请输入您要查询的百科知识:

 

词条 Minnesota Farmer–Labor Party
释义

  1. Background

      Gubernatorial candidate performance  

  2. References

  3. Further reading

  4. External links

{{Infobox political party
|country = the United States
| name = Farmer–Labor Party of Minnesota
|logo =
|leader =
|foundation = {{start date|1918}}
|dissolution = {{end date|1944}}
|headquarters =
|ideology = Populism
Progressivism
Democratic socialism
Cooperative economics
|position = Left-wing
|national = Labor Party of the United States (1919–20)
Farmer–Labor Party of the United States (1920–23; 1924–36)
Federated Farmer–Labor Party (1923–24)
None (1918–19; 1936–44)
|predecessor = Nonpartisan League
|successor = Minnesota Democratic–Farmer–Labor Party
|colors =
|website =
|colorcode = {{Farmer–Labor Party/meta/color}}
}}

The Minnesota Farmer–Labor Party (FL) was a left-wing American political party in Minnesota between 1918 and 1944. Largely dominating Minnesota politics during the Great Depression, it was one of the most successful statewide third party movements in United States history and the longest-lasting affiliate of the national Farmer–Labor movement. At its height in the 1920s and 1930s, party members included three Minnesota Governors, four United States Senators, eight United States Representatives and a majority in the Minnesota legislature.

In 1944, Hubert H. Humphrey and Elmer Benson worked to merge the party with the state's Democratic Party, forming the contemporary Minnesota Democratic–Farmer–Labor Party.[1]

Background

The Minnesota Farmer–Labor Party emerged from the Nonpartisan League in North Dakota and the Union Labor Party in Duluth, Minnesota, on a platform of farmer and labor union protection, government ownership of certain industries, and social security laws.[2] One of the primary obstacles of the party, besides constant vilification on the pages of local and state newspapers, was the difficulty of uniting the party's divergent base and maintaining political union between rural farmers and urban laborers who often had little in common other than the populist perception that they were an oppressed class of hardworking producers exploited by a small elite.

According to political scientist George Mayer:

{{quote|The farmer approached problems as a proprietor or petty capitalist. Relief to him meant a mitigation of conditions that interfered with successful farming. It involved such things as tax reduction, easier access to credit, and a floor under farm prices. His individualist psychology did not create scruples against government aid, but he welcomed it only as long as it improved agricultural conditions. When official paternalism took the form of public works or the dole, he openly opposed it because assistance on such terms forced him to abandon his chosen profession, to submerge his individuality in the labor crew, and to suffer the humiliation of the bread line. Besides, a public works program required increased revenue, and since the state relied heavily on the property tax, the cost of the program seemed likely to fall primarily on him.

At the opposite end of the seesaw sat the city worker, who sought relief from the hunger, exposure, and disease that followed the wake of unemployment. Dependent on an impersonal industrial machine, he had sloughed off the frontier tradition of individualism for the more serviceable doctrine of cooperation through trade unionism. Unlike the depressed farmer, the unemployed worker often had no property or economic stake to protect. He was largely immune to taxation and had nothing to lose by backing proposals to dilute property rights or redistribute the wealth. Driven by the primitive instinct to survive, the worker demanded financial relief measures from the state.[3]}}

The Minnesota Democratic Party, led by Hubert Humphrey, was able to merge the Farmer–Labor party with the Minnesota Democratic Party on April 15, 1944. Since 1944, the two parties together make up the Minnesota Democratic–Farmer–Labor Party.

  • Governors of Minnesota who were Farmer–Labor
    • Floyd B. Olson (1931–1936)
    • Hjalmar Petersen (1936–1937)
    • Elmer Austin Benson (1937–1939)
  • United States Senators from Minnesota who were Farmer–Labor
    • Henrik Shipstead (1923–1941); later became a Republican
    • Magnus Johnson (1923–1925)
    • Elmer Austin Benson (1935–1937)
    • Ernest Lundeen (1937–1940)
  • United States Representatives from Minnesota who were Farmer–Labor
    • William Leighton Carss (1919–1921, 1925–1929)
    • Ole J. Kvale (1923–1929)
    • Knud Wefald (1923–1927)
    • Paul John Kvale (1929–1939)
    • Henry M. Arens (1933–1935)
    • Magnus Johnson (1933–1935)
    • Ernest Lundeen (1933–1937); had previously served as a Republican Representative (1915–1917), also served in the Senate
    • Francis Shoemaker (1933–1935)
    • John T. Bernard (1937-1939)
{{See also|United States congressional delegations from Minnesota}}

