“November 2010 San Francisco general election”的意思、由来-开放百科全书

词条

November 2010 San Francisco general election

释义

Board of Supervisors
Superior Court
Seat 15
Assessor-Recorder
Public defender
Propositions
Proposition AA Proposition A Proposition B Proposition C Proposition D Proposition E Proposition F Proposition G Proposition H Proposition I Proposition J Proposition K Proposition L Proposition M Proposition N
External links

The November 2010 San Francisco general elections was held on November 2, 2010, in San Francisco, California. The elections included five seats to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors, a runoff election for a seat on the San Francisco County Superior Court, assessor-recorder, public defender, and fifteen San Francisco ballot measures.

Board of Supervisors

{{main article|San Francisco Board of Supervisors elections, 2010}}

Superior Court

Seat 15

As no candidate had more than 50% of the votes in the June 2010 election, a runoff election was held between the two highest vote-getting candidates.

{{Election box begin no party no change
| title = San Francisco County Superior Court Seat 15 election, 2010
}}{{Election box winning candidate no party no change
| candidate = Richard B. Ulmer, Jr. (incumbent)
| votes = 99,342
| percentage = 53.17
}}{{Election box candidate no party no change
| candidate = Michael Nava
| votes = 87,511
| percentage = 46.83
}}{{Election box valid no party no change
| votes = 186,853
| percentage = 67.72
}}{{Election box invalid no party no change
| votes = 89,058
| percentage = 32.28
}}{{Election box total no party no change
| votes = 275,911
| percentage = 100.00
}}{{Election box turnout no party no change
| percentage = 59.16
}}{{Election box end}}

Assessor-Recorder

Incumbent assessor-recorder Phil Ting ran for reelection against James Pan.

{{Election box begin no party no change
| title = San Francisco assessor-recorder election, 2010
}}{{Election box winning candidate no party no change
| candidate = Phil Ting (incumbent)
| votes = 175,388
| percentage = 79.68
}}{{Election box candidate no party no change
| candidate = James Pan
| votes = 43,961
| percentage = 19.97
}}{{Election box candidate no party no change
| candidate = Write-in
| votes = 756
| percentage = 0.34
}}{{Election box valid no party no change
| votes = 220,105
| percentage = 79.20
}}{{Election box invalid no party no change
| votes = 57,802
| percentage = 20.80
}}{{Election box total no party no change
| votes = 277,907
| percentage = 100.00
}}{{Election box turnout no party no change
| percentage = 59.58
}}{{Election box end}}

Public defender

Incumbent public defender Jeff Adachi ran for reelection unopposed.

{{Election box begin no party no change
| title = San Francisco public defender election, 2010
}}{{Election box winning candidate no party no change
| candidate = Jeff Adachi (incumbent)
| votes = 199,502
| percentage = 98.85
}}{{Election box candidate no party no change
| candidate = Write-in
| votes = 2,328
| percentage = 1.15
}}{{Election box valid no party no change
| votes = 201,830
| percentage = 72.63
}}{{Election box invalid no party no change
| votes = 76,077
| percentage = 27.37
}}{{Election box total no party no change
| votes = 277,907
| percentage = 100.00
}}{{Election box turnout no party no change
| percentage = 59.58
}}{{Election box end}}

Propositions

Propositions: AA • A • B • C • D • E • F • G • H • I • J • K • L • M • N __NOTOC__

Note: "City" refers to the San Francisco municipal government.

Proposition AA

Proposition AA would increase the annual vehicle registration fee by $10 to fund congestion and pollution mitigation programs.

{{Referendum
| title = Proposition AA
| yes = 156,016
| yespct = 58.77
| no = 109,434
| nopct = 41.23
| valid = 265,450
| validpct = 94.10
| invalid = 16,631
| invalidpct = 5.90
| total = 282,081
| turnoutpct = 60.48
}}

Proposition A

Proposition A would authorize the City to issue $46.15 million in bonds for the seismic retrofitting of multi-story wood structures. This measure required a two-thirds majority to pass.

{{Referendum
| title = Proposition A
| yes = 162,266
| yespct = 63.24
| no = 94,324
| nopct = 36.76
| majorityneeded = 66.67
| valid = 256,590
| validpct = 90.96
| invalid = 25,491
| invalidpct = 9.04
| total = 282,081
| turnoutpct = 60.48
}}

Proposition B

Proposition B would require city employees to contribute additional amounts to their pensions and health benefits, and changed arbitration rules regarding City collective bargaining agreements.

{{Referendum
| title = Proposition B
| yes = 113,894
| yespct = 43.04
| no = 150,734
| nopct = 56.96
| valid = 264,628
| validpct = 93.81
| invalid = 17,453
| invalidpct = 6.19
| total = 282,081
| turnoutpct = 60.48
}}

Proposition C

Proposition C would require the Mayor to appear before the Board of Supervisors monthly for formal policy discussions.

{{Referendum
| title = Proposition C
| yes = 154,776
| yespct = 59.89
| no = 103,673
| nopct = 40.11
| valid = 258,449
| validpct = 91.62
| invalid = 23,632
| invalidpct = 8.38
| total = 282,081
| turnoutpct = 60.48
}}

Proposition D

Proposition D would allow adult noncitizen parents, guardians, and caregivers with children in the San Francisco Unified School District to vote in San Francisco Board of Education elections.

