“November 2006 San Francisco general election”的意思、由来-开放百科全书

词条

November 2006 San Francisco general election

释义

Assessor-Recorder
Public defender
Board of Supervisors
Propositions
Proposition A Proposition B Proposition C Proposition D Proposition E Proposition F Proposition G Proposition H Proposition I Proposition J Proposition K
References
External links

The November 2006 San Francisco general elections were held on November 7, 2006 in San Francisco, California. The elections included five seats to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors, positions for San Francisco assessor-recorder and public defender, and eleven San Francisco ballot measures.

Assessor-Recorder

Incumbent assessor-recorder Phil Ting won reelection unopposed.

{{Election box begin no party no change
| title = San Francisco assessor-recorder election, 2006^[1]
}}{{Election box winning candidate no party no change
| candidate = Phil Ting (incumbent)
| votes = 184,138
| percentage = 98.56
}}{{Election box candidate no party no change
| candidate = Write-in
| votes = 2,690
| percentage = 1.44
}}{{Election box invalid no party no change
| votes = 66,891
| percentage = 26.36
}}{{Election box total no party no change
| votes = 253,719
| percentage = 100.00
}}{{Election box turnout no party no change
| percentage = 60.66
}}{{Election box end}}

Public defender

Incumbent public defender Jeff Adachi won reelection unopposed.

{{Election box begin no party no change
| title = San Francisco public defender election, 2006^[1]
}}{{Election box winning candidate no party no change
| candidate = Jeff Adachi (incumbent)
| votes = 180,771
| percentage = 98.85
}}{{Election box candidate no party no change
| candidate = Write-in
| votes = 2,101
| percentage = 1.15
}}{{Election box invalid no party no change
| votes = 70,847
| percentage = 27.92
}}{{Election box total no party no change
| votes = 253,719
| percentage = 100.00
}}{{Election box turnout no party no change
| percentage = 60.66
}}{{Election box end}}

Board of Supervisors

{{main article|San Francisco Board of Supervisors elections, 2006}}

Propositions

Propositions: A • B • C • D • E • F • G • H • I • J • K __NOTOC__

Note: "City" refers to the San Francisco municipal government.

Proposition A

Proposition A would authorize the San Francisco Unified School District to issue $450 million worth of bonds, funded by a property tax increase, to modernize and repair school facilities, and create a citizens' oversight committee to monitor expenditures.^[2] This proposition required a majority of 55% to pass.

{{Referendum
| title = Proposition A^[1]
| yes = 171,236
| yespct = 73.85
| no = 60,640
| nopct = 26.15
| majorityneeded = 55.00
| invalid = 21,843
| invalidpct = 8.61
| total = 253,719
| turnoutpct = 60.66
}}

Proposition B

Proposition B would require the Board of Supervisors to create parental leave policies permitting Board members and members of other City boards and commissions to attend meetings via teleconference due to pregnancy, childbirth, and other related conditions.^[2]

{{Referendum
| title = Proposition B^[1]
| yes = 164,166
| yespct = 72.22
| no = 63,157
| nopct = 27.78
| invalid = 26,396
| invalidpct = 10.40
| total = 253,719
| turnoutpct = 60.66
}}

Proposition C

Proposition C would require the Civil Service Commission to set the base salaries of the Mayor, city attorney, district attorney, public defender, assessor-recorder, city treasurer, and sheriff based on the average salaries of comparable officials in other Bay Area counties.^[2]

{{Referendum
| title = Proposition C^[1]
| yes = 140,561
| yespct = 63.33
| no = 81,396
| nopct = 36.67
| invalid = 31,762
| invalidpct = 12.52
| total = 253,719
| turnoutpct = 60.66
}}

Proposition D

Proposition D would prohibit the City and its contractors from disclosing personal information about individuals except in limited circumstances.^[2]

{{Referendum
| title = Proposition D^[1]
| yes = 143,020
| yespct = 64.35
| no = 79,230
| nopct = 35.65
| invalid = 31,469
| invalidpct = 12.40
| total = 253,719
| turnoutpct = 60.66
}}

Proposition E

Proposition E would increase the City parking tax from 25% to 35% and extend the tax to include valet parking services even if the valet company does not pay for the property where it parks its cars.^[2]

