1. History

2. Preliminary design

3. Launch vehicle
    Rus-M  Angara  Irtysh / Soyuz-5 

4. See also

5. References

6. External links

• 5–14 days (free flight)^[1]
• 365 days (docked in LEO)^[1]
• 200 days (docked in Lunar orbit)^[1]

• Angara A5^[8]
• Soyuz-5^[3]

• Vostochny Cosmodrome
• Baikonur Cosmodrome^[2][8]

Federation ({{lang-ru|Федерация}}, Federatsiya),^[6] formerly called PPTS (Prospective Piloted Transport System, {{lang|ru|Перспективная Пилотируемая Транспортная Система}}, Perspektivnaya Pilotiruemaya Transportnaya Sistema) is a project by Roscosmos to develop a new-generation, partially reusable piloted spacecraft.

Until 2016 its official name was {{lang|ru|Пилотируемый Транспортный Корабль Нового Поколения}}, Pilotiruemyi Transportny Korabl Novogo Pokoleniya or PTK NP meaning "New Generation Piloted Transport Ship". The goal of the project is to develop a new-generation spacecraft to replace the aging Soyuz spacecraft developed by the former Soviet Union to support low Earth orbit and lunar operations. It is similar in function to the American Orion spacecraft.^[7]

The PPTS project was started following the failed attempt by Russia and the European Space Agency to co-develop the Crew Space Transportation System (CSTS), which until the middle of 2006 was known as the ACTS. Following this the Russian Federal Space Agency ordered the local space industry to finalize proposals for the new crewed spacecraft.^[8] A firm development contract was awarded to RKK Energia on December 19, 2013.^[9]

Federation will be capable of carrying crews of four into Earth orbit and beyond on missions of up to 30 days. If docked with a space station, it could stay in space up to a year, which is double the duration of the Soyuz spacecraft. The spacecraft will send cosmonauts to lunar orbit, with a plan to place a space station there.^[10]

History

Previously, ESA officials had inquired whether they could be part of the Constellation Program of the United States, with NASA focused on its Orion spacecraft, but they had received a negative response.^[11] Consequently, Europe decided to join the Russians to co-develop a new-generation crewed spacecraft. ESA insisted on a joint design rather than the Russian-designed Kliper, and as a result the joint Russian/European CSTS project came into being. CSTS had completed an initial study phase, which lasted for 18 months from September 2006 to spring 2008, before the project was shut down before an ESA member state conference in November 2008. ESA decided to use some technology of the CSTS project from its Automated Transfer Vehicle.^[12]

The Russian space agency, Roskosmos, had repeatedly received proposals from Moscow-based Khrunichev enterprise to develop a new-generation crewed spacecraft based on the TKS spacecraft that would be launched on the new Angara launch Vehicle. Citing the requirement to start work on a new crewed spacecraft, Russia decided to go forward with the project by itself.{{Clarify|date=April 2009|rewrite needed because russianspaceweb.com does not state that "Russia" cited anything nor that it decided anything other than "officially canceled in June 2006" - maybe this should explain it was the Khrunichev enterprise that decided? Also, please give dates for "At the same time". 2006? 2007? 2008?}}^[13]

By the first quarter of 2009, Roskosmos had finalized its requirements for the next-generation crewed spacecraft and had received proposals from both RKK Energia and Khrunichev enterprise. This was the actual beginning of the PPTS project. The agency was finally ready to name the prime developer of the vehicle. Formally, only two organizations which were practically capable of developing crewed space vehicles competed in the government tender to build the new spacecraft—RKK Energia in Korolev and Moscow-based Khrunichev enterprise.^[1]

Although Roskosmos has remained tight-lipped about the project, a number of Russian officials made statements hinting about various stages of the project. On January 21, 2009, the head of Roskosmos, Anatoly Perminov, told Rossiyskaya Gazeta, a Russian newspaper, that Russia would likely proceed with independent development of the next-generation crewed spacecraft. According to Perminov, the agency and its main research and certification center—TsNIIMash—had already conducted an expanded meeting of the Scientific and Technical Council, NTS, examining follow-on transport systems, including the next-generation crewed ship. It would be followed by a government tender to select a developer for the new vehicle. Perminov further indicated that the new spacecraft would be expected to enter service within a time frame of the Orion spacecraft, but a more detailed development plan would be ready with the preliminary design of the vehicle in the middle of 2010.{{citation needed|date=February 2016}}

In the first quarter of 2009, Roskosmos released requirements which were used in the development of the Technical Assignment to the industry working on the PPTS project. The preliminary development of the project was expected to take place from March 2009 until June 2010 at an estimated cost of around 800,000,000 rubles ($24 million). The work apparently covered only an Earth-orbiting version of the spacecraft, while laying the foundation for later lunar-orbiting spacecraft, or even a Mars-bound crew vehicle.{{citation needed|date=February 2016}}

The agency's general requirements asked the industry to develop a vehicle of "foreign" standards in its technical capabilities and cost, while at the same time using existing technologies as much as possible.^[1]

In late 2018, It was announced that the first launch was scheduled sometime in 2022, or possibly 2024.^[14]

Preliminary design

Roskosmos has envisioned several versions of the spacecraft, configurable for low Earth orbit, lunar, and uncrewed missions.

