请输入您要查询的百科知识:

 

词条 Holmes v. City of Atlanta
释义

  1. See also

  2. References

{{Infobox SCOTUS case
|Litigants=Holmes v. Atlanta
|DecideDate=November 7
|DecideYear=1955
|FullName=Holmes, et al. v. City of Atlanta, et al.
|USVol=350
|USPage=879
|ParallelCitations=76 S. Ct. 141; 100 L. Ed. 776; 1955 U.S. LEXIS 176
|Prior={{cite court |litigants=Holmes et al. v. City of Atlanta |vol=223 |reporter=F.2d |opinion=93 |pinpoint= |court=5th Cir. |date=1955 |url= |quote=}}
|Subsequent=
|Holding=Held that the practice of the City of Atlanta of operating a golf course that was open to different races on different days was improper.
|PerCuriam=yes
|LawsApplied=
}}Holmes v. Atlanta, 350 U.S. 879 (1955), was a per curiam order by the Supreme Court of the United States that summarily reversed an order by the Georgia Court of Appeals that permitted the city of Atlanta to allocate a municipal golf course to different races on different days. The case was remanded to the district court with directions to enter a decree in conformity with Mayor and City Council of Baltimore City v. Dawson.[1]

See also

  • List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 350

References

1. ^Varat, J.D. et al. Constitutional Law Cases and Materials, Concise Thirteenth Edition. Foundation Press, New York, NY: 2009, p. 526
{{SCOTUS-stub}}{{civil-rights-movement-stub}}

5 : United States Supreme Court cases|1955 in United States case law|History of Atlanta|United States Supreme Court cases of the Warren Court|Civil rights movement case law

随便看

 

开放百科全书收录14589846条英语、德语、日语等多语种百科知识,基本涵盖了大多数领域的百科知识,是一部内容自由、开放的电子版国际百科全书。

 

Copyright © 2023 OENC.NET All Rights Reserved
京ICP备2021023879号 更新时间:2024/11/13 10:42:17