请输入您要查询的百科知识：

　

词条 2011 reasons of the Supreme Court of Canada
释义

  1. Reasons

  2. 2011 Statistics

  3. References

The table below lists the decisions (known as reasons) delivered from the bench by the Supreme Court of Canada during 2011. The table illustrates what reasons were filed by each justice in each case, and which justices joined each reason. This list, however, does not include reasons on motions.

Reasons

{{SCCOpinionKey}}
Case nameArguedDecidedMcLachlinBinnieLeBelDeschampsFishAbellaCharronRothsteinCromwellMoldaverKarakatsanis
Celgene Corp v Canada (AG), 2011 SCC 1, [2011] 1 SCR 3  November 10, 2010January 20, 2011
Canadian Broadcasting Corp v Canada (AG), 2011 SCC 2, [2011] 1 SCR 19 [https://web.archive.org/web/20120407203409/http://scc.lexum.org/en/2011/2011scc2/2011scc2.html]March 16, 2010January 28, 2011
Canadian Broadcasting Corp v The Queen, 2011 SCC 3, [2011] 1 SCR 65 [https://web.archive.org/web/20120407203414/http://scc.lexum.org/en/2011/2011scc3/2011scc3.html]March 16, 2010January 28, 2011
R v Bruce, 2011 SCC 4, [2011] 1 SCR 76 [https://web.archive.org/web/20120407203419/http://scc.lexum.org/en/2011/2011scc4/2011scc4.html]January 19, 2011February 2, 2011
R v Caron, 2011 SCC 5, [2011] 1 SCR 78 [https://web.archive.org/web/20120118073743/http://scc.lexum.org/en/2011/2011scc5/2011scc5.html]April 13, 2010February 4, 2011
R v Ahmad, 2011 SCC 6, [2011] 1 SCR 110 [https://web.archive.org/web/20120705031421/http://scc.lexum.org/en/2011/2011scc6/2011scc6.html]March 18, 2010February 10, 2011
Smith v Alliance Pipeline Ltd, 2011 SCC 7, [2011] 1 SCR 160 [https://web.archive.org/web/20110530030217/http://scc.lexum.org/en/2011/2011scc7/2011scc7.html]October 5, 2010February 11, 2011
R v Miljevic, 2011 SCC 8, [2011] 1 SCR 203 [https://web.archive.org/web/20120705050914/http://scc.lexum.org/en/2011/2011scc8/2011scc8.html]December 17, 2010February 16, 2011
Bou Malhab v Diffusion Métromédia CMR inc, 2011 SCC 9, [2011] 1 SCR 214 [https://web.archive.org/web/20120705031204/http://scc.lexum.org/en/2011/2011scc9/2011scc9.html]December 15, 2009February 17, 2011
Kerr v Baranow, 2011 SCC 10, [2011] 1 SCR 269 [https://web.archive.org/web/20111216180255/http://scc.lexum.org/en/2011/2011scc10/2011scc10.html]April 21, 2010February 18, 2011
Case nameArguedDecidedMcLachlinBinnieLeBelDeschampsFishAbellaCharronRothsteinCromwellMoldaverKarakatsanis
Québec (AG) v Canada, 2011 SCC 11, [2011] 1 SCR 368 [https://web.archive.org/web/20120705042457/http://scc.lexum.org/en/2011/2011scc11/2011scc11.html]October 14, 2010March 3, 2011
Withler v Canada (AG), 2011 SCC 12, [2011] 1 SCR 369 [https://web.archive.org/web/20111127050017/http://scc.lexum.org/en/2011/2011scc12/2011scc12.html]March 17, 2010March 4, 2011
R v White, 2011 SCC 13, [2011] 1 SCR 433 [https://web.archive.org/web/20120705031736/http://scc.lexum.org/en/2011/2011scc13/2011scc13.html]May 14, 2010March 11, 2011
R v SD, 2011 SCC 14, [2011] 1 SCR 527 [https://web.archive.org/web/20120705031309/http://scc.lexum.org/en/2011/2011scc14/2011scc14.html]March 17, 2011March 21, 2011V
Seidel v TELUS Communications Inc, 2011 SCC 15, [2011] 1 SCR 531 [https://web.archive.org/web/20111003183755/http://scc.lexum.org/en/2011/2011scc15/2011scc15.html]May 12, 2010March 18, 2011
R v St-Onge, 2011 SCC 16, [2011] 1 SCR 625 [https://web.archive.org/web/20120705025119/http://scc.lexum.org/en/2011/2011scc16/2011scc16.html]March 24, 2011April 1, 2011
R v JAA, 2011 SCC 17, [2011] 1 SCR 628 [https://web.archive.org/web/20120705024958/http://scc.lexum.org/en/2011/2011scc17/2011scc17.html]February 22, 2011April 8, 2011
British Columbia (AG) v Malik, 2011 SCC 18, [2011] 1 SCR 657 [https://web.archive.org/web/20120407203359/http://scc.lexum.org/en/2011/2011scc18/2011scc18.html]October 15, 2011April 21, 2011
R v Reynolds, 2011 SCC 19, [2011] 1 SCR 693 [https://web.archive.org/web/20120407203404/http://scc.lexum.org/en/2011/2011scc19/2011scc19.html]April 19, 2011April 28, 2011
Ontario (AG) v Fraser, 2011 SCC 20, [2011] 2 SCR 3 [https://web.archive.org/web/20110616021904/http://scc.lexum.org/en/2011/2011scc20/2011scc20.html]December 17, 2009April 29, 2011211
Case nameArguedDecidedMcLachlinBinnieLeBelDeschampsFishAbellaCharronRothsteinCromwellMoldaverKarakatsanis