{{Referendum
| title = Proposition D
| yes = 118,608
| yespct = 45.09
| no = 144,418
| nopct = 54.91
| valid = 263,026
| validpct = 93.24
| invalid = 19,055
| invalidpct = 6.76
| total = 282,081
| turnoutpct = 60.48
}}

Proposition E

Proposition E would allow for Election Day voter registration for municipal elections.

{{Referendum
| title = Proposition E
| yes = 118,217
| yespct = 47.21
| no = 132,189
| nopct = 52.79
| valid = 250,406
| validpct = 88.77
| invalid = 31,675
| invalidpct = 11.23
| total = 282,081
| turnoutpct = 60.48
}}

Proposition F

Proposition F would shorten, for one time only, the term of one Health Service Board member from five to three years and of another from five to two years, so that terms will expire in pairs and can be filled in the same Board election.

{{Referendum
| title = Proposition F
| yes = 130,415
| yespct = 53.32
| no = 114,178
| nopct = 46.68
| valid = 244,593
| validpct = 86.71
| invalid = 37,488
| invalidpct = 13.29
| total = 282,081
| turnoutpct = 60.48
}}

Proposition G

Proposition G would remove the wage formula impacting San Francisco Municipal Railway operators from the City Charter in favor of collective bargaining and binding arbitration, and modify rules regarding binding arbitration and terms of employment for San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency employees.

{{Referendum
| title = Proposition G
| yes = 164,234
| yespct = 64.94
| no = 88,671
| nopct = 35.06
| valid = 252,905
| validpct = 89.66
| invalid = 29,176
| invalidpct = 10.34
| total = 282,081
| turnoutpct = 60.48
}}

Proposition H

Proposition H would prohibit local elected officials from holding a position on a political party county central committee.

{{Referendum
| title = Proposition H
| yes = 103,141
| yespct = 42.44
| no = 139,178
| nopct = 57.56
| valid = 242,319
| validpct = 85.90
| invalid = 39,762
| invalidpct = 14.10
| total = 282,081
| turnoutpct = 60.48
}}

Proposition I

Proposition I would allow early voting on the Saturday before the 2011 municipal elections, paid for by individual and group donors, followed by a study of the efficacy of Saturday elections in the future.

{{Referendum
| title = Proposition I
| yes = 150,701
| yespct = 59.29
| no = 103,486
| nopct = 40.71
| valid = 254,187
| validpct = 90.11
| invalid = 27,894
| invalidpct = 9.89
| total = 282,081
| turnoutpct = 60.48
}}

Proposition J

Proposition J would impose a temporary 2% increase on the hotel room tax, clarified who is responsible for collecting and remitting third-party taxes, consolidated definitions, and amended the definition of "Permanent Resident."

{{Referendum
| title = Proposition J
| yes = 116,313
| yespct = 45.52
| no = 139,206
| nopct = 54.48
| valid = 255,519
| validpct = 90.58
| invalid = 26,562
| invalidpct = 9.42
| total = 282,081
| turnoutpct = 60.48
}}

Proposition K

Proposition K would clarify who is responsible for collecting and remitting third-party taxes, consolidate definitions, and amend the definition of "Permanent Resident." It would override the tax increase portion of Proposition J if both propositions passed and Proposition K received more votes.

{{Referendum
| title = Proposition K
| yes = 95,357
| yespct = 38.53
| no = 152,159
| nopct = 61.47
| valid = 247,516
| validpct = 87.75
| invalid = 34,565
| invalidpct = 12.25
| total = 282,081
| turnoutpct = 60.48
}}

Proposition L

Proposition L would prohibit sitting or lying on sidewalks between 7 am and 11 pm with certain exceptions.

{{Referendum
| title = Proposition L
| yes = 142,601
| yespct = 54.30
| no = 120,023
| nopct = 45.70
| valid = 262,624
| validpct = 93.10
| invalid = 19,457
| invalidpct = 6.90
| total = 282,081
| turnoutpct = 60.48
}}

Proposition M

Proposition M would establish community policing and foot patrols. It would override Proposition L if both propositions had passed and Proposition M received more votes.

{{Referendum
| title = Proposition M
| yes = 117,608
| yespct = 46.49
| no = 134,808
| nopct = 53.41
| valid = 252,416
| validpct = 89.48
| invalid = 29,665
| invalidpct = 10.52
| total = 282,081
| turnoutpct = 60.48
}}

Proposition N

Proposition N would increase the real property transfer tax on certain properties.

{{Referendum
| title = Proposition N
| yes = 149,350
| yespct = 58.49
| no = 105,979
| nopct = 41.51
| valid = 255,329
| validpct = 90.52
| invalid = 26,752
| invalidpct = 9.48
| total = 282,081
| turnoutpct = 60.48
}}

External links

[https://web.archive.org/web/20091210182855/http://www.sfgov.org/site/elections_index.asp San Francisco Department of Elections]

3 : 2010 California elections|Elections in San Francisco|2010s in San Francisco

随便看

开放百科全书收录14589846条英语、德语、日语等多语种百科知识，基本涵盖了大多数领域的百科知识，是一部内容自由、开放的电子版国际百科全书。