“PCI Express”的意思、由来-开放百科全书

PCI Express (Peripheral Component Interconnect Express), officially abbreviated as PCIe or PCI-e,^[1] is a high-speed serial computer expansion bus standard, designed to replace the older PCI, PCI-X and AGP bus standards. It is the common motherboard interface for personal computers' graphics cards, hard drives, SSDs, Wi-Fi and Ethernet hardware connections.^[2] PCIe has numerous improvements over the older standards, including higher maximum system bus throughput, lower I/O pin count and smaller physical footprint, better performance scaling for bus devices, a more detailed error detection and reporting mechanism (Advanced Error Reporting, AER^[3]), and native hot-swap functionality. More recent revisions of the PCIe standard provide hardware support for I/O virtualization.

Defined by its number of lanes,^[4] the PCI Express electrical interface is also used in a variety of other standards, most notably the laptop expansion card interface ExpressCard and computer storage interfaces SATA Express, U.2 (SFF-8639) and M.2.

Format specifications are maintained and developed by the PCI-SIG (PCI Special Interest Group), a group of more than 900 companies that also maintain the conventional PCI specifications.

{{Anchor|SWITCH}}Architecture

Conceptually, the PCI Express bus is a high-speed serial replacement of the older PCI/PCI-X bus.^[5] One of the key differences between the PCI Express bus and the older PCI is the bus topology; PCI uses a shared parallel bus architecture, in which the PCI host and all devices share a common set of address, data and control lines. In contrast, PCI Express is based on point-to-point topology, with separate serial links connecting every device to the root complex (host). Because of its shared bus topology, access to the older PCI bus is arbitrated (in the case of multiple masters), and limited to one master at a time, in a single direction. Furthermore, the older PCI clocking scheme limits the bus clock to the slowest peripheral on the bus (regardless of the devices involved in the bus transaction). In contrast, a PCI Express bus link supports full-duplex communication between any two endpoints, with no inherent limitation on concurrent access across multiple endpoints.

In terms of bus protocol, PCI Express communication is encapsulated in packets. The work of packetizing and de-packetizing data and status-message traffic is handled by the transaction layer of the PCI Express port (described later). Radical differences in electrical signaling and bus protocol require the use of a different mechanical form factor and expansion connectors (and thus, new motherboards and new adapter boards); PCI slots and PCI Express slots are not interchangeable. At the software level, PCI Express preserves backward compatibility with PCI; legacy PCI system software can detect and configure newer PCI Express devices without explicit support for the PCI Express standard, though new PCI Express features are inaccessible.

The PCI Express link between two devices can vary in size from one to 32 lanes. In a multi-lane link, the packet data is striped across lanes, and peak data throughput scales with the overall link width. The lane count is automatically negotiated during device initialization, and can be restricted by either endpoint. For example, a single-lane PCI Express (×1) card can be inserted into a multi-lane slot (×4, ×8, etc.), and the initialization cycle auto-negotiates the highest mutually supported lane count. The link can dynamically down-configure itself to use fewer lanes, providing a failure tolerance in case bad or unreliable lanes are present. The PCI Express standard defines link widths of ×1, ×4, ×8, ×12, ×16 and ×32.^[6]{{rp|4,5}} This allows the PCI Express bus to serve both cost-sensitive applications where high throughput is not needed, and performance-critical applications such as 3D graphics, networking (10 Gigabit Ethernet or multiport Gigabit Ethernet), and enterprise storage (SAS or Fibre Channel). Slots and connectors are only defined for a subset of these widths, with link widths in between using the next larger physical slot size.

As a point of reference, a PCI-X (133 MHz 64-bit) device and a PCI Express 1.0 device using four lanes (×4) have roughly the same peak single-direction transfer rate of 1064 MB/s. The PCI Express bus has the potential to perform better than the PCI-X bus in cases where multiple devices are transferring data simultaneously, or if communication with the PCI Express peripheral is bidirectional.

{{Anchor|LINK}}Interconnect

PCI Express devices communicate via a logical connection called an interconnect^[7] or link. A link is a point-to-point communication channel between two PCI Express ports allowing both of them to send and receive ordinary PCI requests (configuration, I/O or memory read/write) and interrupts (INTx, MSI or MSI-X). At the physical level, a link is composed of one or more lanes.^[7] Low-speed peripherals (such as an 802.11 Wi-Fi card) use a single-lane (×1) link, while a graphics adapter typically uses a much wider and therefore faster 16-lane (×16) link.

{{Anchor|LANE}}Lane

A lane is composed of two differential signaling pairs, with one pair for receiving data and the other for transmitting. Thus, each lane is composed of four wires or signal traces. Conceptually, each lane is used as a full-duplex byte stream, transporting data packets in eight-bit "byte" format simultaneously in both directions between endpoints of a link.^[8] Physical PCI Express links may contain from one to 32 lanes, more precisely 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 16 or 32 lanes.^[6]{{rp|4,5}}^[7] Lane counts are written with an "×" prefix (for example, "×8" represents an eight-lane card or slot), with ×16 being the largest size in common use.^[9] Lane sizes are also referred to via the terms "width" or "by" e.g., an eight-lane slot could be referred to as a "by 8" or as "8 lanes wide."

Serial bus

The bonded serial bus architecture was chosen over the traditional parallel bus because of inherent limitations of the latter, including half-duplex operation, excess signal count, and inherently lower bandwidth due to timing skew. Timing skew results from separate electrical signals within a parallel interface traveling through conductors of different lengths, on potentially different printed circuit board (PCB) layers, and at possibly different signal velocities. Despite being transmitted simultaneously as a single word, signals on a parallel interface have different travel duration and arrive at their destinations at different times. When the interface clock period is shorter than the largest time difference between signal arrivals, recovery of the transmitted word is no longer possible. Since timing skew over a parallel bus can amount to a few nanoseconds, the resulting bandwidth limitation is in the range of hundreds of megahertz.

A serial interface does not exhibit timing skew because there is only one differential signal in each direction within each lane, and there is no external clock signal since clocking information is embedded within the serial signal itself. As such, typical bandwidth limitations on serial signals are in the multi-gigahertz range. PCI Express is one example of the general trend toward replacing parallel buses with serial interconnects; other examples include Serial ATA (SATA), USB, Serial Attached SCSI (SAS), FireWire (IEEE 1394), and RapidIO. In digital video, examples in common use are DVI, HDMI and DisplayPort.

Multichannel serial design increases flexibility with its ability to allocate fewer lanes for slower devices.

Form factors

{{Anchor|HHHL|FHHL}}PCI Express (standard)

A PCI Express card fits into a slot of its physical size or larger (with ×16 as the largest used), but may not fit into a smaller PCI Express slot; for example, a ×16 card may not fit into a ×4 or ×8 slot. Some slots use open-ended sockets to permit physically longer cards and negotiate the best available electrical and logical connection.

The number of lanes actually connected to a slot may also be fewer than the number supported by the physical slot size. An example is a ×16 slot that runs at ×4, which will accept any ×1, ×2, ×4, ×8 or ×16 card, but provides only four lanes. Its specification may read as "×16 (×4 mode)", while "×size @ ×speed" notation ("×16 @ ×4") is also common. The advantage is that such slots can accommodate a larger range of PCI Express cards without requiring motherboard hardware to support the full transfer rate. Standard mechanical sizes are ×1, ×4, ×8, and ×16. Cards with a differing number of lanes need to use the next larger mechanical size (ie. a ×2 card uses the ×4 size, or a ×12 card uses the ×16 size).

The cards themselves are designed and manufactured in various sizes. For example, solid-state drives (SSDs) that come in the form of PCI Express cards often use HHHL (half height, half length) and FHHL (full height, half length) to describe the physical dimensions of the card.^[10]^[11]

Pinout

The following table identifies the conductors on each side of the edge connector on a PCI Express card. The solder side of the printed circuit board (PCB) is the A side, and the component side is the B side.^[12] PRSNT1# and PRSNT2# pins must be slightly shorter than the rest, to ensure that a hot-plugged card is fully inserted. The WAKE# pin uses full voltage to wake the computer, but must be pulled high from the standby power to indicate that the card is wake capable.^[13]

Power

All PCI express cards may consume up to {{val|3|ul=A}} at {{val|+3.3|ul=V}} ({{val|9.9|ul=W}}). The amount of +12 V and total power they may consume depends on the type of card:^[16]{{rp|35–36}}^[17]

Optional connectors add 75 W (6-pin) or 150 W (8-pin) of +12 V power for up to 300 W total (2×75 W + 1×150 W).

There are cards that use two 8-pin connectors, but this has not been standardized yet {{as of|lc=y|2018}}, therefore such cards must not carry the official PCI Express logo. This configuration allows 375 W total (1×75 W + 2×150 W) and will likely be standardized by PCI-SIG with the PCI Express 4.0 standard. The 8-pin PCI Express connector could be confused with the EPS12V connector, which is mainly used for powering SMP and multi-core systems.

