词条 | Consequences of the War of the Pacific |
释义 |
The War of the Pacific had profound consequences on the involved countries. Diplomatic changesAfter the war Chile had obtained military hegemony at the Pacific coast of South America. Chile's expansion was seen with concern across the continent and Chilean diplomats responded to this by fomenting rivalries between Chile's neighbors and other South American countries while promoting friendly relationships between countries with disputes with Chile's neighbors. Examples of this are the Chilean attempts to establish friendly relationships between Ecuador and Colombia, both were countries that had serious territorial disputes with Peru in the Amazon. Military cooperation with Ecuador grew considerably with Chile sending instructors to the military academy in Quito and selling superfluous arms and munitions to Ecuador.[1] Despite Chile's over-all good relations with Ecuador both countries had a minor diplomatic crisis resulting from the capture of the Peruvian torpedo boat Alay in Ecuadorian territorial waters during the war.[2] Argentina, the only country that didn't have war with Chile for border proximity, also had tensions with Chile since, but unlike Peru and Bolivia, Argentina successfully maintained status quo with Chile and remained not involved, despite how they almost fought a war over the Falklands War controversies. Fate of war loot{{see also|Chilenization of Tacna, Arica and Tarapacá|Patriotic Leagues (Southern Cone)}}Only in 2007 the Chilean government returned almost 4,000 books to Peru's national library, more than a century after they were taken by Chilean soldiers in hopes that the return of the books may go some way to improving the two nations’ relations.[3] Chilean economic boom and decline{{see also|Economic history of Chile}}As the victor and possessor of a new coastal territory following the War of the Pacific, Chile benefited by gaining a lucrative territory with significant mineral income. The national treasury grew by 900 percent between 1879 and 1902, due to taxes coming from the newly acquired lands.[4] British involvement and control of the nitrate industry rose significantly,[5] but from 1901 to 1921 Chilean ownership increased from 15% to 51%.[6] The growth of Chilean economy sustained in its saltpetre monopoly[7] meant, compared to the previous growth cycle (1832–1873), that the economy became less diversified and overly dependent on a single natural resource.[8] In addition the Chilean nitrate, used world-wide as fertilizer, was sensitive to economic downturns as farmers made cuts on fertilizer use one of their earliest economic measures in the face of economic decline.[7] It has been questioned on whether the nitrate wealth conquered in the War of the Pacific was a resource curse or not.[8] During the Nitrate Epoch the government increased public spending but was however accused of squandering money.[9] Rise of Bolivian/Peruvian Anti-Chilean sentiment{{see also|Anti-Chilean sentiment}}Historical and current anti-Chilean resentiment in Bolivia, Peru and Argentina was caused by the Chilean expansionism that took place during the 19th century. The War of the Pacific contributed decisively to it in the case of the first two countries. In Bolivia, a common political discourse attributes that country's underdevelopment to its loss of seaports in the War of the Pacific becoming a landlocked country.[12] Bolivia lost its Litoral Department and its outlet to the Pacific Ocean, following that war. Currently Chile's huge copper vein in the Atacama Desert—which makes Chile the largest copper exporter in the world—is held in the lands claimed by Bolivia; the same lands lost during the war. In Peru, a strong anti-Chilean sentiment exists due to losing "a large chunk of its southern territory to Chile" in the War of the Pacific.[10] Peru lost its provinces of Tarapaca and Arica, and then suffered the indignity of having its capital, Lima, be not only occupied by Chile at the end of the war, but essentially ransacked. For Argentina, since they didn't get involved in the conflict, and were also on the run to colonize the less inhabitated South, Chile's victory in the conflict stemmed tensions that Chile was trying to take land from the hand of the Argentines. Although this never happened and both finalized their border, the two countries remained belligerents, and even almost fought a war in 1982. On the other side, Argentina's unsupportive action for Bolivia and Peru also made their relationships very tense, and there is a sense of distrust towards Argentina among many Peruvians and Bolivians. Rise of superiority ideasDuring and after the war there was a rise of racial and national superiority ideas among the Chilean ruling class.