词条 | Magdeburg rights |
释义 |
Contents{{refimprove section|date=June 2013}}As with most medieval city laws, the rights were primarily targeted at regulating trade to the benefit of the local merchants and artisans, who formed the most important part of the population of many such cities. In medieval Poland, Jews were invited along with German merchants to settle in cities as part of the royal city development policy. Jews and Germans were sometimes competitors in those cities. Jews lived under privileges that they carefully negotiated with the king or emperor. They were not subject to city jurisdiction. These privileges guaranteed that they could maintain communal autonomy, live according to their laws, and be subjected directly to the royal jurisdiction in matters concerning Jews and Christians. One of the provisions granted to Jews was that a Jew could not be made Gewährsmann, that is, he could not be compelled to tell from whom he acquired any object which had been sold or pledged to him and which was found in his possession. Other provisions frequently mentioned were a permission to sell meat to Christians, or employ Christian servants. External merchants coming into the city were not allowed to trade on their own, but instead forced to sell the goods they had brought into the city to local traders, if any wished to buy them. Being a member of the Hanseatic League, Magdeburg thus was one of the most important trade cities also, maintaining commerce with the Low countries (Flanders), the Baltic states, and the interior (for example Braunschweig). Spread of the lawAmong the most advanced systems of old Germanic law of the time, in the 13th and 14th centuries, Magdeburg rights were granted to more than a hundred cities, in Central Europe apart from Germany, including Schleswig, Bohemia, Poland, Belarus,[3] Ukraine, especially in Pomerania, Prussia, Lithuania (following the Christianization of Lithuania), and probably Moldavia. In these lands they were mostly known as German or Teutonic law. Since the local tribunal of Magdeburg also became the superior court for these towns, Magdeburg, together with Lübeck, practically defined the law of northern Germany, Poland and Lithuania for centuries, being the heart of the most important "family" of city laws. This role remained until the old Germanic laws were successively replaced with Roman law under the influence of the Reichskammergericht, in the centuries after its establishment during the Imperial Reform of 1495. Implementation across EuropeThe Law of Magdeburg implemented in Poland was different from its original German form.[6] It was combined with a set of civil and criminal laws, and adjusted to include the urban planning popular across Western Europe – which was based (more or less) on the ancient Roman model. Polish land owners used the location privilege known as "settlement with German law" across the country usually with no German settlers present. Meanwhile, the country people often ignorant of the actual German text, practiced the old common law of Poland in private relations.[4] Notable Polish, Lithuanian and today's Belarus and Ukraine towns governed on the basis of the location privilege known as the "settlement with German law" issued by Polish and Grand Duchy of Lithuania landlords (since the 16th to 18th centuries by Polish–Lithuanian Commonwealth landlords) included Biecz, Frysztak, Sandomierz, Kraków, Kurów, Minsk, Polotsk, Poznań, Ropczyce, Łódź, Wrocław, Szczecin (which was not a part of Poland when granted town rights, they were given by a Pomeranian landlord), Złotoryja, Vilnius, Trakai, Kaunas, Hrodna, Kiev, Lviv, Czernowitz (currently Chernivtsi in Ukraine), Brody, Lutsk, Volodymyr-Volynskyi, Sanok, Sniatyn, Nizhyn among many hundreds of others. The advantages were not only economic, but also political. Members of noble families were able to join the city patriciate usually unchallenged.[4] In the medieval Kingdom of Hungary, the first town to receive the Magdeburg rights was Székesfehérvár in 1237, followed by, i.a., Trnava (1238), Nitra (1248), Levoča (1271) and Žilina (1369). Towns and cities including Bardejov, Buda, Bratislava and Košice adopted the Southern German Nuremberg town rights, rather than the Magdeburg rights. See also
References1. ^1 {{cite web | url=https://books.google.ca/books?id=ANdbpi1WAIQC&lpg=PA328&ots=tQQ7jUvZCJ&dq=Magdeburg%20Law&pg=PA328 | title=Law and Justice | publisher=University of Washington Press | work=East Central Europe in the Middle Ages, 1000-1500 | date=1994 | accessdate=October 23, 2012 | author=Jean W. Sedlar | page=328 | isbn=0295972904}} {{Commons category|Magdeburg rights}}2. ^1 {{cite web | url=http://womeninworldhistory.com/WR-02.html | title=Magdeburg Law 1261: Northern Germany | publisher=New York University Press, 1998 | work=World History in Documents: A Comparative Reader | accessdate=28 February 2014 | author=Peter Stearns}} 3. ^{{cite web|url=http://www.tvr.by/eng/society.asp?id=14423|title=Magdeburg Rights granted to Minsk 510 years ago|publisher=Belteleradiocompany|date=29 July 2009|deadurl=yes|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20110605230843/http://www.tvr.by/eng/society.asp?id=14423|archivedate=5 June 2011|df=}} 4. ^1 2 {{cite web | url=https://books.google.ca/books?id=N883AAAAIAAJ&lpg=PA133&ots=TPRlgFDaY7&dq=Magdeburg%20Law&pg=PA133#v=onepage&q=Magdeburg%20Law&f=false | title=The Law of Magdeburg used in Poland | publisher=CUP (Cambridge University Press) Archive | work=The Cambridge History of Poland | accessdate=October 23, 2012 |author1=Oskar Halecki |author2=W: F. Reddaway |author3=J. H. Penson | pages=133–136 | isbn=1001288025}} 5 : Legal history of Germany|Legal history of Poland|History of Magdeburg|Magdeburg rights|Urban planning in Germany |
随便看 |
|
开放百科全书收录14589846条英语、德语、日语等多语种百科知识,基本涵盖了大多数领域的百科知识,是一部内容自由、开放的电子版国际百科全书。