| 词条 | Jaitapur Nuclear Power Project | |||||||||||||||||||||
| 释义 |
| name = Jaitapur Nuclear Power Project | name_official = | image = | image_size = | image_caption = | image_alt = | location_map = India Maharashtra | location_map_size = | location_map_caption = | coordinates = {{coord|16|35|43|N|73|20|28|E|type:landmark_region:IN|display=inline,title}} | coordinates_ref = | country = India | location = | status = Planned. Construction to start in late 2018.[1] | construction_began = | commissioned = | decommissioned = | cost = {{INRConvert|1.12|t}}[1] | owner = Nuclear Power Corporation of India | operator = | ps_units_uc = | ps_units_planned= 6 x 1650 MW | ps_units_decommissioned = | np_reactor_type = EPR | np_reactor_supplier = Framatome | ps_units_manu_model = | ps_electrical_capacity = 9900 | ps_electrical_cap_fac = | website = | extra = }} Jaitapur Nuclear Power Project is a proposed nuclear power plant in India. If built, it would be the largest nuclear power generating station in the world by net generation capacity, at 9,900 MW.[2][3] The power project is proposed by Nuclear Power Corporation of India (NPCIL) and would be built at Madban village of Ratnagiri district in Maharashtra.[4] On 6 December 2010 agreement was signed for the construction of a first set of two third-generation European Pressurized Reactors and the supply of nuclear fuel for 25 years in the presence of French president Nicolas Sarkozy and Indian prime minister Manmohan Singh.[5] French state-controlled nuclear engineering firm Areva S.A. and Indian state-owned nuclear operator Nuclear Power Corporation of India signed the agreement, valued about $9.3 billion. This is a general framework agreement that was signed along with the agreement on 'Protection of Confidentiality of Technical Data and Information Relating to Nuclear Power Corporation in the Peaceful Uses of Nuclear Energy'.[6][7][8][10][9] The plant construction is expected to start in late 2018.[10] GeographyThe proposed Jaitapur Nuclear Power Project is located at the west coast. It has an average elevation of {{convert|90|ft|m}}. This project will spread over {{convert|968|ha|sqmi km2}} of land. Jaitapur is on the Arabian Sea coast in Ratnagiri district in the southwestern part of Maharashtra, India. The district is a part of Konkan in Western Ghats.[11] The Sahyadri Mountain range forms the eastern boundary of the Konkan, and the Arabian Sea marks the western boundary. Jaitapur was one of the important ports in ancient and early medieval times.[12] Project descriptionIt is proposed to construct 6 European Pressurized Reactors designed and developed by Framatome of France, each of 1650 MW, thus totalling 9900 MW. These are the third generation pressurised water reactors (PWR). Estimated cost of this project was around {{INRConvert|1000|b}}.[13][13][14] A memorandum of understanding was signed between the Indian and French governments and an agreement between Areva and the Nuclear Power Corporation of India during French president Nicolas Sarkozy's visit to India during December 2010.[15] A new agreement between Électricité de France and the Nuclear Power Corporation of India was signed in March 2018.[16] The cost of building the plant is about {{INRConvert|20|c}} per MW electric power compared with {{INRConvert|5|c}} per MW electric power for a coal power station.[17] Nuclear power plants generally feature significantly higher investment cost while day-to-day operating cost is lower compared to combustion plants. Refraining from going into detail, Areva CEO Anne Lauvergeon asserted in November 2010 that the cost of electricity from this power plant will be below {{INRConvert|4}} per Kilowatt hour.[18] A consortium of French financial institutions will finance this project as a loan. Both French and Indian government will give sovereign guarantee for this loan. The extent of guarantee will depend on what portion of the cost the French credit will cover. The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) will govern the interest rates and other terms of agreement. Interest rates and other terms are under discussion.[19] It is one of several nuclear power projects being undertaken in a thin strip of coast of Raigad, Ratnagiri and Sindhudurg districts. The total power generating capacity proposed on a narrow strip of coastal land {{convert|50|km|mi}} to {{convert|90|km|mi}} km wide and {{convert|200|km|mi}} long is around 33,000 MW.