请输入您要查询的百科知识:

 

词条 Losing Chess
释义

  1. Rules (main variant)

  2. Analysis

  3. Variations

     Variations regarding stalemate  Variants in The Encyclopedia of Chess Variants 

  4. Notes

  5. References

  6. External links

{{Chess diagram
|tright
|
|rd|nd| |qd|kd|bd|nd|rd
|pd|bd|pd|pd|pd|pd|pd|pd
| | | | | | | |
| |bl| | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | |pl| | |
|pl|pl|pl|pl| |pl|pl|pl
|rl|nl|bl|ql|kl| |nl|rl
|After 1.e3 b5 2.Bxb5 Bb7 (diagram) White must capture 3.Bxd7, the only legal move. Then Black must also capture, but can choose among Nxd7, Qxd7, Kxd7, or Bxg2.
}}

Losing Chess (also known as Antichess, the Losing Game, Giveaway Chess, Suicide Chess, Killer Chess, Must-Kill, Take-All Chess, Capture Chess or Losums) is one of the most popular chess variants.[1][2] The objective of each player is to lose all of their pieces or be stalemated, that is, a misère version. In some variations, a player may also win by checkmating or by being checkmated.

The origin of the game is unknown, but believed to significantly predate an early version, named Take Me, played in the 1870s. Because of the popularity of Losing Chess, several variations have spawned. The most widely played (main variant) is described in Popular Chess Variants by D. B. Pritchard.

{{algebraic notation|pos=toc}}

Rules (main variant)

The rules are the same as those for standard chess, except for the following special rules:

  • Capturing is compulsory.
  • When more than one capture is available, the player may choose.
  • The king has no {{chessprobgloss|royal piece|royal power}} and accordingly:
    • it may be captured as any other piece;
    • there is no check or checkmate;
    • therefore the king may expose itself to capture;
    • there is no castling;
    • a pawn may also promote to a king.
  • Stalemate is a win for the stalemated player (the player with no legal moves).

A player wins by losing all their pieces, or being stalemated. Apart from move repetition, draw by agreement, and the fifty-move rule, the game is also drawn when a win is impossible (for example, when the only pieces remaining are {{chessgloss|bishops of opposite colors}}).

Analysis

Because of the forced capture rule, Losing Chess games often involve long sequences of {{chessgloss|forced move|forced}} captures by one player. This means that a minor mistake can doom a game. Such mistakes can be made from the very first move—losing openings for White include 1.a3, 1.b4, 1.c3, 1.d3, 1.d4, 1.e4, 1.f3, 1.f4, 1.h3, 1.h4, 1.Nc3 and 1.Nf3. Some of these openings took months of computer time to solve, but wins against 1.e4, 1.d4, and 1.d3 consist of simple series of forced captures and can be played from memory by most experienced players.{{efn|Solutions by David Bronstein were published in Popular Chess Variants (2000), pp. 33–34:

  • 1.d4?? e5 2.dxe5 Qg5 3.Qxd7 Bxd7 4.Bxg5 Kd8 5.Bxd8 a6 6.Bxc7 Ra7 7.Bxb8 b6 8.Bxa7 a5 9.Bxb6 g6 10.Bxa5 Bb4 11.Bxb4 Ne7 12.Bxe7 Rf8 13.Bxf8 h6 14.Bxh6 g5 15.Bxg5 f6 16.Bxf6 Bh3 17.Nxh3 0–1
  • 1.d3?? g5 2.Bxg5 Bg7 3.Bxe7 Bxb2 4.Bxd8 Bxa1 5.Bxc7 Bc3 6.Bxb8 Rxb8 7.Nxc3 d5 8.Nxd5 Nf6 9.Nxf6 Rg8 10.Nxe8 Rxg2 11.Bxg2 f6 12.Bxb7 Rxb7 13.Nxf6 Rb8 14.Nxh7 Rb1 15.Qxb1 Bb7 16.Qxb7 a6 17.Qxa6 0–1
  • 1.e4?? b5 2.Bxb5 Nf6 3.Bxd7 Nxe4 and White loses no matter which capture he chooses:
    • 4.Bxe8 Qxd2 5.Qxd2 (if 5.Bxf7 Qxc1 6.Qxc1 Nxf2 7.Kxf2 Rg8 etc.) 5...Nxd2 6.Kxd2 Rg8 7.Bxf7 c5 8.Bxg8 g6 9.Bxh7 e5 10.Bxg6 e4 11.Bxe4 Nc6 12.Bxc6 Bb7 13.Bxb7 Rc8 14.Bxc8 a6 15.Bxa6 c4 16.Bxc4 Ba3 17.Nxa3 0–1
    • Or 4.Bxc8 Nxd2 5.Bxd2 Qxd2 6.Qxd2 Na6 7.Bxa6 Rc8 8.Bxc8 f5 9.Bxf5 Rg8 10.Bxh7 c5 11.Bxg8 e6 12.Bxe6 c4 13.Bxc4 a6 14.Bxa6 g5 15.Qxg5 Kd8 16.Qxd8 Be7 17.Qxe7 0–1}}

