词条 | Project MATCH |
释义 |
Three types of treatment were investigated:
The study concluded that patient-treatment matching is not necessary in alcoholism treatment because the three techniques are equal in effectiveness. CriticsCutler and Fishbain, in a review of Project Match, stated that in out of more than 60 publications generated by Project MATCH, all have overlooked important results.[6] Dr. Stanton Peele criticized MATCH on the basis that there was no control group (a group selected specifically for non treatment) to determine whether the treatments were more effective than the natural recovery process. Therapists in MATCH were more highly trained and monitored than addiction counselors usually available to the public. Effectiveness for all treatments was measured by reduction in frequency and intensity of drinking, whereas twelve-step and abstention-based programs, he argued, should claim no improvement without full abstention. Peele states Project Match failure to confirm a matching hypothesis{{efn|For this sense of the term matching hypothesis, see {{cite book |year=1990 |title=Prevention and treatment of alcohol problems: Research opportunities |p=149f |url=https://www.nap.edu/read/1486/chapter/10}}}} revealed more its oversights in their methods, as well as showing that American conceptions of alcoholism and treatment policy are fundamentally wrong. Non American research has shown that subjective matching does work and other research shows that many with alcohol abuse problems heal on their own without treatment.[7]George Vaillant argues researchers need to examine differences between alcoholics who succeed in recovering and those who fail, rather than limiting themselves to a search for contrasts among professionally run treatments. Project MATCH was poorly designed "to say the least" asserts psychologist G. Alan Marlatt of the University of Washington in Seattle, a pioneer in the development of behavioral treatments for alcoholism. Marlatt states: "Everybody can now project their own views about alcoholism onto this study."[5] Notes{{notelist}}References1. ^1 NIAAA Reports Project MATCH Main Findings {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20071029204522/http://www.niaaa.nih.gov/NewsEvents/NewsReleases/match.htm |date=2007-10-29 }}, Press release from National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, Dec 1996. Retrieved 2007-05-25. 2. ^{{cite journal|pmid=8979210 |url=http://www.jsad.com/jsad/link/58/7 |archive-url=https://archive.is/20130127012721/http://www.jsad.com/jsad/link/58/7 |dead-url=yes |archive-date=2013-01-27 |year=1997 |title=Matching Alcoholism Treatments to Client Heterogeneity: Project MATCH posttreatment drinking outcomes |volume=58 |issue=1 |pages=7–29 |journal=Journal of studies on alcohol }} 3. ^Treatment of alcoholism: New results. Harvard Mental Health Letter, Aug2006, Vol. 23 Issue 2, p6-7, 2p 4. ^Adler, Jerry; Underwood, Anne; Kelley, Raina; Springen, Karen; Breslau, Karen. "Rehab Reality Check{{dead link|date=May 2017 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes }}" Newsweek, 2/19/2007, Vol. 149 Issue 8, p44-46, 3p, 4c 5. ^1 {{cite journal |pages=62–3 |doi=10.2307/3980635 |last1=Bower |first1=Bruce |title=Alcoholics synonymous: Heavy drinkers of all stripes may get comparable help from a variety of therapies |volume=151 |issue=4 |journal=Science News |year=1997 |url=http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m1200/is_n4_v151/ai_19084159/}} 6. ^{{cite journal |doi=10.1186/1471-2458-5-75 |year=2005 |last1=Cutler |first1=Robert B |last2=Fishbain |first2=David A |journal=BMC Public Health |volume=5 |pages=75 |pmid=16018798 |title=Are alcoholism treatments effective? The Project MATCH data |pmc=1185549}} 7. ^Peele, Stanton. "Ten Radical Things NIAAA Research Shows About Alcoholism." The Addictions Newsletter (The American Psychological Association, Division 50), Spring, 1998 (Vol 5, No. 2), pp. 6; 17-19. Puro Varrio. Further reading
External links
4 : Research projects|Alcohol abuse in the United States|Alcohol in the United States|1989 establishments in the United States |
随便看 |
|
开放百科全书收录14589846条英语、德语、日语等多语种百科知识,基本涵盖了大多数领域的百科知识,是一部内容自由、开放的电子版国际百科全书。