[20][21] The prospect of nuclear power generation in India received a boost after the Indo US Civilian Nuclear Agreement became operational in October 2008. India has also signed similar agreements with France and Russia.[22][23][24] ControversyNuclear liabilityAccording to the Areva lack of clarity on The Civil Liability for Nuclear Damage Bill 2010 passed in Indian Parliament in August 2010 is a hurdle in finalising deal.[25] This Civil Liability for Nuclear Damage Bill 2010 has a clause that deals with the legal binding of the culpable groups in case of a nuclear accident. It allows only the operator (NPCIL) to sue the manufacturers and suppliers. Victims will not be able to sue anyone. In reality, no one will be considered legally liable because the recourse taken by the operator will yield only {{INRConvert|15|b}}. United States of America has a law on liability-related issues for all non-military nuclear facilities constructed in the United States before 2026 named Price–Anderson Nuclear Industries Indemnity Act. This American Act establishes a no fault insurance-type system in which the first $10 billion is industry-funded as described in the Act (any claims above the $10 billion would be covered by the federal government).[26][27] DebateDebate on nuclear power project at Jaitapur is ongoing on various levels. Environmental effects of nuclear power and geological issues have been raised by anti nuclear activists of India against this power project. Even though The Government of Maharashtra state completed land acquisition in January 2010, only 33 out of the 2,335 villagers have accepted compensation cheques as of November 2010.[28]As of Feb 12, 2014, land compensation has been accepted by all 2336 title holders.[29] A public hearing on the environmental impact assessment (EIA) Report, prepared by NEERI was conducted by Maharashtra Pollution Control Board, on behalf of Ministry of Environment and Forests on 16 April 2010, at the plant site. The public hearing became controversial as the EIA report was not delivered for study to 3 of the 4 Gram panchayat (local village bodies) a month in advance.[30] A Public Interest Litigation (PIL) has also been filed against the government's civil nuclear program at the apex Supreme Court. The PIL specifically asks for the "staying of all proposed nuclear power plants till satisfactory safety measures and cost-benefit analyses are completed by independent agencies".[31][32] OpponentsSince Jaitapur is a seismically sensitive area, the danger of an earthquake has been foremost on the minds of people. According to the Earthquake hazard zoning of India, Jaitapur comes under Zone III. This zone is called the moderate Risk Zone and covers areas liable to MSK VIII.[33][34] The presence of two major creeks on the proposed site has been ignored while clearing the site.[35] It is not clear where the nuclear waste from the site will be dumped. The plant is estimated to generate 300 tonnes of used nuclear fuel each year, the volume of a 2.5 m sided cube. Owing to the Generation III reactors having a higher fuel efficiency than previous Gen II designs,[36] the smaller amount of used nuclear fuel from an EPR will contain "four times" as much fission products by volume, Iodine, Caesium, etc., compared to presently operating Gen II pressurised water reactors.[13] Since the plant will use the sea water for cooling and then release warmed water in the Arabian Sea, fishermen in villages around fear the destruction of fisheries in the nearby sea. Media articles also highlight the possible human and fisheries cost of this project.[37] Social impact assessment review of the project are being conducted by the Jamsetji Tata centre for disaster management of the Tata Institute of Social Sciences (TISS). According to this report, the Government of India is not fully transparent with its citizens, and is hiding the huge negative impacts on the social and environmental development of the Konkan region in general. The government is allegedly manipulating the area seismic risk level, lowering it from high severity earthquake zone to moderate seismic severity zone.[38][39] ProponentsProponents are advocating the Jaitapur Project as safe, environmentally benign and an economically viable source of electrical energy to meet the increasing electricity needs of India.