释义 |
- Election summaries
- Early election dates
- California
- Florida
- South Carolina
- See also
- Notes
- References
- Bibliography
- External links
{{Infobox election | election_name = 1902 United States House of Representatives elections | country = United States | flag_year = 1896 | type = legislative | ongoing = no | previous_election = 1900 United States House of Representatives elections | previous_year = 1900 | next_election = 1904 United States House of Representatives elections | next_year = 1904 | seats_for_election = All 386 seats to the United States House of Representatives 194 seats were needed for a majority | election_date = November 4, 1902[1] | image1 = | leader1 = Joseph Cannon | leader_since1 = March 4, 1903 | party1 = Republican Party (United States) | leaders_seat1 = Illinois-18th | last_election1 = 201 seats[2] | seats_before1 = | seats1 = 210[4][5][6] | seat_change1 = {{increase}} 9 | popular_vote1 = | percentage1 = | swing1 = | image2 = | leader2 = John Sharp Williams | leader_since2 = March 4, 1903 | party2 = Democratic Party (United States) | leaders_seat2 = Mississippi-8th | last_election2 = 151 seats | seats_before2 = | seats2 = 176[4][5] | seat_change2 = {{increase}} 25 | popular_vote2 = | percentage2 = | swing2 = | title = Speaker | before_election = David Henderson | before_party = Republican Party (United States) | after_election = Joseph Cannon | after_party= Republican Party (United States) }}Elections to the United States House of Representatives held in 1902 occurred in the middle of President Theodore Roosevelt's first term, about a year after the assassination of President William McKinley in September 1901. Due to the increased size of the House and the reapportionment that resulted from the 1900 U.S. Census, the Republican Party and the Democratic Party both gained seats simultaneously, which has not occurred in any elections since. The Democrats increased their share of the House, but not by enough to regain control. With a stable economy and no cornerstone issue, Democratic gains can mostly be linked to the effects of redistricting. Many of the new seats were in areas with high numbers of immigrants (mostly Eastern and Southern European industrial workers, and Northern European farmers), with new immigrants tending to vote Democrat. The Populist Party disappeared from the House, with its supporters almost unanimously switching to the Democratic Party.{{citation needed|date=May 2015}} Notable freshmen included future Vice President and Speaker John Nance Garner (D-Texas). This election marked the third and most recent time in American history where the incumbent President's party gained House seats in a midterm election while still losing seats in the Senate, the first two being in 1814 and 1822. Election summaries29 new seats were added in reapportionment following the 1900 Census.[8] No states lost seats, 16 had no change in apportionment, 14 gained 1 seat, 3 gained 2 seats, and 3 gained 3 seats. Two of the states that gained representation elected the new seat at-large. ↓207 | 3 | 176 | Republican | IR | Democratic | State | Type | Total seats | Republican | Democratic |
---|
Seats | Change | Seats | Change | Seats | Change |
---|
