| 词条 | Patel v Ali |
| 释义 |
| name = Patel v Ali | court = High Court | image = | date decided = | full name = | citations = [1984] Ch 283 | judges = | prior actions = | subsequent actions = | opinions = Goulding J | transcripts = | keywords = Remedies, specific performance }} Patel v Ali [1984] Ch 283 is an English contract law case, concerning the possibility of claiming specific performance of a promise after breach of contract. FactsA vendor of a house became disabled after the sale. If she went through with the sale she would have lost the house. The buyer of the house demanded specific performance to convey the property. JudgmentGoulding J refused to grant specific performance, and granted only damages. As a discretionary, equitable remedy, specific performance was refused on the ground that considerable hardship would be caused. See also{{Clist remedies}}
NotesReferencesExternal links 4 : English contract case law|High Court of Justice cases|1985 in case law|1985 in British law |
| 随便看 |
|
开放百科全书收录14589846条英语、德语、日语等多语种百科知识，基本涵盖了大多数领域的百科知识，是一部内容自由、开放的电子版国际百科全书。