{{Anchor|MINI-CARD}}PCI Express Mini Card

PCI Express Mini Card (also known as Mini PCI Express, Mini PCIe, Mini PCI-E, mPCIe, and PEM), based on PCI Express, is a replacement for the Mini PCI form factor. It is developed by the PCI-SIG. The host device supports both PCI Express and USB 2.0 connectivity, and each card may use either standard. Most laptop computers built after 2005 use PCI Express for expansion cards; however, {{as of|2015|lc=yes}}, many vendors are moving toward using the newer M.2 form factor for this purpose.

Due to different dimensions, PCI Express Mini Cards are not physically compatible with standard full-size PCI Express slots; however, passive adapters exist that allow them to be used in full-size slots.^[22]

Physical dimensions

Dimensions of PCI Express Mini Cards are 30 × 50.95 mm (width × length) for a Full Mini Card. There is a 52-pin edge connector, consisting of two staggered rows on a 0.8 mm pitch. Each row has eight contacts, a gap equivalent to four contacts, then a further 18 contacts. Boards have a thickness of 1.0 mm, excluding the components. A "Half Mini Card" (sometimes abbreviated as HMC) is also specified, having approximately half the physical length of 26.8 mm.

Electrical interface

{{Anchor|MSATA}}Mini-SATA (mSATA) variant

Despite sharing the Mini PCI Express form factor, an mSATA slot is not necessarily electrically compatible with Mini PCI Express. For this reason, only certain notebooks are compatible with mSATA drives. Most compatible systems are based on Intel's Sandy Bridge processor architecture, using the Huron River platform. Notebooks such as Lenovo's ThinkPad T, W and X series, released in March–April 2011, have support for an mSATA SSD card in their WWAN card slot. The ThinkPad Edge E220s/E420s, and the Lenovo IdeaPad Y460/Y560/Y570/Y580 also support mSATA.^[23]

Some notebooks (notably the Asus Eee PC, the Apple MacBook Air, and the Dell mini9 and mini10) use a variant of the PCI Express Mini Card as an SSD. This variant uses the reserved and several non-reserved pins to implement SATA and IDE interface passthrough, keeping only USB, ground lines, and sometimes the core PCIe ×1 bus intact.^[24] This makes the "miniPCIe" flash and solid-state drives sold for netbooks largely incompatible with true PCI Express Mini implementations.

Also, the typical Asus miniPCIe SSD is 71 mm long, causing the Dell 51 mm model to often be (incorrectly) referred to as half length. A true 51 mm Mini PCIe SSD was announced in 2009, with two stacked PCB layers that allow for higher storage capacity. The announced design preserves the PCIe interface, making it compatible with the standard mini PCIe slot. No working product has yet been developed.

Intel has numerous desktop boards with the PCIe ×1 Mini-Card slot which typically do not support mSATA SSD. A list of desktop boards that natively support mSATA in the PCIe ×1 Mini-Card slot (typically multiplexed with a SATA port) is provided on the Intel Support site.^[25]

PCI Express M.2 (Mini PCIe v2)

The new version of Mini PCI express, M.2 replaces the mSATA standard. Computer bus interfaces provided through the M.2 connector are PCI Express 3.0 (up to four lanes), Serial ATA 3.0, and USB 3.0 (a single logical port for each of the latter two). It is up to the manufacturer of the M.2 host or device to select which interfaces are to be supported, depending on the desired level of host support and device type.

{{Anchor|EXTERNAL-CABLING|OCULINK}}PCI Express External Cabling

Standard cables and connectors have been defined for ×1, ×4, ×8, and ×16 link widths, with a transfer rate of 250 MB/s per lane. The PCI-SIG also expects the norm will evolve to reach 500 MB/s, as in PCI Express 2.0. An example of the uses of Cabled PCI Express is a metal enclosure, containing a number of PCIe slots and PCIe-to-ePCIe adapter circuitry. This device would not be possible had it not been for the ePCIe spec.

PCI Express OCuLink

OCuLink in last version will have up to 16 GT/s (8 GB/s total for ×4 lanes),^[36] while the maximum bandwidth of a Thunderbolt 3 connector is 5 GB/s.

Derivative forms

History and revisions

While in early development, PCIe was initially referred to as HSI (for High Speed Interconnect), and underwent a name change to 3GIO (for 3rd Generation I/O) before finally settling on its PCI-SIG name PCI Express. A technical working group named the Arapaho Work Group (AWG) drew up the standard. For initial drafts, the AWG consisted only of Intel engineers; subsequently, the AWG expanded to include industry partners.

Since, PCIe has undergone several large and smaller revisions, improving on performance and other features.

{{Anchor|1.0|1.0a}}PCI Express 1.0a

In 2003, PCI-SIG introduced PCIe 1.0a, with a per-lane data rate of 250 MB/s and a transfer rate of 2.5 gigatransfers per second (GT/s). Transfer rate is expressed in transfers per second instead of bits per second because the number of transfers includes the overhead bits, which do not provide additional throughput;^[36] PCIe 1.x uses an 8b/10b encoding scheme, resulting in a 20% (= 2/10) overhead on the raw channel bandwidth.^[37]

{{Anchor|1.1}}PCI Express 1.1

In 2005, PCI-SIG^[38] introduced PCIe 1.1. This updated specification includes clarifications and several improvements, but is fully compatible with PCI Express 1.0a. No changes were made to the data rate.

{{Anchor|2.0}}PCI Express 2.0

PCI-SIG announced the availability of the PCI Express Base 2.0 specification on 15 January 2007.^[39] The PCIe 2.0 standard doubles the transfer rate compared with PCIe 1.0 to 5 GT/s and the per-lane throughput rises from 250 MB/s to 500 MB/s. Consequently, a 32-lane PCIe connector (×32) can support an aggregate throughput of up to 16 GB/s.

PCIe 2.0 motherboard slots are fully backward compatible with PCIe v1.x cards. PCIe 2.0 cards are also generally backward compatible with PCIe 1.x motherboards, using the available bandwidth of PCI Express 1.1. Overall, graphic cards or motherboards designed for v2.0 will work with the other being v1.1 or v1.0a.

The PCI-SIG also said that PCIe 2.0 features improvements to the point-to-point data transfer protocol and its software architecture.^[40]

Like 1.x, PCIe 2.0 uses an 8b/10b encoding scheme, therefore delivering, per-lane, an effective 4 Gbit/s max transfer rate from its 5 GT/s raw data rate.

{{Anchor|2.1}}PCI Express 2.1

PCI Express 2.1 (with its specification dated March 4, 2009) supports a large proportion of the management, support, and troubleshooting systems planned for full implementation in PCI Express 3.0. However, the speed is the same as PCI Express 2.0. The increase in power from the slot breaks backward compatibility between PCI Express 2.1 cards and some older motherboards with 1.0/1.0a, but most motherboards with PCI Express 1.1 connectors are provided with a BIOS update by their manufacturers through utilities to support backward compatibility of cards with PCIe 2.1.

{{Anchor|3.0}}PCI Express 3.0

PCI Express 3.0 Base specification revision 3.0 was made available in November 2010, after multiple delays. In August 2007, PCI-SIG announced that PCI Express 3.0 would carry a bit rate of 8 gigatransfers per second (GT/s), and that it would be backward compatible with existing PCI Express implementations. At that time, it was also announced that the final specification for PCI Express 3.0 would be delayed until Q2 2010.^[44] New features for the PCI Express 3.0 specification include a number of optimizations for enhanced signaling and data integrity, including transmitter and receiver equalization, PLL improvements, clock data recovery, and channel enhancements for currently supported topologies.^[45]

Following a six-month technical analysis of the feasibility of scaling the PCI Express interconnect bandwidth, PCI-SIG's analysis found that 8 gigatransfers per second can be manufactured in mainstream silicon process technology, and can be deployed with existing low-cost materials and infrastructure, while maintaining full compatibility (with negligible impact) to the PCI Express protocol stack.

PCI Express 3.0 upgrades the encoding scheme to 128b/130b from the previous 8b/10b encoding, reducing the bandwidth overhead from 20% of PCI Express 2.0 to approximately 1.54% (= 2/130). A desirable balance of 0 and 1 bits in the data stream is achieved by XORing a known binary polynomial as a "scrambler" to the data stream in a feedback topology. Because the scrambling polynomial is known, the data can be recovered by applying the XOR a second time. Both the scrambling and descrambling steps are carried out in hardware. PCI Express 3.0's 8 GT/s bit rate effectively delivers 985 MB/s per lane, nearly doubling the lane bandwidth relative to PCI Express 2.0.^[46]

On November 18, 2010, the PCI Special Interest Group officially published the finalized PCI Express 3.0 specification to its members to build devices based on this new version of PCI Express.^[47]

{{Anchor|3.1}}PCI Express 3.1

In September 2013, PCI Express 3.1 specification was announced to be released in late 2013 or early 2014, consolidating various improvements to the published PCI Express 3.0 specification in three areas: power management, performance and functionality.^[31]^[48] It was released in November 2014.^[49]

{{Anchor|4.0}}PCI Express 4.0

On November 29, 2011, PCI-SIG preliminarily announced PCI Express 4.0,^[50] providing a 16 GT/s bit rate that doubles the bandwidth provided by PCI Express 3.0, while maintaining backward and forward compatibility in both software support and used mechanical interface.^[51] PCI Express 4.0 specs will also bring OCuLink-2, an alternative to Thunderbolt connector. OCuLink version 2 will have up to 16 GT/s (8 GB/s total for ×4 lanes),^[52] while the maximum bandwidth of a Thunderbolt 3 connector is 5 GB/s. Additionally, active and idle power optimizations are to be investigated.

