| 词条 | Opinion 2027 |
| 释义 |
The 17 names involved:
The opinion of the commission was that "the "name of a wild species...is not invalid by virtue of being predated by the name based on a domestic form."[1] These 17 species of wild animals were named later than the relevant domestic animals, hence the use of the ICZN provision for conservation. The names of the 17 species were added to the Official Lists and Indexes of Names in Zoology of the ICZN, which means that they are valid taxons.[4] References1. ^1 {{cite web|title=Opinions, March 2003|author=International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature|url=http://www.iczn.org/BZNMar2003opinions.htm|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080621073659/http://www.iczn.org/BZNMar2003opinions.htm|archive-date=2008-06-21}} 2. ^{{cite journal|author1=ICZN|title=Opinion 2027 (Case 3010): Usage of 17 specific names based on wild species which are pre-dated by or contemporary with those based on domestic animals (Lepidoptera, Osteichthyes, Mammalia): conserved|journal=Bulletin of Zoological Nomenclature|date=31 March 2003|volume=60|issue=1|pages=81–84|url=https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/34357823#page/97/mode/1up}} 3. ^{{cite web|url=http://www.iczn.org/BZNMar2002comments.htm#comment3010_59_1|title=Comment on the proposed conservation of usage of 15 mammal specific names based on wild species which are antedated by or contemporary with those based on domestic animals|author1=Anthea Gentry |author2=Juliet Clutton-Brock |author3=Colin P. Groves |last-author-amp=yes |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080517122333/http://www.iczn.org/BZNMar2002comments.htm#comment3010_59_1 |archive-date=2008-05-17}} 4. ^{{cite book|title=Official Lists and Indexes of Names in Zoology|publisher=International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature|year=2014|pages=126, 225|url=http://iczn.org/sites/iczn.org/files/officialists.pdf}} 1 : Zoological nomenclature |
| 随便看 |
|
开放百科全书收录14589846条英语、德语、日语等多语种百科知识，基本涵盖了大多数领域的百科知识，是一部内容自由、开放的电子版国际百科全书。