请输入您要查询的百科知识:

 

词条 Lexikon der indogermanischen Verben
释义

  1. Entries

  2. Indices

  3. Reception and criticism

  4. See also

     Other PIE dictionaries and grammars 

  5. References

  6. External links

{{Infobox book
| name = Lexikon der indogermanischen Verben
| image = Lexikon der indogermanischen Verben.png
| caption = LIV, 2nd edition
| author = Helmut Rix, Martin Kümmel et al.
| country = Germany
| language = German
| subject = Proto-Indo-European verb
| media_type = Print (Hardcover)
| publisher = Dr. Ludwig Reichert Verlag
| pub_date = 1998, 2001
| pages = 754 (1st edition),
823 (2nd edition)
| isbn = 3-89500-219-4
| dewey= 415/.03 21
| congress= P572 .L58 2001
| oclc= 47295102
}}{{PIE notice}}

The Lexikon der indogermanischen Verben (LIV, "Lexicon of the Indo-European Verbs") is an etymological dictionary of the Proto-Indo-European (PIE) verb. The first edition appeared in 1998, edited by Helmut Rix. A second edition followed in 2001. The book may be seen as an update to the verb entries of the Indogermanisches etymologisches Wörterbuch (IEW) by Julius Pokorny. It was the first dictionary fully utilizing the modern three-laryngeal theory with reconstructions of Indo-European verbal roots.

== The LIVs hypothesis about aspect ==

The authors of the LIV assume a dichotomy between telic verbs (terminated: for example, {{PIE|*leh₂p-}} 'to light up') and atelic verbs (ongoing: for example, {{PIE|*bʰeh₂-}} 'to shine') in early stages of Proto-Indo-European. Before the daughter languages split off, aspect emerged as a new grammatical category.

Telic verbs were interpreted as aorist forms, and the missing present was formed with various suffixes (for example, {{PIE|*leh₂p-: *l̥h₂p-sḱé-}}) and the nasal infix ({{PIE|*l̥h₂--p-}}), all of which are supposed to come from old grammatical forms of uncertain meaning.

Atelic verbs were interpreted as present forms, and the missing aorist was formed with the suffix -s-, yielding the sigmatic aorist.

This hypothesis is used to explain various phenomena:

  • Some verbs in Indo-European languages form root presents (Latin {{lang|la|dūcō}} 'I pull, I lead', from PIE {{PIE|deu̯k-, duk-}}) and derived sigmatic aorists (perfect forms in Latin: {{lang|la|dūxī}} 'I have pulled, I have led', pronounced dūksī, from {{PIE|déu̯k-s-}}).
  • Other verbs form root aorists (Latin {{lang|la|vīcī}} 'I have won', pronounced vīkī, from {{PIE|wei̯k-, wik-}}) and derived present forms ({{lang|la|vincō}} 'I win', from {{PIE|wi-n-k-}}, with nasal infix).
  • For many PIE verbs, various present forms can be reconstructed without discernible differences in meaning (like {{PIE|l̥h₂--p-}} and {{PIE|l̥h₂p-sḱé-}} above, both forms have attested reflexes in IE languages: Greek {{lang|grc|λάμπω}} 'I shine' and Proto-Celtic {{lang|cel-x-proto|laske-}} 'to shine, burn',[1] respectively).

In addition to the present and the aorist, the following aspects are assumed:

  • Perfect
  • Causative-Iterative
  • Desiderative
  • Intensive (repetition)
  • Fientive (onset of a new state)
  • Essive (persistent state)

Entries

The lexical part contains for each verbal root

  • the conjectured meaning,
  • reconstructed stems with their reflexes in the daughter languages,
  • extensive footnotes (with references, remarks on alternative and dubious reconstructions, etc.),
  • the page number of the corresponding IEW entry.

Indices

The book includes

  • a regressive root index,
  • an index of reconstructed primary stems, sorted by aspect and formation rule,
  • an index of reflexes in the daughter languages, sorted by language.

