| 词条 | Gobiconodontidae |
| 释义 |
| fossil_range = {{fossilrange|189|94}} | image = GobiconodonDB15.jpg | image_caption = Life restoration of Gobiconodon | taxon = Gobiconodontidae | authority = Jenkins Jr. & Schaff, 1988 | subdivision_ranks = Genera | subdivision =
}} Gobiconodontidae is a family of extinct mammals that ranged from the mid-Jurassic to the early Late Cretaceous, though most common during the Early Cretaceous.[3] The Gobiconodontids form a diverse lineage of carnivorous non-therian mammals, and include some of the best preserved Mesozoic mammal specimens. BiologyLike many other non-therian mammals, gobiocontids retained classical mammalian synapomorphies like epipubic bones (and likely the associated reproductive constrictions), venomous spurs and sprawling limbs. Through Spinolestes we also know that they had fur similar to that of modern mammals, with compound hair follicles with primary and secondary hairs. Spinolestes also possesses a clear diaphragm like modern mammals, as well as spines, dermal scutes and an ossified Meckel's cartilage. Furthermore, it may also display signs of dermatophytosis, suggesting that gobiconodontids, like modern mammals, were vulnerable to this type of fungal infection.[4] Gobiconodontid dentition, being classically triconodont, has no analogue among living mammals, so comparisons are difficult. Like amphilestids but unlike triconodontids, occlusion happens by the mollars essentially interlocking, with lower cusp "a" basically fitting between two upper molars.[3] Nonetheless, its clear that most if not all gobiconodontids were primarily carnivorous, given the presence of long, sharp canines and incisors,{{#tag:ref|In Gobiconodon, the canine-like lower incisors outrightly replace the true canines, which are vestigial.[8]|group=note}} premolars with trenchant main cusps that were well suited to grasp and pierce prey, strong development of the madibular abductor musculature, bone crushing ability in at least some species and several other features.[5] Gobiconodontids are often among the largest mammals in Mesozoic faunal assemblages, with forms like Repenomamus and Gobiconodon exceeding 2 kilos. They were among the first mammals to be specialised to hunt vertebrate prey, and likely occupied the highest trophic levels among mammals in their faunal communities. Several forms like Gobiconodon and Repenomamus show evidence of scavenging, being among the few Mesozoic mammals to have significantly exploited that.[5] At least in carnivorous niches, gobiconodontids were probably replaced by deltatheroidean metatherians, which are the dominant carnivorous mammals in Late Cretaceous faunal assemblages.[6] Competition between both groups is unattested, but in Asia the Early Cretaceous gobiconodontid diversity is replaced entirely by a deltatheroidean one, while in North America Nanocuris appears after the absence of Gobiconodon and other larger eutriconodonts.[7] Given that all insectivorous and carnivorous mammals groups suffered heavy losses during the mid-Cretaceous, it seems likely these metatherians simply occupied niches left after the extinction of eutriconodonts.[8] At least Spinolestes had xenarthrous vertebrae and osseous scutes, convergent to those of modern xenarthrans and to a lesser extent the hero shrew. This genus may have displayed an ecological role similar to that of modern anteaters, pangolins, echidnas, aardvark, aardwolf and numbat, being the second known Mesozoic mammal after Fruitafossor to have done so.[9] PhylogenyCladogram after Marisol Montellano, James A. Hopson, James M. Clark (2008)[10] and Gao et al. (2010).[11]{{clade| style=font-size:90%;line-height:85%|label1= Gobiconodontidae |1={{clade |1=Hangjinia |2={{clade |1={{clade |1=? Meemannodon [12] |2=Repenomamus }} |2={{clade |1=Gobiconodon (incl. Guchinodon) |2=Huasteconodon }} }} }} }} Notes1. ^{{cite journal |doi=10.1007/BF03187223 |author1=J. Li |author2=Y. Wang |author3=Y. Wang |author4=C. Li |year=2001 |title=A new family of primitive mammal from the Mesozoic of western Liaoning, China |journal=Chinese Science Bulletin |volume=46 |issue=9 |pages=782–785 |id= |url=http://dml.cmnh.org/2001May/msg00969.html |accessdate= |issn=1001-6538 }} 2. ^Thomas Martin, Jesús Marugán-Lobón, Romain Vullo, Hugo Martín-Abad, Zhe-Xi Luo and Angela D. Buscalioni (2015). "A Cretaceous eutriconodont and integument evolution in early mammals". Nature 526 (7573): 380–384. doi:10.1038/nature14905. 