[40] They argue that nuclear power is a sustainable energy source that reduces carbon emissions and increases energy security by decreasing India's dependence on foreign oil. The promoter of Jaitapur project is Nuclear Power Corporation of India. It is a public Sector Enterprise under the administrative control of the Department of Atomic Energy (India). {{Quote box |quote = I know the environmentalists will not be very happy with my decision, but it is foolish romance to think that India can attain high growth rate and sustain the energy needs of a 1.2 billion population with the help of solar, wind, biogas and such other forms of energy. It is paradoxical that environmentalists are against nuclear energy, |source = Jairam Ramesh, Environment Minister. The Hindu November 28, 2010 |quoted = 1}}As of 2010, India is sixth in rank, after USA, France, Japan, the Russian Federation and the Republic of Korea, to have twenty or more nuclear power reactors in operation.[41] According to former chairman of Atomic Energy Commission Anil Kakodkar, the Jaitapur site is the best as it fulfilled the technical and scientific requirements for a nuclear power plant.[42][43] It is proposed that the spent fuel generated at this nuclear power plant be recycled. Only five per cent of it would be encapsulated and stored for 30 to 40 years, till scientists develop some technology to treat it.[44] The environmental impact assessment and other associated studies of the Jaitapur project have been carried out in detail over the last few years by National Environmental Engineering Research Institute (NEERI), Nagpur in collaboration with several other reputed organisations specializing in specific environment studies.[45] These studies include Bhabha Atomic Research Centre Pre-operational Baseline Radiological Survey of the Area around JNPP Site, Central Water and Power Research Station Pune, Thermal Dispersion Studies for Condenser Cooling Water (CCW) Discharges, Konkan Krishi Vidyapith, College of Forestry, Dapoli, Baseline Biodiversity Study of the area around JNPP Site.{{Citation needed|date=October 2011}} Nuclear Power Corporation of India has declared that 1.5 to 2 per cent of the net profit from Jaitapur plant would be spent in that area only. Development projects will be decided by local people and NPC will provide the funds to ensure development of these areas.[46]ProtestsMany protests have been carried out by the local population against the proposed nuclear power plant. On 29 December 2009, 12 January 2010, and 22 January 2010, when the government authorities visited Madban for distribution of cheques in lieu of compulsory land acquisition, the villagers refused to accept the cheques. Government officials were shown black flags, and were denied any co-operation in carrying out their activities. 72 people were arrested on 22 January 2010 when people protested against the compulsory land acquisition.[47][48][49] Debate about the nuclear power project at Jaitapur is ongoing on various levels. Environmental effects of nuclear power and geological issues have been raised by anti nuclear activists. On 4 December 2010, protests became violent when over 1500 people were detained from among thousands of protesters, who included environmentalists and local villagers. Members and leaders of the Konkan Bachao Samiti (KBS) and the Janahit Seva Samiti (organisations that are spearheading opposition to the project) were also detained.[50] In Mumbai, members of various trade unions and social organisations came together to protest against the project. The protesters raised doubts about the neutrality of the Environment Impact Assessment Report prepared by the National Environmental Engineering Research Institute (NEERI), which forms the basis of environmental clearance for the project. Parallel studies carried out by the Bombay Natural History Society show that the Jaitapur nuclear plant project will cause substantial environmental damage.[51] On 18 April 2011, one man was shot and killed by police and eight were injured after protests turned violent.[52][53] Events
See also{{Portal|India|Maharashtra|Nuclear technology|Energy}}
References
