请输入您要查询的百科知识：

　

词条 2012 reasons of the Supreme Court of Canada
释义

  1. Reasons

  2. 2012 Statistics

  3. References

The table below lists the decisions (known as reasons) delivered from the bench by the Supreme Court of Canada during 2012. The table illustrates what reasons were filed by each justice in each case, and which justices joined each reason. This list, however, does not include reasons on motions.

Reasons

{{SCCOpinionKey}}
Case nameArguedDecidedMcLachlinBinnieLeBelDeschampsFishAbellaCharronRothsteinCromwellMoldaverKarakatsanisWagner
Toronto Dominion Bank v Canada, 2012 SCC 1 [https://web.archive.org/web/20120701220348/http://scc.lexum.org/en/2012/2012scc1/2012scc1.html]January 12, 2012January 12, 2012V
Catalyst Paper Corp v North Cowichan (District), 2012 SCC 2 [https://web.archive.org/web/20120707022404/http://scc.lexum.org/en/2012/2012scc2/2012scc2.html]October 18, 2011January 20, 2012
Merck Frosst Canada Ltd v Canada (Health), 2012 SCC 3 [https://web.archive.org/web/20120411030942/http://scc.lexum.org/en/2012/2012scc3/2012scc3.html]November 12, 2010February 3, 2012
Reference Re Broadcasting Act, 2012 SCC 4 [https://web.archive.org/web/20120211142935/http://scc.lexum.org/en/2012/2012scc4/2012scc4.html]January 16, 2012February 9, 2012
R v DAI, 2012 SCC 5 [https://web.archive.org/web/20120217102432/http://scc.lexum.org/en/2012/2012scc5/2012scc5.html]May 17, 2011February 10, 2012
R v TLM, 2012 SCC 6 [https://web.archive.org/web/20120707022409/http://scc.lexum.org/en/2012/2012scc6/2012scc6.html]February 14, 2012February 14, 2012V
SL v Commission scolaire des Chênes, 2012 SCC 7 [https://web.archive.org/web/20120220113306/http://scc.lexum.org/en/2012/2012scc7/2012scc7.html]May 18, 2011February 17, 2012
Richard v Time Inc, 2012 SCC 8 [https://web.archive.org/web/20120304150958/http://scc.lexum.org/en/2012/2012scc8/2012scc8.html]January 18, 2011February 28, 2012
Momentous.ca Corp v Canadian American Association of Professional Baseball Ltd, 2012 SCC 9 [https://web.archive.org/web/20120317231239/http://scc.lexum.org/en/2012/2012scc9/2012scc9.html]February 10, 2012March 15, 2012
Halifax (Regional Municipality) v Nova Scotia (Human Rights Commission), 2012 SCC 10 [https://web.archive.org/web/20120708030022/http://scc.lexum.org/en/2012/2012scc10/2012scc10.html]October 19, 2011March 16, 2012
Case nameArguedDecidedMcLachlinBinnieLeBelDeschampsFishAbellaCharronRothsteinCromwellMoldaverKarakatsanisWagner
R v Eastgaard, 2012 SCC 11 [https://web.archive.org/web/20120707022048/http://scc.lexum.org/en/2012/2012scc11/2012scc11.html]March 21, 2012March 21, 2012V
Doré v Barreau du Québec, 2012 SCC 12 [https://web.archive.org/web/20120407203424/http://scc.lexum.org/en/2012/2012scc12/2012scc12.html]January 26, 2011March 22, 2012
R v Ipeelee, 2012 SCC 13 [https://web.archive.org/web/20121017100928/http://scc.lexum.org/en/2012/2012scc13/2012scc13.html]October 17, 2011March 23, 2012
Fundy Settlement v Canada, 2012 SCC 14 [https://web.archive.org/web/20120427001805/http://scc.lexum.org/en/2012/2012scc14/2012scc14.html]March 13, 2012April 12, 2012
R v Kociuk, 2012 SCC 15 [https://web.archive.org/web/20120707022348/http://scc.lexum.org/en/2012/2012scc15/2012scc15.html]April 12, 2012April 12, 2012V
R v Tse, 2012 SCC 16 [https://web.archive.org/web/20120415201155/http://scc.lexum.org/en/2012/2012scc16/2012scc16.html]November 18, 2011April 13, 2012
Club Resorts Ltd v Van Breda, 2012 SCC 17 [https://web.archive.org/web/20120421203652/http://scc.lexum.org/en/2012/2012scc17/2012scc17.html]March 21, 2011April 18, 2012
Éditions Écosociété Inc v Banro Corp, 2012 SCC 18 [https://web.archive.org/web/20120427051457/http://scc.lexum.org/en/2012/2012scc18/2012scc18.html]March 25, 2011April 18, 2012
Breeden v Black, 2012 SCC 19 [https://web.archive.org/web/20120421203731/http://scc.lexum.org/en/2012/2012scc19/2012scc19.html]March 22, 2011April 18, 2012
