| 词条 | Pegram v. Herdrich |
| 释义 |
|Litigants=Pegram v. Herdrich |ArgueDate=February 23 |ArgueYear=2000 |DecideDate=June 12 |DecideYear=2000 |FullName=Lori Pegram, et al., Petitioners v. Cynthia Herdrich |USVol=530 |USPage=211 |ParallelCitations=120 S. Ct. 2143; 147 L. Ed. 2d 164; 2000 U.S. LEXIS 3964 |Prior= |Subsequent= |Holding=Because mixed treatment and eligibility decisions by health maintenance organization physicians are not fiduciary according to the Employee Retirement Income Security Act, Herdrich does not state a claim under the Act. |SCOTUS=1994-2005 |Majority=Souter |JoinMajority=unanimous |LawsApplied=Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, {{USC|29|1001}} et seq. }}Pegram v. Herdrich, 530 U.S. 211 (2000), was a United States Supreme Court case that held that the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 does not provide a remedy for coverage determinations by health maintenance organizations. The case is important because by excluding suits involving coverage determinations from the Act, it does not pre-empt state law remedies.[1] References1. ^{{ussc|name=Pegram v. Herdrich|volume=530|page=211|pin=|year=2000}}. External links
| case = Pegram v. Herdrich, {{Ussc|530|211|2000|el=no}} | courtlistener =https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/118372/pegram-v-herdrich/ | googlescholar = https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=17125855822711771249 | justia =https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/530/211/ | loc =http://cdn.loc.gov/service/ll/usrep/usrep530/usrep530211/usrep530211.pdf | oyez ={{SCOTUS-stub}} 4 : United States Supreme Court cases|United States Supreme Court cases of the Rehnquist Court|Employee Retirement Income Security Act|2000 in United States case law |
| 随便看 |
|
开放百科全书收录14589846条英语、德语、日语等多语种百科知识，基本涵盖了大多数领域的百科知识，是一部内容自由、开放的电子版国际百科全书。