请输入您要查询的百科知识:

 

词条 Permanente Quarry
释义

  1. History

     Economic problems and bankruptcy 

  2. Pollution

     Mercury emissions  Selenium discharge  Sediment discharges 

  3. Opposition

     Workplace violence 

  4. See also

  5. References

  6. External links

The Permanente Quarry is a limestone quarry in an unincorporated area of Santa Clara County, California, just west of Cupertino, California.[1] The quarry is a limestone and aggregate mining operation and cement plant, owned by Lehigh Southwest Cement, a subsidiary of HeidelbergCement. Since 1939 the plant has been in operation and is responsible for the production of more than half of the cement used in the Bay Area. Roughly 70 percent of the cement used in the communities of Santa Clara county is acquired from the cement plant.[2]

Located in the foothills above Cupertino on the northeast slopes of Black Mountain, the quarry runs east-west parallel to the upper watershed of Permanente Creek to the south and to Permanente Ridge and Rancho San Antonio Open Space Preserve to the north.

The limestone rock found in the Permanente Creek valley and on the summit of Black Mountain is relatively unique in the Bay Area. Microfossils in the limestone deposits suggest that the mountain originated as a seamount at 22 degrees north in the tropical Pacific about 100 million years ago and was transported to Los Altos by the Pacific Plate.[3][4][5] These rocks occur as jagged gray boulders and outcrops just southwest of the radio towers on the summit of Black Mountain, as well as in the Permanente Quarry.

History

The quarry was founded by Henry J. Kaiser as the Kaiser Permanente Cement Plant in 1939, taking the name of the business from the Permanente Creek in whose valley it lies. Kaiser intended to use the quarry to provide the majority of the cement used in the construction of the Shasta Dam, supplying the {{convert|6|Moilbbl|m3}} of cement .[6] Additionally, Kaiser Cement Company built Highway 101, Highway 85 and other major Northern California landmarks from the quarry.[7] The cement plant is the primary reason for the lone railroad line that runs through the city. Hanson Cement acquired Kaiser Cement for $200 million in 1986.[8] The cement company was renamed Hanson Permanente Cement in 1999.[9] At the time of sale, Kaiser Cement was the 5th largest producer of cement in the entire United States.[10]

Economic problems and bankruptcy

Hanson Permanente Cement filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy with the US Bankruptcy Court in 2016. The bankruptcy is related to more than 14,000 injury lawsuits.[11] The previous year Hanson Permanente Cement was ordered to spend $5 million to install an advanced wastewater treatment plant along with $2.55 million in civil penalties.[12]

Pollution

Mercury emissions

The cement plant at the quarry has been fueled by petroleum coke since 2007, the latter (along with the limestone itself) is a major source of mercury emissions. The cement plant is responsible for 29 percent of total Bay Area airborne mercury emissions and was shown to impact a rural site, Calero Reservoir, {{convert|20|mi|km}} away.[13] Mercury, a neurotoxin and pollutant which is concentrated in the aquatic food web, was found to be 5.8 to 6.7 times higher in precipitation near the cement plant than at a control location {{convert|2.0|mi|km}} away.[14]

Selenium discharge

Groundwater fills the current quarry and is pumped into Permanente Creek. Selenium pollution in the creek downstream from the quarry ranged from 13 to 81 micrograms/liter (μg/L). A North Quarry water sample in January 2010 had a dissolved selenium concentration of 82 μg/L, indicating that the quarry is the source of the selenium pollution. Selenium is bioaccumulated in the aquatic food web.[15] Safety standards for selenium concentrations in fresh water are 5 μg/L under the California Toxics Rule (same as the National Toxics Rule set by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) in 2000 and 2012.[16]

Sediment discharges

Anthropization related to quarry operations and the cement plant have resulted in sediment discharges into Permanente Creek that are 3.5 times what would be expected under normal conditions.[17] Sediment loads in the upper Permanente Creek mainstem are 15 times those in the West Fork Permanente Creek, which drains mostly parkland. These sediment loads could threaten the resident rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) population in the creek.[18]

Opposition

Under the terms of a 1985 reclamation plan, the quarry was not supposed to dump quarry waste materials more than 100 feet higher than the natural chaparral ridge known as Permanente Ridge. This waste material storage area, or WMSA, was piled on and above the Permanente Ridge and this brownish-gray scar is visible from much of the southern Bay Area – despite claims from the 2004 owner, Hanson Cement, that it was hydroseeded annually with native grass mix and that they planted 80% of the area in trees and shrubs, it remains (see photo inset) a barren zone, degrading the aesthetic value of the adjacent Rancho San Antonio Open Space Preserve.[19] This barren ridge line, referred to by Lehigh Southwest as the West Materials Storage Area (WMSA) is visible to much of the Silicon Valley.

