| 词条 | Igbo v Johnson, Matthey Chemicals Ltd |
| 释义 |
| name = Igbo v Johnson, Matthey Chemicals Ltd | court = Court of Appeal of England and Wales | image = | caption = | date decided = | full name = | citations = [1986] ICR 505 | judges = | prior actions = | subsequent actions = | opinions = | transcripts = | keywords = Unfair dismissal }} Igbo v Johnson, Matthey Chemicals Ltd [1986] ICR 505 is a UK labour law case, concerning unfair dismissal, now governed by the Employment Rights Act 1996. FactsMs Igbo was granted three extra days holiday for signing an agreement that if she failed to return on a set date ‘your contract of employment will automatically terminate’. She was ill, and sent in a medical note, but her job was still terminated. JudgmentParker LJ held that agreed terminations are very often still dismissals, as under the Employment Rights Act 1996 section 95(1)(b) where fixed term contracts expire, or where there is notice under section 95(1)(a). Here the provision for automatic termination had the effect, if valid, of limiting the operation of the sections. It was therefore void by virtue of section 203. See also{{Clist unfair dismissal}}
NotesReferencesExternal links 4 : United Kingdom labour case law|Court of Appeal of England and Wales cases|1986 in case law|1986 in British law |
| 随便看 |
|
开放百科全书收录14589846条英语、德语、日语等多语种百科知识，基本涵盖了大多数领域的百科知识，是一部内容自由、开放的电子版国际百科全书。