In August 2016, Synopsys presented a test machine running PCIe 4.0 at the Intel Developer Forum. Their IP has been licensed to several firms planning to present their chips and products at the end of 2016.^[34]

PCI Express 4.0 was officially announced on June 8, 2017, by PCI-SIG.^[53] The spec includes improvements in flexibility, scalability, and lower-power.

NETINT Technologies introduced the first NVMe SSD based on PCIe 4.0 on July 17, 2018, ahead of Flash Memory Summit 2018^[54]

AMD announced on 9 January 2019 their upcoming X570 chipset will support PCIe 4.0.^[56] Motherboard manufacturers will be able to update UEFIs on 300 and 400 series motherboards to enable partial PCIe 4.0 support, accessible when a Ryzen 3000 series CPU is installed. This would enable the first PCIe x16 slot to provide PCIe 4.0 connectivity, while the other CPU-driven slots would remain as PCIe 3.0. ^[57]

{{Anchor|5.0}}PCI Express 5.0

In June 2017, PCI-SIG preliminarily announced the PCI Express 5.0 specification.^[53] Bandwidth is expected to increase to 32 GT/s, yielding 63 GB/s in each direction in a 16 lane configuration. It is expected to be standardized in 2019.

PLDA announced the availability of their XpressRICH5 PCIe 5.0 Controller IP based on draft 0.7 of the PCIe 5.0 specification on the same day.^[58]^[59]

On 10 December 2018, the PCI SIG released version 0.9 of the PCIe 5.0 specification to its members.^[35]

On 17 January 2019, the PCI SIG announced the version 0.9 of the PCIe 5.0 specification has been ratified, and the version 1.0 is targeted for release in the first quarter of 2019.^[60]

{{Anchor|M-PCIE|Thunderbolt}}Extensions and future directions

Some vendors offer PCIe over fiber products,^[61]^[62]^[63] but these generally find use only in specific cases where transparent PCIe bridging is preferable to using a more mainstream standard (such as InfiniBand or Ethernet) that may require additional software to support it; current implementations focus on distance rather than raw bandwidth and typically do not implement a full ×16 link.

Thunderbolt was co-developed by Intel and Apple as a general-purpose high speed interface combining a ×4 PCIe link with DisplayPort and was originally intended to be an all-fiber interface, but due to early difficulties in creating a consumer-friendly fiber interconnect, nearly all implementations are copper systems. A notable exception, the Sony VAIO Z VPC-Z2, uses a nonstandard USB port with an optical component to connect to an outboard PCIe display adapter. Apple has been the primary driver of Thunderbolt adoption through 2011, though several other vendors^[64] have announced new products and systems featuring Thunderbolt.

Draft process

Historically, the earliest adopters of a new PCIe specification generally begin designing with the Draft 0.5 as they can confidently build up their application logic around the new bandwidth definition and often even start developing for any new protocol features. At the Draft 0.5 stage, however, there is still a strong likelihood of changes in the actual PCIe protocol layer implementation, so designers responsible for developing these blocks internally may be more hesitant to begin work than those using interface IP from external sources.

Hardware protocol summary

The PCIe link is built around dedicated unidirectional couples of serial (1-bit), point-to-point connections known as lanes. This is in sharp contrast to the earlier PCI connection, which is a bus-based system where all the devices share the same bidirectional, 32-bit or 64-bit parallel bus.

PCI Express is a layered protocol, consisting of a transaction layer, a data link layer, and a physical layer. The Data Link Layer is subdivided to include a media access control (MAC) sublayer. The Physical Layer is subdivided into logical and electrical sublayers. The Physical logical-sublayer contains a physical coding sublayer (PCS). The terms are borrowed from the IEEE 802 networking protocol model.

{{Anchor|PHYSICAL-LAYER}}Physical layer

The PCIe Physical Layer (PHY, PCIEPHY, PCI Express PHY, or PCIe PHY) specification is divided into two sub-layers, corresponding to electrical and logical specifications. The logical sublayer is sometimes further divided into a MAC sublayer and a PCS, although this division is not formally part of the PCIe specification. A specification published by Intel, the PHY Interface for PCI Express (PIPE),^[68] defines the MAC/PCS functional partitioning and the interface between these two sub-layers. The PIPE specification also identifies the physical media attachment (PMA) layer, which includes the serializer/deserializer (SerDes) and other analog circuitry; however, since SerDes implementations vary greatly among ASIC vendors, PIPE does not specify an interface between the PCS and PMA.

At the electrical level, each lane consists of two unidirectional differential pairs operating at 2.5, 5, 8 or 16 Gbit/s, depending on the negotiated capabilities. Transmit and receive are separate differential pairs, for a total of four data wires per lane.

A connection between any two PCIe devices is known as a link, and is built up from a collection of one or more lanes. All devices must minimally support single-lane (×1) link. Devices may optionally support wider links composed of 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, or 32 lanes. This allows for very good compatibility in two ways:

In both cases, PCIe negotiates the highest mutually supported number of lanes. Many graphics cards, motherboards and BIOS versions are verified to support ×1, ×4, ×8 and ×16 connectivity on the same connection.

Even though the two would be signal-compatible, it is not usually possible to place a physically larger PCIe card (e.g., a ×16 sized card) into a smaller slot{{snd}} though if the PCIe slots are altered or a riser is used most motherboards will allow this. The width of a PCIe connector is 8.8 mm, while the height is 11.25 mm, and the length is variable. The fixed section of the connector is 11.65 mm in length and contains two rows of 11 (22 pins total), while the length of the other section is variable depending on the number of lanes. The pins are spaced at 1 mm intervals, and the thickness of the card going into the connector is 1.8 mm.^[69]^[70]

Data transmission

PCIe sends all control messages, including interrupts, over the same links used for data. The serial protocol can never be blocked, so latency is still comparable to conventional PCI, which has dedicated interrupt lines.

Data transmitted on multiple-lane links is interleaved, meaning that each successive byte is sent down successive lanes. The PCIe specification refers to this interleaving as data striping. While requiring significant hardware complexity to synchronize (or deskew) the incoming striped data, striping can significantly reduce the latency of the n^th byte on a link. While the lanes are not tightly synchronized, there is a limit to the lane to lane skew of 20/8/6 ns for 2.5/5/8 GT/s so the hardware buffers can re-align the striped data.^[71] Due to padding requirements, striping may not necessarily reduce the latency of small data packets on a link.

As with other high data rate serial transmission protocols, the clock is embedded in the signal. At the physical level, PCI Express 2.0 utilizes the 8b/10b encoding scheme^[46] to ensure that strings of consecutive identical digits (zeros or ones) are limited in length. This coding was used to prevent the receiver from losing track of where the bit edges are. In this coding scheme every eight (uncoded) payload bits of data are replaced with 10 (encoded) bits of transmit data, causing a 20% overhead in the electrical bandwidth. To improve the available bandwidth, PCI Express version 3.0 instead uses 128b/130b encoding with scrambling. 128b/130b encoding relies on the scrambling to limit the run length of identical-digit strings in data streams and ensure the receiver stays synchronised to the transmitter. It also reduces electromagnetic interference (EMI) by preventing repeating data patterns in the transmitted data stream.

Data link layer

On the transmit side, the data link layer generates an incrementing sequence number for each outgoing TLP. It serves as a unique identification tag for each transmitted TLP, and is inserted into the header of the outgoing TLP. A 32-bit cyclic redundancy check code (known in this context as Link CRC or LCRC) is also appended to the end of each outgoing TLP.

On the receive side, the received TLP's LCRC and sequence number are both validated in the link layer. If either the LCRC check fails (indicating a data error), or the sequence-number is out of range (non-consecutive from the last valid received TLP), then the bad TLP, as well as any TLPs received after the bad TLP, are considered invalid and discarded. The receiver sends a negative acknowledgement message (NAK) with the sequence-number of the invalid TLP, requesting re-transmission of all TLPs forward of that sequence-number. If the received TLP passes the LCRC check and has the correct sequence number, it is treated as valid. The link receiver increments the sequence-number (which tracks the last received good TLP), and forwards the valid TLP to the receiver's transaction layer. An ACK message is sent to remote transmitter, indicating the TLP was successfully received (and by extension, all TLPs with past sequence-numbers.)

If the transmitter receives a NAK message, or no acknowledgement (NAK or ACK) is received until a timeout period expires, the transmitter must retransmit all TLPs that lack a positive acknowledgement (ACK). Barring a persistent malfunction of the device or transmission medium, the link-layer presents a reliable connection to the transaction layer, since the transmission protocol ensures delivery of TLPs over an unreliable medium.

In addition to sending and receiving TLPs generated by the transaction layer, the data-link layer also generates and consumes DLLPs, data link layer packets. ACK and NAK signals are communicated via DLLPs, as are some power management messages and flow control credit information (on behalf of the transaction layer).