On December 19, 2011, the Sierra Club sued Lehigh Southwest Cement Company[20] and Heidelberg Cement in federal court to stop its unpermitted discharges of selenium and other toxic water pollutants into Permanente Creek. The Sierra Club maintains that Lehigh has been polluting Permanente Creek in violation of the clean water act for years. Lehigh's own water quality analyses have demonstrated that quarry pit wastewater that Lehigh discharges into the creek has been 16 times higher than Clean Water Act stream standards. The pollution is especially harmful to aquatic life in downstream areas such as Rancho San Antonio County Park, where selenium concentrations are often more than five times more dangerous than state and federal standards allow.

On June 7, 2012, the County of Santa Clara Board of Supervisors approved amendments to the 1985 Permanente Quarry Reclamation Plan for Lehigh Southwest Cement Company, including approval of a new waste material storage area (EMSA) at the east end of the quarry. The newly approved Reclamation Plan has 89 conditions (significantly more than the 73 conditions in the 1985 Amendment), and calls for higher performance standards for re-vegetation of all disturbed areas, minimizing selenium runoff and an increased level of reporting and monitoring. The Board also ratified the Final Environmental Impact Report in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act.[21]

In December 2012 the Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District filed a lawsuit against Santa Clara County, challenging the reclamation plan for Lehigh Southwest Cement's Permanente Quarry near Cupertino, saying its environmental impact report failed to analyze and mitigate the project's impacts on air quality, hazardous materials, recreation, groundwater and endangered species.[22]

Workplace violence

On October 5, 2011, the Lehigh Southwest Cement plant was the site of a shooting committed by a disgruntled employee, 47-year-old Shareef Allman. During a safety meeting at 4:00 a.m., Allman opened fire with a .223-caliber semiautomatic rifle and a .40-caliber handgun, killing three coworkers and wounding six others.

