“Kuder–Richardson Formula 20”的意思、由来-开放百科全书

In psychometrics, the Kuder–Richardson Formula 20 (KR-20), first published in 1937, is a measure of internal consistency reliability for measures with dichotomous choices. It was developed by Kuder and Richardson. The name of this formula stems from the fact that is the twentieth formula discussed in Kuder and Richardson's seminal paper on test reliability.^[1]

It is a special case of Cronbach's α, computed for dichotomous scores.^[2]^[3] It is often claimed that a high KR-20 coefficient (e.g., > 0.90) indicates a homogeneous test. However, like Cronbach's α, homogeneity (that is, unidimensionality) is actually an assumption, not a conclusion, of reliability coefficients. It is possible, for example, to have a high KR-20 with a multidimensional scale, especially with a large number of items.

Values can range from 0.00 to 1.00 (sometimes expressed as 0 to 100), with high values indicating that the examination is likely to correlate with alternate forms (a desirable characteristic). The KR-20 may be affected by difficulty of the test, the spread in scores and the length of the examination.

In the case when scores are not tau-equivalent (for example when there is not homogeneous but rather examination items of increasing difficulty) then the KR-20 is an indication of the lower bound of internal consistency (reliability).

where p_i is the proportion of correct responses to test item i, q_i is the proportion of incorrect responses to test item i (so that p_i + q_i = 1), and the variance for the denominator is

If it is important to use unbiased operators then the sum of squares should be divided by degrees of freedom (n − 1) and the probabilities are multiplied by

Kuder-Richardson Formula 21

Often discussed in tandem with KR-20, is Kuder-Richardson Formula 21 (KR-21).^[4] KR-21 is a simplified version of KR-20, which can be used when the difficulty of all items on the test are known to be equal. Like KR-20, KR-21 was first set forth as the twenty-first formula discussed in Kuder and Richardson's 1937 paper.

Similarly to KR-20, K is equal to the number of items. Difficulty level of the items (p), is assumed to be the same for each item, however, in practice, KR-21 can be applied by finding the average item difficulty across the entirety of the test. KR-21 tends to be a more conservative estimate of reliability than KR-20, which in turn is a more conservative estimate than Cronbach's α.^[4]

References

1. ^Kuder, G. F., & Richardson, M. W. (1937). The theory of the estimation of test reliability. Psychometrika, 2(3), 151–160.
2. ^Cortina, J. M., (1993). What Is Coefficient Alpha? An Examination of Theory and Applications. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(1), 98–104.
3. ^{{cite conference |url=http://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED526237 |title=Understanding a Widely Misunderstood Statistic: Cronbach's "Alpha" |last=Ritter |first=Nicola L. |date=2010-02-18 |conference=Annual meeting of the Southwest Educational Research Association |location=New Orleans }}
4. ^¹{{Cite web|url=http://www.real-statistics.com/reliability/kuder-richardson-formula-20/|title=Kuder and Richardson Formula 20 {{!}} Real Statistics Using Excel|language=en-US|access-date=2019-03-08}}

Kuder-Richardson Formula 21

References

External links