This main variant of Losing Chess was weakly solved in October 2016; White is able to force a win beginning with 1.e3.{{efn|name=solve|{{cite web |last1=Watkins |first1=Mark |title=Losing Chess: 1. e3 wins for White|url=http://magma.maths.usyd.edu.au/~watkins/LOSING_CHESS/LCsolved.pdf |accessdate=29 August 2017}} - This solution is valid for both FICS and "International" rules on stalemate.}}

David Pritchard, the author of The Encyclopedia of Chess Variants, wrote that the "complexity and beauty" of Losing Chess is found in its endgame. He noted that, in contrast with regular chess, Losing Chess endgames with just two pieces require considerable skill to play correctly, whereas three- or four-pieces endgames can exceed human capacity to solve precisely.{{sfnp|Pritchard|2000|p=34|ps=}}

Variations

Variations regarding stalemate

{{chess diagram small
|tleft
|
| | | | | | |nd|bl
| | | | | | |pl|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | |pd| | |
| | |pd| |pl| | |
| | |pl| | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
|White to move, but there are no legal moves. The position is stalemate. The game result depends on the variant being played.
}}

Implementations of the main variant can vary in regard to stalemate.[3] "International" rules are as described above, with the stalemated player winning. FICS rules resolve stalemate as a win for the player with the fewer number of pieces remaining; if both have the same number, it is a draw (the piece types are irrelevant). "Joint" FICS/International rules resolves stalemate as a draw unless it is a victory for the same player under both rulesets.{{efn|name=solve}} The stalemate in the diagram is a win for White under "International" rules, a win for Black under FICS rules, and a draw under "joint" rules.

{{clear}}

Variants in The Encyclopedia of Chess Variants

Pritchard discusses the following variants of the game in The Encyclopedia of Chess Variants.{{sfnp|Pritchard|1994|p=176|ps=}}

Variant 2

Rules are the same as the main rules, except:

{{unordered list|style=list-style-position:inside
|Pawns promote only to queens.
|Stalemate is a draw.
}}Variant 3

Rules are the same as the main rules, except:

  • The king has royal powers, and removing the king from check takes precedence over capturing another piece.
  • A player wins by reducing his pieces to a bare king, or by checkmating the opponent.
  • Stalemate is a draw.
Variant 4

Rules are the same as variant 3, except:

  • A player wins by reducing his pieces to a bare king, or by getting checkmated.
{{clear}}

Notes

{{notelist|notes=}}

References

1. ^Pritchard (2007), p. 86
2. ^Parlett (1999), p. 324
3. ^{{cite web |last1=Bodlaender |first1=Hans |title=Losing Chess |url=http://www.chessvariants.org/diffobjective.dir/giveaway.html |website=The Chess Variant Pages |accessdate=25 January 2016}}
Bibliography
  • {{cite book

|last=Parlett
|first=David
|authorlink=David Parlett
|title=The Oxford History of Board Games
|publisher=Oxford University Press Inc
|year=1999
|isbn=0-19-212998-8}}
  • {{cite book

|last=Pritchard
|first=D. B.
|authorlink=David Pritchard (chess player)
|title=The Encyclopedia of Chess Variants
|publisher=Games & Puzzles Publications
|chapter=Losing Chess
|pages=176–79
|year=1994
|isbn=0-9524142-0-1}}
  • {{cite book

|last=Pritchard
|first=D. B.
|authorlink=David Pritchard (chess player)
|title=Popular Chess Variants
|publisher=B.T. Batsford Ltd
|chapter=§7 Losing Chess
|pages=32–38
|year=2000
|isbn=0-7134-8578-7}}
  • {{cite book

|last=Pritchard
|first=D. B.
|authorlink=David Pritchard (chess player)
|editor-last=Beasley
|editor-first=John
|title=The Classified Encyclopedia of Chess Variants
|publisher=John Beasley
|chapter=§10.9 Playing to lose
|pages=85–89
|year=2007
|isbn=978-0-9555168-0-1}}

External links

  • Losing Chess by Hans Bodlaender, The Chess Variant Pages
  • Suicide Chess Review by Vladica Andrejić
  • Losing Chess by Fabrice Liardet {{link language|fr}}
  • Nilatac's opening book Suicide Chess book browser
  • Scidb a chess database supporting Losing Chess
  • Losing Chess Losing Chess II Losing Chess III Losing Chess IV simple programs by Ed Friedlander (Java)
{{Chess variants|state=collapsed}}

2 : Chess variants|Solved games

随便看

 

开放百科全书收录14589846条英语、德语、日语等多语种百科知识,基本涵盖了大多数领域的百科知识,是一部内容自由、开放的电子版国际百科全书。

 

Copyright © 2023 OENC.NET All Rights Reserved
京ICP备2021023879号 更新时间:2024/11/13 9:20:13