请输入您要查询的百科知识:

 

词条 Estate of Rockefeller v. Commissioner
释义

  1. Facts of the case

  2. Determination of the court

  3. References

  4. External links

{{refimprove|date=September 2018}}{{Infobox COA case
|Litigants=Estate of Rockefeller v. Commissioner
|Court=United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
|CourtSeal=
|ArgueDate=April 22,
|ArgueYear=1985
|DecideDate=May 24,
|DecideYear=1985
|FullName=Estate of Nelson A. Rockefeller, Deceased, Laurance S. Rockefeller, J. Richardson Dilworth and Donal C. O'Brien, Jr., Executors and Margaretta F. Rockefeller v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
|Citations=762 F.2d [https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/F2/762/264/406661/ 264]; 56 A.F.T.R.2d 85-5094; 53 USLW 2620; 85-1 USTC (CCH) ¶ 9429
|Prior=83 T.C. [https://www.leagle.com/decision/198445183xtc3681428 368] (1984)
|Subsequent=
|Holding=
|Judges=Wilfred Feinberg, Henry Friendly, Jon O. Newman
|Majority=Friendly
|JoinMajority=Feinberg, Newman
|LawsApplied=Internal Revenue Code § 162(a)
|keywords= {{hlist |Business expense}}
}}

Estate of Rockefeller v. Commissioner, 762 F.2d 264 (2d Cir. 1985),[1] was a case in which the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit held that section 162(a) of the Internal Revenue Code only allows deductions against income for expenses that occur while carrying on a trade or business.

Facts of the case

Nelson Rockefeller had incurred $550,159.78 worth of legal fees and services with regard to his 1974 vice presidential confirmation hearings. Mr. Rockefeller then claimed a $63,275 deduction on his 1974 income tax return, which was the amount of his salary as vice-president.

Determination of the court

The 2nd Circuit affirmed the Tax Courts ruling that the deductions were not allowed under IRC section 162.[2] The Court essentially compared Rockefeller’s past job as Governor of New York with his position as Vice President and found that the two positions did not constitute the same trade or business. Mr. Rockefeller’s estate argued that his trade or business was that of public service, but there was no authority that supported such a broad interpretation. Thus, the legal and consulting fees were not incurred in carrying out a trade or business, but in anticipation of doing so. Essentially, the court ruled that the expenses could not be deducted because Rockefeller was not yet “carrying on” the business of being Vice President.

References

1. ^{{cite court |litigants=Estate of Rockefeller v. Commissioner |vol=762 |reporter=F.2d |opinion=264 |pinpoint= |court=2d Cir. |date=1985 |url=https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/F2/762/264/406661/ |accessdate=2017-11-27 |quote=}}
2. ^{{USC|26|162}}

External links

  • {{caselaw source

| case = Estate of Rockefeller v. Commissioner, 762 F.2d 264 (2d Cir. 1985)
| courtlistener =https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/452076/estate-of-nelson-a-rockefeller-deceased-laurance-s-rockefeller-j/
| justia =https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/F2/762/264/406661/
| other_source1 = OpenJurist
| other_url1 =https://openjurist.org/762/f2d/264
| other_source2 = Google Scholar
| other_url2 =https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=15000766966419808793{{US-case-law-stub}}{{Tax-stub}}

4 : United States taxation and revenue case law|United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit cases|Nelson A. Rockefeller|1985 in United States case law

随便看

 

开放百科全书收录14589846条英语、德语、日语等多语种百科知识,基本涵盖了大多数领域的百科知识,是一部内容自由、开放的电子版国际百科全书。

 

Copyright © 2023 OENC.NET All Rights Reserved
京ICP备2021023879号 更新时间:2024/11/12 3:12:49