| 词条 | Lujan v. G & G Fire Sprinklers, Inc. |
| 释义 |
|Litigants=Lujan v. G & G Fire Sprinklers, Inc. |ArgueDate=February 26 |ArgueYear=2001 |DecideDate=April 17 |DecideYear=2001 |FullName=Arthur S. Lujan, Labor Commissioner of California, et al., v. G & G Fire Sprinklers, Incorporated |USVol=532 |USPage=189 |ParallelCitations=121 S. Ct. 1446; 149 L. Ed. 2d 391 |Prior=C.D. of CA grants summary judgement to Respondents, G & G Fire Sprinklers, Inc. v. Bradshaw, 156 F.3d 893, 898 (CA9 1998) (Bradshaw I), Ninth Circuit affirms C.D. of CA, rehearing after intervening Supreme Court case 204 F.3d, at 943 |Subsequent=Ninth Circuit Reversed, injunction vacated |Holding=Even though there is no hearing under the state contractual scheme, because plaintiffs can bring claims in state court, there is no violation of due process |SCOTUS=1994-2005 |Majority=Rehnquist |JoinMajority=unanimous |Dissent= |JoinDissent= |Dissent2= |Dissent3= |LawsApplied=U.S. Const. amends. VIX }} Lujan v. G & G Fire Sprinklers, Inc., 532 U.S. 189 (2001), was a United States Supreme Court case decided in 2001. The case concerned a provision of the California Labor Code which allowed the state to withhold payment to contractors or subcontractors if found in breach of contract, without a specific hearing on the matter. The Court upheld the provision because the companies were still able to pursue a claim in state court. Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Rehnquist delivered the unanimous Opinion of the Court, reversing the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals which had ruled the contested labor code regulation unconstitutional. Rehnquist stated that the companies involved would still be able to have the contract dispute reviewed in state court, despite the fact that the immediate withholding of funds was without a hearing. In sum he reasoned, "[I]f California makes ordinary judicial process available to G & G for resolving its contractual dispute, that process is due process."[1] See also
References1. ^{{ussc|name=Lujan v. G & G Fire Sprinklers, Inc.|volume=532|page=189|pin=|year=2001}}. External links
| case=Lujan v. G&G Fire Sprinklers, Inc., {{ussc|532|189|2001|el=no}} | cornell =https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/00-152.ZO.html | courtlistener =https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/118418/lujan-v-g-g-fire-sprinklers-inc/ | findlaw = | googlescholar = https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=5500082310949339010 | justia =https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/532/189/ | loc = | oyez =https://www.oyez.org/cases/2000/00-152 }}{{DEFAULTSORT:Lujan V. G and G Fire Sprinklers, Inc.}} 6 : United States Supreme Court cases|2001 in United States case law|United States civil due process case law|Government procurement in the United States|Legal history of California|United States Supreme Court cases of the Rehnquist Court |
| 随便看 |
|
开放百科全书收录14589846条英语、德语、日语等多语种百科知识，基本涵盖了大多数领域的百科知识，是一部内容自由、开放的电子版国际百科全书。