词条 | Medical guideline |
释义 |
A medical guideline (also called a clinical guideline or clinical practice line) is a document with the aim of guiding decisions and criteria regarding diagnosis, management, and treatment in specific areas of healthcare. Such documents have been in use for thousands of years during the entire history of medicine. However, in contrast to previous approaches, which were often based on tradition or authority, modern medical guidelines are based on an examination of current evidence within the paradigm of evidence-based medicine.[1][2][3] They usually include summarized consensus statements on best practice in healthcare. A healthcare provider is obliged to know the medical guidelines of his or her profession, and has to decide whether to follow the recommendations of a guideline for an individual treatment.[4] BackgroundModern clinical guidelines identify, summarize and evaluate the highest quality evidence and most current data about prevention, diagnosis, prognosis, therapy including dosage of medications, risk/benefit and cost-effectiveness. Then they define the most important questions related to clinical practice and identify all possible decision options and their outcomes. Some guidelines contain decision or computation algorithms to be followed. Thus, they integrate the identified decision points and respective courses of action with the clinical judgement and experience of practitioners. Many guidelines place the treatment alternatives into classes to help providers in deciding which treatment to use. Additional objectives of clinical guidelines are to standardize medical care, to raise quality of care, to reduce several kinds of risk (to the patient, to the healthcare provider, to medical insurers and health plans) and to achieve the best balance between cost and medical parameters such as effectiveness, specificity, sensitivity, resolutiveness, etc. It has been demonstrated repeatedly that the use of guidelines by healthcare providers such as hospitals is an effective way of achieving the objectives listed above, although they are not the only ones. PublicationGuidelines are usually produced at national or international levels by medical associations or governmental bodies, such as the United States Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Local healthcare providers may produce their own set of guidelines or adapt them from existing top-level guidelines. Special computer software packages known as guideline execution engines have been developed to facilitate the use of medical guidelines in concert with an electronic medical record system. The Guideline Interchange Format (GLIF) is a computer representation format for clinical guidelines that can be used with such engines.[5] The USA and other countries maintain medical guideline clearinghouses. In the USA, the National Guideline Clearinghouse maintains a catalog of high-quality guidelines published by various health and medical associations. In the United Kingdom, clinical practice guidelines are published primarily by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). In The Netherlands, two bodies—the Institute for Healthcare Improvement (CBO) and College of General Practitioners (NHG)—have published specialist and primary care guidelines, respectively. In Germany, the German Agency for Quality in Medicine (ÄZQ) coordinates a national program for disease management guidelines. All these organisations are now members of the Guidelines International Network (G-I-N), an international network of organisations and individuals involved in clinical practice guidelines. ComplianceChecklists have been used in medical practice to attempt to ensure that clinical practice guidelines are followed. An example is the Surgical Safety Checklist developed for the World Health Organization by Dr. Atul Gawande.[6] According to a meta-analysis after introduction of the checklist mortality dropped by 23% and all complications by 40%, but further high-quality studies are required to make the meta-analysis more robust.[7] In the UK, a study on the implementation of a checklist for provision of medical care to elderly patients admitting to hospital found that the checklist highlighted limitations with frailty assessment in acute care and motivated teams to review routine practices, but that work is needed to understand whether and how checklists can be embedded in complex multidisciplinary care.[8]ProblemsGuidelines may lose their clinical relevance as they age and newer research emerges.[9] Even 20% of strong recommendations, especially when based on opinion rather than trials, from practice guidelines may be retracted.[10] The New York Times reported in 2004 that some simple clinical practice guidelines are not routinely followed to the extent they might be.[11] It has been found that providing a nurse or other medical assistant with a checklist of recommended procedures can result in the attending physician being reminded in a timely manner regarding procedures that might have been overlooked. Guidelines may have both methodological problems and conflict of interest.[12] As such, the quality of guidelines may vary substantially, especially for guidelines that are published on-line and have not had to follow methodological reporting standards often required by reputable clearinghouses.[13] Guidelines may make recommendations that are stronger than the supporting evidence.[14] In response to many of these problems with traditional guidelines, the BMJ created a new series of trustworthy guidelines focused on the most pressing medical issues called BMJ Rapid Recommendations.[15] Examples
See also