3. ^1 Percy M. Butler; Denise Sigogneau-Russell (2016). "Diversity of triconodonts in the Middle Jurassic of Great Britain" (PDF). Palaeontologia Polonica 67: 35–65. doi:10.4202/pp.2016.67_035. 4. ^Thomas Martin, Jesús Marugán-Lobón, Romain Vullo, Hugo Martín-Abad, Zhe-Xi Luo and Angela D. Buscalioni (2015). "A Cretaceous eutriconodont and integument evolution in early mammals". Nature 526 (7573): 380–384. doi:10.1038/nature14905. 5. ^1 2 {{Cite book| author = Zofia Kielan-Jaworowska| author-link = Zofia Kielan-Jaworowska| author2 = Richard L. Cifelli| author3 = Zhe-Xi Luo | editor = | others = | title = Mammals from the Age of Dinosaurs: origins, evolution, and structure | edition = | publisher = Columbia University Press | location = New York | year = 2004 | pages =216–248 | chapter = Chapter 7: Eutriconodontans | isbn = 978-0-231-11918-4 | oclc = | doi = | accessdate = }} 6. ^{{Cite book| author = Zofia Kielan-Jaworowska| author-link = Zofia Kielan-Jaworowska| author2 = Richard L. Cifelli| author3 = Zhe-Xi Luo | editor = | others = | title = Mammals from the Age of Dinosaurs: origins, evolution, and structure | edition = | publisher = Columbia University Press | location = New York | year = 2004 | pages =425–462 | chapter = Chapter 12: Metaherians | isbn = 978-0-231-11918-4 | oclc = | doi = | accessdate = }} 7. ^G. W. Rougier, B. M. Davis, and M. J. Novacek. 2015. A deltatheroidan mammal from the Upper Cretaceous Baynshiree Formation, eastern Mongolia. Cretaceous Research 52:167-177 8. ^David M. Grossnickle, P. David Polly, Mammal disparity decreases during the Cretaceous angiosperm radiation, Published 2 October 2013.DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2013.2110 9. ^Thomas Martin, Jesús Marugán-Lobón, Romain Vullo, Hugo Martín-Abad, Zhe-Xi Luo & Angela D. Buscalioni, A Cretaceous eutriconodont and integument evolution in early mammals, Nature 526, 380–384 (15 October 2015) doi:10.1038/nature14905Received 05 March 2015 Accepted 13 July 2015 Published online 14 October 2015 10. ^1 {{Cite journal|author=Marisol Montellano|author2=James A. Hopson|author3=James M. Clark|year=2008|title=Late Early Jurassic Mammaliaforms from Huizachal Canyon, Tamaulipas, México|journal=Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology|volume=28|issue=4|pages=1130–1143 |doi=10.1671/0272-4634-28.4.1130}} 11. ^{{Cite journal|author=Chun-Ling Gao|author2=Gregory P. Wilson|author3=Zhe-Xi Luo|author4=A. Murat Maga|author5=Qingjin Meng|author6=Xuri Wang|last-author-amp=yes|year=2010|title=A new mammal skull from the Lower Cretaceous of China with implications for the evolution of obtuse-angled molars and 'amphilestid' eutriconodonts|journal=Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences|volume=277|issue=1679|pages=237–246 |doi=10.1098/rspb.2009.1014|pmid=19726475|pmc=2842676|url=http://rspb.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/277/1679/237.abstract}} 12. ^1 {{Cite journal |author1=, J. |author2=Hu, Y.-M. |author3=Wang, Y.-Q. |author4=Li, C.-K. |year= 2005 |title= A new triconodont (Mammalia) from the Early Cretaceous Yixian Formation of Liaoning, China |journal= Vertebrata PalAsiatica |volume= 43 |issue= 1 |pages= 1–10}} References{{Reflist}}
15 : Triconodonts|Middle Jurassic first appearances|Callovian taxonomic families|Oxfordian taxonomic families|Kimmeridgian taxonomic families|Tithonian taxonomic families|Berriasian taxonomic families|Valanginian taxonomic families|Hauterivian taxonomic families|Barremian taxonomic families|Aptian taxonomic families|Albian taxonomic families|Cenomanian taxonomic families|Late Cretaceous extinctions|Mammal families |
| 随便看 |
|
开放百科全书收录14589846条英语、德语、日语等多语种百科知识，基本涵盖了大多数领域的百科知识，是一部内容自由、开放的电子版国际百科全书。