词条 | March 2004 San Francisco general election | |
释义 |
The March 2004 San Francisco general elections were held on March 2, 2004 in San Francisco, California. The elections included seats to various political parties' county central committees and ten seven ballot measures. {{TOClimit|2}}{{clear}}Propositions
Note: "City" refers to the San Francisco municipal government. Proposition AProposition A would allow City employees who receive cash payments for unused vacation time and sick leave to defer the payment and any federal and state taxes associated with said payment. {{Referendum| title = Proposition A | yes = 107,690 | yespct = 62.38 | no = 64,943 | nopct = 37.62 | valid = 172,633 | validpct = 90.47 | invalid = 18,195 | invalidpct = 9.53 | total = 190,828 | turnoutpct = 42.51 }} Proposition BProposition B would contract out retirement benefits of district attorneys, public defenders, and public defender investigators to the California Public Employee Retirement System (CalPERS) if there is no additional cost to the City. {{Referendum| title = Proposition B | yes = 114,209 | yespct = 67.73 | no = 54,418 | nopct = 32.27 | valid = 168,627 | validpct = 88.37 | invalid = 22,201 | invalidpct = 11.63 | total = 190,828 | turnoutpct = 42.51 }} Proposition CProposition C would reduce the number of required uniform officers by the number of Police Department positions currently staffed by uniformed officers that would be replaced by civilian staff. {{Referendum| title = Proposition C | yes = 105,005 | yespct = 61.85 | no = 64,773 | nopct = 38.15 | valid = 169,778 | validpct = 88.97 | invalid = 21,050 | invalidpct = 11.03 | total = 190,828 | turnoutpct = 42.51 }} Proposition DProposition D would allow domestic partners to register in the City and have the City Employees' Retirement System to treat domestic partners as spouses. {{Referendum| title = Proposition D | yes = 113,646 | yespct = 65.07 | no = 60,999 | nopct = 34.93 | valid = 174,645 | validpct = 91.52 | invalid = 16,183 | invalidpct = 8.48 | total = 190,828 | turnoutpct = 42.51 }} Proposition EProposition E would have the San Francisco Board of Supervisors respond to any federal or state requests potentially involving private information on citizens instead of individual officials and departments. {{Referendum| title = Proposition E | yes = 87,704 | yespct = 52.22 | no = 80,236 | nopct = 47.78 | valid = 167,940 | validpct = 88.01 | invalid = 22,888 | invalidpct = 11.99 | total = 190,828 | turnoutpct = 42.51 }} Proposition FProposition F would apply labor negotiation rules regarding police officers and fire departments on labor negotiations regarding deputy sheriffs. {{Referendum| title = Proposition F | yes = 103,327 | yespct = 63.16 | no = 60,267 | nopct = 36.84 | valid = 163,594 | validpct = 85.73 | invalid = 27,234 | invalidpct = 14.27 | total = 190,828 | turnoutpct = 42.51 }} Proposition GProposition G would allow the Mayor and Board of Supervisors to decide to provide supplemental pay over 180 days to City employees called for military service. {{Referendum| title = Proposition G | yes = 99,726 | yespct = 58.90 | no = 69,589 | nopct = 41.10 | valid = 169,315 | validpct = 88.73 | invalid = 21,513 | invalidpct = 11.27 | total = 190,828 | turnoutpct = 42.51 }} Proposition HProposition H would create a Public Education Fund to increase City spending on public education over the next eleven years. {{Referendum| title = Proposition H | yes = 123,103 | yespct = 70.77 | no = 50,837 | nopct = 29.23 | valid = 173,940 | validpct = 91.15 | invalid = 16,888 | invalidpct = 8.85 | total = 190,828 | turnoutpct = 42.51 }} Proposition IProposition I would require Muni to replace all diesel buses purchased before 1991 and require new buses to meet anti-pollution standards that apply to other City vehicles. {{Referendum| title = Proposition I | yes = 118,074 | yespct = 67.49 | no = 56,864 | nopct = 32.51 | valid = 174,938 | validpct = 91.67 | invalid = 15,890 | invalidpct = 8.32 | total = 190,828 | turnoutpct = 42.51 }} Proposition JProposition J would allow developers building in downtown or along the central waterfront to be subject to less restrictions regarding height and density provided they build and sell more below-market rate housing. {{Referendum| title = Proposition J | yes = 52,028 | yespct = 30.01 | no = 121,352 | nopct = 69.99 | valid = 173,380 | validpct = 90.86 | invalid = 17,448 | invalidpct = 9.14 | total = 190,828 | turnoutpct = 42.51 }} External links
3 : 2004 California elections|Elections in San Francisco|2004 in San Francisco |
|
随便看 |
|
开放百科全书收录14589846条英语、德语、日语等多语种百科知识,基本涵盖了大多数领域的百科知识,是一部内容自由、开放的电子版国际百科全书。