词条 | Allow natural death |
释义 |
DNR orders range from solely prohibiting the use of resuscitation to prohibiting any action seen as life extending. Because there are many parties involved in a patient’s end of life care - significant others, family, personal doctors, specialists and nurses - DNR orders are not always completely clear, leaving open possible violation of the patient’s wishes.[1] “DNR orders may lead to conflict, unnecessary suffering, and inappropriate care at the EOL [end of life.]” Those who propose to replace DNR orders with AND orders posit that AND are less ambiguous, clearly instructing medical personnel to not use any artificial, life extending measures. This would be especially helpful in regards to emergency care, when medical personnel who are unfamiliar with the patient must decide what medical practices should be used. Furthermore, proponents of AND claim that because it contains “death” in the title it is more clear to the patient and family exactly what the patient is agreeing to. Critics of AND claim it is simply the replacement of one ambiguous term with another. Just as DNR particulars vary so too would AND particulars vary. Thus, the change would be ineffective.[3] See also
References1. ^1 2 {{cite journal|last=Schlairet|first=Maura C|title=Allow-Natural-Death (AND) Orders: Legal, Ethical, And Practical Considerations|journal=HEC Forum}} 2. ^{{cite journal|last=Venneman|first=S.S.|title='Allow Natural Death' Versus 'Do Not Resuscitate': Three Words That Can Change A Life|journal=Journal of Medical Ethics|doi=10.1136/jme.2006.018317|volume=34|year=2008|pages=2–6}} 3. ^{{cite journal|last=Chen|first=Y-Y|title='Allow Natural Death' Is Not Equivalent To 'Do Not Resuscitate': A Response|journal=Journal of Medical Ethics|doi=10.1136/jme.2008.024570|volume=34|year=2008|pages=887–888}} 3 : Medical ethics|Medical aspects of death|Medical terminology |
随便看 |
|
开放百科全书收录14589846条英语、德语、日语等多语种百科知识,基本涵盖了大多数领域的百科知识,是一部内容自由、开放的电子版国际百科全书。