Calgary (City) v Canada, 2012 SCC 20 [https://web.archive.org/web/20120708030027/http://scc.lexum.org/en/2012/2012scc20/2012scc20.html]November 15, 2011April 26, 2012
Case nameArguedDecidedMcLachlinBinnieLeBelDeschampsFishAbellaCharronRothsteinCromwellMoldaverKarakatsanisWagner
R v Jesse, 2012 SCC 21 [https://web.archive.org/web/20120430012558/http://scc.lexum.org/en/2012/2012scc21/2012scc21.html]December 9, 2011April 27, 2012
R v RP, 2012 SCC 22 [https://web.archive.org/web/20120707022109/http://scc.lexum.org/en/2012/2012scc22/2012scc22.html]December 16, 2011May 11, 2012
Tessier Ltée v Quebec (Commission de la santé et de la sécurité du travail), 2012 SCC 23 [https://web.archive.org/web/20120707143128/http://scc.lexum.org/en/2012/2012scc23/2012scc23.html]January 17, 2012May 17, 2012
R v Maybin, 2012 SCC 24 [https://web.archive.org/web/20121017101512/http://scc.lexum.org/en/2012/2012scc24/2012scc24.html]December 15, 2011May 18, 2012
R v Roy, 2012 SCC 26 [https://web.archive.org/web/20120707022133/http://scc.lexum.org/en/2012/2012scc26/2012scc26.html]November 9, 2011June 1, 2012
Annapolis County District School Board v Marshall, 2012 SCC 27 [https://web.archive.org/web/20120708030054/http://scc.lexum.org/en/2012/2012scc27/2012scc27.html]May 8, 2012June 7, 2012
R v Gibbons, 2012 SCC 28 [https://web.archive.org/web/20120614093136/http://scc.lexum.org/en/2012/2012scc28/2012scc28.html]December 14, 2011June 8, 2012
Halifax (Regional Municipality) v Canada (Public Works and Government Services), 2012 SCC 29 [https://web.archive.org/web/20120618040327/http://scc.lexum.org/en/2012/2012scc29/2012scc29.html]December 12, 2011June 15, 2012
Westmount (City) v Rossy, 2012 SCC 30 [https://web.archive.org/web/20120707143139/http://scc.lexum.org/en/2012/2012scc30/2012scc30.html]February 13, 2012June 22, 2012
R v Mayuran, 2012 SCC 31 [https://web.archive.org/web/20120708030151/http://scc.lexum.org/en/2012/2012scc31/2012scc31.html]April 19, 2012June 28, 2012
Case nameArguedDecidedMcLachlinBinnieLeBelDeschampsFishAbellaCharronRothsteinCromwellMoldaverKarakatsanisWagner
Clements v Clements, 2012 SCC 32 [https://web.archive.org/web/20120708030218/http://scc.lexum.org/en/2012/2012scc32/2012scc32.html]February 17, 2012June 29, 2012
R v Venneri, 2012 SCC 33 [https://web.archive.org/web/20120711063054/http://scc.lexum.org/en/2012/2012scc33/2012scc33.html]April 16, 2012July 6, 2012
Entertainment Software Association v Society of Composers, Authors and Music Publishers of Canada, 2012 SCC 34 [https://web.archive.org/web/20120715043207/http://scc.lexum.org/en/2012/2012scc34/2012scc34.html]December 6, 2011July 12, 2012
Rogers Communications Inc v Society of Composers, Authors and Music Publishers of Canada, 2012 SCC 35 [https://web.archive.org/web/20120716045120/http://scc.lexum.org/en/2012/2012scc35/2012scc35.html]December 6, 2011July 12, 2012
Society of Composers, Authors and Music Publishers of Canada v Bell Canada, 2012 SCC 36 [https://web.archive.org/web/20120716040811/http://scc.lexum.org/en/2012/2012scc36/2012scc36.html]December 6, 2011July 12, 2012
Alberta (Education) v Canadian Copyright Licensing Agency (Access Copyright), 2012 SCC 37 [https://web.archive.org/web/20120715043126/http://scc.lexum.org/en/2012/2012scc37/2012scc37.html]December 7, 2011July 12, 2012
Re Sound v Motion Picture Theatre Associations of Canada, 2012 SCC 38 [https://web.archive.org/web/20120716045129/http://scc.lexum.org/en/2012/2012scc38/2012scc38.html]December 7, 2011July 12, 2012
R v Punko, 2012 SCC 39 [https://web.archive.org/web/20120809085606/http://scc.lexum.org/en/2012/2012scc39/2012scc39.html]March 21, 2012July 20, 2012
R v Vu, 2012 SCC 40 [https://web.archive.org/web/20121017100837/http://scc.lexum.org/en/2012/2012scc40/2012scc40.html]February 15, 2012July 26, 2012