In practice, the number of in-flight, unacknowledged TLPs on the link is limited by two factors: the size of the transmitter's replay buffer (which must store a copy of all transmitted TLPs until the remote receiver ACKs them), and the flow control credits issued by the receiver to a transmitter. PCI Express requires all receivers to issue a minimum number of credits, to guarantee a link allows sending PCIConfig TLPs and message TLPs.

Transaction layer

PCI Express implements split transactions (transactions with request and response separated by time), allowing the link to carry other traffic while the target device gathers data for the response.

PCI Express uses credit-based flow control. In this scheme, a device advertises an initial amount of credit for each received buffer in its transaction layer. The device at the

opposite end of the link, when sending transactions to this device, counts the number of credits each TLP consumes from its account. The sending device may only transmit a TLP when doing so does not make its consumed credit count exceed its credit limit. When the receiving device finishes processing the TLP from its buffer, it signals a return of credits to the sending device, which increases the credit limit by the restored amount. The credit counters are modular counters, and the comparison of consumed credits to credit limit requires modular arithmetic. The advantage of this scheme (compared to other methods such as wait states or handshake-based transfer protocols) is that the latency of credit return does not affect performance, provided that the credit limit is not encountered. This assumption is generally met if each device is designed with adequate buffer sizes.

PCIe 1.x is often quoted to support a data rate of 250 MB/s in each direction, per lane. This figure is a calculation from the physical signaling rate (2.5 gigabaud) divided by the encoding overhead (10 bits per byte.) This means a sixteen lane (×16) PCIe card would then be theoretically capable of 16×250 MB/s = 4 GB/s in each direction. While this is correct in terms of data bytes, more meaningful calculations are based on the usable data payload rate, which depends on the profile of the traffic, which is a function of the high-level (software) application and intermediate protocol levels.

Like other high data rate serial interconnect systems, PCIe has a protocol and processing overhead due to the additional transfer robustness (CRC and acknowledgements). Long continuous unidirectional transfers (such as those typical in high-performance storage controllers) can approach >95% of PCIe's raw (lane) data rate. These transfers also benefit the most from increased number of lanes (×2, ×4, etc.) But in more typical applications (such as a USB or Ethernet controller), the traffic profile is characterized as short data packets with frequent enforced acknowledgements.^[72] This type of traffic reduces the efficiency of the link, due to overhead from packet parsing and forced interrupts (either in the device's host interface or the PC's CPU). Being a protocol for devices connected to the same printed circuit board, it does not require the same tolerance for transmission errors as a protocol for communication over longer distances, and thus, this loss of efficiency is not particular to PCIe.

Applications

PCI Express operates in consumer, server, and industrial applications, as a motherboard-level interconnect (to link motherboard-mounted peripherals), a passive backplane interconnect and as an expansion card interface for add-in boards.

In virtually all modern ({{as of|2012|lc=on}}) PCs, from consumer laptops and desktops to enterprise data servers, the PCIe bus serves as the primary motherboard-level interconnect, connecting the host system-processor with both integrated-peripherals (surface-mounted ICs) and add-on peripherals (expansion cards). In most of these systems, the PCIe bus co-exists with one or more legacy PCI buses, for backward compatibility with the large body of legacy PCI peripherals.

Note that there are special power cables called PCI-e power cables which are required for high-end graphics cards^[73].

External GPUs

Theoretically, external PCIe could give a notebook the graphics power of a desktop, by connecting a notebook with any PCIe desktop video card (enclosed in its own external housing, with a power supply and cooling); this is possible with an ExpressCard interface or a Thunderbolt interface. The ExpressCard interface provides bit rates of 5 Gbit/s (0.5 GB/s throughput), whereas the Thunderbolt interface provides bit rates of up to 40 Gbit/s (5 GB/s throughput).

In 2006, Nvidia developed the Quadro Plex external PCIe family of GPUs that can be used for advanced graphic applications for the professional market.^[74] These video cards require a PCI Express ×8 or ×16 slot for the host-side card which connects to the Plex via a VHDCI carrying eight PCIe lanes.^[75]

In 2008, AMD announced the ATI XGP technology, based on a proprietary cabling system that is compatible with PCIe ×8 signal transmissions.^[76] This connector is available on the Fujitsu Amilo and the Acer Ferrari One notebooks. Fujitsu launched their AMILO GraphicBooster enclosure for XGP soon thereafter.^[77] Around 2010 Acer launched the Dynavivid graphics dock for XGP.^[78]

In 2010 external card hubs were introduced that can connect to a laptop or desktop through a PCI ExpressCard slot. These hubs can accept full-sized graphics cards. Examples include MSI GUS,^[79] Village Instrument's ViDock,^[80] the Asus XG Station, Bplus PE4H V3.2 adapter,^[81] as well as more improvised DIY devices.^[82] However such solutions are limited by the size (often only ×1) and version of the available PCIe slot on a laptop.

Intel Thunderbolt interface has given opportunity to new and faster products to connect with a PCIe card externally. Magma has released the ExpressBox 3T, which can hold up to three PCIe cards (two at ×8 and one at ×4).^[83] MSI also released the Thunderbolt GUS II, a PCIe chassis dedicated for video cards.^[84] Other products such as the Sonnet’s Echo Express^[85] and mLogic’s mLink are Thunderbolt PCIe chassis in a smaller form factor.^[86] However, all these products require a computer with a Thunderbolt port (i.e., Thunderbolt devices), such as Apple's MacBook Pro models released in late 2013.

In 2017, more fully featured external card hubs were introduced, such as the Razer Core, which has a full-length PCIe ×16 interface.^[87]

Storage devices

PCI Express protocol can be used as data interface to flash memory devices, such as memory cards and solid-state drives (SSDs).

Many high-performance, enterprise-class SSDs are designed as PCI Express RAID controller cards with flash memory chips placed directly on the circuit board, utilizing proprietary interfaces and custom drivers to communicate with the operating system; this allows much higher transfer rates (over 1 GB/s) and IOPS (over one million I/O operations per second) when compared to Serial ATA or SAS drives.^[89]^[90] For example, in 2011 OCZ and Marvell co-developed a native PCI Express solid-state drive controller for a PCI Express 3.0 ×16 slot with maximum capacity of 12 TB and a performance of to 7.2 GB/s sequential transfers and up to 2.52 million IOPS in random transfers.^[91]

PCI Express storage devices can implement both AHCI logical interface for backward compatibility, and NVM Express logical interface for much faster I/O operations provided by utilizing internal parallelism offered by such devices. Enterprise-class SSDs can also implement SCSI over PCI Express.^[94]

Cluster interconnect

Certain data-center applications (such as large computer clusters) require the use of fiber-optic interconnects due to the distance limitations inherent in copper cabling. Typically, a network-oriented standard such as Ethernet or Fibre Channel suffices for these applications, but in some cases the overhead introduced by routable protocols is undesirable and a lower-level interconnect, such as InfiniBand, RapidIO, or NUMAlink is needed. Local-bus standards such as PCIe and HyperTransport can in principle be used for this purpose,^[95] but {{as of | 2015 | lc = on}} solutions are only available from niche vendors such as Dolphin ICS.

Competing protocols

Other communications standards based on high bandwidth serial architectures include InfiniBand, RapidIO, HyperTransport, Intel QuickPath Interconnect, and the Mobile Industry Processor Interface (MIPI). The differences are based on the trade-offs between flexibility and extensibility vs latency and overhead. For example, making the system hot-pluggable, as with Infiniband but not PCI Express, requires that software track network topology changes.

Another example is making the packets shorter to decrease latency (as is required if a bus must operate as a memory interface). Smaller packets mean packet headers consume a higher percentage of the packet, thus decreasing the effective bandwidth. Examples of bus protocols designed for this purpose are RapidIO and HyperTransport.

PCI Express falls somewhere in the middle, targeted by design as a system interconnect (local bus) rather than a device interconnect or routed network protocol. Additionally, its design goal of software transparency constrains the protocol and raises its latency somewhat.

Delays in PCIe 4.0 implementations led to the Gen-Z consortium, the CCIX^[96] effort and an open Coherent Accelerator Processor Interface (CAPI) all being announced by the end of 2016.^[97]

As March 2019, Intel presented Compute Express Link (CXL),^[98] a new interconnect bus, based on the PCI Express 5.0 physical layer infrastructure.

