 December 2012|accessdate=21 December 2012}}
95. ^¹{{cite web|title=Treaty on Stability, Coordination and Governance in the Economic and Monetary Union|url=http://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/documents-publications/agreements-conventions/agreement/?aid=2012008|work=consilium.europa.eu|publisher=Council of the European Union|accessdate=16 January 2014}}
96. ^{{cite web|url=http://european-council.europa.eu/media/639235/st00tscg26_en12.pdf|title=Treaty on Stability, Coordination and Governance in the Economic and Monetary Union (TSCG)|format=PDF|publisher=European Council|date=2 March 2012|accessdate=17 August 2012}}
97. ^{{citeweb|url=http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_IP-13-1307_en.htm|title=Latvia becomes the 18th Member State to adopt the euro|date=2013-12-31|accessdate=2013-12-31|publisher=European Commission}}
98. ^{{cite web |url=http://euobserver.com/political/118490 |title='Historic day' as EU patent deal ends 40-year wait |last1=Fox |first1=Benjamin |last2= |first2= |date=12 December 2012 |work= |publisher=EUobserver.com |accessdate=14 December 2012}}
99. ^{{cite web|url=http://curia.europa.eu/jcms/upload/docs/application/pdf/2011-03/cp110017en.pdf|title=The draft agreement on the creation of a European and Community Patent Court is not compatible with European Union law|publisher=Court of Justice of the European Union|date=8 March 2011|accessdate=2013-02-08}}
100. ^{{cite web|url=http://www.consilium.europa.eu/uedocs/cms_Data/docs/pressdata/en/intm/134393.pdf|title=The long road to unitary patent protection in Europe|date=17 December 2012|accessdate=2013-02-08|publisher=Council of the European Union}}
101. ^{{cite journal|url=http://register.consilium.europa.eu/pdf/en/12/st16/st16351.en12.pdf|title=Agreement on a Unified Patent Court|date=11 January 2013|accessdate=2013-02-11|publisher=Council of the European Union|volume=16351/12}}
102. ^{{cite press release|title=Single European Patent: a major achievement but still some way to go|url=http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_SPEECH-13-132_en.htm?locale=en|work=European Commission|date=18 February 2013|accessdate=18 February 2013}}
103. ^{{cite web|url=http://www.europeanvoice.com/article/imported/countries-to-sign-up-to-unitary-patent-system-/76422.aspx|title=Countries to sign up to unitary patent system|last=Wishart|first=Ian|date=14 February 2013|accessdate=2013-02-19}}
104. ^¹{{cite web|url=http://www.consilium.europa.eu/ueDocs/cms_Data/docs/pressData/en/intm/135391.pdf|title=Background note – Competitiveness Council – Brussels, 18 and 19 February 2013|publisher=Court of Justice of the European Union|date=11 February 2013|accessdate=2013-02-11}}
105. ^¹{{cite web|url=http://www.epo.org/law-practice/unitary/faq.html|work=European Patent Organisation |title=Unitary patent – frequently asked questions|accessdate=12 December 2012}}
106. ^{{cite web|url=http://s3.documentcloud.org/documents/373846/towards-a-genuine-economic-and-monetary-union.pdf|title=TOWARDS A GENUINE ECONOMIC AND MONETARY UNION|work=Herman Van Rompuy|accessdate=7 July 2012|date=26 June 2012}}
107. ^{{citeweb|url=http://register.consilium.europa.eu/doc/srv?l=EN&f=ST%2014044%202013%20INIT|title=Council approves single supervisory mechanism for banking|date=2013-10-15|accessdate=2014-05-29|publisher=Council of the European Union}}
108. ^¹²³⁴{{citeweb|url=http://www.gr2014.eu/sites/default/files/Member%20states%20sign%20agreement%20on%20bank%20resolution%20fund.pdf|title=Member states sign agreement on bank resolution fund|date=2014-05-21|accessdate=2014-05-30|publisher=European Commission}}
109. ^¹{{citeweb|url=http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_MEMO-14-295_en.htm?locale=en|title=A Single Resolution Mechanism for the Banking Union – frequently asked questions|date=2014-04-15|accessdate=2014-05-29|publisher=European Commission}}
110. ^¹{{citeweb|url=http://www.consilium.europa.eu/homepage/highlights/council-agrees-its-position-on-the-single-resolution-mechanism?lang=if|title=Council agrees its position on the single resolution mechanism|date=2013-12-19|publisher=Council of the European Union|accessdate=2014-05-29}}