| 词条 | Adelaide of Poland |
| 释义 |
|consort= | name =Adelaide of Poland | succession = | image =Adelajda Kujawska.jpeg | caption =Fragment of an image of Adelaide in the Dominican Church of Sandomierz. | reign = | spouse = | issue = | house =House of Piast (by birth) | father =Casimir II the Just | mother =Helen of Znojmo | birth_date =ca. late 1170s / early 1180s | birth_place = | death_date =8 December 1211 | death_place = |}} Adelaide of Poland ({{lang-pl|Adelajda Kazimierzówna}}) (c. late 1170s / early 1180s – 8 December 1211), was a Polish princess and member of the Piast dynasty. She was the daughter of Casimir II the Just, Duke of Sandomierz and High Duke of Poland, by his wife Helena of Znojmo , a Přemyslid princess. On basis of the inscription of her tombstone at the Dominican Church and Convent of St. James in Sandomierz and two different reports of Jan Długosz,[1] modern historians agreed with the origin and facts from Adelaide's life. Today existed a dominant view in historiography consistent with her filiation and death date. According to them, Adelaide was indeed the daughter of Casimir II the Just and died in 1211, but wasn't the foundress of the Convent of St. James and only another nun there.[2] In the 19th century, appeared a theory which states that Adelaide was the daughter of Casimir I of Kuyavia, who entered in the Convent of St. James as a nun and died there in 1291.[3] This view, accepted by several scholars, has been disputed. More recent historiography recognized her as the daughter of Casimir II the Just, founder of the Convent, in which was she buried after her death in 1211.[4] LifeJan Długosz reported that Adelaide was the daughter of Casimir II the Just.[5] It's unknown when she was born. The fact that she never married and became a nun, supports the presumption that at the time of her father's death in 1194 her future wasn't decide.[6] Her birth date was placed between the late 1170s and early 1180s.[6] By convention among the offspring of Casimir II and Helena of Znojmo she is placed in the fifth place, after Odon (who died in infancy) and before Leszek I the White and Konrad I of Masovia.[6]The origin of her name is unclear. Historians placed three theories about it:[7]
Adelaide was the foundress of the Convent of St. James in Sandomierz, where in 1226 thanks to Iwo Odrowąż, Bishop of Kraków, the Dominicans settled.[8] She probably was also a nun in the Sanctuary of St. Jadwiga in Trzebnica during the rule of the first Abbess Petrissa.[9] She died on 8 December 1211,[10] and was buried at the Convent of St. James. At the end of the 14th and early 15th century,[11] was founded her Gothic tombstone. Included a carved convex form of a woman dress in a long dress and coat, with her head resting on a pillow, his hands clasped in prayer, and around contains an inscription in Latin: {{lang|la|hic iacet domicella adleais filia ducis kazimiri fundatrix ilius convet' et obit anno domini milesimo ccxi}}. In English: Here lies Lady Adelaide, daughter of Duke Casimir, foundress of the monastery and died in the year of our Lord 1211. The title of the tombstone who mentioned Adelaide as the foundress of the Convent was known by Jan Długosz, but was translated by the Dominicans, and this probably resulted in the error of the source. The theory of a Kuyavian originIn the 19th century appeared an incompatible theory about Adelaide's origins. It was assumed that the Piast princess buried in the Dominican Church of Sandomierz was a nun and not the foundress. Since the Convent was established in 1226, it seems impossible that she could died in 1211. It's considered unlikely that she was the daughter of Casimir II the Just, because this supposed that she took the veil at the late age of 40 or previously lived in another Monastic rule.[12] The doubt who arosed about the paternity of the Casimir II made that historians recognized Adelaide as the daughter of Casimir I of Kuyavia.[13] It was established that she was born shortly before 7 April 1249 from the second marriage of the Kuyavian Duke with Constance, daughter of Henry II the Pious, Duke of Wrocław.[14] After 1278 she entered in the Dominican Convent in Sandomierz, located in the lands of her brother Leszek II the Black.[12] The title of foundress placed in her tombstone was probably thanks to either her prestige of through the intercession of her brother Leszek II.[15] She died on 8 December 1291 and the year of 1211 on the tombstone was explained as carelessness of the sculptor.[16] This interpretation, accepted by historians for several years, has been questioned in modern times.[17] As where mentioned the reports of Jan Długosz, who supposedly named Adelaide as a nun in the Dominican Convent; a further examination of this showed that a woman couldn't be a nun in a manly Order and the chronicler, indeed, never mentioned the religious Order of the princess.