See also

  • HeidelbergCement

References

1. ^{{cite gnis|2674820|Permanente Quarry}}
2. ^Cupertino cement quarry to pay $7.5 million to settle water pollution violations – The Mercury News
3. ^{{cite book |title=Peninsula Trails and Tales |last=Weintraub |first=David |year=2003 |publisher=Graphic Arts Books |location=Portland, OR |isbn=978-1-55868-850-6 |page=384 }}
4. ^{{cite book |title=Geology of the San Francisco Bay Region |last=Sloan |first=Doris |page=172 |publisher=University of California Press |location=Berkeley and Los Angeles, California |year=2006 |isbn=978-0-520-23629-5 }}
5. ^{{cite journal |title=Franciscan Complex Calera limestones: accreted remnants of Farallon Plate oceanic plateaus |authors=John A. Tarduno, Michael McWilliams, Michel G. Debiche, William V. Sliter, M. C. Blake |journal=Nature |volume=317 |year=1985 |url=http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v317/n6035/pdf/317345a0.pdf |accessdate=2012-08-23 |issue=6035|pages=345–347 |doi=10.1038/317345a0}}
6. ^Shasta Dam – Encyclopædia Britannica
7. ^Frequently Asked Questions – City of Cupertino
8. ^Kaiser Cement OKs Bid by Unit of Hanson Trust : Competitor, Lone Star, Will Sell Some Holdings to Another British Firm – LA Times
9. ^Frequently Asked Questions – City of Cupertino
10. ^[https://www.nytimes.com/1986/11/28/business/company-news-hanson-to-acquire-kaiser-cement.html – Hanson to Acquire Kaiser Cement] – New York Times
11. ^Hanson Permanente Cement files for bankruptcy – Global Cement
12. ^Cupertino cement quarry to pay $7.5 million to settle water pollution violations – The Mercury News
13. ^{{cite journal |title=Evidence for short-range transport of atmospheric mercury to a rural, inland site |authors=Sarah E. Rothenberg, Lester McKee, Alicia Gilbreath, Donald Yee, Mike Connor, Xuewu Fu |journal=Atmospheric Environment |date=March 2010 |volume=44 |issue=10 |pages=1263–1273 |url=http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1352231009010668 |accessdate=2012-12-15 |doi=10.1016/j.atmosenv.2009.12.032}}
14. ^{{cite journal |title=Wet deposition of mercury within the vicinity of a cement plant before and during cement plant maintenance |authors=Sarah E. Rothenberg, Lester McKee, Alicia Gilbreath, Donald Yee, Mike Connor, Xuewu Fu |journal=Atmospheric Environment |date=March 2010 |volume=44 |issue=10 |pages=1255–1262 |url=http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S135223100901067X |accessdate=2012-12-15 |doi=10.1016/j.atmosenv.2009.12.033}}
15. ^{{cite book | last = Lemly | first = Dennis | title = Selenium Assessment in Aquatic Ecosystems: A guide for hazard evaluation and water quality criteria | publisher = Springer | year = 1998 | url = https://books.google.com/?id=qGH37iOW7yMC&dq=Selenium+Assessment+in+Aquatic+Ecosystems&printsec=frontcover#PPP1,M1 | isbn = 978-0-387-95346-5}}
16. ^{{cite report |title=Lehigh Permanente Quarry Selenium Treatment |author=CH2MHILL and Environmental Science Associates |date=April 2012 |url=http://www.sccgov.org/sites/planning/Plans%20-%20Programs/Surface%20Mining%20%28SMARA%29/Documents/2250_Lehigh_Final_Quarry_FA_042312.pdf |accessdate=2012-12-22 }}
17. ^{{cite report |title=Effects of Limestone Quarrying and Cement-Plant Operations on Runoff and Sediment Yields in the Upper Permanente Creek Basin, Santa Clara County, California |authors=K. Michael Nolan, R. Barry Hill |publisher=U. S. Geological Survey |year=1989 |pages=46 |url=https://pubs.er.usgs.gov/publication/wri894130 |accessdate=2012-12-23 }}
18. ^{{cite report |title=Sediment Impact and Management Practice Assessments |publisher=Santa Clara Valley Urban Runoff Pollution Prevention Program (SCVURPPP) |date=January 2006 |url=http://www.scvurppp-w2k.com/pdfs/0506/sediment%20factsheet-300dpi.pdf |accessdate=2012-12-23 }}
19. ^{{cite web |title=The Quarry's Perspective: Reclamation status of Hanson Quarry |author=Stewart Smith |publisher=Committee on Green Foothills |date=July 2004 |url=http://www.greenfoothills.org/news/2004/07-2004_QuarryStatus.html |accessdate=2012-08-04 }}
20. ^{{cite news|last=Ferrier|first=Mike|title=Sierra Club Files Suit Against Lehigh for Permanente Creek Pollution|url=http://lomaprieta.sierraclub.org/files/press_release_12192011.pdf|accessdate=25 July 2012|work=Sierra Club Press Release|date=19 December 2011|deadurl=yes|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20120321173033/http://lomaprieta.sierraclub.org/files/press_release_12192011.pdf|archivedate=21 March 2012|df=}}
21. ^{{cite news |title=County Upholds Planning Commission Approval of Lehigh Permanente Quarry Reclamation Plan Amendment |author=Gwendolyn Mitchell |publisher=Santa Clara County |date=2012-06-26 |url=http://www.sccgov.org/sites/opa/nr/Pages/County-Upholds-Planning-Commission-Approval-of-Lehigh-Permanente-Quarry-Reclamation-Plan-Amendment.aspx |accessdate=2012-08-04 }}
22. ^{{cite news |title=Cupertino: Open space district files lawsuit against county over Lehigh Cement's EIR |author=Matt Wilson |newspaper=San Jose Mercury News |date=2012-12-04 |url=http://www.mercurynews.com/science/ci_22125169/cupertino-open-space-district-files-lawsuit-against-county |accessdate=2012-12-22 }}

External links

  • [https://plus.google.com/photos/102075305971819749850/albums/5746254935014103425?banner=pwa&authkey=CJv46_LIpsmbjgE Map images of the quarry.]
  • [https://web.archive.org/web/20120707002231/http://www.greenfoothills.org/index.shtml Committee for Green Foothills (group against expansion of the quarry)]
  • News article about the cement plant
  • Information on the City of Cupertino Website
{{Silicon Valley}}{{coord|37.319627|N|122.113552|W|scale:50000|display=title}}

4 : Quarries in the United States|Cupertino, California|Geography of Santa Clara County, California|Mass shootings in the United States

随便看

 

开放百科全书收录14589846条英语、德语、日语等多语种百科知识,基本涵盖了大多数领域的百科知识,是一部内容自由、开放的电子版国际百科全书。

 

Copyright © 2023 OENC.NET All Rights Reserved
京ICP备2021023879号 更新时间:2024/11/12 5:32:52