| 词条 | Gold v. Eddy |
| 释义 |
| name = 1 Mass. 1 (1804) | court = Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court | image = | imagesize = 100px | imagealt = | caption = | full name = THOMAS GOLD, Plaintiff in Review vs. JOSHUA EDDY, Administrator | ArgueDate = September Term | ArgueDateA = | ArgueDateB = | ArgueDateC = | ArgueYear = 1804 | ReargueDate = | ReargueDateA = | ReargueDateB = | ReargueYear = | ReargueDate2 = | ReargueDateA2 = | ReargueDateB2 = | ReargueYear2 = | SubmitDate = | SubmitYear = | date_decided = September Term 1804 | citations = 1 Mass. 1 (1804) | Neutral Citation = | Other Citations = | transcripts = | Claim = | Cases_cited = | Legislation_cited = | prior_actions = | appealed from = | appealed to = | subsequent_actions = none | Procedural = | related actions = | OralArgument = | OralArguments = | OralReargument = | OpinionAnnouncement = | holding = In an action by the endorser against the promisor of a promissory note negotiated subsequent to the day of payment, the defendant may go into such evidence as he would have been entitled to had the action been brought by the original promisee. The deposition of a person used in a former trial is competent evidence in a review, though the deponent is a party to the suit, having become administrator of one of the original parties. | judges = | ChiefJudge = Francis Dana | AssociateJudges = Simeon Strong, Theodore Sedgwick, Samuel Sewall, George Thacher | decision by = | Majority = | JoinMajority = | Majority2 = | JoinMajority2 = | Majority3 = | JoinMajority3 = | Plurality = | JoinPlurality = | Plurality2 = | JoinPlurality2 = | Plurality3 = | JoinPlurality3 = | Plurality4 = | JoinPlurality4 = | Seriatim = | Seriatim2 = | Seriatim3 = | Seriatim4 = | Seriatim5 = | Concurrence = | JoinConcurrence = | Concurrence2 = | JoinConcurrence2 = | Concurrence3 = | JoinConcurrence3 = | Concurrence4 = | JoinConcurrence4 = | Concurrence5 = | JoinConcurrence5 = | Concurrence6 = | JoinConcurrence6 = | Concurrence7 = | JoinConcurrence7 = | Concurrence8 = | JoinConcurrence8 = | Concurrence/Dissent = | JoinConcurrence/Dissent = | Concurrence/Dissent2 = | JoinConcurrence/Dissent2 = | Concurrence/Dissent3 = | JoinConcurrence/Dissent3 = | Concurrence/Dissent4 = | JoinConcurrence/Dissent4 = | Concurrence/Dissent5 = | JoinConcurrence/Dissent5 = | Concurrence/Dissent6 = | JoinConcurrence/Dissent6 = | Concurrence/Dissent7 = | JoinConcurrence/Dissent7 = | Concurrence/Dissent8 = | JoinConcurrence/Dissent8 = | dissenting = | JoinDissent = | ConcurrenceDissent = | Dissent2 = | JoinDissent2 = | ConcurrenceDissent2 = | Dissent3 = | JoinDissent3 = | ConcurrenceDissent3 = | Dissent4 = | JoinDissent4 = | ConcurrenceDissent4 = | Dissent5 = | JoinDissent5 = | ConcurrenceDissent5 = | NotParticipating = | LawsApplied = Acts of 1788, ch. 47; Acts of 1786, ch. 66 | Superseded = | Overruled = | Overturned previous case = | Abrogated = | keywords = | italic title = }} Gold v. Eddy, 1 Mass. 1 (1804), was the first recorded case in the official reports of the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court. RulingAccording to the reporter's summation:
References1. ^Gold v. Eddy, 1 Mass. 1 (1804) (accessed June 21, 2009) External links
5 : Massachusetts state case law|Negotiable instrument law|United States state evidence case law|1804 in United States case law|1804 in Massachusetts |
| 随便看 |
|
开放百科全书收录14589846条英语、德语、日语等多语种百科知识，基本涵盖了大多数领域的百科知识，是一部内容自由、开放的电子版国际百科全书。