| 词条 | Neoclassical realism |
| 释义 |
Neoclassical realism is an approach to foreign policy analysis. Initially coined by Gideon Rose in a 1998 World Politics review article, it is a combination of classical realist and neorealist – particularly defensive realist – theories. Neoclassical realism holds that the actions of a state in the international system can be explained by intervening systemic variables – such as the distribution of power capabilities among states – as well as cognitive variables – such as the perception and misperception of systemic pressures, other states' intentions, or threats – and domestic variables – such as state institutions, elites, and societal actors within society – affecting the power and freedom of action of the decision-makers in foreign policy. OverviewWhile holding true to the realist concept of balance of power, neoclassical realism further adds that states' mistrust and inability to perceive one another accurately, or state leaders' inability to mobilize state power and public support can result in an underexpansion or underbalancing behaviour leading to imbalances within the international system, the rise and fall of great powers, and war:
According to one review study, Neoclassical realism has primarily been criticized for its "apparent ontological and epistemological incoherence".[1] A 1995 study criticized Neoclassical realism for encompassing "nearly the entire universe of international relations theory" and stretching realism "beyond all recognition or utility."[2] According to Steven Walt of the Kennedy School at Harvard University, one of the chief flaws in Neoclassical realism is that it "tends to incorporate domestic variables in an ad hoc manner, and its proponents have yet to identify when these variables have greater or lesser influence".[3] Neoclassical realism has been used to explain a number of puzzling foreign policy cases, such as the volatility in South Korea-Japan relations,[4] Fascist Italy's foreign policy,[5] Slobodan Milosevic's decision-making during the 1999 Kosovo crisis,[6] the occurrence of the Cod Wars between Iceland and the United Kingdom,[7] and Iran's foreign policy choices after the American invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq.[8] Proponents of the theory argue that the theory is particularly valuable in explaining cases that fly in the face of other international relations theories, due to its incorporation of domestic variables.[9] Notable neoclassical realistsPersons mentioned as neoclassical realists, and the year of the release of the work associated with this classification include:[10]
See also
References
1. ^{{Cite journal|last=Smith|first=Nicholas Ross|date=2018-02-27|title=Can Neoclassical Realism Become a Genuine Theory of International Relations?|journal=The Journal of Politics|volume=80|issue=2|pages=742–749|doi=10.1086/696882|issn=0022-3816}} {{more citations needed|date=May 2012}}2. ^{{Cite journal|last=Legro|first=Jeffrey W.|last2=Moravcsik|first2=Andrew|date=2006-03-29|title=Is Anybody Still a Realist?|journal=International Security|language=en|volume=24|issue=2|pages=5–55|doi=10.1162/016228899560130}} 3. ^{{Cite book|title=The enduring relevance of the realist tradition.|last=Walt|first=Stephen M|date=2002|publisher=W.W. Norton Company|location=New York|language=English|oclc = 746955865}} 4. ^{{Cite journal|last=Cha|first=Victor D.|date=2000|title=Abandonment, Entrapment, and Neoclassical Realism in Asia: The United States, Japan, and Korea|jstor=3013998|journal=International Studies Quarterly|volume=44|issue=2|pages=261–291|doi=10.1111/0020-8833.00158}} 5. ^{{Cite journal|date=2002|title=The Roots of Revisionism: Fascist Italy, 1922-39|journal=Security Studies|volume=11|issue=4|pages=125–159|doi=10.1080/714005356|last1=Davidson|first1=Jason W.}} 6. ^{{Cite journal|last=Devlen|first=Balkan|title=Neoclassical Realism and Foreign Policy Crises|url=https://www.academia.edu/1829975|language=en}} 7. ^{{Cite journal|last=Steinsson|first=Sverrir|date=2017-07-01|title=Neoclassical Realism in the North Atlantic: Explaining Behaviors and Outcomes in the Cod Wars|url=https://academic.oup.com/fpa/article/13/3/599/3075280|journal=Foreign Policy Analysis|language=en|volume=13|issue=3|pages=599–617|doi=10.1093/fpa/orw062|issn=1743-8586}} 8. ^{{Cite web|url=http://www.sup.org/books/title/?id=25005|title=Squandered Opportunity: Neoclassical Realism and Iranian Foreign Policy {{!}} Thomas Juneau|last=Press|first=Stanford University|website=www.sup.org|language=en|access-date=2018-02-28}} 9. ^{{Cite book|url=https://global.oup.com/academic/product/neoclassical-realist-theory-of-international-politics-9780199899234?cc=is&lang=en&|title=Neoclassical Realist Theory of International Politics|last=Ripsman|first=Norrin M.|last2=Taliaferro|first2=Jeffrey W.|last3=Lobell|first3=Steven E.|date=2016-05-26|publisher=Oxford University Press|isbn=9780199899234|location=Oxford, New York}} 10. ^Baylis, John, Steve Smith and Patricia Owens (eds.) The globalization of world politics: an introduction to international relations.(Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008) p.231 11. ^{{Cite book | url=https://global.oup.com/academic/product/neoclassical-realist-theory-of-international-politics-9780199899234?cc=is&lang=en& | isbn=9780199899234| title=Neoclassical Realist Theory of International Politics| publisher=Oxford University Press| date=2016-05-26}}
2 : International relations|Political realism |
| 随便看 |
|
开放百科全书收录14589846条英语、德语、日语等多语种百科知识，基本涵盖了大多数领域的百科知识，是一部内容自由、开放的电子版国际百科全书。