词条 | Jones calculus | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
释义 |
In optics, polarized light can be described using the Jones calculus, discovered by R. C. Jones in 1941. Polarized light is represented by a Jones vector, and linear optical elements are represented by Jones matrices. When light crosses an optical element the resulting polarization of the emerging light is found by taking the product of the Jones matrix of the optical element and the Jones vector of the incident light. Note that Jones calculus is only applicable to light that is already fully polarized. Light which is randomly polarized, partially polarized, or incoherent must be treated using Mueller calculus. The Jones vectorThe Jones vector describes the polarization of light in free space or another homogeneous isotropic non-attenuating medium, where the light can be properly described as transverse waves. Suppose that a monochromatic plane wave of light is travelling in the positive z-direction, with angular frequency ω and wavevector k = (0,0,k), where the wavenumber k = ω/c. Then the electric and magnetic fields E and H are orthogonal to k at each point; they both lie in the plane "transverse" to the direction of motion. Furthermore, H is determined from E by 90-degree rotation and a fixed multiplier depending on the wave impedance of the medium. So the polarization of the light can be determined by studying E. The complex amplitude of E is written Note that the physical E field is the real part of this vector; the complex multiplier serves up the phase information. Here is the imaginary unit with . The Jones vector is then Thus, the Jones vector represents the amplitude and phase of the electric field in the x and y directions. The sum of the squares of the absolute values of the two components of Jones vectors is proportional to the intensity of light. It is common to normalize it to 1 at the starting point of calculation for simplification. It is also common to constrain the first component of the Jones vectors to be a real number. This discards the overall phase information that would be needed for calculation of interference with other beams. Note that all Jones vectors and matrices on this article employ the convention that the phase of the light wave is given by , a convention used by Hecht. Under this convention, increase in (or ) indicates retardation (delay) in phase, while decrease indicates advance in phase. For example, a Jones vectors component of () indicates retardation by (or 90 degree) compared to 1 (). Circular polarisation described under Jones' convention is called : "From the point of view of the receiver". Collett uses the opposite definition for the phase (). Circular polarisation described under Collett's convention is called : "From the point of view of the source". The reader should be wary of the choice of convention when consulting references on the Jones calculus. The following table gives the 6 common examples of normalized Jones vectors.
A general vector that points to any place on the surface is written as a ket . When employing the Poincaré sphere (also known as the Bloch sphere), the basis kets ( and ) must be assigned to opposing (antipodal) pairs of the kets listed above. For example, one might assign = and = . These assignments are arbitrary. Opposing pairs are
The polarization of any point not equal to or and not on the circle that passes through is known as elliptical polarization. Jones matricesThe Jones matrices are operators that act on the Jones vectors defined above. These matrices are implemented by various optical elements such as lenses, beam splitters, mirrors, etc. Each matrix represents projection onto a one-dimensional complex subspace of the Jones vectors. The following table gives examples of Jones matrices for polarizers:
Phase retardersPhase retarders introduce a phase shift between the vertical and horizontal component of the field and thus change the polarization of the beam. Phase retarders are usually made out of birefringent uniaxial crystals such as calcite, MgF2 or quartz. Uniaxial crystals have one crystal axis that is different from the other two crystal axes (i.e., ni ≠ nj = nk). This unique axis is called the extraordinary axis and is also referred to as the optic axis. An optic axis can be the fast or the slow axis for the crystal depending on the crystal at hand. Light travels with a higher phase velocity along an axis that has the smallest refractive index and this axis is called the fast axis. Similarly, an axis which has the largest refractive index is called a slow axis since the phase velocity of light is the lowest along this axis. "Negative" uniaxial crystals (e.g., calcite CaCO3, sapphire Al2O3) have ne < no so for these crystals, the extraordinary axis (optic axis) is the fast axis, whereas for "positive" uniaxial crystals (e.g., quartz SiO2, magnesium fluoride MgF2, rutile TiO2), ne > n o and thus the extraordinary axis (optic axis) is the slow axis. Any phase retarder with fast axis equal to the x- or y-axis has zero off-diagonal terms and thus can be conveniently expressed as where and are the phase offsets of the electric fields in and directions respectively. In the phase convention , define the relative phase between the two waves as . Then a positive (i.e. > ) means that doesn't attain the same value as until a later time, i.e. leads . Similarly, if , then leads . For example, if the fast axis of a quarter wave plate is horizontal, then the phase velocity along the horizontal direction is ahead of the vertical direction i.e., leads . Thus, which for a quarter wave plate yields . In the opposite convention , define the relative phase as . Then means that doesn't attain the same value as until a later time, i.e. leads .