Information on the proposed spacecraft released in 2009 indicated that the Earth-orbiting version of the ship would have a mass of 12 tonnes and carry a crew of six, along with no less than 500 kg of cargo. It would be able to fly 30-day-long autonomous missions, or a year-long mission, while docked to the ISS in the orbit, with the inclination 51.6 degrees, and to the future Russian space station launched from Vostochny into a 51.8-degree orbit.^[15]

The lunar version would weigh 16.5 tonnes, have four seats, and be capable of delivering and bringing back 100 kg of cargo. It would be able to fly 14-day missions to orbit around the Moon, or stay docked to the proposed Russian Lunar Orbital Station for up to 200 days.{{citation needed|date=April 2015}}

The uncrewed cargo version of the vehicle would be required to carry no less than 2,000 kg to Earth orbit, and return at least 500 kg back to the planet's surface.{{citation needed|date=April 2015}}

As of March 2009, Roskosmos made the requirement for crew capsule landing accuracy to 10 kilometers, while directing the developers to continue work on various modes of high-precision landing. Emergency escape and landing capabilities were mandated for every phase of the mission and were to provide for the survivability of the crew until the arrival of the rescue and recovery teams.^[1]

The vehicle, like Soyuz, would be wingless and be able to conduct fully automated and manual docking, and have sufficient propulsion capabilities during transport missions to dock and re-dock with orbital assets and then provide for the reentry and safe return of the vehicle to Earth. The reentry capsule design requirement specified that only environmentally safe propellants could be used during the atmospheric phase of the flight. Roskosmos reserved the option of making the crew module of the spacecraft reusable, reckoning that a cone-shaped capsule could possibly fly up to 10 missions during a 15-year lifespan.^[15]

It has been suggested that the vehicle may only use rocket thrusters to slow itself down during its landing, unlike the Soyuz reentry module which relies on a parachute to slow its descent, and uses solid propellant motors only to soften its touchdown.^[16]

Launch vehicle

Rus-M

A formal industry-wide tender for the development of the crewed launch vehicle to launch PPTS was initiated at the beginning of 2009. Although the agency delayed the announcement of the winner, many unofficial sources in Russia maintained that TsSKB Progress, based in Samara and KB Mashinostroenia, would lead the development of the new rocket.^[17] It was believed that the launch vehicle, named Rus-M, would feature a common core stage and a variable number of boosters, each equipped with powerful RD-180 engines, burning a mix of liquid oxygen and kerosene. The engine was originally developed by Moscow-based NPO Energomash for the US Atlas V rocket and its performance to date has been impressive. The second stage was expected to sport a pair of RD-0124 engines, currently in use on the Soyuz-2 rocket. Thus, both stages would have been equipped with existing engines, greatly reducing the cost and the risk to the overall project.^[8] In October 2011, it was announced that the Rus-M program was being canceled.^[18]

Angara

In July 2012, it was reported that the Angara A5 will be used as the new launch vehicle for Federation.^[19]

Irtysh / Soyuz-5

Russian space officials have dropped plans to launch the next-generation spacecraft on the modified version of the Angara-5 rocket and instead opted for the yet-to-be developed Soyuz-5 booster recently conceived within the Feniks and Sunkar projects.^[20]

In April 2017, the head of RKK Energia Vladimir Solntsev told the official TASS news agency that the Soyuz-5 rocket would be a preferable launch vehicle for the PTK/Federatsiya new-generation transport spacecraft to the Angara-5P rocket due to the lower cost.^[21] In 2018, Soyuz-5 was renamed as Irtysh, the first start is planned in 2022.

See also

• Angara (rocket)
• Colonization of the Moon
• Crew Space Transportation System
• Kliper
• Rus-M

References

External links

• A prospective look at PPTS
• [https://web.archive.org/web/20130913065736/http://fotografersha.livejournal.com/434010.html Interior of new Russian spacecraft]

• Sajofelsosebes
• Sajogalgoc
• Sajogoemoer
• Sajogomor
• Sajohidveg
• Sajoivanka
• Sajokapolna
• Sajokaza
• Sajokeresztur
• Sajolad
• Sajolaszlofalva
• Sajomercse
• Sajomezo
• Sajonemeti
• Sajonia (Asuncion)
• Sajooros
• Sajopalfala
• Sajopetri
• Sajopuspoki
• Sajosebes
• Sajosenye
• Sajoszoged
• Sajovamos
• Sajovelezd
• Sajowka