1. ^Forbes India Magazine - A Perspective on the Nuclear Uproar in India. Business.in.com. Retrieved on 2013-12-06. 2. ^ {{cite news|url=http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/article532044.ece |title=Jaitapur nuclear project: villagers turn down compensation |date=25 July 2010 |work=The Hindu |accessdate=29 November 2010 |location=Mumbai- India}} 3. ^ {{cite web|url=http://www.world-nuclear.org/info/inf53.html|title=Nuclear Power in India|date=November 2010 |publisher=World Nuclear Association|accessdate=29 November 2010}} 4. ^{{cite news |url=http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/article919959.ece?homepage=true |title=It's paradoxical that environmentalists are against nuclear energy: Jairam Ramesh |last=Deshpande |first=VIinaya |date=28 November 2010 |work=The Hindu |accessdate=29 November 2010 |location=Mumbai- India}} 5. ^{{cite news |title=Areva and NPCIL Sign Nuclear Agreement |author1=Yep, Eric |author2=Jagota, Mukesh |url=http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:LV1MaFnmkXkJ:online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704156304576002761899077484.html |newspaper=The Wall Street Journal – Business (online) |date=6 December 2010 |accessdate=21 August 2011 |archive-url=https://archive.is/20121130081133/http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:LV1MaFnmkXkJ:online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704156304576002761899077484.html |archive-date=30 November 2012 |dead-url=yes |df=dmy-all }} 6. ^ {{cite news|url=http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/article935337.ece?homepage=true#|title=India, France sign nuclear power deal- Hindu |agency=Associates Press |date=6 December 2010 |work=The Hindu |accessdate=6 December 2010 |location=New Delhi}} 7. ^ {{cite news |url=http://www.ndtv.com/article/india/india-france-sign-agreement-on-civil-nuclear-cooperation-70721 |title=India-France sign agreement on civil nuclear cooperation|author=NDTV Correspondents |date=6 December 2010 |publisher=NDTV |accessdate=6 December 2010 |location=New Delhi}} 8. ^ {{cite news|url=http://www.hindu.com/2010/12/02/stories/2010120265621400.htm |title=Sarkozy eyes big contracts|author1=Vaiju Naravane |author2=Sandeep Dikshit |date=2 December 2010 |work=The Hindu |accessdate=2 December 2010}} 9. ^ {{cite news|url=http://www.thehindu.com/news/states/other-states/article920159.ece |title=Environmental clearance for Jaitapur nuclear project |last=Deshpande |first=VIinaya|date=29 November 2010 |work=The Hindu |accessdate=29 November 2010}} 10. ^1 {{cite news |last1=India |first1=Press Trust of |title=Construction of Jaitapur nuclear plant expected to begin by year-end: French ambassador |url=https://www.business-standard.com/article/pti-stories/construction-of-jaitapur-nuclear-plant-expected-to-begin-by-year-end-french-ambassador-118032001145_1.html |accessdate=27 August 2018 |work=Business Standard India |date=20 March 2018}} 11. ^{{cite news |url=http://www.esakal.com/esakal/20100610/5254018892963275791.htm |title=Inspect all sides Jaitapur project - as announced by the Ministry of Environment Ratnagiri and Sindhudurg districts biodiversity samrddhimule already protected. जैतापूर प्रकल्पाच्या सर्व बाजू तपासणार – रत्नागिरी आणि सिंधुदुर्ग हे जिल्हे जैवविविधतेच्या समृद्धीमुळे पर्यावरण मंत्रालयातर्फे यापूर्वीच संरक्षित म्हणून जाहीर.. |author=Morning News Network |date=10 June 2010 |publisher=Sakal newspaper |language=Marathi |accessdate=2 December 2010 |location=New Delhi |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20101202011900/http://esakal.com/esakal/20100610/5254018892963275791.htm |archive-date=2 December 2010 |dead-url=yes |df=dmy-all }} 12. ^ {{cite book |last=Hebalkar |first=Sharad |title=Ancient Indian ports: with special reference to Maharashtra |publisher=Munshiram Manoharlal Publishers |year=2001 |edition=illustrated |page=175 |isbn= 9788121508582|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=3ontAAAAMAAJ&q=Jaitapur&dq=Jaitapur |accessdate=3 December 2010 }} 13. ^1 2 {{cite news |url=http://newindianexpress.com/opinion/article166017.ece |title=Reject French reactors for Jaitapur |author=A Gopalakrishnan |authorlink=A. Gopalakrishnan |date=3 December 2010 |work=The Indian Express |accessdate=3 December 2010}} 14. ^{{cite news|url=http://sify.com/finance/european-pressurised-reactors-costlier-less-efficient-expert-news-default-kmdwuhgagdf.html|title=European