请输入您要查询的百科知识:

 

词条 Hardin v. Boyd
释义

  1. References

  2. External links

{{Infobox SCOTUS case
|Litigants=Hardin v. Boyd
|SubmitDate=December 22
|SubmitYear=1884
|DecideDate=March 15
|DecideYear=1885
|FullName=Hardin, Administratrix, & Others v. Boyd, Administrator, & Others
|USVol=113
|USPage=756
|ParallelCitations=5 S. Ct. 771; 28 L. Ed. 1141
|Prior=
|Subsequent=
|Holding=
|SCOTUS=1882-1887
|Majority=Harlan
|JoinMajority=unanimous
|LawsApplied=
}}Hardin v. Boyd, 113 U.S. 756 (1885), was a motion to dismiss a lawsuit on county bonds issued in aid of a railroad. Judgment below for the plaintiff. The defendant brought a writ bf error to reverse it. Subsequently, to the judgment, the county settled with the plaintiff and other bondholders, by giving them new bonds bearing a less rate of interest, and the old bonds, which were the cause of action in this suit, were surrendered and destroyed. Fraud and collusion was alleged in the handling of a will which transferred ownership of property in Crittenden County, Arkansas. These facts were brought before this Court by affidavits and transcripts from the county records, accompanied by a motion to dismiss the writ of error.[1]

The court saw no reason to impeach the transaction by which the new bonds were substituted for the old, and for the judgment it was asked to reverse, so the writ of error was dismissed.

References

1. ^{{ussc|name=Hardin v. Boyd|volume=113|page=756|pin=|year=1885}}.

External links

  • {{caselaw source

| case = Hardin v. Boyd, {{Ussc|113|756|1885|el=no}}
| justia =https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/113/756/
| loc =http://cdn.loc.gov/service/ll/usrep/usrep113/usrep113756/usrep113756.pdf{{SCOTUS-case-stub}}

4 : United States Supreme Court cases|United States Supreme Court cases of the Waite Court|1885 in United States case law|Crittenden County, Arkansas

随便看

 

开放百科全书收录14589846条英语、德语、日语等多语种百科知识,基本涵盖了大多数领域的百科知识,是一部内容自由、开放的电子版国际百科全书。

 

Copyright © 2023 OENC.NET All Rights Reserved
京ICP备2021023879号 更新时间:2024/9/27 12:15:08