请输入您要查询的百科知识:

 

词条 Out-of-place artifact
释义

  1. Examples

      Unusual artifacts    Questionable interpretations    Alternate interpretations    Natural objects mistaken for artifacts    Erroneously dated objects    Modern-day creations, forgeries and hoaxes    Entirely fictional  

  2. See also

      Authors and works  

  3. References

  4. External links

{{Redirect|OOPArts|The Pillows' album|OOPArts (album)|the SYUN album|OOPARTS (SYUN album)}}

An out-of-place artifact (OOPArt) is an artifact of historical, archaeological, or paleontological interest found in an unusual context, that challenges conventional historical chronology by being "too advanced" for the level of civilization that existed at the time, or showing "human presence" before humans were known to exist. Other examples suggest contact between different cultures that are hard to account for with conventional historical understanding.

The term is used largely by cryptozoologists, proponents of ancient astronaut theories, young Earth creationists, and paranormal enthusiasts.[1] It can describe a wide variety of objects, from anomalies studied by mainstream science and pseudoarchaeology far outside the mainstream to objects that have been shown to be hoaxes or to have mundane explanations.

Critics argue that most purported OOPArts which are not hoaxes are the result of mistaken interpretation, wishful thinking, or a mistaken belief that a particular culture could not have created an artifact or technology due to a lack of knowledge or materials. In some cases, the uncertainty results from inaccurate descriptions. For example: the Wolfsegg Iron was said to be a perfect cube, but in fact it is not; the Klerksdorp spheres were said to be perfect spheres, but they are not; and the Iron pillar of Delhi was said to be "rust proof", but it has some rust near its base.

Supporters regard OOPArts as evidence that mainstream science is overlooking huge areas of knowledge, either willfully or through ignorance.[1] Many writers or researchers who question conventional views of human history have used purported OOPArts in attempts to bolster their arguments.[1] Creation science relies on allegedly anomalous finds in the archaeological record to challenge scientific chronologies and models of human evolution.[2] Claimed OOPArts have been used to support religious descriptions of pre-history, ancient astronaut theories, and the notion of vanished civilizations that possessed knowledge or technology more advanced than that of modern times.[1]

Examples

The following are examples of objects that have been argued by various fringe authors (see list) to have been OOPArts:

Unusual artifacts

A minority of alleged OOPARTs are at least debatably unusual within the scientific mainstream, although not impossible for their time period.

  • Antikythera mechanism: Its clockwork-like appearance, dating to about 1,000 years before clocks were invented, has been claimed by fringe sources to be evidence of alien visitation,[3] and authors such as Zecharia Sitchin argue that this artifact is a product "not of Man, but of the gods".[4] However, mainstream scientists consider the Antikythera mechanism to be a form of mechanical computer created around 150–100 BCE based on the theories of astronomy and mathematics developed by the ancient Greeks. Its design and workmanship reflect a previously unknown, but not implausible, degree of sophistication.[5][6]
  • Maine penny: Some authors argue the 11th-century Norwegian coin found in a Native American shell midden in Maine, United States is evidence of direct contact between Vikings and Native Americans in Maine. Mainstream belief is that it was brought to Maine from Labrador or Newfoundland via an extensive northern native trade network.[7] Over 20,000 objects were found over a 15-year period at the Goddard Site in Brooklin, Maine. The sole non-Native artifact was the coin.[8]

Questionable interpretations

  • Baghdad Battery: Vase and rods made in Parthian or Sassanid Persia. May have been used as a galvanic cell for electroplating, though no electroplated artifacts from this era have been found.[9][10]
  • Dorchester Pot: A metal pot claimed to have been blasted out of solid rock in 1852.[11][12]
  • Kingoodie artifact: An object resembling a corroded nail, said to have been encased in solid rock.[13][14]
  • Lake Winnipesaukee mystery stone: Originally thought to be a record of a treaty between tribes, subsequent analysis has called its authenticity into question.[15][16]
  • Sivatherium of Kish: An ornamental war chariot piece discovered in the Sumerian ruins of Kish, which is now in central Iraq, in 1928. The figurine, dated to the Early Dynastic I period in 2800-2750 BC, depicts a quadrupedal mammal with branched horns, a nose ring and a rope tied to the ring. Because of the shape of the horns, Edwin Colbert identified it as a depiction of a late surviving, possibly domesticated Sivatherium, a vaguely moose-like relative of the giraffe that lived in North Africa and India during the Pleistocene but was believed extinct early in the Holocene extinction event. Henry Field and Berthold Laufer instead argued that it represented a captive Persian fallow deer and that the antlers had broken over the years. The missing antlers were found in the Field Museum's storeroom in 1977.[17]
  • Tecaxic-Calixtlahuaca head: A terracotta offering head seemingly of Roman appearance, found beneath three intact floors of a Pre-Columbian burial site in Mexico, dated between 1476 and 1510. However, the artifact has been determined to be older and ancient Roman provenance has not been excluded.[18][19]