Integrators List

Integrators List is the Compliance Program power by PCI-SIG, This list includes all products that have successfully completed the rigorous testing procedures of the Compliance Workshop. Inclusion on the list is only available to PCI-SIG member companies and cannot be used for individual marketing programs. The list include Switches/Bridges, NIC, SSD etc. However, many companies do refer to the list when making company-to-company purchases.^[99]

See also

Notes

References

1. ^{{cite web |url=http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/1231473/?reload=true |title=Archived copy |accessdate=2017-03-23 |deadurl=no |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20170324001436/http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/1231473/?reload=true |archivedate=2017-03-24 |df= }}
2. ^https://www.pcmag.com/encyclopedia/term/48998/pci-express
3. ^{{cite web | publisher = Fedora project | url = http://ols.fedoraproject.org/OLS/Reprints-2007/zhang-Reprint.pdf | format = PDF | title = Enable PCI Express Advanced Error Reporting in the Kernel | work = Proceedings of the Linux Symposium | first1 = Yanmin | last1 = Zhang | first2 = T Long | last2 = Nguyen | date = June 2007 | deadurl = no | archiveurl = https://web.archive.org/web/20160310074031/https://ols.fedoraproject.org/OLS/Reprints-2007/zhang-Reprint.pdf | archivedate = 2016-03-10 | df = }}
4. ^https://www.hyperstone.com Flash Memory Form Factors - The Fundamentals of Reliable Flash Storage, Retrieved 19 April 2018
5. ^{{cite web | url = http://computer.howstuffworks.com/pci-express.htm | work = How Stuff Works | title = How PCI Express Works | accessdate = 2009-12-07 | deadurl = no | archiveurl = https://web.archive.org/web/20091203053924/http://computer.howstuffworks.com/pci-express.htm | archivedate = 2009-12-03 | df = }}
6. ^¹²³{{cite web |url = http://www.pcisig.com/developers/main/training_materials/get_document?doc_id=4e00a39acaa5c5a8ee44ebb07baba982e5972c67 |title = PCI Express Basics |date = 2007-08-21 |accessdate = 2014-07-15 |author = Ravi Budruk |publisher = PCI-SIG |format = PDF |deadurl = yes |archiveurl = https://web.archive.org/web/20140715120034/http://www.pcisig.com/developers/main/training_materials/get_document?doc_id=4e00a39acaa5c5a8ee44ebb07baba982e5972c67 |archivedate = 2014-07-15 |df = }}
7. ^¹²{{cite web |url = http://www.pcisig.com/news_room/faqs/faq_express/ |title = PCI Express Architecture Frequently Asked Questions |publisher = PCI-SIG |accessdate = 23 November 2008 |deadurl = yes |archiveurl = https://web.archive.org/web/20081113163608/http://www.pcisig.com/news_room/faqs/faq_express/ |archivedate = 13 November 2008 |df = }}
8. ^{{cite web | work = Interface bus | url = http://www.interfacebus.com/Design_Connector_PCI_Express.html | title = PCI Express Bus | accessdate = 2010-06-12 | deadurl = yes | archiveurl = https://web.archive.org/web/20071208162241/http://www.interfacebus.com/Design_Connector_PCI_Express.html | archivedate = 2007-12-08 | df = }}
9. ^{{cite web | url = http://zone.ni.com/devzone/cda/tut/p/id/3767 | title = PCI Express – An Overview of the PCI Express Standard | work = Developer Zone | publisher = National Instruments | date = 2009-08-13 | accessdate = 2009-12-07 | deadurl = no | archiveurl = https://web.archive.org/web/20100105163040/http://zone.ni.com/devzone/cda/tut/p/id/3767 | archivedate = 2010-01-05 | df = }}
10. ^{{cite web |url=http://www.nvmexpress.org/blog/new-pcie-form-factor-enables-greater-pcie-ssd-adoption/ |date=12 June 2012 |title=New PCIe Form Factor Enables Greater PCIe SSD Adoption |work=NVM Express |deadurl=no |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20150906180730/http://www.nvmexpress.org/blog/new-pcie-form-factor-enables-greater-pcie-ssd-adoption/ |archivedate=6 September 2015 |df= }}
11. ^{{cite web |url=http://www.storagereview.com/memblaze_pblaze4_aic_nvme_ssd_review |date=21 December 2015 |title=Memblaze PBlaze4 AIC NVMe SSD Review |work=StorageReview }}
12. ^{{cite web| title=What is the A side, B side configuration of PCI cards| work=Frequently Asked Questions| publisher=Adex Electronics| year=1998| url=http://www.adexelec.com/faq.htm#pcikeys| accessdate=Oct 24, 2011| deadurl=no| archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20111102042843/http://www.adexelec.com/faq.htm#pcikeys| archivedate=2011-11-02| df=}}
13. ^¹{{Citation | title = PCI Express Card Electromechanical Specification Revision 2.0}}
14. ^{{cite web | url = https://pcisig.com/sites/default/files/specification_documents/ECN_L1_PM_Substates_with_CLKREQ_31_May_2013_Rev10a.pdf | title = L1 PM Substates with CLKREQ, Revision 1.0a | publisher = PCI-SIG | format = PDF | accessdate = 2018-11-08}}
15. ^{{cite web | url = https://pcisig.com/sites/default/files/specification_documents/Emergency%20Power%20Reduction%20Mechanism%20with%20PWRBRK%20Signal%20ECN.pdf | title = Emergency Power Reduction Mechanism with PWRBRK Signal ECN | publisher = PCI-SIG | format = PDF | accessdate = 2018-11-08}}
16. ^PCI Express Card Electromechanical Specification Revision 1.1
17. ^{{Citation |publisher=PCI-SIG |first=Zale |last=Schoenborn |title=Board Design Guidelines for PCI Express Architecture |year=2004 |pages=19–21 |url=http://e2e.ti.com/cfs-file/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/639/7851.PCIe_5F00_designGuides.pdf#page=19 |deadurl=no |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20160327185412/http://e2e.ti.com/cfs-file/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/639/7851.PCIe_5F00_designGuides.pdf#page=19 |archivedate=2016-03-27 |df= }}
18. ^PCI Express x16 Graphics 150W-ATX Specification Revision 1.0
19. ^PCI Express 225 W/300 W High Power Card Electromechanical Specification Revision 1.0
20. ^PCI Express Card Electromechanical Specification Revision 3.0
21. ^{{Cite web |url=http://kavi.pcisig.com/developers/main/training_materials/get_document?doc_id=fa4ec3357012d69821baa0856011c665ac770768 |title=PCIe Electromechanical Updates |author=Yun Ling |date=2008-05-16 |access-date=2015-11-07 |deadurl=yes |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20151105083550/http://kavi.pcisig.com/developers/main/training_materials/get_document?doc_id=fa4ec3357012d69821baa0856011c665ac770768 |archivedate=2015-11-05 |df= }}
22. ^{{cite web |url = http://www.hwtools.net/Adapter/MP1.html |title = MP1: Mini PCI Express / PCI Express Adapter |date = 2014-07-18 |accessdate = 2014-09-28 |website = hwtools.net |deadurl = no |archiveurl = https://web.archive.org/web/20141003233055/http://www.hwtools.net/Adapter/MP1.html |archivedate = 2014-10-03 |df = }}
23. ^{{cite news | url = http://forum.notebookreview.com/lenovo-ibm/574993-msata-faq-basic-primer.html | title = mSATA FAQ: A Basic Primer | publisher = Notebook review | deadurl = no | archiveurl = https://www.webcitation.org/65LPVTXKV?url=http://forum.notebookreview.com/lenovo-ibm/574993-msata-faq-basic-primer.html | archivedate = 2012-02-10 | df = }}
24. ^{{cite web|url=http://beta.ivancover.com/wiki/index.php/Eee_PC_Research|title=Eee PC Research|last=|first=|date=|type=wiki|work=ivc|accessdate=26 October 2009|deadurl=no|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20100330035948/http://beta.ivancover.com/wiki/index.php/Eee_PC_Research|archivedate=30 March 2010|df=}}
25. ^{{cite web |url = http://www.intel.com/support/motherboards/desktop/sb/CS-032415.htm?wapkw=032415 |publisher = Intel |title = Desktop Board Solid-state drive (SSD) compatibility |deadurl = no |archiveurl = https://web.archive.org/web/20160102233130/http://www.intel.com/support/motherboards/desktop/sb/CS-032415.htm?wapkw=032415 |archivedate = 2016-01-02 |df = }}
26. ^{{cite web| title = PCI Express External Cabling 1.0 Specification| accessdate = 9 February 2007| url = http://www.pcisig.com/specifications/pciexpress/pcie_cabling1.0/| deadurl = no| archiveurl = https://web.archive.org/web/20070210055546/http://www.pcisig.com/specifications/pciexpress/pcie_cabling1.0/| archivedate = 10 February 2007| df = }}
27. ^{{cite web |url=http://www.pcisig.com/news_room/news/press_release/02_07_07 |title=PCI Express External Cabling Specification Completed by PCI-SIG |publisher=PCI SIG |date=2007-02-07 |accessdate=2012-12-07 |deadurl=yes |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20131126064157/http://www.pcisig.com/news_room/news/press_release/02_07_07 |archivedate=2013-11-26 |df= }}
