请输入您要查询的百科知识:

 

词条 Wilkinson v. United States
释义

  1. References

  2. External links

{{Infobox SCOTUS case
|Litigants=Wilkinson v. United States
|ArgueDate=November 17
|ArgueYear=1960
|DecideDate=February 27
|DecideYear=1961
|FullName=Frank Wilkinson v. United States
|USVol=365
|USPage=399
|ParallelCitations=81 S. Ct. 567; 5 L. Ed. 2d 633
|Prior=
|Subsequent=
|Holding=
|SCOTUS=1958-1962
|Majority=
|JoinMajority=
|Dissent=Black
|JoinDissent=Warren & Douglas
|Dissent2=Douglas
|JoinDissent2=Warren & Black
|Dissent3=Brennan
|JoinDissent3=Douglas
|LawsApplied={{usc|2|192}}
}}{{wikisource}}

Wilkinson v. United States, 365 U.S. 399 (1961), was a court case during the McCarthy Era in which the petitioner, Frank Wilkinson, an administrator with the Los Angeles Public Housing Authority, challenged his conviction under 2 U.S.C. § 192,[1] which makes it a misdemeanor to refuse to answer any question pertinent to the question under inquiry for any person summoned as a witness by Congress. The petitioner's conviction was sustained in a 5-4 ruling, upholding a prior ruling in Barenblatt v. United States.

The petitioner was indeed summoned to testify, which he did not pertain to, before a Subcommittee of the House of Representatives Un-American Activities Committee, which was investigating alleged Communist infiltration into basic industries and Communist Party propaganda activities. The petitioner refused to answer a question as to whether he was a member of the Communist Party, contending that the Subcommittee lacked legal authority to interrogate him and that its questioning violated his First Amendment rights. He was convicted of a misdemeanor violation of 2 U.S.C. § 192.[1] The Court also, on February 27, 1961, denied Braden v. United States, a companion case appealing a similar 2 U.S.C. § 192 conviction.

The underlying activities of the FBI and government agencies later resulted in a case, Wilkinson v. FBI, 633 F. Supp. 336 (C.D. Cal. 1986), in which it was revealed that the FBI believed the witness that provided the assertion of Wilkinson's association with the Communist Party was "unreliable and emotionally unstable."[2]

References

1. ^{{USC|2|192}}.
2. ^[https://books.google.com/books?id=SkR0CTfUyi4C&pg=PA208&lpg=PA208&dq=%22Wilkinson+v.+FBI%22&source=web&ots=pc91a62DXk&sig=SfaM89DWX4lpqZucfWB__uc9SvM&hl=en Books.Google.com]

External links

  • {{caselaw source

| case = Wilkinson v. United States, {{Ussc|365|399|1961|el=no}}
| cornell =
| courtlistener =https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/106181/wilkinson-v-united-states/
| findlaw = https://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/365/399.html
| googlescholar = https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=1998845357020858365
| justia =https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/365/399/
| oyez =https://www.oyez.org/cases/1960/37
  • Looking at Wilkinson v. United States in light of Wilkinson v. Federal Bureau of Investigation, Frank Wilkinson, Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review Vol. 33:681 January 2000
  • [https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/02/192- § 192. Refusal of witness to testify or produce papers] 2 U.S.C. § 192
{{SCOTUS-case-stub}}

6 : Anti-communism in the United States|United States Supreme Court cases|United States federal criminal case law|United States Free Speech Clause case law|1961 in United States case law|United States Supreme Court cases of the Warren Court

随便看

 

开放百科全书收录14589846条英语、德语、日语等多语种百科知识,基本涵盖了大多数领域的百科知识,是一部内容自由、开放的电子版国际百科全书。

 

Copyright © 2023 OENC.NET All Rights Reserved
京ICP备2021023879号 更新时间:2024/9/21 2:32:33