Alternate interpretations

  • Abydos helicopter: A pareidolia based on palimpsest carving in an ancient Egyptian temple.
  • Baalbek megaliths: almost impossible to move with Bronze Age technology.
  • Dendera Lamps: Supposed to depict light bulbs, but made in Ptolemaic Egypt.
  • Iron Man (Eiserner Mann): An old iron pillar, said to be a unique oddity in Central Europe.
  • The Hidden character stone, a Chinese petroglyph.
  • Iron pillar of Delhi: Rust-proof Iron pillar demonstrates more advanced metallurgy than was supposedly available in India, pre 1000 AD.
  • Igneous rock statues and buildings: demonstrates ability to accurately carve basalt, Granite, Diorite, etc., in the Bronze age.
  • The "London Hammer", also known as the "London Artifact", hammer made of iron and wood that was found in London, Texas in 1936. Part of the hammer is embedded in a limy rock concretion.
  • Nazca Lines: Supposedly impossible to design without the aid of an aerial view.
  • The Newark Holy Stones, used as extremely unlikely evidence that Hebrews lived in the Americas, but more probably a hoax.
  • Pacal's sarcophagus lid: Described by Erich von Däniken as a depiction of a spaceship.
  • Piri Reis map: Several ancient astronauts authors, and others such as Gavin Menzies and Charles Hapgood, suggested that this map, compiled by the Turkish admiral Piri Reis, shows Antarctica long before it was discovered.
  • Quimbaya airplanes: Golden objects found in Colombia and made by Quimbaya civilization culture, they are supposed to represent modern airplanes. In the Gold Museum, Bogotá, they are described as figures of birds and insects.
  • Saqqara Bird: Supposed to depict a glider, but made in Ancient Egypt.
  • Shakōkidogū: Small humanoid and animal figurines made during the late Jōmon period (14,000–400 BCE) of prehistoric Japan, said to resemble extraterrestrial astronauts.
  • Stone spheres of Costa Rica: Inaccurately described as being perfectly spherical, and therefore demonstrating greater stone-working skill than was present in pre-Columbian times.

Natural objects mistaken for artifacts

  • Aix-en-Provence petrified tools: Likely petrified tree remains.[20][21]
  • Baigong Pipes: Their natural origins are challenged.[22][23][24]
  • Eltanin Antenna: Actually a sponge.[25][26]
  • Face of Mars: Pareidolia caused by poor resolution in early Martian missions.
  • Klerksdorp spheres: Actually pre-Cambrian concretions.[27][28]
  • Paluxy River tracks: Identified by Biblical literalists as giant humanoid footprints found alongside dinosaur tracks. Actually tracks of theropod dinosaurs, and 1930s forgeries.

Erroneously dated objects

  • Aiud object: An aluminum wedge found in 1974 in the Mureș River in central Romania, near the town of Aiud is claimed by Romanian UFOlogists to be of ancient and/or extraterrestrial origin,[29] however it is more likely a fragment of modern machinery lost during excavation work.[30]
  • Coso artifact: Thought to be prehistoric; actually a 1920s spark plug.[2]
  • Malachite Man: Thought to be from the early Cretaceous; actually a post-Columbian burial.[31][32]
  • Wolfsegg Iron: Thought to be from the Tertiary epoch; actually from an early mining operation. Inaccurately described as a perfect cube.

