- History
- Experimental method
- The principal assumptions underlying the Morris–Lecar model
- Physiological description Variables Parameters and constants
- Bifurcations
- See also
- References
- External links
The Morris–Lecar model is a biological neuron model developed by Catherine Morris and Harold Lecar to reproduce the variety of oscillatory behavior in relation to Ca++ and K+ conductance in the muscle fiber of the giant barnacle .[1] Morris–Lecar neurons exhibit both class I and class II neuron excitability.
History
Catherine Morris (b. 24 December 1949) is a Canadian biologist. She won a Commonwealth scholarship to study at Cambridge University, where she earned her PhD in 1977. She became a professor at the University of Ottawa in the early 1980s. As of 2015, she is an emeritus professor at the University of Ottawa. Harold Lecar (18 October 1935 – 4 February 2014) was an American professor of biophysics and neurobiology at the University of California Berkeley. He graduated with his PhD in physics from Columbia University in 1963.
Experimental method
The Morris–Lecar experiments relied on the current clamp method established by Keynes et al. (1973).[2]
{{Quotation|Large specimens of the barnacle Balanus nubilus (Pacific Bio-Marine Laboratories Inc., Venice, California) were used. The barnacle was sawed into lateral halves, and the depressor scutorum rostralis muscles were carefully exposed. Individual fibers were dissected, the incision starting from the tendon. The other end of the muscle was cut close to its attachment on the shell and ligatured. Isolated fibers were either used immediately or kept for up to 30 min in standard artificial seawater (ASW; see below) before use. Experiments were carried out at room temperature of 22 C.[1] }}The principal assumptions underlying the Morris–Lecar model
Among the principal assumptions are these:
- Equations apply to a spatially iso-potential patch of membrane. There are two persistent (non-inactivating) voltage-gated currents with oppositively biased reversal potentials. The depolarizing current is carried by Na+ or Ca2+ ions (or both), depending on the system to be modeled, and the hyperpolarizing current is carried by K+.
- Activation gates follow changes in membrane potential sufficiently rapidly that the activating conductance can instantaneously relax to its steady-state value at any voltage.
- The dynamics of the recovery variable can be approximated by a first-order linear differential equation for the probability of channel opening.&91;3&93;
Physiological description
The Morris–Lecar model is a two-dimensional system of nonlinear differential equations. It is considered a simplified model compared to the four-dimensional Hodgkin–Huxley model.
Qualitatively, this system of equations describes the complex relationship between membrane potential and the activation of ion channels within the membrane: the potential depends on the activity of the ion channels, and the activity of the ion channels depends on the voltage. As bifurcation parameters are altered, different classes of neuron behavior are exhibited. {{math|τN}} is associated with the relative time scales of the firing dynamics, which varies broadly from cell to cell and exhibits significant temperature dependency.[3]
Quantitatively:
where
Note that the {{math|Mss}} and {{math|Nss}} equations may also be expressed as {{math|Mss {{=}} (1 + exp[−2(V − V1) / V2])−1}} and {{math|Nss {{=}} (1 + exp[−2(V − V3) / V4])−1}}, however most authors prefer the form using the hyperbolic functions.
Variables
- {{math|V}} : membrane potential
- {{math|N}} : recovery variable: the probability that the K+ channel is conducting
Parameters and constants
- {{math|I}} : applied current
- {{math|C}} : membrane capacitance
- {{math|gL}}, {{math|gCa}}, {{math|gK}} : leak, Ca++, and K+ conductances through membranes channel
- {{math|VL}}, {{math|VCa}}, {{math|VK}} : equilibrium potential of relevant ion channels
- {{math|V1}}, {{math|V2}}, {{math|V3}}, {{math|V4}}: tuning parameters for steady state and time constant
- {{math|φ}}: reference frequency
Bifurcations
{{main|Bifurcation theory}}Bifurcation in the Morris–Lecar model have been analyzed with the applied current {{math|I}}, as the main bifurcation parameter and {{math|φ}}, {{math|gCa}}, {{math|V3}}, {{math|V4}} as secondary parameters for phase plane analysis.[4]
{{multiple image| align = center
| direction = horizontal
| width = 360
| header = Possible Bifurcations
| header_align = center
| header_background =
| footer = Current clamp simulations of the Morris–Lecar model. The injected current for the SNIC bifurcation and the homoclinic bifurcation is varied between 30 nA and 50 nA, while the current for the Hopf bifurcation is varied between 80nA and 100nA
| footer_align =
| footer_background =
| background color =
|image1=MorrisLecarHopfTimeDomain.gif
|width1=360
|caption1=
|alt1=Upper Darboux sum example
|image2=MorrisLecarSNICTimeDomain.gif
|width2=360
|caption2=
|alt2=Lower Darboux sum example
|image3=MorrisLecarHomoclincTimeDomain.gif
|width3=360
|caption3=
|alt3=Lower Darboux sum example
}}
See also
- Computational neuroscience
- Biological neuron model
- Hodgkin–Huxley model
- FitzHugh–Nagumo model
- Neural oscillations
- Nonlinear dynamics
- Quantitative models of the action potential
References
2. ^{{Citation | last = Keynes | first = RD | author-link = Richard Keynes | last2 = Rojas | first2 = E | last3 = Taylor | first3 = RE | last4 = Vergara | first4 = J | title = Calcium and potassium systems of a giant barnacle muscle fibre under membrane potential control | journal = The Journal of Physiology | volume = 229 | pages = 409–455 |date=March 1973 | url = http://www.pubmedcentral.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=1350315 | id = | pmid=4724831 | pmc=1350315}}
3. ^1 This assumption is never exactly true, since channel proteins are composed of subunits, which must act in concert, to reach the open state. Despite missing delays in the onset of recovery, the model appears to be adequate for phase-plane considerations for many excitable systems.{{Citation| last = Lecar| first = Harold| title = Morris–Lecar model| journal = Scholarpedia| volume = 2| issue = 10| pages = 1333| year = 2007| doi = 10.4249/scholarpedia.1333}}
4. ^{{Citation | last = Tsumoto | first = Kunichika | last2 = Kitajimab | first2 = Hiroyuki | last3 = Yoshinagac | first3 = Tetsuya | last4 = Aiharad | first4 = Kazuyuki | last5 = Kawakamif | first5 = Hiroshi | title = Bifurcations in Morris–Lecar neuron model | journal = Neurocomputing | volume = 69 | issue = 4–6 | pages = 293–316 |date=January 2006 | language = English, Japanese | url = http://pegasus.medsci.tokushima-u.ac.jp/~tsumoto/work/nolta2002_4181.pdf | doi = 10.1016/j.neucom.2005.03.006 }}
External links
- A Morris–Lecar simulator
- Scholarpedia: Morris–Lecar Model
- Catherine Morris – Research Profile
- John Field Lister
- John Field (proto-Copernican)
- John Fields (disambiguation)
- John Fields (producer)
- John Fields (record producer)
- John Fife (surgeon)
- John Figarelli
- John Figdor
- John Filby Childs
- John Filipec
- John Filippi
- John Fillian
- John Filmore
- John Finbarr Jones
- John Finch (disambiguation)
- John Fincher
- John Finch (MP for Winchelsea)
- John Findlater
- John Findlater Clements
- John Findlay (New Zealand)
- John Findlay (United States politician)
- John Findlay Wallace
- John Fine (disambiguation)
- John Finegan
- John Finegan (disambiguation)