| 词条 | Self-Injurious Behavior Inhibiting System |
| 释义 |
The Self-Injurious Behavior Inhibiting System (SIBIS) is an apparatus designed to reduce self-injurious behavior (SIB) directed at the head, such as banging the head against walls and other objects or hitting oneself in the head. Invented by Dr. Robert E. Fischell, Glen H. Fountain, and Charles M. Blackburn in 1984, the device is able to detect instances of head-directed SIB, and delivers an aversive electric shock contingent on its occurrence.[1] It use is controversial and some areas in the United States have banned its use.[2] In 2016 the FDA proposed banning the device.[3] EffectivenessThe amount of evidence that looks at the usefulness of SIBIS is small.[4] One study was undertaken in 1990 of five individuals with developmental disabilities exhibiting severe self-injurious behavior that was resistant to multiple other treatments, who showed rapid and large decreases in self-injury when a SIBIS device was used.[4] Another study in 2004 reported positive effects of SIBIS on a single pre-school child.[6] Its usefulness, however, varies between people.[5] Side effectsThe FDA states that psychological and physical harm may result from the devices use.[3] This may include depression, anxiety, and worsened behavior.[3] Physical issues may include burns and pain.[3] ComponentsThere are two models of SIBIS. The simpler model consists of an electrode and a radio transmitter wrapped around the arm or leg using Velcro.[6] When a child administers a blow to the head, the SIBIS device is used to recognize the self-injurious behavior. This is possible because the SIBIS device is composed of two wirelessly connected parts: the "sensor module" and the "stimulus module".[1] The impact monitor serves to both detect an impact to the head and to protect the head from the damage that the impact could potentially incur. The sensor module is placed on either the body part receiving the impact (such as the head) or on the body part delivering the impact (such as the arm or knee). Wherever it is placed, the sensor module senses the impact of the blow and sends out an electrical signal. This electrical signal triggers the stimulus module, allowing for the aversive stimulation, the shock, to be delivered. SpecificationsSIBIS is designed to reduce SIB by immediately delivering positive punishment when head-directed SIB occurs. Only 5 cm × 3 cm × 1 cm in size,[7] the stimulus module delivers an 85 V electrical shock at 3.5 mA of current to the subject each time the patient strikes his or her head sufficiently hard enough to register on the velocity impact detector.[8] The delivered shock is designed not to be very painful, but rather an uncomfortable response to the SIB. The impact detector of the apparatus can be adjusted, allowing for the reduction of punishment over time and the eventual dismissal of the apparatus from the child's punishment schedule.[7] Ethical debateThe utilization of SIBIS is controversial, thus making it the center of ethical debates. Dr. Brian A. Iwata refers to SIBIS as a “default technology."[9] More specifically, Dr. Iwata states that default technology is a last resort to behavior modification after all other methods have been exhausted. Moreover, it is strongly advised that SIBIS should only be used after a full functional analysis of the problem behavior has been completed. Though the American Psychological Association and the National Association of School Psychologists have attempted to direct school psychologists in the administration of behavioral treatment, the use of SIBIS has proven to be a very controversial topic in the public school system.[10] Those that oppose the SIBIS device as a form of treatment in a school setting claim the shock delivered to the subject qualifies as corporal punishment. However, researchers claim that aversive therapy adheres to a systematic treatment plan that is carefully constructed to diminish the dangerous, and sometimes even life-threatening, actions exhibited by children with self-injurious behavior.[10] The researchers claim that corporal punishment, unlike an aversive stimulus treatment plan, uses the administration of pain as a "disciplinary action" in order to punish an unwanted behavior. Schools in some states, such as Michigan, have found SIBIS to be lawful and have allowed its use within the classroom setting.[10] Three stipulations are met, however:
See also
References1. ^1 {{cite web |url=http://www.patentstorm.us/patents/4440160/description.html |title=Archived copy |accessdate=2009-12-03 |deadurl=yes |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20110612225112/http://www.patentstorm.us/patents/4440160/description.html |archivedate=2011-06-12 |df= }} 2. ^{{cite book|last1=Terry|first1=Scott|title=Learning and Memory: Basic Principles, Processes, and Procedures, Fourth Edition|date=2015|publisher=Psychology Press|isbn=9781317350873|page=140|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=4s5WCgAAQBAJ&pg=PA140}} 3. ^1 2 3 {{cite web|title=FDA proposes ban on electrical stimulation devices intended to treat self-injurious or aggressive behavior|url=http://www.fda.gov/NewsEvents/Newsroom/PressAnnouncements/ucm497194.htm|website=FDA|accessdate=7 May 2016|date=April 22, 2016}} 4. ^{{cite book|last1=Matson|first1=Johnny L|last2=Andrasik|first2=Frank|last3=Matson|first3=Michael L|title=Treating Childhood Psychopathology and Developmental Disabilities|date=Dec 10, 2008|publisher=Springer Science & Business Media|location=New York, NY|isbn=978-0-387-09529-5|pages=32|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=k5RP0RNrYsEC&pg=PA32}} 5. ^1 {{cite book|last1=Spiegler|first1=Michael|title=Contemporary Behavior Therapy|date=2015|isbn=9781305446359|page=177|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=CW5vCgAAQBAJ&pg=PA177}} 6. ^{{cite web | url=http://www.bostonmagazine.com/2008/06/the-shocking-truth/ | title=The Shocking Truth | work=Boston Magazine | date=July 2008 | accessdate=3 September 2015 | author=Kix, Paul}} 7. ^1 Linscheid, T.R., Iwata, B.A., Ricketts, R.W., Williams, D.E., & Griffin, J.C. (1990). Clinical evaluation of the self-injurious behavior inhibiting system (SIBIS). Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 23, 53–78. {{doi|10.1901/jaba.1990.23-53}} 8. ^1 Salvy, S., Mulick, J., Butter, E., Bartlett, R.K., & Linscheid, T.R. (2004). Contingent electric shock (SIBIS) and a conditioned punisher eliminate severe head banging in a preschool child. Behavioral Interventions, 19, 59–72. {{doi|10.1002/bin.157}} 9. ^Iwata, Brian A. (1988). The development and adoption of controversial default technologies. The Behavior Analyst/MABA, 11.2, 149-157. 10. ^1 2 Jacob-Timm, S. (1996). Ethical and legal issues associated with the use of aversives inthe public schools: The SIBIS controversy. School Psychology Review, 25(2), 184–199. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com.lp.hscl.ufl.edu/login.aspx?direct=true&db=psyh&AN=1996-00658-004&site=ehost-live External links
4 : Mental health in the United States|Medical treatments|Self-harm|Behavior modification |
| 随便看 |
|
开放百科全书收录14589846条英语、德语、日语等多语种百科知识，基本涵盖了大多数领域的百科知识，是一部内容自由、开放的电子版国际百科全书。