The special expressions for the phase retarders can be obtained by taking suitable parameter values in the general expression for a birefringent material. In the general expression:
Note that for linear retarders, = 0 and for circular retarders, = ± /2, = /4. In general for elliptical retarders, takes on values between - /2 and /2. Axially rotated elementsAssume an optical element has its optic axis{{clarify|reason=Does this mean (1) the "optic axis" of a (presumably uniaxial) birefringent material, or (2) the "optic axis" (also known as optical axis) of a rotationally symmetric lens system?|date=May 2015}} perpendicular to the surface vector for the plane of incidence{{clarify|reason=What is the "surface vector for the plane of incidence"? Is it the normal vector? This would then be tangent to the surface of the refracting material, right?|date=May 2015}} and is rotated about this surface vector by angle θ/2 (i.e., the principal plane,{{clarify|reason="Principal plane" is not defined in this article nor in the article on polarized light. Is it defined for lens systems?|date=May 2015}} through which the optic axis passes,{{clarify|reason=What is the geometric relation between a vector and a plane expressed by "passes through"?|date=May 2015}} makes angle θ/2 with respect to the plane of polarization of the electric field{{clarify|reason=What is "the plane of polarization" of the electric field? I thought polarization was expressed by a vector. Does it mean the plane orthogonal to the direction of propagation, in which E can take its values?|date=May 2015}} of the incident TE wave). Recall that a half-wave plate rotates polarization as twice the angle between incident polarization and optic axis (principal plane). Therefore, the Jones matrix for the rotated polarization state, M(θ), is where This agrees with the expression for a half-wave plate in the table above. These rotations are identical to beam unitary splitter transformation in optical physics given by where the primed and unprimed coefficients represent beams incident from opposite sides of the beam splitter. The reflected and transmitted components acquire a phase θr and θt, respectively. The requirements for a valid representation of the element are [5] and Both of these representations are unitary matrices fitting these requirements; and as such, are both valid. Arbitrarily rotated elements{{expand section|date=July 2014}}This would involve a three-dimensional rotation matrix. See Russell A. Chipman[6] and Garam Yun for work done on this.[7][8][9] See also
Notes1. ^1 2 3 4 5 {{cite book|author=Fowles, G.|title=Introduction to Modern Optics|edition=2nd|publisher=Dover|date=1989|page=35}} 2. ^1 2 {{cite book|author=Hecht, E.|title=Optics|edition=4th|date=2001|page=378|isbn=978-0805385663}} 3. ^{{cite book|author=Gerald, A.|author2=Burch, J.M.|title=Introduction to Matrix Methods in Optics|edition=1st|publisher=John Wiley & Sons|date=1975|page=212|isbn=978-0471296850}} 4. ^Obtainment of the polarizing and retardation parameters of a non-depolarizing optical system from the polar decomposition of its Mueller matrix, Optik, Jose Jorge Gill and Eusebio Bernabeu,76, 67-71 (1987). 5. ^Am. J. Phys. 57 (1), 66 (1989). 6. ^Russell A. Chipman (1995) "Mechanics of polarization ray tracing", Opt. Eng. 34(6), 1636-1645 [https://dx.doi.org/10.1117/12.202061] 7. ^Three-dimensional polarization ray-tracing calculus I: definition and diattenuation, Applied Optics, Garam Yun, Karlton Crabtree, and Russell A. Chipman,50, 2855-2865 (2011). 8. ^Three-dimensional polarization ray-tracing calculus II: retardance, Applied Optics, Garam Yun, Stephen C. McClain, and Russell A. Chipman,50, 2866-2874 (2011). 9. ^Garam Yun, Polarization Ray Tracing, PhD thesis References{{reflist}}Further reading{{more footnotes|date=July 2014}}