R v Walle, 2012 SCC 41 [https://web.archive.org/web/20120731164600/http://scc.lexum.org/en/2012/2012scc41/2012scc41.html]April 13, 2012July 27, 2012
Case nameArguedDecidedMcLachlinBinnieLeBelDeschampsFishAbellaCharronRothsteinCromwellMoldaverKarakatsanisWagner
R v Knott, 2012 SCC 42 [https://web.archive.org/web/20120809085611/http://scc.lexum.org/en/2012/2012scc42/2012scc42.html]December 14, 2011July 31, 2012
Canada v Craig, 2012 SCC 43 [https://web.archive.org/web/20120807113028/http://scc.lexum.org/en/2012/2012scc43/2012scc43.html]March 23, 2012August 1, 2012
R v Bellusci, 2012 SCC 44 [https://web.archive.org/web/20120809085616/http://scc.lexum.org/en/2012/2012scc44/2012scc44.html]February 16, 2012August 3, 2012
Canada (AG) v Downtown East Side Sex Workers United Against Violence Society et al, 2012 SCC 45 [https://web.archive.org/web/20120925021343/http://scc.lexum.org/en/2012/2012scc45/2012scc45.html]January 19, 2012September 21, 2012
AB v Bragg Communications Inc, 2012 SCC 46 [https://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/10007/index.do]May 10, 2012September 27, 2012
R v Mabior, 2012 SCC 47 [https://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/10008/index.do]February 8, 2012October 5, 2012
R v DC, 2012 SCC 48 [https://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/10010/index.do]February 8, 2012October 5, 2012
R v Prokofiew, 2012 SCC 49 [https://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/10011/index.do]November 8, 2011October 12, 2012
R v Rochon, 2012 SCC 50  October 16, 2012October 16, 2012V
Southcott Estates Inc v Toronto Catholic District School Board, 2012 SCC 51  {{Dead link|date=September 2018 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes }}March 20, 2012October 17, 2012
Case nameArguedDecidedMcLachlinBinnieLeBelDeschampsFishAbellaCharronRothsteinCromwellMoldaverKarakatsanisWagner
Canada v GlaxoSmithKline Inc, 2012 SCC 52  January 13, 2012October 18, 2012
R v Cole, 2012 SCC 53  May 15, 2012October 19, 2012
R v Picot, 2012 SCC 54  October 19, 2012October 19, 2012V
Opitz v Wrzesnewskyj, 2012 SCC 55  July 10, 2012October 25, 2012
R v Boudreault, 2012 SCC 56  June 6, 2012October 26, 2012
R v St-Onge Lamoureux, 2012 SCC 57  October 13, 2011November 2, 2012
R v Dineley, 2012 SCC 58  October 13, 2011November 2, 2012
R v Nedelcu, 2012 SCC 59  March 16, 2012November 7, 2012
Teva Canada Ltd v Pfizer Canada Inc, 2012 SCC 60  April 18, 2012November 8, 2012
Moore v British Columbia (Education), 2012 SCC 61  March 22, 2012November 9, 2012
Case nameArguedDecidedMcLachlinBinnieLeBelDeschampsFishAbellaCharronRothsteinCromwellMoldaverKarakatsanisWagner
R v PDT, 2012 SCC 62  November 9, 2012November 9, 2012V
R v DJW, 2012 SCC 63  November 16, 2012November 16, 2012V
Canada (AG) v Kane, 2012 SCC 64  November 6, 2012November 23, 2012
Construction Labour Relations v Driver Iron Inc, 2012 SCC 65  November 15, 2012November 29, 2012
R v Aucoin, 2012 SCC 66  May 16, 2012November 30, 2012
Newfoundland and Labrador v AbitibiBowater Inc, 2012 SCC 67  November 16, 2011December 7, 201212
Reference Re Broadcasting Regulatory Policy CRTC 2010-167 and Broadcasting Order CRTC 2010-168, 2012 SCC 68  April 17, 2012December 13, 2012
R v Khawaja, 2012 SCC 69  June 11, 2012December 14, 2012
Sriskandarajah v United States of America, 2012 SCC 70  June 11, 2012December 14, 2012
Professional Institute of the Public Service of Canada v Canada (AG), 2012 SCC 71  February 9, 2012December 19, 2012
Case nameArguedDecidedMcLachlinBinnieLeBelDeschampsFishAbellaCharronRothsteinCromwellMoldaverKarakatsanisWagner
R v NS, 2012 SCC 72  December 8, 2011December 20, 2012
R v Yumnu, 2012 SCC 73  March 15, 2012December 21, 2012
R v Emms, 2012 SCC 74  March 15, 2012December 21, 2012
R v Davey, 2012 SCC 75  March 15, 2012December 21, 2012
Case nameArguedDecidedMcLachlinBinnieLeBelDeschampsFishAbellaCharronRothsteinCromwellMoldaverKarakatsanisWagner

