| 词条 | British Steel Corp v Cleveland Bridge and Engineering Co Ltd |
| 释义 |
| name = British Steel Corp v Cleveland Bridge and Engineering Co Ltd | court = High Court | image = | caption = | date decided = | full name = | citations = [1984] 1 All ER 504 | judges = | prior actions = | subsequent actions = | opinions = Robert Goff J | transcripts = | keywords = Duty of care }} British Steel Corp v Cleveland Bridge and Engineering Co Ltd [1984] 1 All ER 504 is an English contract law case concerning agreement. FactsSteel nodes delivered to defendants after letter of intent to buy, but no formal contract had been concluded because the claimants refused to use the defendants’ terms, and negotiations took so long. No agreement was reached on progress payments and liability for late delivery, and defendants refused to pay because of lateness and nodes coming out of sequence. They had, however, been delivered. JudgmentRobert Goff J gave three alternatives, so (1) intent letter could have been an executory contract, but was not because negotiations were going on (2) the defendants' terms were a standing offer accepted by beginning the work, but that was presumptuous (3) so the best solution is to allow restitutionary recovery for the value of the work done. The nodes were a benefit at the expense, See also{{Caselist agreement}}
NotesHahn. ReferencesExternal links 5 : English contract case law|High Court of Justice cases|1984 in case law|1984 in British law|Steel industry of the United Kingdom |
| 随便看 |
|
开放百科全书收录14589846条英语、德语、日语等多语种百科知识，基本涵盖了大多数领域的百科知识，是一部内容自由、开放的电子版国际百科全书。