R v Loewen, 2011 SCC 21, [2011] 2 SCR 167 [https://web.archive.org/web/20120421203648/http://scc.lexum.org/en/2011/2011scc21/2011scc21.html]April 12, 2011May 5, 2011
R v VY, 2011 SCC 22, [2011] 2 SCR 173 [https://web.archive.org/web/20120705025208/http://scc.lexum.org/en/2011/2011scc22/2011scc22.html]April 21, 2011May 6, 2011
Sharbern Holding Inc v Vancouver Airport Centre Ltd, 2011 SCC 23, [2011] 2 SCR 175 [https://web.archive.org/web/20120705031010/http://scc.lexum.org/en/2011/2011scc23/2011scc23.html]October 6, 2010May 11, 2011
Alberta v Elder Advocates of Alberta Society, 2011 SCC 24, [2011] 2 SCR 261 [https://web.archive.org/web/20120705034039/http://scc.lexum.org/en/2011/2011scc24/2011scc24.html]January 27, 2011May 12, 2011
Canada (Information Commissioner) v Canada (Minister of National Defence), 2011 SCC 25, [2011] 2 SCR 306 [https://web.archive.org/web/20120705034100/http://scc.lexum.org/en/2011/2011scc25/2011scc25.html]October 7, 2010May 13, 2011
i Trade Finance Inc v Bank of Montreal, 2011 SCC 26, [2011] 2 SCR 360 [https://web.archive.org/web/20110530030056/http://scc.lexum.org/en/2011/2011scc26/2011scc26.html]November 4, 2010May 20, 2011
Masterpiece Inc v Alavida Lifestyles Inc, 2011 SCC 27, [2011] 2 SCR 387 [https://web.archive.org/web/20110928160841/http://scc.lexum.org/en/2011/2011scc27/2011scc27.html]December 8, 2010May 26, 2011
R v JA, 2011 SCC 28, [2011] 2 SCR 440 [https://web.archive.org/web/20120226203714/http://scc.lexum.org/en/2011/2011scc28/2011scc28.html]November 8, 2010May 27, 2011
R v O'Brien, 2011 SCC 29, [2011] 2 SCR 485 [https://web.archive.org/web/20120705031741/http://scc.lexum.org/en/2011/2011scc29/2011scc29.html]February 23, 2011June 9, 2011
Canada (AG) v Mavi, 2011 SCC 30, [2011] 2 SCR 504 [https://web.archive.org/web/20120512205800/http://scc.lexum.org/en/2011/2011scc30/2011scc30.html]December 9, 2010June 10, 2011
Case nameArguedDecidedMcLachlinBinnieLeBelDeschampsFishAbellaCharronRothsteinCromwellMoldaverKarakatsanis
R v EMW, 2011 SCC 31, [2011] 2 SCR 542 [https://web.archive.org/web/20120705031158/http://scc.lexum.org/en/2011/2011scc31/2011scc31.html]May 20, 2011June 17, 2011
R v Campbell, 2011 SCC 31, [2011] 2 SCR 549 [https://archive.is/20130415054954/http://scc.lexum.org/en/2011/2011scc32/2011scc32.html]May 11, 2011June 23, 2011
R v Nixon, 2011 SCC 34, [2011] 2 SCR 566 [https://web.archive.org/web/20120705034801/http://scc.lexum.org/en/2011/2011scc34/2011scc34.html]December 15, 2010June 24, 2011
Schreyer v Schreyer, 2011 SCC 35, [2011] 2 SCR 605 [https://web.archive.org/web/20111116013658/http://scc.lexum.org/en/2011/2011scc35/2011scc35.html]November 9, 2010July 14, 2011
Canada Trustco Mortgage Co v Canada, 2011 SCC 36, [2011] 2 SCR 635 [https://web.archive.org/web/20120430022812/http://scc.lexum.org/en/2011/2011scc36/2011scc36.html]December 10, 2010July 15, 2011
Alberta (Aboriginal Affairs and Northern Development) v Cunningham, 2011 SCC 37, [2011] 2 SCR 670 [https://web.archive.org/web/20111207075019/http://scc.lexum.org/en/2011/2011scc37/2011scc37.html]December 16, 2010July 21, 2011
Bastien Estate v Canada, 2011 SCC 38, [2011] 2 SCR 710 [https://web.archive.org/web/20120118072710/http://scc.lexum.org/en/2011/2011scc38/2011scc38.html]May 20, 2010July 22, 2011
Dubé v Canada, 2011 SCC 39, [2011] 2 SCR 764 [https://web.archive.org/web/20111004155651/http://scc.lexum.org/en/2011/2011scc39/2011scc39.html]May 20, 2010July 22, 2011
R v Sinclair, 2011 SCC 40, [2011] 3 SCR 3 [https://web.archive.org/web/20120705034105/http://scc.lexum.org/en/2011/2011scc40/2011scc40.html]December 14, 2010July 28, 201112
R v Imperial Tobacco Canada Ltd, 2011 SCC 42, [2011] 3 SCR 45 [https://web.archive.org/web/20120104004333/http://scc.lexum.org/en/2011/2011scc42/2011scc42.html]February 24, 2011July 29, 2011
Case nameArguedDecidedMcLachlinBinnieLeBelDeschampsFishAbellaCharronRothsteinCromwellMoldaverKarakatsanis
R v Topp, 2011 SCC 43, [2011] 3 SCR 119 [https://web.archive.org/web/20111004155740/http://scc.lexum.org/en/2011/2011scc43/2011scc43.html]March 23, 2011September 23, 2011
Canada (AG) v PHS Community Services Society, 2011 SCC 44, [2011] 3 SCR 134 [https://web.archive.org/web/20111004155740/http://scc.lexum.org/en/2011/2011scc43/2011scc43.html]May 12, 2011September 30, 2011