28. ^Anton Shilov. PCI SIG to finalize OCuLink external PCI Express this fall {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150627171005/http://www.kitguru.net/components/anton-shilov/pci-sig-to-finalize-oculink-external-pci-express-this-fall/ |date=2015-06-27 }}. KitGuru. June 26th, 2015
29. ^{{cite web |url=http://www.supermicro.com/products/nfo/uio.cfm |title=Supermicro Universal I/O (UIO) Solutions |publisher=Supermicro.com |date= |accessdate=2014-03-24 |deadurl=no |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20140324184437/http://www.supermicro.com/products/nfo/uio.cfm |archivedate=2014-03-24 |df= }}
30. ^{{Citation | contribution-url = http://www.edn.com/design/pc-board/4423319/Get-ready-for-M-PCIe-testing | contribution = Get ready for M-PCIe testing | publisher = EDN | title = PC board design}}
31. ^¹²{{Citation | title = PCI SIG discusses M‐PCIe oculink & 4th gen PCIe | date = September 13, 2013 | newspaper = The Register | place = UK | url = https://www.theregister.co.uk/Print/2013/09/13/pci_sig_discusses_m_pcie_oculink_and_fourth_gen_pcie/ | deadurl = no | archiveurl = https://web.archive.org/web/20170629201006/http://www.theregister.co.uk/Print/2013/09/13/pci_sig_discusses_m_pcie_oculink_and_fourth_gen_pcie/ | archivedate = June 29, 2017 | df = }}
32. ^{{Cite web | url = http://www.pcisig.com/news_room/faqs/FAQ_PCI_Express_4.0/#EQ3 | archiveurl = https://web.archive.org/web/20140518224913/http://www.pcisig.com/news_room/faqs/FAQ_PCI_Express_4.0/#EQ3 | title = PCI Express 4.0 Frequently Asked Questions | accessdate = 2014-05-18 | archivedate = 2014-05-18 | publisher = PCI-SIG | work = pcisig.com}}
33. ^{{Cite web |url=http://www.eetimes.com/document.asp?doc_id=1330006 |title=PCIe 4.0 Heads to Fab, 5.0 to Lab |publisher=EE Times |date=2016-06-26 |accessdate=2016-08-27 |deadurl=no |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20160828221858/http://www.eetimes.com/document.asp?doc_id=1330006 |archivedate=2016-08-28 |df= }}
34. ^¹{{cite web |url=http://www.heise.de/newsticker/meldung/IDF-PCIe-4-0-laeuft-PCIe-5-0-in-Arbeit-3297114.html |title=Archived copy |accessdate=2016-08-18 |deadurl=no |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20160819153631/http://www.heise.de/newsticker/meldung/IDF-PCIe-4-0-laeuft-PCIe-5-0-in-Arbeit-3297114.html |archivedate=2016-08-19 |df= }}
35. ^¹{{Cite web|url=http://pcisig.com/doubling-bandwidth-under-two-years-pci-express®-base-specification-revision-50-version-09-now|title=Doubling Bandwidth in Under Two Years: PCI Express® Base Specification Revision 5.0, Version 0.9 is Now Available to Members|website=pcisig.com|language=en|access-date=2018-12-12}}
36. ^{{cite web |url= http://www.tmworld.com/electronics-news/4380071/What-does-GT-s-mean-anyway- |title= What does GT/s mean, anyway? |work= TM World |accessdate= 2012-12-07 |deadurl= no |archiveurl= https://web.archive.org/web/20120814002641/http://www.tmworld.com/electronics-news/4380071/What-does-GT-s-mean-anyway- |archivedate= 2012-08-14 |df= }}
37. ^{{cite web | url = http://www.eiscat.se/groups/EISCAT_3D_info/DeliverableWP12.2/preview_popup | title = Deliverable 12.2 | publisher = Eiscat | location = SE | accessdate = 2012-12-07 | deadurl = yes | archiveurl = https://web.archive.org/web/20100817201815/http://www.eiscat.se/groups/EISCAT_3D_info/DeliverableWP12.2/preview_popup | archivedate = 2010-08-17 | df = }}
38. ^{{Citation | url = http://www.pcisig.com/ | title = PCI SIG | deadurl = no | archiveurl = https://web.archive.org/web/20080706134414/http://pcisig.com/ | archivedate = 2008-07-06 | df = }}
39. ^{{cite press release | title = PCI Express Base 2.0 specification announced | publisher = PCI-SIG | date = 15 January 2007 | accessdate = 9 February 2007 | url = http://www.pcisig.com/news_room/PCIe2_0_Spec_Release_FINAL2.pdf | format = PDF | deadurl = yes | archiveurl = https://web.archive.org/web/20070304101327/http://www.pcisig.com/news_room/PCIe2_0_Spec_Release_FINAL2.pdf | archivedate = 4 March 2007 | df = }} — note that in this press release the term aggregate bandwidth refers to the sum of incoming and outgoing bandwidth; using this terminology the aggregate bandwidth of full duplex 100BASE-TX is 200 Mbit/s.
40. ^{{Cite news | first = Tony | last = Smith | publisher = The Register | title = PCI Express 2.0 final draft spec published | date = 11 October 2006 | accessdate = 9 February 2007 | url = http://www.reghardware.co.uk/2006/10/11/pic-sig_posts_pcie_2_final_draft/ | deadurl = no | archiveurl = https://web.archive.org/web/20070129121731/http://www.reghardware.co.uk/2006/10/11/pic-sig_posts_pcie_2_final_draft/ | archivedate = 29 January 2007 | df = }}
41. ^{{Cite news | first1 = Gary | last1 = Key | first2 = Wesley | last2 = Fink | publisher = AnandTech | title = Intel P35: Intel's Mainstream Chipset Grows Up | date = 21 May 2007 | accessdate = 21 May 2007 | url = http://www.anandtech.com/cpuchipsets/showdoc.aspx?i=2993 | deadurl = no | archiveurl = https://web.archive.org/web/20070523055011/http://www.anandtech.com/cpuchipsets/showdoc.aspx?i=2993 | archivedate = 23 May 2007 | df = }}
42. ^{{Cite news | first = Anh | last = Huynh | publisher = AnandTech | title = NVIDIA "MCP72" Details Unveiled | date = 8 February 2007 | accessdate = 9 February 2007 | url = http://www.dailytech.com/article.aspx?newsid=6021 | deadurl = no | archiveurl = https://web.archive.org/web/20070210200616/http://www.dailytech.com/article.aspx?newsid=6021 | archivedate = 10 February 2007 | df = }}
43. ^{{cite web |url=http://download.intel.com/products/chipsets/P35/317304.pdf |title=Intel P35 Express Chipset Product Brief |publisher=Intel |format=PDF |accessdate=5 September 2007 |deadurl=no |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20070926150158/http://download.intel.com/products/chipsets/P35/317304.pdf |archivedate=26 September 2007 |df= }}
44. ^{{cite web |last=Hachman |first=Mark |url=https://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2351266,00.asp |title=PCI Express 3.0 Spec Pushed Out to 2010 |publisher=PC Mag |date=2009-08-05 |accessdate=2012-12-07 |deadurl=no |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20140107192535/http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2351266,00.asp |archivedate=2014-01-07 |df= }}
45. ^{{Cite news |url= http://www.extremetech.com/article2/0,1697,2169018,00.asp |title= PCI Express 3.0 Bandwidth: 8.0 Gigatransfers/s |publisher= ExtremeTech |date= 9 August 2007 |accessdate= 5 September 2007 |deadurl= no |archiveurl= https://web.archive.org/web/20071024140702/http://www.extremetech.com/article2/0,1697,2169018,00.asp |archivedate= 24 October 2007 |df= }}
46. ^¹²{{Cite web | url = http://www.pcisig.com/news_room/faqs/pcie3.0_faq/#EQ2 | archiveurl = https://web.archive.org/web/20140201172536/http://www.pcisig.com/news_room/faqs/pcie3.0_faq/#EQ2 | title = PCI Express 3.0 Frequently Asked Questions | accessdate = 2014-05-01 | archivedate = 2014-02-01 | publisher = PCI-SIG | work = pcisig.com}}
47. ^{{Cite news | publisher = X bit labs | url = http://www.xbitlabs.com/news/other/display/20101118151837_PCI_Special_Interest_Group_Publishes_PCI_Express_3_0_Standard.html | title = PCI Special Interest Group Publishes PCI Express 3.0 Standard | date = 18 November 2010 | accessdate = 18 November 2010 | deadurl = yes | archiveurl = https://web.archive.org/web/20101121001048/http://www.xbitlabs.com/news/other/display/20101118151837_PCI_Special_Interest_Group_Publishes_PCI_Express_3_0_Standard.html | archivedate = 21 November 2010 | df = }}
48. ^{{cite web | url = http://www.eteknix.com/pcie-3-1-and-4-0-specifications-revealed/ | title = PCIe 3.1 and 4.0 Specifications Revealed | website = eteknix.com | deadurl = no | archiveurl = https://web.archive.org/web/20160201102133/http://www.eteknix.com/pcie-3-1-and-4-0-specifications-revealed/ | archivedate = 2016-02-01 | df = }}