Modern-day creations, forgeries and hoaxes

  • Babylonokia: A clay tablet shaped like a mobile phone. Fringe scientists and alternative archaeology proponents subsequently misrepresented a photograph of the artwork as showing an 800-year-old archaeological find; that story was popularised in a video on the YouTube channel Paranormal Crucible and led to the object being reported by some press sources as a mystery.
  • Acámbaro figures: Mid-20th century figurines of dinosaurs, attributed by Waldemar Julsrud to an ancient society.
  • Crystal skulls: Supposedly demonstrate more advanced stone-cutting skill than was present in pre-Columbian Mesoamerica. Appear to have been made in the 19th century.
  • Ica stones: Depict Inca dinosaur-hunters, surgery, and other modern or fanciful topics. Collected by Javier Cabrera Darquea, who claimed them to be prehistoric.
  • Kensington Runestone: Purports to have been made by 15th century descendents of Leif Ericson's colony. Generally believed to be a modern-day hoax.
  • The Michigan relics, supposedly ancient artifacts that are archaeological forgeries and were supposed to prove that people of an ancient Near Eastern culture had lived in Michigan, United States.
  • The Tucson artifacts, a hoax.
  • The Calaveras Skull, an admitted hoax.
  • Los Lunas Decalogue Stone: Supposedly made by Pre-Columbian Israelite visitors to the Americas. Generally believed to be a modern-day hoax.
  • The Japanese Paleolithic hoax, perpetrated by discredited amateur archeologist Shinichi Fujimura.

Entirely fictional

  • Dropa stones: Popularized by David Gamon (as David Agamon) as part of his false document Sungods in Exile.

See also

  • Ancient technology
  • Lost inventions
  • Anachronism
  • Lazarus taxon – when a biological lineage is discovered to have been alive long after it was assumed extinct

Authors and works

  • Charles Fort, researcher of anomalous phenomena
  • Fortean Times
  • Peter Kolosimo
  • Fingerprints of the Gods book by Graham Hancock
  • Michael Cremo, author of several books including Forbidden Archeology
  • Charles Berlitz, famous linguist and writer of anomalous phenomena
  • The Mysterious Origins of Man originally aired on NBC in 1996