Gubernatorial candidate performance

YearGubernatorial candidatePopular votesPercentagePlace
1918 David H. Evans111,948 23.73% 2nd
1922 Magnus Johnson295,479 43.13% 2nd
1924 Floyd B. Olson366,029 43.84% 2nd
1926 Magnus Johnson266,845 38.09% 2nd
1928 Ernest Lundeen227,193 22.72% 2nd
1930 Floyd B. Olson473,154 59.34% 1st
1932 Floyd B. Olson522,438 50.57% 1st
1934 Floyd B. Olson468,812 44.61% 1st
1936 Elmer Austin Benson680,342 60.74% 1st
1938 Elmer Benson387,263 34.18% 2nd
1940 Hjalmar Petersen459,609 36.55% 2nd
1942 Hjalmar Petersen299,917 37.76% 2nd

References

1. ^{{cite web| title =Farmer Labor Party| publisher =Spartacus| url =http://www.spartacus-educational.com/USAfarmerlabor.htm| accessdate =2007-08-31}}
2. ^Hudelson, Richard & Ross, Carl. By the ore docks : a working people's history of Duluth Minneapolis : University of Minnesota Press, 2006. {{ISBN|0-8166-4636-8}} pp. 144–150.
3. ^George H. Mayer, The Political Career of Floyd B. Olson, Reprint, (Minneapolis, MN: Minnesota Historical Society Press, 1987) 86-87.

Further reading

  • Benson, Elmer A. "Politics in My Lifetime." Minnesota History 47 (1980): 154-60. online
  • Garlid, George W. "The Antiwar Dilemma of the Farmer-Labor Party." Minnesota History (1967): 365-374. [https://www.jstor.org/stable/20177928 in JSTOR]
  • Gieske, Millard L. Minnesota Farmer-Laborism: The Third-Party Alternative (1979) 389pp
  • Haynes, John Earl. Dubious alliance: the making of Minnesota's DFL Party (U of Minnesota Press, 1984)
  • Haynes, John Earl. "Farm Coops and the Election of Hubert Humphrey to the Senate." Agricultural History (1983): 201-211. [https://www.jstor.org/stable/3743156 in JSTOR]
  • Haynes, John Earl. "The new history of the communist party in state politics: The implications for mainstream political history." Labor History (1986) 27#4 pp: 549-563.
  • Hyman, Colette A. "Culture as Strategy: Popular Front Politics and the Minneapolis Theatre Union, 1935-39." Minnesota History (1991): 294-306. [https://www.jstor.org/stable/20187735 in JSTOR]
  • Lovin, Hugh T. "The Fall of Farmer-Labor Parties, 1936-1938." Pacific Northwest Quarterly (1971): 16-26. [https://www.jstor.org/stable/40488875 in JSTOR]
  • McCoy, Donald R. Angry voices: Left-of-center politics in the New Deal era (1958; reprint 2012)
  • Mayer, George H. The Political Career of Floyd B. Olson (1987)
  • Mitau, G. Theodore. "The Democratic-Farmer-Labor Party Schism of 1948." Minnesota History (1955): 187-194. [https://www.jstor.org/stable/20175887 in JSTOR]
  • Sofchalk, Donald G. "Union and Ethnic Group Influence in the 1938 Election on the Minnesota Iron Ranges." Journal of the West (2003) 42#3 pp: 66-74.
  • Valelly, Richard M. Radicalism in the States: The Minnesota Farmer-Labor Party and the American Political Economy (University of Chicago Press, 1989)

External links

  • Article on the Minnesota Farmer–Labor party from The Progressive Populist
  • Minnesota Farmer–Labor
  • Farmer–Labor information page
  • The Farmer Labor Party 1918–1924 Organizational history of attempts to form a national Farmer–Labor Party. Marxist Internet Archive. Retrieved May 26, 2006.
  • TOWARD THE COOPERATIVE COMMONWEALTH: AN INTRODUCTORY HISTORY OF THE FARMER–LABOR MOVEMENT IN MINNESOTA (1917–1948). 232 page online copy of Thomas Gerald O'Connell's 1979 Phd thesis from The Union Institute.
  • Luoma, Everett E.: The'>Farmer Takes A Holiday. Exposition Press, 1967.
{{Minnesota political parties}}{{Authority control}}{{DEFAULTSORT:Minnesota Farmer-Labor Party}}

10 : Agrarian parties in the United States|Defunct democratic socialist parties in the United States|Defunct progressive parties in the United States|Defunct social democratic parties in the United States|History of Minnesota|Labour parties|Political parties established in 1918|Political parties in Minnesota|1918 establishments in Minnesota|Farmer–Labor Party (United States)

随便看

 

开放百科全书收录14589846条英语、德语、日语等多语种百科知识,基本涵盖了大多数领域的百科知识,是一部内容自由、开放的电子版国际百科全书。

 

Copyright © 2023 OENC.NET All Rights Reserved
京ICP备2021023879号 更新时间:2024/9/20 20:53:14