pressurised reactors costlier, less efficient: expert|date=3 December 2010|publisher=Sify.com, India News Portal|accessdate=4 December 2010}} 15. ^ {{cite news|url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-south-asia-11923836|title=Nicholas Sarkozy and Manmohan Singh in nuclear deal |date=6 December 2010 |publisher=BBC |accessdate=6 December 2010 |location=New Delhi}} 16. ^{{cite news | url = http://www.world-nuclear-news.org/NN-Way-forward-agreed-for-Jaitapur-reactors-1203187.html | work = World Nuclear News | date = 2018-03-12 | title = Way forward agreed for Jaitapur reactors | accessdate = 2019-02-06}} 17. ^A Perspective on the Nuclear Uproar in India 18. ^1 {{cite news|url=http://www.thehindu.com/opinion/interview/article911058.ece |title="We are partners over the long haul" Interview with Anne Lauvergeon, CEO of Areva. |last=Naravane |first=Vaiju |date=25 November 2010 |work=The Hindu |accessdate=30 November 2010 |location=Paris}} 19. ^{{cite news|url=http://www.business-standard.com/india/news/sovereign-guarantee-for-jaitapur-nuclear-project/419286/|title=Sovereign guarantee for Jaitapur Nuclear project |last=Mukul|first=Jyoti |date=23 December 2010|work=Business Standard|accessdate=26 December 2010|location=New Delhi}} 20. ^ {{cite news|url=http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/article919959.ece?homepage=true |title=It's paradoxical that environmentalists are against nuclear energy: Jairam Ramesh |last=Deshpande |first=VIinaya |date=28 November 2010 |work=The Hindu |accessdate=30 November 2010 |location=Mumbai}} 21. ^{{cite news|url=http://sify.com/news/jaitapur-nuclear-plant-in-maharashtra-gets-green-signal-news-national-kl3nkgafdge.html |title=There are other power projects coming up on a thin strip of coast of Raigad, Ratnagiri and Sindhudurg with power generation adding up to 33,000 MW. |author=ANI |date=29 November 2010 |publisher=Sify News |accessdate=30 November 2010}} 22. ^ {{cite web|url=http://www.dnaindia.com/india/report_indo-french-civil-nuclear-energy-pact-enters-into-force_1334829 |title=DNA Report on France India Nuclear Agreement |work=Daily News and Analysis |accessdate=2010-11-28}} 23. ^ {{cite web|url=http://www.dnaindia.com/world/report_french-parliament-ratifies-indo-french-nuclear-deal_1317162 |title=French Parliament ratifies indo-french nuclear deal |work=Daily News and Analysis |date=27 November 2009 |accessdate=2010-11-28}} 24. ^{{cite news|url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/7766789.stm |title=Indo-Russian Nuclear Deal on BBC |publisher=BBC News |date=5 December 2008 |accessdate=2010-11-28}} 25. ^{{cite news|url=http://www.indianexpress.com/news/Jaitapur-n-reactors-flagged-off-but-liability-concerns-remain/721283|title=Jaitapur n-reactors flagged off but liability concerns remain|last=Roy|first=Shubhajit |date=7 December 2010|work=The Indian Express|accessdate=18 December 2010|location=New Delhi}} 26. ^{{cite web|url=http://www.eoearth.org/article/Civil_liability_for_nuclear_damage |title=Civil liability for nuclear damage |publisher=Eoearth.org |accessdate=2010-12-21}} 27. ^{{cite news|url=http://www.thehindubusinessline.com/2009/01/14/stories/2009011452031500.htm|title=US nuke team pushes for firm commitment on project sites|publisher=The Hindu Bureau|date=14 January 2009|work=Business Line|accessdate=26 December 2010}} 28. ^ {{cite news|url=http://www.hindustantimes.com/Nod-for-Jaitapur-nuclear-project-in-time-for-French-President-s-visit/Article1-632133.aspx |title=Nod for Jaitapur nuclear project in time for French President's visit |last=Rebello |first=Snehal |date=29 November 2010 |work=Hindustan Times |accessdate=30 November 2010|location=Mumbai}} 29. ^ {{cite news|url=http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/other-states/no-displacement-due-to-jaitapur-nuclear-power-project-govt/article5680912.ece |title=No displacement due to Jaitapur nuclear power project: govt |last=x |first=y |date=12 February 2014 |work=The Hindu |accessdate=5 March 2014|location=New Delhi}} 30. ^{{cite web|url=http://lokayatpune.wordpress.com/2010/07/05/jaitapur-nuclear-power-plant-public-hearing-transcript |title=Jaitapur EIA Public Hearing |publisher=Lokayatpune.wordpress.com |date=5 July 2010 |accessdate=2010-11-28}} 31. ^{{cite web |url=http://www.asiasentinel.