Alabama | District | 9 | {{steady}} | 0 | {{steady}} | 9 | {{steady}} | Arkansas | District | 7 | {{increase}} 1 | 0 | {{steady}} | 7 | {{increase}} 1 | California | District | 8 | {{increase}} 1 | 5 | {{decrease}} 2 | 3 | {{increase}} 3 | Colorado | District +at-large[9] | 3[10] | {{increase}} 1 | 3 | {{increase}} 2[11] | 0 | {{steady}} | Connecticut | District +at-large[9] | 5 | {{increase}} 1 | 5 | {{increase}} 1 | 0 | {{steady}} | Delaware | At-large | 1 | {{steady}} | 0 | {{decrease}} 1 | 1 | {{increase}} 1 | Florida | District | 3 | {{increase}} 1 | 0 | {{steady}} | 3 | {{increase}} 1 | Georgia | District | 11 | {{steady}} | 0 | {{steady}} | 11 | {{steady}} | Idaho | At-large | 1[10] | {{steady}} | 1 | {{increase}} 1 | 0 | {{steady}} | Illinois | District | 25 | {{increase}} 3 | 17 | {{increase}} 6 | 8 | {{decrease}} 3 | Indiana | District | 13 | {{steady}} | 9 | {{steady}} | 4 | {{steady}} | Iowa | District | 11 | {{steady}} | 10 | {{decrease}} 1 | 1 | {{increase}} 1 | Kansas | District +at-large | 8 | {{steady}} | 8 | {{increase}} 1 | 0 | {{decrease}} 1 | Kentucky | District | 11 | {{steady}} | 1 | {{decrease}} 1 | 10 | {{increase}} 1 | Louisiana | District | 7 | {{increase}} 1 | 0 | {{steady}} | 7 | {{increase}} 1 | Maine[12] | District | 4 | {{steady}} | 4 | {{steady}} | 0 | {{steady}} | Maryland | District | 6 | {{steady}} | 4 | {{decrease}} 2 | 2 | {{increase}} 2 | Massachusetts | District | 14 | {{increase}} 1 | 10 | {{steady}} | 4 | {{increase}} 1 | Michigan | District | 12 | {{steady}} | 11 | {{decrease}} 1 | 1 | {{increase}} 1 | Minnesota | District | 9 | {{increase}} 2 | 8 | {{increase}} 1 | 1 | {{increase}} 1 | Mississippi | District | 8 | {{increase}} 1 | 0 | {{steady}} | 8 | {{increase}} 1 | Missouri | District | 16 | {{increase}} 1 | 1 | {{decrease}} 2 | 15 | {{increase}} 3 | Montana | At-large | 1[10] | {{steady}} | 1 | {{increase}} 1 | 0 | {{steady}} | Nebraska | District | 6[13] | {{steady}} | 5 | {{increase}} 3 | 1 | {{decrease}} 1 | Nevada | At-large | 1 | {{steady}} | 0 | {{steady}} | 1 | {{steady}} | New Hampshire | District | 2 | {{steady}} | 2 | {{steady}} | 0 | {{steady}} | New Jersey | District | 10 | {{increase}} 2 | 7 | {{increase}} 1 | 3 | {{increase}} 1 | New York | District | 37 | {{increase}} 3 | 20 | {{decrease}} 1 | 17 | {{increase}} 4 | North Carolina | District | 10 | {{increase}} 1 | 0 | {{decrease}} 2 | 10 | {{increase}} 3 | North Dakota | At-large | 2 | {{increase}} 1 | 2 | {{increase}} 1 | 0 | {{steady}} | Ohio | District | 21 | {{steady}} | 17 | {{steady}} | 4 | {{steady}} | Oregon[12] | District | 2 | {{steady}} | 2 | {{steady}} | 0 | {{steady}} | Pennsylvania | District[14] | 32 | {{increase}} 2 | 29[6] | {{increase}} 3 | 3 | {{decrease}} 1 | Rhode Island | District | 2 | {{steady}} | 1 | {{decrease}} 1 | 1 | {{increase}} 1 | South Carolina | District | 7 | {{steady}} | 0 | {{steady}} | 7 | {{steady}} | South Dakota | At-large | 2 | {{steady}} | 2 | {{steady}} | 0 | {{steady}} | Tennessee | District | 10 | {{steady}} | 2 | {{steady}} | 8 | {{steady}} | Texas | District | 16 | {{increase}} 3 | 0 | {{steady}} | 16 | {{increase}} 3 | Utah | At-large | 1 | {{steady}} | 1 | {{steady}} | 0 | {{steady}} | Vermont[12] | District | 2 | {{steady}} | 2 | {{steady}} | 0 | {{steady}} | Virginia | District | 10 | {{steady}} | 1 | {{increase}} 1 | 9 | {{decrease}} 1 | Washington | At-large | 3 | {{increase}} 1 | 3 | {{increase}} 1 | 0 | {{steady}} | West Virginia | District | 5 | {{increase}} 1 | 5 | {{increase}} 1 | 0 | {{steady}} | Wisconsin | District | 11 | {{increase}} 1 | 10 | {{steady}} | 1 | {{increase}} 1 | Wyoming | At-large | 1 | {{steady}} | 1 | {{steady}} | 0 | {{steady}} | Total | 386 | {{increase}} 29 | 210[6] 54.4% | {{increase}} 9 | 176 45.6% | {{increase}} 25 | {{bar box |title=House seats |titlebar=#ddd |width=600px |barwidth=410px |bars={{bar percent|Republican|{{Republican Party (US)/meta/color}}|54.40}}{{bar percent|Democratic|{{Democratic Party (US)/meta/color}}|45.60}} }}The previous election had 5 Populists, but the party completely disappeared from the U.S. House in the 1902 elections. Early election datesIn 1902, three states, with 8 seats among them, held elections early: - June 2 Oregon
