词条 | Causal inference |
释义 |
Causal inference is the process of drawing a conclusion about a causal connection based on the conditions of the occurrence of an effect. The main difference between causal inference and inference of association is that the former analyzes the response of the effect variable when the cause is changed.[1][2] The science of why things occur is called etiology. Causal inference is an example of causal reasoning. DefinitionInferring the cause of something has been described as:
MethodsEpidemiological studies employ different epidemiological methods of collecting and measuring evidence of risk factors and effect and different ways of measuring association between the two. A hypothesis is formulated, and then tested with statistical methods (see Statistical hypothesis testing). It is statistical inference that helps decide if data are due to chance, also called random variation, or indeed correlated and if so how strongly. However, correlation does not imply causation, so further methods must be used to infer causation. Common frameworks for causal inference are structural equation modeling and the Rubin causal model.{{citation needed|date=August 2014}} In epidemiologyEpidemiology studies patterns of health and disease in defined populations of living beings in order to infer causes and effects. An association between an exposure to a putative risk factor and a disease may be suggestive of, but is not equivalent to causality because correlation does not imply causation. Historically, Koch's postulates have been used since the 19th century to decide if a microorganism was the cause of a disease. In the 20th century the Bradford Hill criteria, described in 1965[5] have been used to assess causality of variables outside microbiology, although even these criteria are not exclusive ways to determine causality. In molecular epidemiology the phenomena studied are on a molecular biology level, including genetics, where biomarkers are evidence of cause or effects. A recent trend{{when|date=August 2014}} is to identify evidence for influence of the exposure on molecular pathology within diseased tissue or cells, in the emerging interdisciplinary field of molecular pathological epidemiology (MPE).{{third-party-inline|date=August 2014}} Linking the exposure to molecular pathologic signatures of the disease can help to assess causality. {{third-party-inline|date=August 2014}} Considering the inherent nature of heterogeneity of a given disease, the unique disease principle, disease phenotyping and subtyping are trends in biomedical and public health sciences, exemplified as personalized medicine and precision medicine.{{third-party-inline|date=August 2014}} In computer scienceDetermination of cause and effect from joint observational data for two time-independent variables, say X and Y, has been tackled using asymmetry between evidence for some model in the directions, X → Y and Y → X. The primary approaches are based on Algorithmic information theory models and noise models. Algorithmic Information ModelsCompare two programs, both of which output both X and Y.
The shortest such program implies the uncompressed stored variable more-likely causes the computed variable.[6][7]. Noise ModelsIncorporate an independent noise term in the model to compare the evidences of the two directions. Here are some of the noise models for the hypothesis Y → X with the noise E:
The common assumption in these models are:
On an intuitive level, the idea is that the factorization of the joint distribution P(Cause,Effect) into P(Cause)*P(Effect | Cause) typically yields models of lower total complexity than the factorization into P(Effect)*P(Cause | Effect). Although the notion of “complexity” is intuitively appealing, it is not obvious how it should be precisely defined.[11] A different family of methods attempt to discover causal "footprints" from large amounts of labeled data, and allow the prediction of more flexible causal relations.[12] In statistics and economics{{Main|Causality#Statistics and economics}}In statistics and economics, causality is often tested for using regression. Several methods can be used to distinguish actual causality from spurious indications of causality. First, the explanatory variable could be one that conceptually could not be caused by the dependent variable, thereby avoiding the possibility of being misled by reverse causation: for example, if the independent variable is rainfall and the dependent variable is the futures price of some agricultural commodity. Second, the instrumental variables technique may be employed to remove any reverse causation by introducing a role for other variables (instruments) that are known to be unaffected by the dependent variable. Third, the principle that effects cannot precede causes can be invoked, by including on the right side of the regression only variables that precede in time the dependent variable. Fourth, other regressors are included to ensure that confounding variables are not causing a regressor to spuriously appear to be significant. Correlation by coincidence, as opposed to correlation reflecting actual causation, can be ruled out by using large samples and by performing cross validation to check that correlations are maintained on data that were not used in the regression. EducationGraduate courses on causal inference have been introduced to the curriculum of many schools.