R v JMH, 2011 SCC 45, [2011] 3 SCR 197 [https://web.archive.org/web/20120629213926/http://scc.lexum.org/en/2011/2011scc44/2011scc44.html]May 19, 2011October 6, 2011
R v Côté, 2011 SCC 46, [2011] 3 SCR 215 [https://web.archive.org/web/20111224210135/http://scc.lexum.org/en/2011/2011scc46/2011scc46.html]March 15, 2011October 14, 2011
Crookes v Newton, 2011 SCC 47, [2011] 3 SCR 269 [https://web.archive.org/web/20120118125345/http://scc.lexum.org/en/2011/2011scc47/2011scc47.html]December 7, 2010October 19, 2011
R v Katigbak, 2011 SCC 48, [https://web.archive.org/web/20111023201229/http://scc.lexum.org/en/2011/2011scc48/2011scc48.html]February 21, 2011October 20, 2011
R v Whyte, 2011 SCC 49, [https://web.archive.org/web/20120705025225/http://scc.lexum.org/en/2011/2011scc49/2011scc49.html]October 20, 2011October 20, 2011V
R v Dorfer, 2011 SCC 50, [https://web.archive.org/web/20120705031048/http://scc.lexum.org/en/2011/2011scc50/2011scc50.html]October 21, 2011October 21, 2011V
R v Barros, 2011 SCC 51, [https://archive.is/20130415081808/http://scc.lexum.org/en/2011/2011scc51/2011scc51.html]January 25, 2011October 26, 201112
British Columbia (Workers' Compensation Board) v Figliola, 2011 SCC 52, [https://archive.is/20130415084531/http://scc.lexum.org/en/2011/2011scc52/2011scc52.html]March 16, 2011October 27, 2011
Case nameArguedDecidedMcLachlinBinnieLeBelDeschampsFishAbellaCharronRothsteinCromwellMoldaverKarakatsanis
Canada (Canadian Human Rights Commission) v Canada (AG), 2011 SCC 53, [https://web.archive.org/web/20120104002235/http://scc.lexum.org/en/2011/2011scc53/2011scc53.html]December 13, 2010October 28, 2011
R v Sarrazin, 2011 SCC 54, [https://web.archive.org/web/20120705031345/http://scc.lexum.org/en/2011/2011scc54/2011scc54.html]April 18, 2011November 4, 2011
R v Banwait, 2011 SCC 55, [https://web.archive.org/web/20120705025030/http://scc.lexum.org/en/2011/2011scc55/2011scc55.html]November 8, 2011November 8, 2011V
Lax Kw'alaams Indian Band v Canada (AG), 2011 SCC 56, [https://archive.is/20130415085013/http://scc.lexum.org/en/2011/2011scc56/2011scc56.html]February 17, 2011November 10, 2011
Public Service Alliance of Canada v Canada Post Corp, 2011 SCC 57, [https://web.archive.org/web/20111228032247/http://scc.lexum.org/en/2011/2011scc57/2011scc57.html]November 17, 2011November 17, 2011V
R v Bouchard-Lebrun, 2011 SCC 58, [https://web.archive.org/web/20120312203626/http://scc.lexum.org/en/2011/2011scc58/2011scc58.html]May 16, 2011November 30, 2011
Nor-man Regional Health Authority Inc v Manitoba Association of Health Care Professionals, 2011 SCC 59, [https://web.archive.org/web/20120424113117/http://scc.lexum.org/en/2011/2011scc59/2011scc59.html]October 20, 2011December 2, 2011
Quebec (AG) v Canada (Human Resources and Social Development), 2011 SCC 60, [https://web.archive.org/web/20120705031752/http://scc.lexum.org/en/2011/2011scc60/2011scc60.html]February 15, 2011December 8, 2011
Alberta (Information and Privacy Commissioner) vv Alberta Teachers' Association, 2011 SCC 61, [https://web.archive.org/web/20120705031834/http://scc.lexum.org/en/2011/2011scc61/2011scc61.html]February 16, 2011December 14, 2011112
Newfoundland and Labrador Nurses' Union v Newfoundland and Labrador (Treasury Board), 2011 SCC 62, [https://archive.is/20120722061603/http://scc.lexum.org/en/2011/2011scc62/2011scc62.html]October 14, 2011December 15, 2011
Case nameArguedDecidedMcLachlinBinnieLeBelDeschampsFishAbellaCharronRothsteinCromwellMoldaverKarakatsanis
Copthorne Holdings Ltd v Canada, 2011 SCC 63, [https://web.archive.org/web/20120212174226/http://scc.lexum.org/en/2011/2011scc63/2011scc63.html]January 21, 2011December 16, 2011
LMP v LS, 2011 SCC 64, [https://archive.is/20130415135445/http://scc.lexum.org/en/2011/2011scc64/2011scc64.html]April 20, 2011December 21, 2011
RP v RC, 2011 SCC 65, [https://web.archive.org/web/20120705034841/http://scc.lexum.org/en/2011/2011scc65/2011scc65.html]April 20, 2011December 21, 2011
Reference re Securities Act, 2011 SCC 66, [https://web.archive.org/web/20120202075359/http://scc.lexum.org/en/2011/2011scc66/2011scc66.html]April 13, 2011December 22, 2011
Case nameArguedDecidedMcLachlinBinnieLeBelDeschampsFishAbellaCharronRothsteinCromwellMoldaverKarakatsanis