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=3889&Itemid=614 |title= India's Rising Nuclear Safety Concerns |author=Siddharth Srivastava |date=27 October 2011 |work=Asia Sentinel }} 32. ^{{cite web |url=http://insideclimatenews.org/news/20111024/india-nuclear-energy-expansion-grassroots-uprising-jaitapur-maharashtra-tamil-nadu-west-bengal-fukushima |title=Prospects Dim for India's Nuclear Power Expansion as Grassroots Uprising Spreads |author=Ranjit Devraj |date=25 October 2011 |work=Inside Climate News }} 33. ^ {{cite web|url=http://www.reliefweb.int/rw/RWB.NSF/db900SID/SKAR-64GBJW?OpenDocument |title=Vulnerability Zones in India |publisher= ReliefWeb |accessdate=29 November 2010}} 34. ^ {{cite web|url=http://www.mapsofindia.com/maps/india/seismiczone.htm |title=Seismic Zone Map of India |publisher=Mapsofindia.com |accessdate=2010-11-28}} 35. ^{{cite web|url=http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/mumbai/Jaitapur-N-plant-Ministry-nod-ignored-creeks-trusted-old-data/articleshow/7724135.cms?referral=PM|title=Jaitapur N-plant: Ministry nod ignored creeks, trusted old data|work=The Times of India|accessdate=20 April 2015}} 36. ^[https://books.google.com/books?id=LZ7zBwWLyLEC&pg=PA121&lpg=PA121&dq=ipsr+reactor&source=bl&ots=RjrcdZBH5t&sig=CFdyY4mBX774oMKN2D-Z2OAiZKk&hl=en&sa=X&ei=C5gvUdSXA5GThgft44DQAw&ved=0CD4Q6AEwAg#v=onepage&q=ipsr%20reactor&f=false page 126. 3 Rs of Nuclear Power: Reading, Recycling, and Reprocessing Making a Better ... By Jan Forsythe] 37. ^ {{cite web |url=http://www.tehelka.com/story_main46.asp?filename=Ne180910The_nuclear.asp |title=Tehelaka Report|publisher=Tehelka.com |accessdate=2010-11-28}} 38. ^{{cite news|url=http://www.dnaindia.com/mumbai/report_jaitapur-nuke-plant-will-be-a-social-disaster-tiss-report_1486600|title=Jaitapur nuke plant will be a social disaster: TISS report|last=Siddhaye|first=Ninad |date=26 December 2010|work=Daily News and Analysis|accessdate=27 December 2010|location=Mumbai}} 39. ^{{cite news|url=http://sakaaltimes.com/SakaalTimesBeta/20101203/5299696247312080006.htm|title=Anti-Jaitapur project campaigners up ante|date=3 December 2010|work=Special Correspondent|accessdate=27 December 2010|location=Mumbai|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110715225451/http://sakaaltimes.com/SakaalTimesBeta/20101203/5299696247312080006.htm|archive-date=15 July 2011|dead-url=yes|df=dmy-all}} 40. ^ {{cite web|url=http://www.npcil.nic.in/main/objective.aspx|title=MISSION AND OBJECTIVES of NPCIL |publisher=NPCIL |accessdate=1 December 2010}} 41. ^ {{cite web|url=http://www.npcil.nic.in/pdf/press_27nov2010.pdf|title=India at Sixth Rank in the World with its 20th Nuclear Power Reactor Commencing Operation |last=Nagaich |first=Nalinish |date=27 November 2010 |publisher=Nuclear Power Corporation of India Limited |accessdate=1 December 2010 |location=Mumbai- India}} 42. ^ {{cite news|url=http://www.indianexpress.com/news/Jaitapur-nuclear-power-plant-no-threat-to-environment--Kakodkar/718504/ |title=Jaitapur nuclear power plant no threat to environment: Kakodkar|agency=Express News Service |date=1 December 2010 |work=The Indian Express |accessdate=1 December 2010 |location=Pune}} 43. ^ {{cite book |author1=Council of Scientific & Industrial Research (India)|author2=Indian National Science Academy|author3=National Institute of Science Communication and Information Resources (New Delhi, India) |title=Indian journal of marine sciences |publisher=Council of Scientific & Industrial Research |year=1994 |volume= Volume-23, Page- 34 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=n5scAQAAIAAJ&q=Jaitapur&dq=Jaitapur |accessdate=3 December 2010 }} 44. ^{{cite web|url=http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/pune/Jaitapur-project-will-not-harm-environment-says-Kakodkar/articleshow/7018390.cms|title=Jaitapur project will not harm environment, says Kakodkar|work=The Times of India|accessdate=20 April 2015}} 45. ^ {{cite press release|url=http://www.npcil.nic.in/pdf/press_29nov2010.pdf|title=Ministry of Environment and Forest (MoEF), grants Environmental Clearance for Jaitapur Nuclear Power Project (JNPP) |date=29 November 2010 |publisher=Nuclear Power Corporation of India Limited |accessdate=30 November 2010 |location=Mumbai- India}} 46. ^{{cite news|url=http://www.business-standard.com/india/news/qa-s-k-jain-cmd-nuclear-power-corporation/416475/|title=Nuclear