{{Referendum
| title = Proposition E^[1]
| no = 151,628
| nopct = 67.23
| yes = 73,922
| yespct = 32.77
| invalid = 28,169
| invalidpct = 11.10
| total = 253,719
| turnoutpct = 60.66
}}

Proposition F

Proposition F would require employers to provide paid sick leave to its employees in San Francisco.^[2]

{{Referendum
| title = Proposition F^[1]
| yes = 139,005
| yespct = 60.95
| no = 89,057
| nopct = 39.05
| invalid = 25,657
| invalidpct = 10.11
| total = 253,719
| turnoutpct = 60.66
}}

Proposition G

Proposition G would require formula retail use stores to seek Planning Commission conditional use approval before opening a new store in Neighborhood Commercial Districts which permit such stores.^[2]

{{Referendum
| title = Proposition G^[1]
| yes = 125,728
| yespct = 58.19
| no = 90,353
| nopct = 41.81
| invalid = 37,638
| invalidpct = 14.83
| total = 253,719
| turnoutpct = 60.66
}}

Proposition H

Proposition H would require landlords to provide relocation assistance to eligible residential tenants when evicting them due to no fault of their own.^[2]

{{Referendum
| title = Proposition H^[1]
| yes = 120,916
| yespct = 52.93
| no = 107,541
| nopct = 47.07
| invalid = 25,262
| invalidpct = 9.96
| total = 253,719
| turnoutpct = 60.66
}}

Proposition I

Proposition I would make it City policy for the Mayor to appear in person at a regularly scheduled Board of Supervisors meeting monthly for formal policy discussions with the Board.^[2]

{{Referendum
| title = Proposition I^[1]
| yes = 126,023
| yespct = 56.36
| no = 97,567
| nopct = 43.64
| invalid = 30,129
| invalidpct = 11.87
| total = 253,719
| turnoutpct = 60.66
}}

Proposition J

Proposition J would make it City policy to call for the impeachment of President George W. Bush and Vice President Dick Cheney.^[2]

{{Referendum
| title = Proposition J^[1]
| yes = 133,042
| yespct = 58.53
| no = 94,282
| nopct = 41.47
| invalid = 26,395
| invalidpct = 10.40
| total = 253,719
| turnoutpct = 60.66
}}

Proposition K

Proposition K would make it City policy to acknowledge the housing needs of seniors and disabled adults with little financial means and to explore ways of addressing their needs.^[2]

{{Referendum
| title = Proposition K^[1]
| yes = 161,684
| yespct = 71.30
| no = 65,073
| nopct = 28.70
| invalid = 26,962
| invalidpct = 10.63
| total = 253,719
| turnoutpct = 60.66
}}

References

1. ^¹²³⁴⁵⁶⁷⁸⁹¹⁰¹¹¹²{{cite web |url = http://www.sfgov.org/site/elections_index.asp?id=61497 |title = City and County of San Francisco November 7, 2006 Consolidated General Election Official Election Results |accessdate = March 7, 2009 |publisher = San Francisco Department of Elections |date = December 5, 2006 |deadurl = yes |archiveurl = https://web.archive.org/web/20090315064252/http://www.sfgov.org/site/elections_index.asp?id=61497 |archivedate = March 15, 2009 |df = }}
2. ^¹²³⁴⁵⁶⁷⁸⁹¹⁰{{cite web | url = http://sfpl.org/pdf/main/gic/elections/November7_2006.pdf | title = November 7, 2006 Consolidated General Election Voter Information Pamphlet and Sample Ballot | format = PDF | accessdate = March 7, 2009 | publisher = San Francisco Department of Elections | date = September 21, 2006}}

[https://web.archive.org/web/20120205065934/http://www.sfgov.org/site/election_index.asp?id=39076 San Francisco Voter Information Pamphlet / Sample Ballot, November 7, 2006], [https://web.archive.org/web/20080720035746/http://www.sfgov.org/election Department of Elections] of the City and County of San Francisco.

External links

[https://web.archive.org/web/20091210182855/http://www.sfgov.org/site/elections_index.asp San Francisco Department of Elections]

3 : 2006 California elections|Elections in San Francisco|2000s in San Francisco

随便看

开放百科全书收录14589846条英语、德语、日语等多语种百科知识，基本涵盖了大多数领域的百科知识，是一部内容自由、开放的电子版国际百科全书。