- September 2 Vermont
- September 8 Maine
California{{Main|United States House of Representatives elections in California, 1902}} District | Incumbent | Party | First elected | Result | Candidates |
---|
California|1|X}} | Samuel D. Woods Redistricted from the 2nd district | Republican | 1900 | Incumbent retired. New member elected. Republican hold. | √ James N. Gillett (Republican) 50.5% Thomas S. Ford (Democratic) 46.7% M. E. Shore (Socialist) 1.9% W. O. Clark (Prohibition) 0.9% | California|2|X}} | Frank Coombs Redistricted from the 1st district | Republican | 1900 | Incumbent lost re-election. New member elected. Democratic gain. | √ Theodore A. Bell (Democratic) 49.2% Frank Coombs (Republican) 48.3% G. H. Rogers (Socialist) 1.7% W. P. Fassett (Prohibition) 0.8% | California|3|X}} | Victor H. Metcalf | Republican | 1898 | Incumbent re-elected. | √ Victor H. Metcalf (Republican) 66.2% Calvin B. White (Democratic) 27.7% M. W. Wilkins (Socialist) 5% T. H. Montgomery (Prohibition) 1.1% | California|4|X}} | Julius Kahn | Republican | 1898 | Incumbent lost re-election. New member elected. Democratic gain. | √ Edward J. Livernash (Democratic) 49.2% Julius Kahn (Republican) 48.7% William Costley (Socialist) 1.9% Joseph Rowell (Prohibition) 0.2% | California|5|X}} | Eugene F. Loud | Republican | 1890 | Incumbent lost re-election. New member elected. Democratic gain. | √ William J. Wynn (Democratic) 56.5% Eugene F. Loud (Republican) 41.2% Joseph Lawrence (Socialist) 1.5% Frank W. Caton (Prohibition) 0.7% | California|6|X}} | James C. Needham Redistricted from the 7th district | Republican | 1898 | Incumbent re-elected. | √ James C. Needham (Republican) 53.5% Gaston N. Ashe (Democratic) 42.5% J. L. Cobb (Socialist) 2.5% L. C. Jolley (Prohibition) 1.4% | California|7|X}} | James McLachlan Redistricted from the 6th district | Republican | 1900 | Incumbent re-elected. | √ James McLachlan (Republican) 64.8% Carl A. Johnson (Democratic) 27% George H. Hewes (Socialist) 4.2% Frederick F. Wheeler (Prohibition) 4% | California|8|X}} | None (District created) | New seat. New member elected. Republican gain. | √ Milton J. Daniels (Republican) 51.9% William E. Smythe (Democratic) 40.8% Noble A. Richardson (Socialist) 5.4% Ellsworth Leonardson (Prohibition) 2% |
Florida{{Main|United States House of Representatives elections in Florida, 1902}} District | Incumbent | Party | First elected | Result | Candidates |
---|
FL|1|X}} | Stephen M. Sparkman | Democratic | 1894 | Incumbent re-elected. | √ Stephen M. Sparkman (Democratic) Unopposed | FL|2|X}} | Robert Wyche Davis | Democratic | 1896 | Incumbent re-elected. | √ Robert Wyche Davis (Democratic) Unopposed | FL|3|X}} | None (District created) | New seat. New member elected. Democratic gain. | √ William B. Lamar (Democratic) Unopposed |
South Carolina{{Main|United States House of Representatives elections in South Carolina, 1902}} District | Incumbent | Party | First elected | Result | Candidates |
---|
SC|1|X}} | William Elliott | Democratic | 1886 1896 | Incumbent retired to run for U.S. Senator. New member elected. Democratic hold. | √ George Swinton Legaré (Democratic) 95.5% Aaron P. Prioleau (Republican) 4.5% | SC|2|X}} | W. Jasper Talbert | Democratic | 1892 | Incumbent retired to run for Governor of South Carolina. New member elected. Democratic hold. | √ George W. Croft (Democratic) 94.9% W. S. Dixon (Republican) 5.0% Others 0.1% | SC|3|X}} | Asbury Latimer | Democratic | 1892 | Incumbent retired to run for U.S. Senator. New member elected. Democratic hold. | √ Wyatt Aiken (Democratic) 98.9% John Scott (Republican) 1.1% | SC|4|X}} | Joseph T. Johnson | Democratic | 1900 | Incumbent re-elected. | √ Joseph T. Johnson (Democratic) 98.7% L. W. C. Blalock (Republican) 1.3% | SC|5|X}} | David E. Finley | Democratic | 1898 | Incumbent re-elected. | √ David E. Finley (Democratic) 99.3% C. P. T. White (Republican) 0.7% | SC|6|X}} | Robert B. Scarborough | Democratic | 1900 | Incumbent re-elected. | √ Robert B. Scarborough (Democratic) Unopposed | SC|7|X}} | Asbury F. Lever | Democratic | 1901 (special) | Incumbent re-elected. | √ Asbury F. Lever (Democratic) 96.2% Alexander D. Dantzler (Republican) 3.8% |
