请输入您要查询的百科知识:

 

词条 Chatfield v Jones
释义

  1. Background

  2. Held

  3. References

{{Orphan|date=April 2015}}{{Infobox court case
| name = Chatfield v Jones
| court = Court of Appeal of New Zealand
| date_filed =
| image = Coat of arms of New Zealand.svg
| date decided = 2 May 1990
| full name = Leciester Chatfield, Peter Howard Crump Hanson, Richard Ernest Yates v Peter Ernest Jones, Algar Keith Tozer
| citations = [1990] 3 NZLR 285
| judges = Cooke P, Somers J, Hardie Boys J
| prior actions =
| subsequent actions =
| opinions =
| transcripts = copy of judgment
| Keywords =
}}Chatfield v Jones [1990] 3 NZLR 285 is a cited case in New Zealand regarding the issue of notice of cancellation of a contract, where a contract has been breached.[1][2]

Background

In November 1986, the parties agreed to transfer the shares in Acorn (Fiji) Limited, which operated a tourist train, in the Coral Coast, Fiji for $875,000. When the purchasers neglected to pay for the shares the following year, the shares were resold for $100,000, and sued the purchasers for the loss.

The purchasers defended the claim, saying they were not notified of the cancellation of the contract.

Held

Held, the court ruled that the vendors statement of claim notified them that the contract had been cancelled.

References

1. ^{{cite book |title=An introduction to the Law of Contract in New Zealand |edition=4th |last1=Chetwin |first1=Maree |last2=Graw |first2=Stephen |last3=Tiong |first3=Raymond |publisher=Thomson Brookers |ISBN=0-86472-555-8 |year=2006 |page=423}}
2. ^{{cite book |title=Butterworths Student Companion Contract |edition=4th |last1=Walker |first1=Campbell |publisher=LexisNexis |ISBN=0-408-71770-X|year=2004 |pages=202–203}}
{{NewZealand-case-law-stub}}

4 : Court of Appeal of New Zealand cases|New Zealand contract case law|1990 in New Zealand law|1990 in case law

随便看

 

开放百科全书收录14589846条英语、德语、日语等多语种百科知识,基本涵盖了大多数领域的百科知识,是一部内容自由、开放的电子版国际百科全书。

 

Copyright © 2023 OENC.NET All Rights Reserved
京ICP备2021023879号 更新时间:2024/9/22 6:55:54