[11] Chilean historian Gonzalo Bulnes (son of president Manuel Bulnes) once wrote, "What defeated Peru was the superiority of a race and of a history".[12] During the occupation of Tacna and Arica (1884–1929) the Peruvian people and nation were treated in racist and denigrating terms by the Chilean press.[13] During the war Peruvians were disrespectfully referred to as "cholos" (a slur for persons of mixed European and non-European ancestry) by Chilean officers.[14] Consequences for indigenous peoplesAfter the occupation of Lima Chile diverted part of its war efforts to crush Mapuche resistance in the south.[15] Chilean troops coming from Peru entered Araucanía where they in 1881 defeated the last major Mapuche uprising.[16][17] Chile's newly acquired Aymara population was seen after the war as a "foreign element" contrasting with the also newly conquered Mapuches who were seen as "primordial" Chileans.[14] Following the occupation of Lima Chilean newspapers published extremely patriotic, chauvinist and expansionistic material.[18] An extreme example of this journalism is Revista del Sur that wrote that firearms obtained in Peru, while useless in the hands of Peruvian "fags" (Spanish: maricas), would be useful by Chileans to "kill indians" (Mapuches).[16] In the aftermath of the war, the indigenous populations of Peru became scapegoats in the narratives of Peruvian criollo elites, exemplified in the writing of Ricardo Palma: The principal cause of the great defeat is that the majority of Peru is composed of that wretched and degraded race that we once attempted to dignify and ennoble. The Indian lacks patriotic sense; he is born enemy of the white and of the man of the coast. It makes no difference to him whether he is a Chilean or a Turk. To educate the Indian and to inspire him a feeling for patriotism will not be the task of our institutions, but of the ages.[19] Anti-Chinese sentiment in PeruBecause the Chinese supported Chile in the conflict, it had stemmed a sense of Sinophobia in Peru, the first of its kind ever existed in Latin America. Armed indigenous peasants sacked and occupied haciendas of landed elite criollo "collaborationists" in the central Sierra – majority of them were of ethnic Chinese descent, while indigenous and mestizo Peruvians murdered Chinese shopkeepers in Lima in response to this Chinese coolies revolted and even joined the Chilean Army.[20][21] Even in 20th century, memory of Chinese supports for Chile was so deep that Manuel A. Odría, once dictator of Peru, issued ban against Chinese immigration as a punishment for their betrayal.[22] Although today, Sinophobia has been lesser relevant and the Chinese are widely accepted as Peruvian citizens, distrustful of China and Chinese still remains. Unrest and war trauma in PeruThe War of the Pacific also sparked an indigenous peasant guerrilla movement throughout the central Sierra against Chileans and collaborationist landlords. In 1884 Cáceres turned against his former guerrilla allies in order to defend the old order. In 1886 and 1888 the Cáceres sent troops to the central sierra to disarm the peasants. The lack of rule of law in central sierra was such that, in one particular case, a landowner was only able to recover his occupied estate in 1902 after a massive mobilization of military, police and gunmen.[23] Rise of war heroesEduardo Abaroa{{expand section|date=September 2014}}Miguel GrauMiguel Grau became an important figure in Peru due to his alleged gallantry during the conflict, especially his treatment of Prat's family and rescue of Chilean sailors in Iquique,[24] which gained him recognition as the Caballero de los Mares ("Gentleman of the Seas").[25][26]Arturo Prat{{expand section|date=September 2014}}Overall ConsequencesBoliviaWith the loss of sovereign access to the Pacific ocean in mind the 1904 Treaty of Peace and Friendship granted Bolivia the right to tax-free transport of goods, and duty-free access to northern Chilean ports. It also obliged the Chilean government to build two rail-lines linking La Paz to Antofagasta and Arica. Despite these concessions, the loss of the Litoral (the coast) remains a deeply emotional and political issue for Bolivians,[27] as was particularly evident during the 2003 natural gas riots. Undeterred by the seaport concessions granted to Bolivia via the 1904 treaty popular belief in Bolivia still see their problems attributed to its landlocked condition; getting a sovereign piece of the seacoast via Chilean land is often seen as the solution to their problems. Numerous Bolivian presidents pressured Chile for sovereign access to the sea. Diplomatic relations with Chile were severed on March 17, 1978, in spite of considerable commercial ties. The leading Bolivian newspaper El Diario featured at least a weekly editorial on the subject, and the Bolivian people annually celebrated a patriotic "Dia del Mar" (Day of the Sea) to remember the crippling loss.