2011 Statistics

JusticeReasons written% Majority
Chief Justice Beverley McLachlin
12

1

0

1

Total=14
54 of 59 (91.5%)
Puisne Justice Ian Binnie
8

1

0

2

Total=11
49 of 54 (90.7%)
Puisne Justice Louis LeBel
7

2

0

2

Total=11
52 of 56 (92.9%)
Puisne Justice Marie Deschamps
7

1

2

4

Total=14
51 of 60 (85%)
Puisne Justice Morris Fish
4

1

1

6

Total=12
46 of 57 (80.7%)
Pusine Justice Rosalie Abella
8

1

1

2

Total=12
51 of 56 (91.1%)
Puisne Justice Louise Charron
5

1

1

0

Total=7
53 of 56 (94.6%)
Pusine Justice Marshall Rothstein
7

0

1

1

Total=9
58 of 63 (92.1%)
Pusine Justice Thomas Cromwell
7

3

2

1

Total=13
57 of 61 (93.4%)
Pusine Justice Michael Moldaver
0

0

0

0

Total=0
2 of 2 (100%)
Pusine Justice Andromache Karakatsanis
0

0

0

0

Total=0
2 of 2 (100%)
Notes on statistics:
  • A justice is only included in the majority if they have joined or concurred in the Court's judgment in full. Percentages are based only on the cases in which a justice participated, and are rounded to the nearest decimal.

References

  • 2011 decisions: CanLII, [https://web.archive.org/web/20120419144304/http://scc.lexum.org/en/dn/2011/01.html LexUM]
{{Supreme Court of Canada}}

2 : Supreme Court of Canada reasons by year|2011 in Canadian case law
随便看

　

开放百科全书收录14589846条英语、德语、日语等多语种百科知识，基本涵盖了大多数领域的百科知识，是一部内容自由、开放的电子版国际百科全书。

　

Copyright © 2023 OENC.NET All Rights Reserved
京ICP备2021023879号 更新时间：2024/11/11 17:20:11