| 词条 | United States v. La Vengeance |
| 释义 |
|Litigants=United States v. La Vengeance |ArgueDate=August 10 |ArgueYear=1796 |DecideDate=August 11 |DecideYear=1796 |FullName=United States v. La Vengeance |USVol=3 |USPage=297 |ParallelCitations=3 Dall. 297; 1 L. Ed. 610; 1796 U.S. LEXIS 402 |Prior=Error from the Circuit Court for the District of New York |Subsequent= |Holding=A proceeding by the United States to forfeit a vessel is a cause of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction, and courts will take judicial notice of a geographical fact. |SCOTUS=1796-1798 |Majority=Elsworth |JoinMajority=unanimous |LawsApplied= }}United States v. La Vengeance, 3 U.S. (3 Dall.) 297 (1796), was a 1796 decision of the United States Supreme Court which found that a proceeding by the United States to forfeit a vessel is a cause of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction. Specifically, "[a]n injunction to enforce the forfeiture of a vessel, for an illegal exportation of arms and ammunition, is a civil cause of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction. The courts will take judicial notice of a geographical fact."[1] References1. ^Reports of cases ruled and adjudged in the several courts of the United States, and of Pennsylvania: held at the seat of the federal government, Volume 3 (Banks Law Pub. Co., 1905) pg. 297 [https://books.google.com/books?id=ris3AAAAIAAJ&source=gbs_navlinks_s] External links
| case = United States v. La Vengeance, {{ussc|3|297|1796|Dall.|3|el=no}} | justia =https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/3/297/ | loc =http://cdn.loc.gov/service/ll/usrep/usrep003/usrep003297/usrep003297.pdf | openjurist =https://openjurist.org/3/us/297 4 : United States Supreme Court cases|United States Supreme Court cases of the Ellsworth Court|United States admiralty case law|1796 in United States case law |
| 随便看 |
|
开放百科全书收录14589846条英语、德语、日语等多语种百科知识，基本涵盖了大多数领域的百科知识，是一部内容自由、开放的电子版国际百科全书。