49. ^{{cite web | url = http://blogs.synopsys.com/expressyourself/2014/11/12/trick-or-treat-pci-express-3-1-released/ | title = Trick or Treat… PCI Express 3.1 Released! | website = synopsys.com | deadurl = no | archiveurl = https://web.archive.org/web/20150323193106/https://blogs.synopsys.com/expressyourself/2014/11/12/trick-or-treat-pci-express-3-1-released/ | archivedate = 2015-03-23 | df = }}
50. ^{{cite web | type = press release | url = http://www.pcisig.com/news_room/Press_Releases/November_29_2011_Press_Release_/ | publisher = PCI-SIG | title = PCI Express 4.0 evolution to 16 GT/s, twice the throughput of PCI Express 3.0 technology | date = 2011-11-29 | accessdate = 2012-12-07 | deadurl = yes | archiveurl = https://web.archive.org/web/20121223043627/http://www.pcisig.com/news_room/Press_Releases/November_29_2011_Press_Release_/ | archivedate = 2012-12-23 | df = }}
51. ^https://pcisig.com/faq?field_category_value%5B%5D=pci_express_4.0#4415 {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20161020040106/https://pcisig.com/faq?field_category_value%5B%5D=pci_express_4.0 |date=2016-10-20 }}
52. ^¹OCuLink 2nd gen {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170313215047/http://www.connectortips.com/oculink-connectors-cables-support-new-pcie-standard/ |date=2017-03-13 }}
53. ^¹{{cite news|last1=Born|first1=Eric|title=PCIe 4.0 specification finally out with 16 GT/s on tap|url=https://techreport.com/news/32064/pcie-4-0-specification-finally-out-with-16-gt-s-on-tap|accessdate=8 June 2017|publisher=Tech Report|date=8 June 2017|deadurl=no|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20170608155216/http://techreport.com/news/32064/pcie-4-0-specification-finally-out-with-16-gt-s-on-tap|archivedate=8 June 2017|df=}}
54. ^{{Cite news|url=https://www.netint.ca/blog/netint-introduces-codensity-with-support-for-pcie-4-0/|title=NETINT Introduces Codensity with Support for PCIe 4.0 - NETINT Technologies|date=2018-07-17|work=NETINT Technologies|access-date=2018-09-28|language=en-US}}
55. ^https://www.broadcom.com/company/news/product-releases/2367107
56. ^https://wccftech.com/amd-ryzen-3000-zen-2-desktop-am4-processors-launching-mid-2019/
57. ^https://www.tomshardware.com/news/amd-ryzen-pcie-4.0-motherboard,38401.html
58. ^{{Cite web|url=https://www.plda.com/plda-announces-availability-xpressrich5tm-pcie-50-controller-ip|title=PLDA Announces Availability of XpressRICH5™ PCIe 5.0 Controller IP {{!}} PLDA.com|website=www.plda.com|language=en|access-date=2018-06-28}}
59. ^{{Cite web|url=https://www.plda.com/products/pcie-solutions-asicsoc/pcie-controller-ip/pcie-soft-ip/pcie-40-soft-ip/xpressrich5-asic|title=XpressRICH5 for ASIC {{!}} PLDA.com|website=www.plda.com|language=en|access-date=2018-06-28}}
60. ^{{cite web |title=PCIe 5.0 Is Ready For Prime Time |url=https://www.tomshardware.com/news/pcie-4.0-5.0-pci-sig-specification,38460.html |website=tomshardware.com |accessdate=18 January 2019}}
61. ^{{cite web |url=http://www.cablinginstall.com/index/display/article-display/8876181966/articles/cabling-installation-maintenance/news/data-center/2011/6/plx-demo_shows_pcie.html |title=PLX demo shows PCIe over fiber as data center clustering interconnect |publisher=Penn Well |work=Cabling install |accessdate=29 August 2012}}
62. ^{{cite web |url=http://www.adnaco.com/2011/09/03/new1 |date=2011-04-22 |title=Introduced second generation PCI Express Gen 2 over fiber optic systems |publisher=Adnaco |accessdate=29 August 2012 |deadurl=no |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20121004094357/http://www.adnaco.com/2011/09/03/new1/ |archivedate=4 October 2012 |df= }}
63. ^{{cite web |title=PCIe Active Optical Cable System |url=http://www.samtec.com/cable-systems/active-optics/active-optical-cable/pcie.aspx |accessdate=23 October 2015 |deadurl=no |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20141230122105/http://www.samtec.com/cable-systems/active-optics/active-optical-cable/pcie.aspx |archivedate=30 December 2014 |df= }}
64. ^{{cite web |url=https://www.pcworld.com/article/240013/acer_asus_to_bring_intels_thunderbolt_speed_technology_to_windows_pcs.html |title=Acer, Asus to Bring Intel's Thunderbolt Speed Technology to Windows PCs |publisher=PC World |date=2011-09-14 |accessdate=2012-12-07 |deadurl=no |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20120118190546/http://www.pcworld.com/article/240013/acer_asus_to_bring_intels_thunderbolt_speed_technology_to_windows_pcs.html |archivedate=2012-01-18 |df= }}
65. ^{{cite web | url = http://www.tomshardware.com/news/M-PCIe-M.2-PCIe-3.1-PCIe-4.0-OCuLink,23259.html | title = PCIe for Mobile Launched; PCIe 3.1, 4.0 Specs Revealed | date = 2013-06-28 | accessdate = 2014-07-10 | author = Kevin Parrish | website = Tom's Hardware}}
66. ^{{Cite web|url=https://www.chipestimate.com/PCI-Express-40-Draft-07-and-PIPE-44-Specifications-What-Do-They-Mean-to-Designers/Synopsys/Technical-Article/2017/02/21|title=PCI Express 4.0 Draft 0.7 & PIPE 4.4 Specifications - What Do They Mean to Designers? — Synopsys Technical Article {{!}} ChipEstimate.com|website=www.chipestimate.com|language=en|access-date=2018-06-28}}
67. ^{{cite web |url=http://pinouts.ru/Slots/pci_express_pinout.shtml |title=PCI Express 1×, 4×, 8×, 16× bus pinout and wiring @ |publisher=Pinouts |location=RU |accessdate=2009-12-07 |deadurl=no |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20091125025800/http://pinouts.ru/Slots/pci_express_pinout.shtml |archivedate=2009-11-25 |df= }}
68. ^{{cite web | title = PHY Interface for the PCI Express Architecture | edition = version 2.00 | format = PDF | accessdate = 21 May 2008 | publisher = Intel | url = http://download.intel.com/technology/pciexpress/devnet/docs/pipe2_00.pdf | deadurl = yes | archiveurl = https://web.archive.org/web/20080317171752/http://download.intel.com/technology/pciexpress/devnet/docs/pipe2_00.pdf | archivedate = 17 March 2008 | df = }}
69. ^{{cite web | publisher = Interface bus | title = Mechanical Drawing for PCI Express Connector | accessdate = 7 December 2007 | url = http://www.interfacebus.com/PCI-Express-Bus-PCIe-Description.html#d | deadurl = no | archiveurl = | archivedate = | df = }}
70. ^{{cite web | url = http://portal.fciconnect.com/Comergent/fci/drawing/10018783.pdf | title = FCi schematic for PCIe connectors | publisher = FCI connect | format = PDF | accessdate = 7 December 2007}}
71. ^PCI EXPRESS BASE SPECIFICATION, REV. 3.0 Table 4-24
72. ^{{cite web| url=https://www.google.com/books?id=Xp7-NKsJ8_sC&pg=PA35&dq=frequent+enforced+acknowledgements/| title=Computer Peripherals And Interfaces| publisher=Technical Publications Pune| accessdate=23 July 2009| deadurl=no| archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20140225203956/http://www.google.com/books?id=Xp7-NKsJ8_sC&pg=PA35&dq=frequent+enforced+acknowledgements%2F| archivedate=25 February 2014| df=}}
73. ^{{Cite web|url=http://www.playtool.com/pages/psuconnectors/connectors.html#pciexpress8|title=All about the various PC power supply cables and connectors|website=www.playtool.com|access-date=2018-11-10}}
74. ^{{Cite web|url=http://www.nvidia.com/object/IO_34527.html|title=NVIDIA Introduces NVIDIA Quadro® Plex – A Quantum Leap in Visual Computing|last=|first=|date=2006-08-01|website=Nvidia|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060824225752/http://www.nvidia.com:80/object/IO_34527.html|archive-date=2006-08-24|dead-url=|access-date=}}
75. ^{{cite web|url=http://www.nvidia.com/page/quadroplex.html|title=Quadro Plex VCS – Advanced visualization and remote graphics|publisher=nVidia|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20110428042937/http://www.nvidia.com/page/quadroplex.html|archivedate=2011-04-28|deadurl=no|accessdate=2010-09-11|df=}}
76. ^{{cite web|url=http://ati.amd.com/technology/xgp/|title=XGP|work=ATI|publisher=AMD|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20100129170434/http://ati.amd.com/technology/xgp/|archivedate=2010-01-29|deadurl=yes|accessdate=2010-09-11|df=}}
77. ^{{Citation|title=Fujitsu-Siemens Amilo GraphicBooster External Laptop GPU Released|date=2008-12-03|url=http://www.ubergizmo.com/2008/12/fujitsu-siemens-amilo-graphicbooster-external-laptop-gpu-released/|df=|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20151016192734/http://www.ubergizmo.com/2008/12/fujitsu-siemens-amilo-graphicbooster-external-laptop-gpu-released/|deadurl=no|accessdate=2015-08-09|archivedate=2015-10-16}}