References1. ^{{cite journal | author = Burgers JS, Grol R, Klazinga NS, Mäkelä M, Zaat J | year = 2011 | title = Towards evidence-based clinical practice: an international survey of 18 clinical guideline programs | url = | journal = Int J Qual Health Care | volume = 15 | issue = 1| pages = 31–45 | doi=10.1093/intqhc/15.1.31| pmid = 12630799 }} 2. ^{{cite journal | pmid = 12571340 | volume=12 | issue=1 | title=Development and validation of an international appraisal instrument for assessing the quality of clinical practice guidelines: the AGREE project | pmc=1743672 | journal=Qual Saf Health Care | pages=18–23| year=2003 | author1=AGREE Collaboration | doi=10.1136/qhc.12.1.18 }} 3. ^Institute of Medicine (edt.) Clinical practice guidelines we can trust. Washington DC, 2011 4. ^Council of Europe. Developing a methodology for drawing up guidelines on best medical practice. Recommendation Rec(2001)13 and explanatory memorandum. Strasbourg: Council of Europe Publishing, 2002. 5. ^GLIF website 6. ^{{cite journal|last1=Haynes|first1=Alex B.|last2=Weiser|first2=Thomas G.|last3=Berry|first3=William R.|last4=Lipsitz|first4=Stuart R.|last5=Breizat|first5=Abdel-Hadi S.|last6=Dellinger|first6=E. Patchen|last7=Herbosa|first7=Teodoro|last8=Joseph|first8=Sudhir|last9=Kibatala|first9=Pascience L.|last10=Lapitan|first10=Marie Carmela M.|last11=Merry|first11=Alan F.|last12=Moorthy|first12=Krishna|last13=Reznick|first13=Richard K.|last14=Taylor|first14=Bryce|last15=Gawande|first15=Atul A.|title=A Surgical Safety Checklist to Reduce Morbidity and Mortality in a Global Population|journal=New England Journal of Medicine|date=29 January 2009|volume=360|issue=5|pages=491–499|doi=10.1056/NEJMsa0810119|pmid=19144931}} 7. ^{{cite journal|last1=Bergs|first1=J.|last2=Hellings|first2=J.|last3=Cleemput|first3=I.|last4=Zurel|first4=Ö.|last5=De Troyer|first5=V.|last6=Van Hiel|first6=M.|last7=Demeere|first7=J.-L.|last8=Claeys|first8=D.|last9=Vandijck|first9=D.|title=Systematic review and meta-analysis of the effect of the World Health Organization surgical safety checklist on postoperative complications|journal=British Journal of Surgery|date=February 2014|volume=101|issue=3|pages=150–158|doi=10.1002/bjs.9381|pmid=24469615}} 8. ^{{cite journal|last1=Papoutsi|first1=Chrysanthi|last2=Poots|first2=Alan|last3=Clements|first3=Jake|last4=Wyrko|first4=Zoe|last5=Offord|first5=Natalie|last6=Reed|first6=Julie E|title=Improving patient safety for older people in acute admissions: implementation of the Frailsafe checklist in 12 hospitals across the UK|journal=Age and Ageing|volume=47|issue=2|pages=311–317|date=5 January 2018|doi=10.1093/ageing/afx194|pmid=29315375|pmc=6016694}} 9. ^{{cite journal |author=Shekelle PG|author2=Ortiz E|author3=Rhodes S|title=Validity of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality clinical practice guidelines: how quickly do guidelines become outdated? |journal=JAMA |volume=286 |issue=12 |pages=1461–7 |date=2001 |pmid=11572738 |doi=10.1001/jama.286.12.1461|display-authors=etal}} 10. ^{{cite journal| author=Neuman MD| author2=Goldstein JN| author3=Cirullo MA| author4=Schwartz JS| title=Durability of class I American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association clinical practice guideline recommendations | journal=JAMA | date= 2014 | volume= 311 | issue= 20 | pages= 2092–100 | doi=10.1001/jama.2014.4949 | pmid=24867012| pmc=4346183}} 11. ^Gina Kolata "[https://www.nytimes.com/2004/12/25/health/25medicine.html Program Coaxes Hospitals to See Treatments Under Their Noses]". The New York Times December 25, 2004. 12. ^{{cite journal| author=Reames BN| author2=Krell RW| author3=Ponto SN| author4=Wong SL| title=Critical evaluation of oncology clinical practice guidelines | journal=J Clin Oncol | date= 2013 | volume= 31 | issue= 20 | pages= 2563–8 | pmid=23752105 | doi=10.1200/JCO.2012.46.8371 | pmc=5073383}} 13. ^{{cite journal | author = Norberg MM, Turner MW, Rooke SE, Langton JM, Gates PJ | year = 2012 | title = An Evaluation of Web-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines for Managing Problems Associated with Cannabis Use | journal = J Med Internet Res | volume = 14 | issue = 6| page = e169 | doi = 10.2196/jmir.2319 | pmid = 23249447 | pmc=3799569}} 14. ^{{cite journal| display-authors=4| author=Brito JP| author2=Domecq JP| author3=Murad MH| author4=Guyatt GH| author5=Montori VM| title=The Endocrine Society guidelines: when the confidence cart goes before the evidence horse | journal=J Clin Endocrinol Metab | date= 2013 | volume= 98 | issue= 8 | pages= 3246–52 | doi=10.1210/jc.2013-1814 | pmid=23783104 }} 15. ^1 {{cite journal |vauthors=Siemieniuk RA, Agoritsas T, Macdonald H, Guyatt GH, Brandt L, Vandvik PO | year = 2016 | title = TIntroduction to BMJ Rapid Recommendations | url = http://www.bmj.com/content/354/bmj.i5191.long | journal = BMJ | volume = 354 | issue = | pages = i5191 | doi = 10.1136/bmj.i5191 | pmid = 27680768 }} 16. ^{{cite journal |author=Wilson W|author2=Taubert KA|author3=Gewitz M|title=Prevention of infective endocarditis: guidelines from the American Heart Association |journal=Circulation |volume=116 |issue=15 |pages=1736–54 |date=October 2007 |pmid=17446442 |doi=10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.183095 |url=http://circ.ahajournals.org/cgi/pmidlookup?view=long&pmid=17446442|display-authors=etal}} 17. ^{{cite journal |vauthors=Vandvik PO, Otto CM, Siemieniuk RA, Bagur R, Guyatt GH, Lytvyn L, Whitlock R, Vartdal T, Brieger D, Aertgeerts B, Price S, Foroutan F, Shapiro M, Mertz R, Spencer FA | year = 2016 | title = Transcatheter or surgical aortic valve replacement for patients with severe, symptomatic, aortic stenosis at low to intermediate surgical risk: a clinical practice guideline | url = http://www.bmj.com/content/354/bmj.i5085.long | journal = BMJ | volume = 354 | issue = | pages = i5085 | doi = 10.1136/bmj.i5085 | pmid = 27680583 }} External links
4 : Health informatics|Medical terminology|Healthcare quality|Medical guidelines |
随便看 |
|
开放百科全书收录14589846条英语、德语、日语等多语种百科知识,基本涵盖了大多数领域的百科知识,是一部内容自由、开放的电子版国际百科全书。