[28] Chile{{see also|Chilenization of Tacna, Arica and Tarapacá|Patriotic Leagues (Southern Cone)}}During the war Chile dropped its claims on more than {{convert|1000000|km2|abbr=on}} of Patagonia in the 1881 Chile/Argentina treaty, to ensure Argentina's neutrality. After the war, the Puna de Atacama dispute grew until 1899, since both Chile and Argentina claimed former Bolivian territories. On August 28, 1929, Chile returned the province of Tacna to Peru. In 1999, Chile and Peru at last agreed to fully implement the Treaty of Lima (1929), providing Peru with a port in Arica.[29] PeruAccording to Bruce W. Farcau, "in Peru, the wounds run less deep than in neighboring Bolivia".[30] After the War of the Pacific, Peru was left without saltpeter production, the Chilean controlled production decreased to 15%, and production controlled by British investors rose to 55%.[31] According to military historian Robert L. Scheina, the Chilean plunder of Peruvian national literary and art treasures contributed to "demands of revenge among Peruvians for decades."[32] Scholar Brooke Larson pointed out that the War of the Pacific was the "first time since independence wars" that "Peru was invaded, occupied and pillaged by a foreign army" and that "no other Andean republic experienced such a costly and humiliating defeat as Peru did in the hands of Chile".[33] The war and post-war period was one of profound political and social instability for Peru. The war shook the whole social order of Peru: armed indigenous peasants sacked and occupied haciendas of landed elite criollo "collaborationists" in the central Sierra, Chinese coolies revolted and even joined the Chilean Army, indigenous and mestizo Peruvians murdered Chinese shopkeepers in Lima, African slaves rose against their masters and fought equally the Chinese, Peruvian mobs sacked Chiclayo at the same time different criollo elite remained deeply divided in opposing camps.[20][34] The fear of disorder, opposing factions and armed peasants was for many Peruvians larger than that of the Chilean invaders.[21] In some cases, the delegations of European countries and the United States provided safety during riots and persecutions.[21] References1. ^Burr , Robert N. 1955. The Balance of Power in Nineteenth-Century South America: An Exploratory Essay. The Hispanic American Historical Review. 2. ^{{Citation| last = Tromben| first = Carlos| title = Naval Presence: The Cruiser Esmeralda in Panama| journal = International Journal of Naval History | volume = 1| issue = 1| year = 2002| pages = | url = http://www.ijnhonline.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/pdf_tromben_english.pdf}} 3. ^"Chile returns looted Peru books" BBC Newshttp://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/7082436.stm 4. ^Crow, The Epic of Latin America, p. 180 5. ^Foster, John B. & Clark, Brett. (2003). "Ecological Imperialism: The Curse of Capitalism" (accessed September 2, 2005). The Socialist Register 2004, p190–192. Also available in print from Merlin Press. 6. ^Salazar & Pinto 2002, pp. 124-125. 7. ^1 {{Citation| last1 = Brown| first1 = J. R. | last2 = | first2 = | title = Nitrate Crises, Combinations, and the Chilean Government in the Nitrate Age.| journal = The Hispanic American Historical Review| volume = 43| issue = 2| year = 1963| pages = 230–246| url =| doi=10.2307/2510493}} 8. ^{{Citation| last1 = Ducoing Ruiz| first1 = C. A. | last2 = Miró| first2 = M. B.| title = Avoiding the Dutch disease? The Chilean industrial sector in the nitrate trade cycle. 1870–1938| journal = | volume = | issue = | year = 2012| pages = | url = http://www.uc3m.es/portal/page/portal/instituto_figuerola/home/research/poverty_growth2012/participants/CD_MBM.pdf}} 9. ^1 Salazar & Pinto 2002, pp. 25–29. 10. ^{{cite news| url= https://www.usatoday.com/news/topstories/2008-01-16-3095036279_x.htm |title= Peru disputes boundary with Chile | newspaper= USA Today | date= 16 January 2008 | first= Edison |last= Lopez |agency= Associated Press | location= Lima, Peru| quote=There is strong anti-Chilean sentiment in Peru because the country lost a large chunk of its southern territory to Chile in a war in 1879.