|first1=R. Clark |last1=Jones |title=A new calculus for the treatment of optical systems, I. Description and Discussion of the Calculus |journal=Journal of the Optical Society of America |volume=31 |issue=7 |pages=488–493 |doi=10.1364/JOSA.31.000488 |date=1941}}
|first1=Henry |last1=Hurwitz |first2=R. Clark |last2=Jones |title=A new calculus for the treatment of optical systems, II. Proof of three general equivalence theorems |journal=Journal of the Optical Society of America |volume=31 |issue=7 |pages=493–499 |doi=10.1364/JOSA.31.000493 |date=1941}}
|first1=R. Clark |last1=Jones |title=A new calculus for the treatment of optical systems, III The Sohncke Theory of optical activity |journal=Journal of the Optical Society of America |volume=31 |issue=7 |pages=500–503 |doi=10.1364/JOSA.31.000500 |date=1941}}
|first1=R. Clark |last1=Jones |title=A new calculus for the treatment of optical systems, IV |journal=Journal of the Optical Society of America |volume=32 |issue=8 |pages=486–493 |doi=10.1364/JOSA.32.000486 |date=1942}}
|first1=A. L. |last1=Fymat |title=Jones's Matrix Representation of Optical Instruments. I: Beam Splitters |journal=Applied Optics |volume=10 |issue=11 |pages=2499–2505 |doi=10.1364/AO.10.002499 |date=1971 |pmid=20111363|bibcode = 1971ApOpt..10.2499F }}
|first1=A. L. |last1=Fymat |title=Jones's Matrix Representation of Optical Instruments. 2: Fourier Interferometers (Spectrometers and Spectropolarimeters) |journal=Applied Optics |volume=10 |issue=12 |pages=2711–2716 |doi=10.1364/AO.10.002711 |pmid=20111418 |date=1971|bibcode = 1971ApOpt..10.2711F }}
|first1=A. L. |last1=Fymat |title=Polarization Effects in Fourier Spectroscopy. I: Coherency Matrix Representation |journal=Applied Optics |volume=11 |issue=1 |pages=160–173 |doi=10.1364/AO.11.000160 |date=1972 |pmid=20111472|bibcode = 1972ApOpt..11..160F }}
|first1=Jose Jorge |last1=Gill |first2=Eusebio |last2=Bernabeu |title=Obtainment of the polarizing and retardation parameters of a non-depolarizing optical system from the polar decomposition of its Mueller matrix |journal=Optik |volume=76 |pages=67–71 |date=1987}}
|first1=Christian |last1=Brosseau |first2=Clark R. |last2=Givens |first3=Alexander B. |last3=Kostinski |journal=Journal of the Optical Society of America A |title=Generalized trace condition on the Mueller-Jones polarization matrix |volume=10 |issue=10 |pages=2248–2251 |doi=10.1364/JOSAA.10.002248 |date=1993|bibcode = 1993JOSAA..10.2248B }}
|first1=James P. |last1=McGuire |first2=Russel A. |last2=Chipman |journal=Applied Optics |title=Polarization aberrations. 1. Rotationally symmetric optical systems |volume=33 |issue=22 |pages=5080–5100 |doi=10.1364/AO.33.005080 |date=1994 |pmid=20935891|bibcode=1994ApOpt..33.5080M }}
|first1=Natale C. |last1=Pistoni |journal=Applied Optics |title=Simplified approach to the Jones calculus in retracing optical circuits |volume=34 |issue=34 |pages=7870–7876 |doi=10.1364/AO.34.007870 |date=1995 |pmid=21068881|bibcode = 1995ApOpt..34.7870P }}
|first1=Ignacio |last1=Moreno |first2=Maria J. |last2=Yzuel |first3=Juan |last3=Campos |first4=Asticio |last4=Vargas |journal=Journal of Modern Optics |title=Jones matrix treatment for polarization Fourier optics |volume=51 |issue=14 |pages=2031–2038 |doi=10.1080/09500340408232511 |date=2004|bibcode = 2000JMOp...51.2031M }}
|first1=Ivan |last1=Moreno |journal=Applied Optics |title=Jones matrix for image-rotation prisms |volume=43 |issue=17 |pages=3373–3381 |doi=10.1364/AO.43.003373 |date=2004 |pmid=15219016|bibcode = 2004ApOpt..43.3373M }} External links
3 : Optics|Polarization (waves)|Matrices |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
随便看 |
|
开放百科全书收录14589846条英语、德语、日语等多语种百科知识,基本涵盖了大多数领域的百科知识,是一部内容自由、开放的电子版国际百科全书。