Reception and criticism

  • Seebold[2] claims insufficient evidence for roots reconstructed from a single daughter language. Helmut Rix insists in the preface to the second edition that the assessment of the evidence should be left to the reader.[3]
  • Seebold also criticises some of the conjectured meanings. Rix calls this criticism basically legitimate.[4]
  • Meier-Brügger[5] tentatively calls the LIVs aspect hypothesis “adequate and capable of consensus” ({{lang|de|adäquat und konsensfähig}}), without agreeing on all of the details of the analysis.
  • Fortson[6] calls the LIV “[v]ery useful and up-to-date – though in various places controversial”, but does not elaborate on the controversial places.
  • Ringe[7] states that the theories in Rix (what he terms the “Cowgill-Rix verb”) largely reflect current consensus, but implies that some of his phonological reconstructions may go beyond the consensus (in terms of being insufficiently “conservative”).

See also

  • Proto-Indo-European verb

Other PIE dictionaries and grammars

  • Grundriß der vergleichenden Grammatik der indogermanischen Sprachen (published 1886–1916 by Karl Brugmann and Berthold Delbrück)
  • Indogermanisches etymologisches Wörterbuch (IEW, first published 1956 by Julius Pokorny), with reconstructions pre-dating the laryngeal theory
  • Indo-European Etymological Dictionary, an ongoing project based in Leiden, intended to result in the publication of a comprehensive Indo-European etymological dictionary
  • Nomina im Indogermanischen Lexikon (NIL), structured similarly to the LIV and treating PIE nouns and adjectives
  • Lexikon der indogermanischen Partikeln und Pronominalstämme (LIPP), structured similarly to the LIV and treating PIE particles and pronouns.

References

1. ^Presupposed by Proto-Celtic *loskī-, a secondarily formed causative reconstructed on the basis of Old Irish loscaid and Middle Welsh llosci 'to burn'
2. ^Elmar Seebold, “‘LIV’, Lexicon of Indo-European verbs. Roots and their primary stems”, Indogermanische Forschungen 104 (1999): 287–295.
3. ^{{cite book|last=Rix|first=Helmut|title=Lexikon der indogermanischen Verben|edition=2|page=34}}
4. ^{{cite book|last=Rix|first=Helmut|title=Lexikon der indogermanischen Verben|edition=2|page=35}}
5. ^{{cite book|last=Meier-Brügger|first=Michael |author-link=Michael Meier-Brügger|title=Indogermanische Sprachwissenschaft|edition=7|page=F103}}
6. ^{{cite book|last=Fortson|first=BW|title=Indo-European Language and Culture|publisher=Blackwell|year=2004|page=99}}
7. ^{{cite book| last=Ringe |first=Don | authorlink=Donald Ringe| title=From Proto-Indo-European to Proto-Germanic|publisher=Oxford University Press |year=2006 |isbn=978-0-19-955229-0}}

External links

{{wiktionary|Appendix:List of Proto-Indo-European roots}}
  • Addenda und Corrigenda zu LIV². HTML or [https://web.archive.org/web/20160402234039/http://www.indogermanistik.uni-jena.de/dokumente/PDF/liv2add.pdf PDF]. Latest update: 3 Feb. 2015.
  • Pokorny PIE Data (University of Texas)
  • Indogermanisches Wörterbuch by Gerhard Köbler {{icon de}} (based on the IEW and including laryngeal-based reconstructions, but only as alternative lemmas with cross references to the pre-laryngeal ones)
{{Proto-Indo-European language}}

3 : 1998 books|Indo-European linguistics works|Etymological dictionaries

随便看

 

开放百科全书收录14589846条英语、德语、日语等多语种百科知识,基本涵盖了大多数领域的百科知识,是一部内容自由、开放的电子版国际百科全书。

 

Copyright © 2023 OENC.NET All Rights Reserved
京ICP备2021023879号 更新时间:2024/11/12 5:57:03