| 词条 | Joel v Morison |
| 释义 |
| name = Joel v Morison | court = Exchequer of Pleas | image = | date decided = 3 July 1834 | full name = | citations = [1834] EWHC KB J39 172 ER 1338, (1834) 6 C & P 501 | judges = | prior actions = | subsequent actions = | opinions = | transcripts = | keywords = }} Joel v Morison [1834] EWHC KB J39 is a case in English tort law concerning the scope of vicarious liability of an employer for the acts of his employee. FactsJoel was struck down by a horse and cart, whose driver was Morison's agent. Joel was crossing a street in the City of London, but the driver's job was simply to travel between Burton Crescent Mews and Finchley. The driver had detoured to visit a friend when the accident occurred. Morison argued that he was not liable for Joel's injuries because the agent had strayed off his path. JudgmentParke, B held: "If the servants, being on their master's business, took a detour to call upon a friend, the master will be responsible . . . but if he was going on a frolic of his own, . . . the master will not be liable."[1] The doctrine of respondeat superior meant the principal is liable for his agent's negligence only when the agent is acting at the time of the accident in the "course of his employment". Although the agent was doing Morison's business, he went, albeit momentarily, out of his way against his master's implied command. Morison was found liable. See also
Notes1. ^at (1834) C & P 503; (1834) 172 ER 1138-9 External links
5 : 1834 in British law|English tort case law|English vicarious liability case law|United Kingdom labour case law|Exchequer of Pleas cases |
| 随便看 |
|
开放百科全书收录14589846条英语、德语、日语等多语种百科知识，基本涵盖了大多数领域的百科知识，是一部内容自由、开放的电子版国际百科全书。