“Phatic expression”的意思、由来-开放百科全书

In linguistics, a phatic expression {{IPAc-en|ˈ|f|æ|t|ᵻ|k}} is communication which serves a social function, such as social pleasantries that don't seek or offer any information of value.^[1] Phatic expressions are a socio-pragmatic function and are used in everyday conversational exchange typically expressed in situational instances that call for social cues.^[2] In speech communication the term means "small talk" (conversation for its own sake) and has also been called "grooming talking."^[3]

For example, greetings such as "hello" and "how are you?" are phatic expressions.^[4] In phatic expressions, speech acts are not communicative, since no content is communicated. According to anthropologist Bronisław Malinowski, apparently "purposeless" speech acts—polite small talk, like "how are you?" or "have a nice day"—even though their content may be trivial or irrelevant to the situation, perform the important function of establishing, maintaining, and managing bonds of sociality between participants.^[5]

In Roman Jakobson's work, the 'phatic' function of language concerns the channel of communication; for instance, when one says "I can't hear you, you're breaking up" in the middle of a cell-phone conversation. This usage appears in research on online communities and micro-blogging.^[6]^[7]

History

The term phatic communion ('bonding by language') was coined by anthropologist Bronisław Malinowski in his essay "The Problem of Meaning in Primitive Languages", which appeared in 1923 as a supplementary contribution to The Meaning of Meaning by C. K. Ogden and I. A. Richards. The term "phatic" means "linguistic" (i.e. "by language") and comes from the Greek φατός phatós ("spoken, that may be spoken"), from φημί phēmí ("I speak, say").^[8]

Phatic expressions in various languages

English

"You're welcome", in its phatic usage, is not intended to convey the message that the hearer is welcome; it is a phatic response to being thanked, which in turn is a phatic whose function is to acknowledge the receipt of a benefit.

Similarly, the question "how are you?" is usually an automatic component of a social encounter. Although there are times when "how are you?" is asked in a sincere, concerned manner and does in fact anticipate a detailed response regarding the respondent's present state, this needs to be pragmatically inferred from context and intonation.

Example: a simple, basic exchange between two acquaintances in a non-formal environment:

Neither speaker expects an actual answer to the question but rather it is an indication that each has recognized the other's presence and has therefore sufficiently performed that particular social duty.

Japanese

In Japanese, phatic expressions play a significant role in communication, where they are referred to as "aizuchi."

Persian

Taarof is a complex set of expressions and other gestures in Persian society, primarily reflected in the language.

Non-verbal phatic expressions

Non-verbal phatic expressions are used in nonverbal communication for emphasis or to add detail to the message that a person conveys or expresses. Common examples of these are smiling, gesturing, waving, etc.^[9] According to Dr. Carola Surkamp, professor at University of Cologne, non-verbal phatic communication can be expressed with involuntary physical features such as direction of gaze, blushing, posture, etc. and that these have a vital function in regulating conversation.^[10]

Online phatic expressions

Phatic expressions are used on different communication platforms on the internet such as social media networks where certain platforms require and prompt certain actions to be made between users to communicate or implicate certain messages between people without direct utterances. Examples for this would be: 'likes', comments/replies, shares/reblogs, emoji use, etc. These 'phatic posts' as Radovanovic and Ragnedda like to call them, are again used a social function of social communicative upkeep that has no real value but expresses social connection, relationships between users and recognition.^[11]

See also

References

1. ^{{cite|last=Malinowski|first=B.|year=1923|chapter=The Problem of Meaning in Primitive Languages|editors=Charles K. Ogden and Ian A. Richards|title=The Meaning of Meaning|pages=296-336|location=London|publisher=Kegan Paul, Trench and Trubner}}
2. ^Vladimir Žegarac, "What IS Phatic Communication?", 'Phatic Communication', April 25, 2018
3. ^"Teach Yourself Linguistics", by Jean Aitchison, {{ISBN|978-0-340-87083-9}}
4. ^{{cite|title=Phatic|website=Oxford Living Dictionaries: British & World English|publisher=Oxford University Press|date=n.d.||url=https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/phatic|accessdate=October 25, 2016}}
5. ^Malinowski, B. (1923) "The Problem of Meaning in Primitive Languages”, in: Charles K. Ogden and Ian A. Richards, The Meaning of Meaning, 296–336, London: Kegan Paul, Trench and Trubner
6. ^{{cite conference | last=Makice | first=Kevin | year=2009 | title=Phatics and the design of community | booktitle=Proceedings of the 27th international conference extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems | place=Boston, MA, USA | url=http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1520340.1520445}}
7. ^{{Cite web | last=pear analytics | year=2009 | title=Twitter Study – August 2009, Whitepaper | url=http://www.pearanalytics.com/2009/twitter-study-reveals-interesting-results-about-usage/}}
8. ^Haberland, H. (1996) "Communion or communication? A historical note on one of the 'founding fathers' of pragmatics", in Robin Sackmann (ed.), "Theoretical linguistics and grammatical description", 163-166, Amsterdam: Benjamins
9. ^Carola Surkamp, communication", April 26, 2018
10. ^Carola Surkamp, communication", , April 25, 2018
11. ^Radovanovic and Ragnedda, Posts", 'Phatic Posts', April 26, 2018