References

1. ^{{cite web|url=http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2005/08/31/archaeology/index.html|title=Archaeology from the dark side|last=O'Hehir|first=Andrew |date=August 31, 2005|publisher=Salon.com|accessdate=19 April 2010}}
2. ^Stromberg, P, and PV Heinrich (2004) The Coso Artifact Mystery from the Depths of Time?, Reports of the National Center for Science Education. 24(2):26-30 (March/April 2004) Retrieved March 8, 2014.
3. ^{{Skeptoid|id=4184|number=184|title=The Antikythera Mechanism |accessdate=2011-08-24}}
4. ^{{cite book|author=Zecharia Sitchin|title=Journeys to the Mythical Past|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=mPNg4nfp-6YC&pg=PA171|accessdate=19 June 2013|date=25 January 2011|publisher=Inner Traditions / Bear & Co|isbn=978-1-59143-951-6|pages=171–}}
5. ^"The Antikythera Mechanism Research Project", The Antikythera Mechanism Research Project. Retrieved 2007-07-01 Quote: "The Antikythera Mechanism is now understood to be dedicated to astronomical phenomena and operates as a complex mechanical "computer" which tracks the cycles of the Solar System."
6. ^{{cite news|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/11/30/AR2006113001303.html|title=Experts: Fragments an Ancient Computer|last=Paphitis|first=Nicholas|date=December 1, 2006|work=The Washington Post|location=ATHENS, Greece|quote=Imagine tossing a top-notch laptop into the sea, leaving scientists from a foreign culture to scratch their heads over its corroded remains centuries later. A Roman shipmaster inadvertently did something just like it 2,000 years ago off southern Greece, experts said late Thursday.}}
7. ^{{cite web|url=http://www.mnh.si.edu/vikings/voyage/subset/vinland/archeo.html |title=Vinland Archeology |publisher=Smithsonian Institution National Museum of Natural History |date= |accessdate=2011-08-24}}
8. ^{{cite news|url=http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,919916,00.html|title=Bye, Columbus|date=December 11, 1978|work=Time}}
9. ^Von Handorf, DE, and DE Crotty (2002) The Baghdad battery – myth or reality? Plating and Surface Finishing. vol. 89, no. 5, pp. 84–87.
10. ^Flatow, I (2012) [https://www.npr.org/2012/03/23/149231682/-archaeologists-revisit-iraq Archaeologists Revisit Iraq. interview with Elizabeth Stone], Talk of the Nation, National Public Radio. Washington, DC.
11. ^Steiger, B. (1979) Worlds Before Our Own. New York, New York, Berkley Publishing Group. 236 pp. {{ISBN|978-1-933665-19-1}}
12. ^Fitzpatrick-Matthews, K, and J Doeser (2007) Metallic vase from Dorchester, Massachusetts. Bad Archaeology.
13. ^Sir David, B (1854) Queries and Statements concerning a Nail found imbedded in a Block of Sandstone obtained from Kingoodie (Mylnfield) Quarry, North Britain. Report of the Fourteenth Meeting of the British Association for the Advancement of Science vol. 51, John Murray London.
14. ^Fitzpatrick-Matthews, K, and J Doeser (2007) A nail in Devonian sandstone from Kingoodie, Scotland. Bad Archaeology.
15. ^anonymous (nd) The Mystery Stone. {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100914204903/http://www.nhhistory.org/museumexhibits/mysterystone/mysterystone.htm |date=2010-09-14 }} Museum Exhibits, New Hampshire Historical Society, Concord, New Hampshire.
16. ^Klatell, JM (July 23, 2006). New England's 'Mystery Stone': New Hampshire Displays Unexplained Artifact 134 Years Later. Associated Press. Retrieved March 8, 2014.
17. ^Naish, D. (2007) What happened with that Sumerian 'sivathere' figurine after Colbert's paper of 1936? Well, a lot. Tetrapod Zoology.
18. ^Hristov, RH, and S. Genoves (2001) Tecaxic-Calixtlahuaca. Dept. of Anthropology at the University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico.
19. ^Schaaf, P and GA Wagner (1991) Comments on 'Mesoamerican Evidence of Pre-Columbian Transoceanic Contacts,' by Hristov and Genovés. Ancient Mesoamerica. 10:207-213.
20. ^Stillman, B (1820) Curious Geological Facts: The American Journal of Science. v. 2, no. 2, pp. 144–46. (November 1820). [https://archive.org/details/mobot31753002151832 Internet Archive copy] archived on May 27, 2011.
21. ^Fitzpatrick-Matthews, K (2007) [https://web.archive.org/web/20161116210254/http://www.badarchaeology.com/out-of-place-artefacts/very-ancient-artefacts/tools-in-rock-at-aix-en-provence/ Tools in rock at Aix-en-Provence]. Archived from the original on November 16, 2016.
22. ^Anonymous (2002) Mysterious Pipes Left by 'ET' Reported from Qinghai. People's Daily Online, Beijing, China. Retrieved March 8, 2014.
23. ^Anonymous (2002) Chinese Scientists to Head for Suspected ET Relics. People's Daily Online, Beijing, China. Retrieved March 8, 2014.
24. ^{{Skeptoid|id=4181|number=181|title=The Baigong Pipes|accessdate= March 8, 2014}}
25. ^Brookesmith, P (2004) The Eltanin Enigma. {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130403182441/http://www.forteantimes.com/features/articles/155/the_eltanin_enigma.html |date=2013-04-03 }} Fortean Times. (May 2004). Retrieved March 8, 2014.
26. ^Heezen, BC, and CD Hollister (1971) The Face of the Deep. Oxford University Press, New York. 659 pp. {{ISBN|0-19-501277-1}}
27. ^Cairncross, B (1988) "Cosmic cannonballs" a rational explanation: The South African Lapidary Magazine. v. 30, no. 1, pp. 4–6.
28. ^Heinrich, PV (1997) Mystery spheres: National Center for Science Education Reports. v. 17, no. 1, p. 34. (January/February 1997)
29. ^RealitateaTV (2014) "Specialist despre obiectul preistoric neidentificat din depozitele muzeului de istorie: 'aparţine unui robot primitiv'", RealitateaTV.net.
30. ^Hilblairious (2014) "Aluminum, Aliens (1): What "THEY" left Behind in Aiud", Hilblairious.blogspot.ca.
31. ^Coulam, NJ, and AR Schroedl (1995) The Keystone azurite mine in southeastern Utah. Utah Archaeology. 8(1): 1–12.
32. ^Kuban, GJ, (2005) "Moab Man" – "Malachite Man". The Paluxy Dinosaur/"Man Track" Controversy. Retrieved March 8, 2014.

External links

{{Commons category|OOParts}}
  • Critical perspective on Creationist and New Age claims related to out-of-place artifacts at Bad Archaeology
  • Archaeology from the dark side at Salon.com
  • Out-of-place artifacts article at Cult and Fringe Archaeology

3 : Out-of-place artifacts|Forteana|Pseudoarchaeology

随便看

 

开放百科全书收录14589846条英语、德语、日语等多语种百科知识,基本涵盖了大多数领域的百科知识,是一部内容自由、开放的电子版国际百科全书。

 

Copyright © 2023 OENC.NET All Rights Reserved
京ICP备2021023879号 更新时间:2024/9/24 0:23:40