请输入您要查询的百科知识:

 

词条 McDonough Power Equipment, Inc. v. Greenwood
释义

  1. Background

  2. Decision

  3. See also

  4. References

  5. External links

{{Infobox SCOTUS case
|Litigants=McDonough Power Equipment v. Greenwood
|ArgueDate=November 28
|ArgueYear=1983
|DecideDate=January 18
|DecideYear=1984
|FullName=McDonough Power Equipment, Inc. v. Greenwood, et al.
|USVol=464
|USPage=548
|ParallelCitations=104 S. Ct. 845; 78 L. Ed. 2d 663
|Prior={{cite court |litigants=Greenwood et al. v. McDonough Power Equipment, Inc. |vol=687 |reporter=F.2d |opinion=338 |pinpoint= |court=10th Cir. |date=1982 |url= |quote=}}
|Subsequent=
|Holding=A juror's failure to respond to question on voir dire did not require new trial absent a showing of denial of right to impartial jury.
|SCOTUS=1981-1986
|Majority=Rehnquist
|JoinMajority=Burger, White, Blackmun, Powell, Stevens, O'Connor
|Concurrence=Blackmun
|JoinConcurrence=Stevens, O'Connor
|Concurrence2=Brennan
|JoinConcurrence2=Marshall
|Dissent=
|JoinDissent=
|LawsApplied=Rule 61 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, {{usc|28|2111}}
}}McDonough Power Equipment, Inc. v. Greenwood, 464 U.S. 548 (1984), was a case decided by the Supreme Court of the United States that established a standard for challenging a verdict based on inaccurate answers given by prospective jurors during voir dire.[1]

Background

Bill Greenwood was a juvenile in Kansas whose feet were severed on a riding lawnmower manufactured by McDonough. Before the three-week trials, one of the jurors failed to disclose that her son had sustained a broken leg as a result of an exploding tire. Although McDonough would likely have used a peremptory challenge if they had known the background, there was no direct conflict of interest and the rest of the jurors quickly ruled against the manufacturer in deliberations.

Decision

The standard adopted by the Court in McDonough was that a verdict could be challenged because of inaccurate answers given during voir dire only if the juror failed to honestly answer a question and an honest answer would have provided a valid basis for a challenge for cause.[2]

See also

  • List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 464

References

1. ^Yeazell, S.C. Civil Procedure, Seventh Edition. Aspen Publishers, New York, NY: 2008, p. 594
2. ^Yeazell, p. 594

External links

  • Full text of the opinion at Justia.com

6 : United States Supreme Court cases|United States civil procedure case law|1984 in United States case law|Lawn mowers|Product safety|United States Supreme Court cases of the Burger Court

随便看

 

开放百科全书收录14589846条英语、德语、日语等多语种百科知识,基本涵盖了大多数领域的百科知识,是一部内容自由、开放的电子版国际百科全书。

 

Copyright © 2023 OENC.NET All Rights Reserved
京ICP备2021023879号 更新时间:2024/9/25 20:38:45