1. Morphology and evolution

2. Taxonomy
    Classification  Phylogeny 

3. Natural history

4. References

• † Dinailurictis
• † Dinictis
• † Eofelis
• † Maofelis
• † Pogonodon
• † Quercylurus
• Tribe †Nimravini
  • †Dinaelurus
  • †Nimravus
• Tribe †Hoplophoneini
  • †Eusmilus
  • †Hoplophoneus
  • †Nanosmilus

The barbourofelids were once previously classified as a subfamily of Nimravidae, in 2004, but were reassigned to their own distinct family Barbourofelidae.^[2]

Morphology and evolution

Most nimravids had muscular, low-slung, cat-like bodies, with shorter legs and tails than are typical of cats. Unlike extant Feliformia, the nimravids had a different bone structure in the small bones of the ear. The middle ear of true cats is housed in an external structure called an auditory bulla, which is separated by a septum into two chambers. Nimravid remains show ossified bullae with no septum, or no trace at all of the entire bulla. It is assumed that they had a cartilaginous housing of the ear mechanism.^[3] Nimravid feet were short, indicating they walked in a plantigrade or semiplantigrade posture.^[4]

Although some nimravids physically resembled the sabre-toothed cats of the genus Smilodon, they were not closely related,^[5] but evolved a similar form through parallel evolution. They possessed synapomorphies with the barbourofelids in the cranium, mandible, dentition, and postcranium.^[6] They also had a flange on the front of the mandible, not as prominent as those on Thylacosmilus, that projected downward as long as the canine tooth.

The ancestors of nimravids and cats diverged from a common ancestor soon after the Caniformia-Feliformia split, in the middle Eocene about 50 million years ago (mya), with a minimum constraint of 43 mya. Recognizable nimravid fossils date from the late Eocene (37 mya), from the Chadronian White River Formation at Flagstaff Rim, Wyoming, to the late Miocene (5 mya). Nimravid diversity appears to have peaked about 28 mya.

Taxonomy

Nimravidae was named by American paleontologist Edward Drinker Cope in 1880,^[7] with the type genus as Nimravus. The family was assigned to Fissipedia by Cope (1889); to Caniformia by Flynn and Galiano (1982); to Aeluroidea by Carroll (1988); to Feliformia by Bryant (1991); and to Carnivoramorpha; by Wesley-Hunt and Werdelin (2005).^[8]

Nimravids are placed in tribes by some authors to reflect closer relationships in genera within the family. Some nimravids evolved into large toothed, cat-like forms with massive flattened upper canines and accompanying mandibular flanges. Some had dentition similar to felids, or modern cats, with smaller canines. Others had moderately increased canines in a more intermediate relationship between the saber-toothed cats and felids. The upper canines were not only shorter, but also more conical, than those of the true saber-toothed cats (Machairodontinae). These nimravids are referred to as "false sabre-tooths".

Not only did nimravids exhibit diverse dentition, but they also showed the same diversity in size and morphology as cats. Some were leopard-sized, others the size of today's lions and tigers, one had the short face, rounded skull, and smaller canines of the modern cheetah, and one, Nanosmilus, was only the size of a small bobcat.

Classification

• Family: Nimravidae
  • Subfamily Barbourofelinae (obsolete: the Barbourofelids are no longer included in Nimravidae, following elevation to family as sister clade to the cats)
  • Subfamily Nimravinae (all Nimravids still assigned to Nimravidae)
  • Dinailurictis
  • Dinictis
  • Eofelis
  • Maofelis^[9]
  • Pogonodon
  • Quercylurus'
  • Tribe Nimravini
  • Dinaelurus
  • Nimravus
  • Tribe Hoplophoneini
  • Eusmilus
  • Hoplophoneus
  • Nanosmilus

Phylogeny

The following phylogeny is based on Peigné et al. (2003),^[10] as modified by Averianov et al. (2016).^[9]

                                       }}                                    }}                                    }}                              }}                           }}                        }}                     }}                  }}               }}            }}         }}      }}   }}

Natural history

Nimravids appeared in the middle of the Eocene epoch, about 40 mya, in North America and Asia. The global climate at this time was warm and wet, but was trending cooler and drier toward the late Eocene. The lush forests of the Eocene were transforming to scrub and open woodland. This climatic trend continued in the Oligocene, and nimravids evidently flourished in this environment. North America and Asia were connected and shared much related fauna.^[12] Europe in the Oligocene was more of an archipelago than a continent, though some land bridges must have existed, for nimravids also spread there.

In the Miocene, the fossil record suggests that many animals suited for living in forest or woodland were replaced by grazers suited for grassland. This suggests that much of North America and Asia became dominated by savanna. Nimravids disappeared along with the woodlands, but survived in relictual humid forests in Europe to the late Miocene. When conditions ultimately changed there in the late Miocene, the last nimravids disappeared about 9 mya.^[11]

References

• Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2003, 138, 477–493

• Domain of a relation
• Domain of convergence
• Domain of Moor
• Domain of Soissons
• Domain ontology
• Domain Park Flats
• Domain Park Flats (apartment building)
• Domain railway station, Melbourne
• Domain reduction algorithm
• Domain registration
• Domain Registry Group
• Domain Registry of America
• Domain slamming
• Domain sniping
• Domains of disgust
• Domain-specific
• Domain-specific embedded language
• Domain specific embedded language
• Domain Stadium
• Domain-straightening theorem
• Domain testing
• Domain Testing
• Domain theory of ferromagnetism
• Domain troll
• Domain wall (magnetism)