}} 11. ^Ericka Beckman Imperial Impersonations: Chilean Racism and the War of the Pacific University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign 12. ^{{harvnb|Farcau|2000|p=169}} 13. ^William E. Skuban Lines in the sand: nationalism and identity on the Peruvian-Chilean frontier page 79:: "because it is undoubtedly preferable to be Chilean than Peruvian, because has a cleaner and more glorious history, and its better to belong to the phalanx of the conquerors than that of the conquered, because the Chilean race is more virile, valiant, prouder, nobler and more enterprising than the Peruvian race, which due to reasons of climate will always be enervated" Chilean newspaper El Corvo quote in page 80 14. ^1 {{cite journal |last=Vergara |first=Jorge Iván |last2=Gundermann |first2=Hans |year=2012 |title=Constitution and internal dynamics of the regional identitary in Tarapacá and Los Lagos, Chile |url= |journal=Chungara |language=Spanish |publisher=University of Tarapacá |volume=44 |issue=1 |pages=115–134 |doi= 10.4067/s0717-73562012000100009}} 15. ^{{Citation| last = Velázquez Elizararrás| first = Juan Carlos| title = El problema de los estados mediterráneos o sin litoral en el derecho internacional marítimo. Un estudio de caso: El diferendo Bolivia-Perú-Chile| journal = Anuario Mexicano de Derecho Internacional| volume = 7| issue = | year = 2007| pages = 1379–430| url = http://www.bibliojuridica.org/estrev/derint/cont/7/art/art11.htm}} 16. ^1 {{cite book |last=Bengoa |first=José |authorlink=José Bengoa |title=Historia del pueblo mapuche: Siglos XIX y XX |url= |accessdate= |year=2000 |edition=Seventh |publisher=LOM Ediciones |location= |isbn=956-282-232-X |pages=282–283}} 17. ^{{Citation| url = http://www.memoriachilena.cl/temas/dest.asp?id=ocupacionultimascampanasdeocupacion| title = Ocupación de la Araucanía: Últimas campañas de ocupación| work = Memoria chilena| publisher = | accessdate = June 30, 2013}} 18. ^{{cite book |last=Bengoa |first=José |authorlink=José Bengoa |title=Historia del pueblo mapuche: Siglos XIX y XX |url= |accessdate= |year=2000 |edition=Seventh |publisher=LOM Ediciones |location= |isbn=956-282-232-X |pages=282–283}} 19. ^Larson, Brooke. 2004. Trials of Nation Making: Liberalism, Race and Ethnicity in the Andes, 1810–1910. Page 196. 20. ^1 Taylor, Lewis. Indigenous Peasant Rebellions in Peru during the 1880s 21. ^1 2 Bonilla, Heraclio. 1978. The National and Colonial Problem in Peru. Past and Present 22. ^[https://books.google.com.vn/books?id=OP-EBAAAQBAJ&pg=PA87&lpg=PA87&dq=sinophobia+peru&source=bl&ots=hJsiEwA8Xe&sig=LVE_M83bDe-Mm2igEeTSldf_O4I&hl=vi&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwj4_L72g-vaAhWJurwKHb1ZBrIQ6AEIMDAB#v=onepage&q=sinophobia%20peru&f=false/ Dragons in the Land of the Condor: Writing Tusán in Peru] 23. ^Taylor, Lewis. Indigenous Peasant Rebellions in Peru during the 1880s 24. ^{{cite book | last = Farcau | first = Bruce W. | title = The Ten Cents War: Chile, Peru, and Bolivia in the War of the Pacific, 1879–1884 | publisher = Praeger Publishers | year = 2000 | location = Westport, CT | page = 74 | url = https://books.google.com/books?id=BsxISMTwsSUC&pg=PA74&dq=farcau,+%22such+was+the+sense+of+chivalry+in+this+war%22#v=onepage&q&f=false | isbn = 978-0-275-96925-7 }} 25. ^Jose Vargas Valenzuela, Naval Tradition of the Peoples of Bolivia (Editorial Los Amigos del Libro, 1974), 61 26. ^{{cite web|url=http://elcomercio.pe/noticia/254562/noticia/411287/noticia/411555/claudia-llosa-oscar-permitira-mostrar-que-peruanos-tenemos-mucho-cine-muchas-ganas |title=José Puga, "Alistan estreno de filme chileno que hablará de la hidalguía de Miguel Grau" in El Comercio (Peru). 5 March 2009. Accessed 13 October 2011 |publisher=Elcomercio.pe |accessdate=2012-02-28}} 27. ^1 http://www.coha.org/boliviachile-pacific-access 28. ^{{cite web| title = El día del mar se recordará con más que un tradicional desfile cívico| url = http://www.bolpress.com/art.php?Cod=2006031515| publisher = Bolpress| page = 1| language = Spanish|trans-title=| date = 15 March 2006| accessdate = October 2, 2009| quote =| ref =}} 29. ^Dominguez, Jorge et al. 2003 Boundary Disputes in Latin America. United States Washington, D.C.: Institute of Peace. 30. ^{{harvnb|Farcau|2000|p=2}} 31. ^British Influence on the Salt: The Origin, Nature and Decline, Soto Cárdenas, Alejandro. Santiago : Ed. University of Santiago de Chile, 1998. Page 50 32. ^{{harvnb|Scheina|2003|p= 388}} 33. ^Larson, Brooke. 2004. Trials of Nation Making: Liberalism, Race and Ethnicity in the Andes, 1810–1910. Page 178. 34. ^Bonilla, Heraclio. 1978. The National and Colonial Problem in Peru. Past and Present Bibliography
2 : War of the Pacific|Consequences of wars |
随便看 |
|
开放百科全书收录14589846条英语、德语、日语等多语种百科知识,基本涵盖了大多数领域的百科知识,是一部内容自由、开放的电子版国际百科全书。