See also
References1. ^{{cite journal|last=Pearl|first=Judea|title=Causal inference in statistics: An overview|journal=Statistics Surveys|date=1 January 2009|volume=3|issue=|pages=96–146|doi=10.1214/09-SS057|url=http://ftp.cs.ucla.edu/pub/stat_ser/r350.pdf}} 2. ^{{cite book|last=Morgan|first=Stephen|author2=Winship, Chris|title=Counterfactuals and Causal inference|publisher=Cambridge University Press|year=2007|isbn=978-0-521-67193-4}} 3. ^{{cite web|title=causal inference|url=http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/1442615/causal-inference|publisher=Encyclopædia Britannica, Inc.|accessdate=24 August 2014}} 4. ^{{cite book|author1=John Shaughnessy|author2=Eugene Zechmeister|author3=Jeanne Zechmeister|title=Research Methods in Psychology|date=2000|publisher=McGraw-Hill Humanities/Social Sciences/Languages|isbn=978-0077825362|pages=Chapter 1 : Introduction|url=http://www.mhhe.com/socscience/psychology/shaugh/ch01_concepts.html|accessdate=24 August 2014}} 5. ^{{cite journal |last=Hill |first=Austin Bradford |year=1965 |title=The Environment and Disease: Association or Causation? |journal=Proceedings of the Royal Society of Medicine |volume=58 |pages=295–300 |url=http://www.edwardtufte.com/tufte/hill |pmid=14283879 |pmc=1898525 |issue=5}} 6. ^Kailash Budhathoki and Jilles Vreeken "Causal Inference by Compression" 2016 IEEE 16th International Conference on Data Mining (ICDM) 7. ^{{Cite journal |doi = 10.1007/s10115-018-1286-7|title = Telling cause from effect by local and global regression|journal = Knowledge and Information Systems|year = 2018|last1 = Marx|first1 = Alexander|last2 = Vreeken|first2 = Jilles}} 8. ^Hoyer, Patrik O., et al. "Nonlinear causal discovery with additive noise models." NIPS. Vol. 21. 2008. 9. ^Shimizu, Shohei, et al. "DirectLiNGAM: A direct method for learning a linear non-Gaussian structural equation model." The Journal of Machine Learning Research 12 (2011): 1225-1248. 10. ^Zhang, Kun, and Aapo Hyvärinen. "On the identifiability of the post-nonlinear causal model." Proceedings of the Twenty-Fifth Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence. AUAI Press, 2009. 11. ^1 Mooij, Joris M., et al. "Probabilistic latent variable models for distinguishing between cause and effect." NIPS. 2010. 12. ^Lopez-Paz, David, et al. "Towards a learning theory of cause-effect inference" ICML. 2015 13. ^{{Cite news|url=https://classes.cornell.edu/browse/roster/SP19/class/GOVT/6069|title=GOVT 6069: Causal Inference|date=2019-02-27|work=Government|access-date=2018-02-27|language=en}} 14. ^{{Cite news|url=https://polisci.duke.edu/courses/POLSCI748|title=Introduction to Causal Inference|date=2015-05-21|work=Political Science|access-date=2018-08-26|language=en}} 15. ^https://education.utexas.edu/departments/educational-psychology/graduate-programs/quantitative-methods/required-courses-doctoral 16. ^{{Cite web | url=http://www.skleinberg.org/teaching/CI15/index.html | title=Samantha Kleinberg: Fall 2015 Causal Inference}} 17. ^{{Cite web | url=http://www.bios.unc.edu/~mhudgens/bios/776/2017/bios776.html | title=Bios 776}} 18. ^{{Cite web | url=https://www.ics.uci.edu/~sternh/courses/265/ | title=Statistics 265 - Spring 2018}} External links{{Commonscat}}
5 : Causal inference|Graphical models|Regression analysis|Inductive reasoning|Philosophy of statistics |
随便看 |
|
开放百科全书收录14589846条英语、德语、日语等多语种百科知识,基本涵盖了大多数领域的百科知识,是一部内容自由、开放的电子版国际百科全书。