[18] Another fact who supported this view was that Adelaide wasn't directly mentioned in any contemporary sources related to genealogy or filiation. If Adelaide was the daughter of Casimir I and Constance, she must be mentioned in the Genealogii św. Jadwigi (Genealogy of St. Jadwiga), compiled by 1301 or at latest in 1301, where are only mentioned two sons born from the second marriage of the Kuyavian Duke: Leszek II the Black and Ziemomysł. In addition, she wasn't mentioned in the Genealogy wrote by the Franciscan friar Henry of Brehna, nephew of Casimir I,[19] who certainly never left out in the development of his work his own cousin. In addition, the Abbess at the time of the writing of the Genealogy in the Sanctuary of St. Jadwiga in Trzebnica was Constance, daughter of Ziemomysł of Kuyavia, and was unlikely that she not objected the fact that her paternal aunt wasn't mentioned in this work. However, if Adelaide was born from the third marriage of Casimir I with Euphrosyne of Opole, she certainly wasn't mentioned in the Genealogii św. Jadwigi, but instead of Sandomierz, she must to be placed in a monastery located in the domains of her full-brothers. Notes1. ^J. Długosz: Liber beneficiorum dioecesis Cracoviensis, vol. 3, Monasteria, Cracoviae 1864, p. 455; J. Długosz: Roczniki czyli kroniki sławnego Królestwa Polskiego, book VI, Warsaw 1973, vol. 3, p. 222. 2. ^O. Balzer: Genealogia Piastów, Kraków 1895, p. 338; K. Jasiński: Rodowód Piastów małopolskich i kujawskich, Poznań – Wrocław 2001, p. 17. 3. ^O. Balzer: Genealogia Piastów, Kraków 1895, pp. 337–339. 4. ^K. Jasiński: Rodowód Piastów małopolskich i kujawskich, Poznań – Wrocław 2001, pp. 17–22. 5. ^J. Długosz: Roczniki czyli kroniki sławnego Królestwa Polskiego, book VI, Warsaw 1973, vol. 3, p. 222; J. Długosz: Liber beneficiorum dioecesis Cracoviensis, vol. 3, Monasteria, Cracoviae 1864, p. 455. The filiation given by Długosz was supported by K. Jasiński: Rodowód Piastów małopolskich i kujawskich, Poznań – Wrocław 2001, pp. 17–22. 6. ^1 2 K. Jasiński: Rodowód Piastów małopolskich i kujawskich, Poznań – Wrocław 2001, p. 21. 7. ^K. Jasiński: Rodowód Piastów małopolskich i kujawskich, Poznań – Wrocław 2001, pp. 20–21. 8. ^Jan Długosz in his work Roczniki czyli kroniki sławnego Królestwa Polskiego reported that in 1200 Adelaide founded the Dominican Convent. However, in the work Liber beneficiorum dioecesis Cracoviensis he said that she only founded a Church. O. Balzer: Genealogia Piastów, Kraków 1895, pp. 337–338 and K. Jasiński: Rodowód Piastów małopolskich i kujawskich, Poznań – Wrocław 2001, pp. 18–19, said that Adelaide founded a minor Church. 9. ^O. Balzer took this report from the 18th century chronicle of Arnold Teicher, quoted in the work of A. Bach: Geschichte und Beschreibung des fürstlichen jungfräulichen Klosterstiftes Cistercienser Ordens in Trebnitz..., issued in Nysa in 1859. However, this work considered that Adelaide was the daughter of Casimir I of Kuyavia and died in 1291. O. Balzer: Genealogia Piastów, Kraków 1895, p. 418. 10. ^Date given by Jan Długosz and accepted by O. Balzer: Genealogia Piastów, Kraków 1895, p. 339, and K. Jasiński: Rodowód Piastów małopolskich i kujawskich, Poznań – Wrocław 2001, pp. 21–22. 11. ^In favor of the first date was K. Jasiński: Rodowód Piastów małopolskich i kujawskich, Poznań – Wrocław 2001, p. 22, note. 46; in favor of the second one was S.A. Sroka: Adelajda, [in:] K. Ożóg, S. Szczur (ed.), Piastowie. Leksykon biograficzny, Kraków 1999. 12. ^1 O. Balzer: Genealogia Piastów, Kraków 1895, p. 338. 13. ^The first researcher who placed Adelaide as the daughter of Casimir I of Kuyavia was Ivan Vahylevych in his work Genealogia książąt i królów polskich od roku 880–1195. Aleksander Semkowicz support this view in his work Krytyczny rozbiór dziejów polskich Jana Długosza do roku 1384, Kraków 1887, p. 203. O. Balzer: Genealogia Piastów, Kraków 1895, pp. 337–339, exposed a complete argument who supported this view. However, modern historiography followed the opinion of Stosław Łaguna, who was one of the first who reafirmed the fact that Adelaide was a daughter of Casimir II the Just in his work Rodowodzie Piastów, "Kwartalnik Historyczny" n°11, 1897, p. 767, like W. Dworzaczek: Genealogia, Warsaw 1959, tabl. 3 and K. Jasiński: Rodowód Piastów małopolskich i kujawskich, Poznań – Wrocław 2001, p. 17. 14. ^O. Balzer: Genealogia Piastów, Kraków 1895, p. 339, showed a document issued by Siemowit I of Masovia, Casimir I's brother on 7 April 1249 where he mentioned a family celebration, who he believes was the christening of Adelaide. 15. ^O. Balzer: Genealogia Piastów, Kraków 1895, pp. 338–339. 16. ^O. Balzer: Genealogia Piastów, Kraków 1895, pp. 338–339, claimed that the sculptor omitted a C letter — instead of MCCXCI he carved MCCXI. 17. ^K. Jasiński: Rodowód Piastów śląskich, vol. I, ed. II, Kraków 2007, p. 121, note 7, accused Balzer of made his theory about Adelaide's origins based only in supositiones and not in actual facts, corroborated in older sources. 18. ^Jacek Woroniecki in his work {{lang|pl|Św. Jacek Odrowąż i wprowadzenie Zakonu Kaznodziejskiego do Polski}}, Katowice 1947, p. 86, states that Długosz only said that Adelaide was a pious woman dedicated to the service of God, from which O. Balzer: Genealogia Piastów, Kraków 1895, pp. 337-338 concluded that she was a nun. See K. Jasiński: Rodowód Piastów małopolskich i kujawskich, Poznań – Wrocław 2001, p. 18. 19. ^Son of Eudoxia of Masovia and Dietrich I, Count of Brehna and Wettin. References
8 : 12th-century births|1211 deaths|Polish princesses|Piast dynasty|12th-century Polish people|12th-century Polish women|13th-century Polish people|13th-century Polish women |
| 随便看 |
|
开放百科全书收录14589846条英语、德语、日语等多语种百科知识，基本涵盖了大多数领域的百科知识，是一部内容自由、开放的电子版国际百科全书。