See also- United States elections, 1902
- United States Senate elections, 1902
- 57th United States Congress
- 58th United States Congress
Notes1. ^Three states held early elections between June 2 and September 18. 2. ^Included 1 member of the Silver Republican faction, John F. Shafroth, of CO-01. 3. ^Includes five vacancies. 4. ^1 {{cite web | url=http://history.house.gov/Institution/Party-Divisions/Party-Divisions/ |title=Party Divisions of the House of Representatives* 1789–Present |publisher=Office of the Historian, United States House of Representatives |date= |accessdate=May 18, 2015}} 5. ^1 Martis, pp. 156–157. 6. ^1 2 Includes 3 Independent Republicans elected to PA-29, PA-31, and PA-32 in the Pittsburgh area. 7. ^Includes six vacancies. 8. ^[https://www.census.gov/history/pdf/1900_Apportionment.pdf Apportionment Act of 1901] 9. ^1 Additional seat elected at-large due to State delaying redistricting. 10. ^1 2 Election of 1900 saw the election of 1 Populist. 11. ^There was one member of the Silver Republican Party faction elected in 1900, John F. Shafroth. Shafroth attempted to get elected as a Democrat in 1902, but his election was contested and overturned. 12. ^1 2 Elections held early. 13. ^Election of 1900 saw the election of 2 Populists in Nebraska. 14. ^At-large seats eliminated in redistricting.
References{{Reflist}}Bibliography- Republican Congressional Committee, [https://books.google.com/books?id=TLoJAAAAIAAJ&pg=PA1&dq=Republican+Campaign+Textbook&as_brr=1#PPA1,M1 The Republican Campaign Textbook 1902] (1902).
- {{cite book | first=Michael J. |last=Dubin | url=https://books.google.com/books?id=9ElyQgAACAAJ&dq=United+States+Congressional+Elections,+1788-1997:+The+Official+Results&hl=en&sa=X&ei=wvC6VL-aL5etyAS3_YCADA&ved=0CB8Q6AEwAA | title=United States Congressional Elections, 1788-1997: The Official Results of the Elections of the 1st Through 105th Congresses | publisher=McFarland and Company | date=March 1, 1998 |isbn=978-0786402830}}
- {{cite book | first=Kenneth C. |last=Martis | url=https://books.google.com/books?id=q0hyQgAACAAJ&dq=The+Historical+Atlas+of+Political+Parties+in+the+United+States+Congress,+1789-1989&hl=en&sa=X&ei=gKTGVOiSCM22oQSk9oHoAg&ved=0CB8Q6AEwAA | title=The Historical Atlas of Political Parties in the United States Congress, 1789-1989 | publisher=Macmillan Publishing Company | date=January 1, 1989 |isbn=978-0029201701}}
- {{cite book | editor-first=John L. |editor-last=Moore | url=https://books.google.com/books?id=sKERAQAAMAAJ&q=isbn:9780871879967&dq=isbn:9780871879967&hl=en&sa=X&ei=_K_GVIfQJcbWoASvxIKwCQ&ved=0CB8Q6AEwAA | title=Congressional Quarterly's Guide to U.S. Elections | publisher=Congressional Quarterly Inc. | edition=Third | date=1994 |isbn=978-0871879967}}
- {{cite web | url=http://history.house.gov/Institution/Party-Divisions/Party-Divisions/ |title=Party Divisions of the House of Representatives 1789–Present |publisher=Office of the Historian, House of United States House of Representatives |date= |accessdate=January 21, 2015}}
External links- Office of the Historian (Office of Art & Archives, Office of the Clerk, U.S. House of Representatives)
{{United States House of Representatives elections}} 1 : 1902 United States House of Representatives elections |