| 词条 | Van Dusen v. Barrack |
| 释义 |
|Litigants=Van Dusen v. Barrack |ArgueDateA=January 8 |ArgueDateB=9 |ArgueYear=1964 |DecideDate=March 30 |DecideYear=1964 |FullName=Van Dusen, U.S. District Judge, et al. v. Barrack, Administratrix, et al. |USVol=376 |USPage=612 |ParallelCitations=84 S. Ct. 805; 11 L. Ed. 2d 945; 1964 U.S. LEXIS 1537 |Prior= |Subsequent= |Holding= |SCOTUS=1962-1965 |Majority=Goldberg |JoinMajority=Warren, Douglas, Clark, Harlan, Brennan, Stewart, White |Concurrence=Black |LawsApplied= }}Van Dusen v. Barrack, 376 U.S. 612 (1964), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that when a case is transferred from a federal court in one state to a federal court in another, the choice of law should be that of the state in which the case was originally filed.[1] References1. ^Yeazell, S.C. Civil Procedure, Seventh Edition. Aspen Publishers, New York, NY: 2008, p. 231 External links
| case = Van Dusen v. Barrack, {{ussc|376|612|1964|el=no}} | justia =https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/376/612/ | loc =http://cdn.loc.gov/service/ll/usrep/usrep376/usrep376612/usrep376612.pdf | oyez =https://www.oyez.org/cases/1963/56{{SCOTUS-stub}} 5 : United States Supreme Court cases|United States Supreme Court cases of the Warren Court|United States civil procedure case law|1964 in United States case law|Conflict of laws case law |
| 随便看 |
|
开放百科全书收录14589846条英语、德语、日语等多语种百科知识，基本涵盖了大多数领域的百科知识，是一部内容自由、开放的电子版国际百科全书。