78. ^{{Citation|title=DynaVivid Graphics Dock from Acer arrives in France, what about the US?|date=2010-08-11|url=http://www.ubergizmo.com/2010/08/dynavivid-graphics-dock-from-acer-arrives-in-france-what-about-the-us/|df=|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20151016192734/http://www.ubergizmo.com/2010/08/dynavivid-graphics-dock-from-acer-arrives-in-france-what-about-the-us/|deadurl=no|accessdate=2015-08-09|archivedate=2015-10-16}}
79. ^{{Citation | last1 = Dougherty | first1 = Steve | date = May 22, 2010 | url = http://www.tweaktown.com/news/15382/msi_to_showcase_gus_external_graphics_solution_for_laptops_at_computex/ | title = MSI to showcase 'GUS' external graphics solution for laptops at Computex | newspaper = TweakTown}}
80. ^{{Citation | first1 = Jerry | last1 = Hellstrom | date = August 9, 2011 | url = http://www.pcper.com/news/Editorial/ExpressCard-trying-pull-not-so-fast-one | title = ExpressCard trying to pull a (not so) fast one? | newspaper = PC Perspective | type = editorial | deadurl = no | archiveurl = https://web.archive.org/web/20160201160254/http://www.pcper.com/news/Editorial/ExpressCard-trying-pull-not-so-fast-one | archivedate = February 1, 2016 | df = }}
81. ^{{cite web |url=http://www.hwtools.net/Adapter/PE4H%20V3.2.html |title=PE4H V3.2 (PCIe x16 Adapter) |publisher=Hwtools.net |date= |accessdate=2014-02-05 |deadurl=no |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20140214012341/http://www.hwtools.net/Adapter/PE4H%20V3.2.html |archivedate=2014-02-14 |df= }}
82. ^{{Citation | newspaper = Notebook review | first1 = Kevin | last1 = O'Brien | date = September 8, 2010 | url = http://www.notebookreview.com/default.asp?newsID=5846&review=how+to+upgrade+laptop+graphics+notebook | title = How to Upgrade Your Notebook Graphics Card Using DIY ViDOCK | deadurl = no | archiveurl = https://web.archive.org/web/20131213054647/http://www.notebookreview.com/default.asp?newsID=5846&review=how+to+upgrade+laptop+graphics+notebook | archivedate = December 13, 2013 | df = }}
83. ^{{Citation | first1 = Anand | last1 = Lal Shimpi | date = September 7, 2011 | url = http://www.anandtech.com/show/4743/the-thunderbolt-devices-trickle-in-magmas-expressbox-3t | newspaper = AnandTech | title = The Thunderbolt Devices Trickle In: Magma's ExpressBox 3T | deadurl = no | archiveurl = https://web.archive.org/web/20160304201352/http://www.anandtech.com/show/4743/the-thunderbolt-devices-trickle-in-magmas-expressbox-3t | archivedate = March 4, 2016 | df = }}
84. ^{{cite web |url = https://www.theverge.com/2012/1/10/2698168/msi-GUS-II-external-thunderbolt-gpu-enclosure |title = MSI GUS II external GPU enclosure with Thunderbolt |type = hands-on |publisher = The Verge |accessdate = 2012-02-12 |deadurl = no |archiveurl = https://web.archive.org/web/20120213123659/http://www.theverge.com/2012/1/10/2698168/msi-GUS-II-external-thunderbolt-gpu-enclosure |archivedate = 2012-02-13 |df = }}
85. ^{{Citation | title = PCI express graphics, Thunderbolt | newspaper = Tom’s hardware | url = http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/pci-express-graphics-thunderbolt,3263-2.html}}
86. ^{{Citation | date = Dec 13, 2012 | newspaper = Engadget | title = M logics M link Thunderbold chassis no shipping | url = https://www.engadget.com/2012/12/13/mlogics-mlink-thunderbolt-chassis-now-shipping-399/ | deadurl = no | archiveurl = https://web.archive.org/web/20170625182008/https://www.engadget.com/2012/12/13/mlogics-mlink-thunderbolt-chassis-now-shipping-399/ | archivedate = 2017-06-25 | df = }}
87. ^{{Citation|last1=Burns|first1=Chris|title=2017 Razer Blade Stealth and Core V2 detailed|date=October 17, 2017|url=https://www.slashgear.com/2017-razer-blade-stealth-and-core-v2-detailed-17504328/|newspaper=SlashGear|df=|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20171017211631/https://www.slashgear.com/2017-razer-blade-stealth-and-core-v2-detailed-17504328/|deadurl=no|archivedate=October 17, 2017}}
88. ^{{cite web |url=https://www.engadget.com/2011/12/08/compactflash-association-readies-next-gen-xqd-format-promises-w/ |title=CompactFlash Association readies next-gen XQD format, promises write speeds of 125 MB/s and up |publisher=Engadget |date=2011-12-08 |accessdate=2014-05-18 |deadurl=no |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20140519002107/http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/08/compactflash-association-readies-next-gen-xqd-format-promises-w/ |archivedate=2014-05-19 |df= }}
89. ^{{cite web |url = http://www.storagesearch.com/ssd-29.html |title = What's so very different about the design of Fusion-io's ioDrives / PCIe SSDs? |date = December 2011 |accessdate = 2013-10-02 |author = Zsolt Kerekes |publisher = storagesearch.com |deadurl = no |archiveurl = https://web.archive.org/web/20130923065816/http://www.storagesearch.com/ssd-29.html |archivedate = 2013-09-23 |df = }}
90. ^{{cite web |url = http://www.storagereview.com/fusionio_iodrive_duo_enterprise_pcie_review |title = Fusion-io ioDrive Duo Enterprise PCIe Review |date = 2012-07-16 |accessdate = 2013-10-02 |publisher = storagereview.com |deadurl = no |archiveurl = https://web.archive.org/web/20131004230049/http://www.storagereview.com/fusionio_iodrive_duo_enterprise_pcie_review |archivedate = 2013-10-04 |df = }}
91. ^{{cite web | url= http://www.xbitlabs.com/news/storage/display/20120110180208_OCZ_Demos_4TB_16TB_Solid_State_Drives_for_Enterprise.html | title= OCZ Demos 4 TiB, 16 TiB Solid-State Drives for Enterprise | publisher= X-bit labs | accessdate= 2012-12-07 | deadurl= yes | archiveurl= https://web.archive.org/web/20130325121004/http://www.xbitlabs.com/news/storage/display/20120110180208_OCZ_Demos_4TB_16TB_Solid_State_Drives_for_Enterprise.html | archivedate= 2013-03-25 | df= }}
92. ^{{cite web |url=http://www.sata-io.org/technology/sataexpress.asp |title=Enabling Higher Speed Storage Applications with SATA Express |publisher=SATA-IO |accessdate=2012-12-07 |deadurl=no |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20121127010238/http://www.sata-io.org/technology/sataexpress.asp |archivedate=2012-11-27 |df= }}
93. ^{{cite web |url = https://www.sata-io.org/sata-m2-card |title = SATA M.2 Card |publisher = SATA-IO |accessdate = 2013-09-14 |deadurl = no |archiveurl = https://web.archive.org/web/20131003103042/https://www.sata-io.org/sata-m2-card |archivedate = 2013-10-03 |df = }}
94. ^{{cite web |url= http://www.scsita.org/library/scsi-express/ |publisher= SCSI Trade Association |title= SCSI Express |accessdate= 2012-12-27 |deadurl= no |archiveurl= https://web.archive.org/web/20130127094133/http://www.scsita.org/library/scsi-express/ |archivedate= 2013-01-27 |df= }}
95. ^{{cite web | first = Vijay | last = Meduri | url = http://www.hpcwire.com/hpcwire/2011-01-24/a_case_for_pci_express_as_a_high-performance_cluster_interconnect.html | title = A Case for PCI Express as a High-Performance Cluster Interconnect | publisher = HPCwire | date = 2011-01-24 | accessdate = 2012-12-07 | deadurl = no | archiveurl = https://web.archive.org/web/20130114041356/http://www.hpcwire.com/hpcwire/2011-01-24/a_case_for_pci_express_as_a_high-performance_cluster_interconnect.html | archivedate = 2013-01-14 | df = }}
96. ^{{cite web |url=http://www.ccixconsortium.com/ |title=Archived copy |accessdate=2016-12-17 |deadurl=no |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20161128053813/http://www.ccixconsortium.com/ |archivedate=2016-11-28 |df= }}
97. ^{{Cite news |title= New PCI Express 4.0 delay may empower next-gen alternatives |author= Evan Koblentz |date= February 3, 2017 |work= Tech Republic |url= http://www.techrepublic.com/article/new-pci-express-4-0-delay-may-empower-next-gen-alternatives/ |access-date= March 31, 2017 |deadurl= no |archiveurl= https://web.archive.org/web/20170401143837/http://www.techrepublic.com/article/new-pci-express-4-0-delay-may-empower-next-gen-alternatives/ |archivedate= April 1, 2017 |df= }}
98. ^[https://www.computeexpresslink.org Compute Express Link (CXL)] site
99. ^{{Cite web|url=http://pcisig.com/developers/integrators-list|title=Integrators List {{!}} PCI-SIG|website=pcisig.com|access-date=2019-03-27}}