Power Corporation is committed to environment protection' Q&A: S K Jain, CMD|last=Jog|first=Sanjay |date=29 November 2010|publisher=Business Standard|accessdate=6 December 2010|location=Mumabi}} 47. ^ {{cite news |url=http://www.thehindubusinessline.com/2009/02/10/stories/2009021050150800.htm |title=Unleashing India's nuclear potential |last=Balakrishnan |first=Bhaskar |date=10 February 2009 |publisher=Business Daily from THE HINDU |accessdate=2 December 2010}} 48. ^ {{cite news |url=http://www.hindu.com/2010/01/18/stories/2010011856280300.htm|title=Nuclear power plant opposed |last=Menon |first=Meena |date=18 January 2010 |work=The Hindu |accessdate=2 December 2010 |location=MADBAN (Ratnagiri district)}} 49. ^ {{cite news |url=http://www.loksatta.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=118583:2010-11-30-20-53-12&catid=26:2009-07-09-02-01-20&Itemid=3 |archive-url=https://archive.today/20130127214143/http://www.loksatta.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=118583:2010-11-30-20-53-12&catid=26:2009-07-09-02-01-20&Itemid=3 |dead-url=yes |archive-date=27 January 2013 |title=Jaitapur project: 'Konkan Bachao Samity direct cause of the dispute challenge - meeting on December 3 जैतापूर प्रकल्प : ‘कोकण बचाव समिती’चे थेट वाद-विवादाचे आव्हान – बैठक ३ डिसेंबरला |date=30 November 2010 |publisher=लोकसत्ता Loksatta |language=Marathi |accessdate=2 December 2010 |location=Mumbai}} 50. ^Konkan Bachao Samiti, Coalition for Nuclear Disarmament and Peace: CNDP 51. ^{{cite news|url=http://www.hindu.com/2010/12/05/stories/2010120562481000.htm |title=Protest against Jaitapur nuclear plant |last=Deshpande |first=Vinaya |date=5 December 2010 |work=The Hindu |accessdate=5 December 2010 |deadurl=yes |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20101208044841/http://www.hindu.com/2010/12/05/stories/2010120562481000.htm |archivedate=8 December 2010 }} 52. ^[https://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article/ALeqM5gc1zxEqG5c895I8zEM2vePR9LoeQ?docId=CNG.03f9550f39158525b47a166b6f5d4741.421 AFP: Indian police kill protester in anti-nuclear demo] AFP in Google News, published 2011-04-18. Retrieved 2011-04-19 {{dead link|date=April 2016}} 53. ^{{cite news|url=http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/One-dead-8-hurt-as-protest-against-Jaitapur-N-plant-turns-violent/articleshow/8018951.cms|archive-url=https://archive.is/20110430124727/http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/One-dead-8-hurt-as-protest-against-Jaitapur-N-plant-turns-violent/articleshow/8018951.cms|dead-url=yes|archive-date=30 April 2011|title=One dead, 8 hurt as protest against Jaitapur N-plant turns violent|agency=IANS|date=18 April 2011|work=The Times of India|accessdate=18 April 2011|location=Jaitapur}} 54. ^{{cite news|url=http://news.in.msn.com/business/article.aspx?cp-documentid=4621687|title=India, France N-regulatory bodies meet on EPR safety issues|agency=PTI|date=24 November 2010|publisher=MSN News|accessdate=5 December 2010|location=Mumbai}} 55. ^{{cite news|url=http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2011-03-19/pune/29146005_1_diat-abdul-kalam-defence-systems|title=Lesson from Japan, review N-projects, says Kalam|date=19 March 2011|work=The Times of India|accessdate=19 March 2011|location=Pune}} 56. ^{{cite news|last1=Chandavarkar|first1=Rohit|title=Shiv Sena launches agitations against Jaitapur nuke power plant, Navi Mumbai international airport|url=http://articles.economictimes.indiatimes.com/2014-06-18/news/50678844_1_jaitapur-project-land-acquisition-nuclear-project|accessdate=25 February 2015|work=Economic Times|publisher=Economic Times|date=Jun 18, 2014}} 57. ^{{cite web|url=http://articles.economictimes.indiatimes.com/2014-10-12/news/54928891_1_jaitapur-nuclear-power-plant-uddhav-thackeray-jaitapur-project|title=Jaitapur project to be scrapped if Shiv Sena comes to power: Uddhav Thackeray|work=timesofindia-economictimes|accessdate=20 April 2015}} 58. ^Can the world’s biggest electricity company restart India’s nuclear power programme?
External links
5 : Nuclear power stations in Maharashtra|Energy in Maharashtra|Proposed nuclear power stations|Proposed power stations in India|Ratnagiri district |
|||||||||||||||||||||
| 随便看 |
|
开放百科全书收录14589846条英语、德语、日语等多语种百科知识，基本涵盖了大多数领域的百科知识，是一部内容自由、开放的电子版国际百科全书。