| 词条 | Land for peace |
| 释义 |
This interpretation is widely contested because it implies that Israeli withdrawal is linked to its neighbours' willingness to formally make peace. Competing interpretations of the resolution regard Israel as being obligated to withdraw unilaterally from all territories captured in 1967. Operative paragraph 1 of Resolution 242 reads as follows: 1. Affirms that the fulfillment of Charter principles requires the establishment of a just and lasting peace in the Middle East which should include the application of both the following principles: (i) Withdrawal of Israel armed forces from territories occupied in the recent conflict; (ii) Termination of all claims or states of belligerency and respect for and acknowledgement of the sovereignty, territorial integrity and political independence of every State in the area and their right to live in peace within secure and recognized boundaries free from threats or acts of force; In 1976, when Lord Caradon was asked about the concessions the Arab states would have to make to Israel as part of an overall settlement, he said "Well, that's perfectly obvious if you read again the principles of 242, which have been accepted by Egypt, Jordan, Syria and Saudi Arabia, and in effect by Israel. The provision is that if there is an adequate withdrawal, all states in the area must be free to live within secure and recognized boundaries, free from force and threat of force. So it is an acceptance that Israel has a right to exist, just as they would have a right to their homeland, and have a right to exist. This is the essential bargain that we are proposing. It's not a new thing, it's been going since 1967.[2] Peace treatiesOn 19 June 1967, Israel offered "to give up Sinai and the Golan in exchange for peace,"[3] an offer that was rejected in September 1967 by the Arab States by the Khartoum Resolution, which became famous for the "Three No's": "no peace with Israel, no recognition of Israel, no negotiations with it..."[4] The first application of the land for peace formula was Israel's peace treaty with Egypt in 1979,{{citation needed|date=March 2018}} under which Israel withdrew from the Sinai as part of a comprehensive peace agreement facilitated by economic assistance to both sides from the United States. In 1994 a similar comprehensive agreement invoking resolution 242{{citation needed|date=March 2018}} formed the basis of the Israel Jordan peace treaty whereby both sides redeployed to their respective sides of the agreed international boundary. CriticismThe forced eviction by Israel of its settlers and military forces in entirety from the ground territory of the Gaza strip has been put forth as a 'test case' of "Land for Peace" with the Palestinians.
Arab–Israeli peace diplomacy and treaties
References1. ^[https://books.google.com/books?id=5ROlQUFZIpoC&lpg=RA1-PA308&ots=wkdYnYlBAq&pg=RA1-PA308#v=onepage&q=&f=false The United Nations Security Council ] 2. ^An Interview with Lord Caradon, Journal of Palestine Studies, Vol. 5, No. 3/4 (Spring – Summer, 1976), page 147 3. ^{{Cite book|url=https://www.worldcat.org/oclc/234104996|title=Righteous victims : a history of the Zionist-Arab conflict, 1881–1999|last=Morris|first=Benny|date=|publisher=Vintage Books|year=2001|isbn=9780679744757|location=|pages=346|oclc=234104996}} 4. ^{{cite web|url=http://www.jpost.com/Features/In-Thespotlight/This-Week-In-History-The-Arab-Leagues-three-nos|title=This Week in History: The Arab League Three No's|work=Jerusalem Post|accessdate=4 December 2017}} 5. ^Palestinian terrorists in Gaza continue to fire Qassam rockets at Israeli civilian targets 6. ^Al Jazeera English - News - Israelis Hurt In Gaza Rocket Attack 7. ^FOXNews.com - Israel Warns Gaza Weapons Smuggling, Rocket Attacks Will Lead to 'Invasion' - Middle East Map | News | Crisis 8. ^Bbc News 9. ^DEBKAfile - Karni Tunnel as Hamas Hidden Arm into Israel’s Western Negev 2 : Arab–Israeli conflict|Arab–Israeli peace process |
| 随便看 |
|
开放百科全书收录14589846条英语、德语、日语等多语种百科知识，基本涵盖了大多数领域的百科知识，是一部内容自由、开放的电子版国际百科全书。