| 词条 | United States v. Schooner Sally |
| 释义 |
|Litigants=United States v. Schooner Sally |ArgueDate= |ArgueYear= |DecideDate=February 22 |DecideYear=1805 |FullName=United States v. Schooner Sally of Norfolk |USVol=6 |USPage=406 |ParallelCitations=2 Cranch 406 |Prior= |Subsequent= |Holding=the question of forfeiture of a vessel is of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction, not of common law |SCOTUS=1804-1806 |Majority=No opinion |JoinMajority= |LawsApplied=United States v. La Vengeance (1796) }} United States v. Schooner Sally, 6 U.S. (2 Cranch) 406 (1805), was an 1805 decision of the United States Supreme Court which found that the question of forfeiture of a vessel is of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction, not of common law. Background informationThe schooner Sally and her cargo were seized by the collector of the port of Nottingham, under the authority of an act of Congress "To prohibit the carrying on the Slave Trade from the United States to any foreign place or country" (3 Cong. Ch. 11, March 22, 1794, 1 Stat. 347). Libel (i.e., a suit in admiralty) brought by claimant, Elias De Butts, in the United States District Court for the District of Maryland. Procedural history
Issues
HoldingThe question of forfeiture of a vessel under 1 Stat. 347 is not of common law, but of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction. In United States v. La Vengeance (3 Dall. 297), the Court held that a proceeding by the United States to forfeit a vessel is a cause of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction. Therefore, per the authority of that decision, no argument was heard on the case and was decided without issuing an opinion. 4 : United States Supreme Court cases|United States admiralty case law|1805 in United States case law|United States Supreme Court cases of the Marshall Court |
| 随便看 |
|
开放百科全书收录14589846条英语、德语、日语等多语种百科知识，基本涵盖了大多数领域的百科知识，是一部内容自由、开放的电子版国际百科全书。