| 词条 | ASB Bank Ltd v Harlick |
| 释义 |
| name = ASB Bank Limited v Harlick | court = Court of Appeal of New Zealand | date_filed = | image = Coat of arms of New Zealand.svg | date decided = 6 December 1995 | full name = ASB Bank Limited v Harlick | citations = [1996] 1 NZLR 655 | judges = Gault J, Henry J, McGechan | prior actions = | subsequent actions = | opinions = | transcripts = | Keywords = }} ASB Bank Limited v Harlick [1996] 1 NZLR 655 is a cited case in New Zealand regarding unconscionable bargains. [1]BackgroundThe Harlicks daughter and son in law wished to purchase a bread run, and in order to get the loan from the ASB, the Harlick's went guarantors on the loan. Later, the loan came into default, and the ASB pursued the Harlick's for the loan. The Harlick's applied to the High Court to have the ASB's mortgage over their house set aside on the grounds of unconscionability, and the court set aside the mortgage. The ASB appealed. HeldThe Court of Appeal ruled that the Harlick's thad not suffered from any "material disadvantage or disability', one of the three crucial elements for unconscionable bargains. The Court restored the ASB's mortgage over their house. References1. ^{{cite book |title=An introduction to the Law of Contract in New Zealand |edition=4th |last1=Chetwin |first1=Maree |last2=Graw |first2=Stephen |last3=Tiong |first3=Raymond |publisher=Thomson Brookers |ISBN=0-86472-555-8 |year=2006 |page=338}} {{NewZealand-case-law-stub}} 4 : New Zealand contract case law|1996 in case law|1996 in New Zealand law|Court of Appeal of New Zealand cases |
| 随便看 |
开放百科全书收录14589846条英语、德语、日语等多语种百科知识，基本涵盖了大多数领域的百科知识，是一部内容自由、开放的电子版国际百科全书。