2012 Statistics

JusticeReasons written% Majority
Chief Justice Beverley McLachlin
11

0

0

3

Total=14
58 of 63 (92.1%)
Puisne Justice Ian Binnie
0

0

0

1

Total=1
4 of 5 (80%)
Puisne Justice Louis LeBel
11

2

0

4

Total=17
58 of 67 (86.6%)
Puisne Justice Marie Deschamps
9

0

0

1

Total=10
58 of 61 (95.1%)
Puisne Justice Morris Fish
6

1

0

3

Total=10
56 of 65 (86.2%)
Pusine Justice Rosalie Abella
8

1

0

3

Total=12
64 of 67 (95.5%)
Puisne Justice Louise Charron
0

0

0

0

Total=0
4 of 4 (100%)
Pusine Justice Marshall Rothstein
7

0

0

3

Total=10
61 of 68 (89.7%)
Pusine Justice Thomas Cromwell
6

0

1

5

Total=12
55 of 65 (84.6%)
Pusine Justice Michael Moldaver
11

0

0

0

Total=11
53 of 53 (100%)
Pusine Justice Andromache Karakatsanis
4

0

0

0

Total=4
51 of 52 (98.1%)
Pusine Justice Richard Wagner
0

0

0

0

Total=0
2 of 2 (100%)
Notes on statistics:
  • A justice is only included in the majority if they have joined or concurred in the Court's judgment in full. Percentages are based only on the cases in which a justice participated, and are rounded to the nearest decimal.

References

  • 2012 decisions: CanLII, [https://web.archive.org/web/20120419131323/http://scc.lexum.org/en/dn/2012/01.html LexUM]
{{Supreme Court of Canada}}

2 : Supreme Court of Canada reasons by year|2012 in Canadian case law
随便看

　

开放百科全书收录14589846条英语、德语、日语等多语种百科知识，基本涵盖了大多数领域的百科知识，是一部内容自由、开放的电子版国际百科全书。

　

Copyright © 2023 OENC.NET All Rights Reserved
京ICP备2021023879号 更新时间：2024/9/24 13:12:52